Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Trauma and Debriefing Louise Bailey BA (SocWork) MAASW February 2010.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Trauma and Debriefing Louise Bailey BA (SocWork) MAASW February 2010."— Presentation transcript:


2 Trauma and Debriefing Louise Bailey BA (SocWork) MAASW February 2010

3 Summary of Presentation Brief overview - Historical perception of Trauma Trauma Reaction and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Mitchell Model of Debriefing, Defusing and Demobilisation Efficacy of debriefing – The Current Debate Outcomes of Debate Conclusions

4 Only bad things happen quickly Gordon Livingstone

5 Overview History of trauma 1900 BC Egyptian physicians report of “hysterical reactions” ( Kunyus papyrus - First medical textbook ) Up to ~18th Century reactions to stressful events attributed to: –God –Evil spirits –Devil

6 Overview Warfare Early 20th Century - World War I & II –Various terms used - shell shock, battle fatigue, war neurosis, lack of moral fibre Vietnam War 1970s to present

7 Trauma reactions & PTSD 1980 - official publication of human stress response, to extreme traumatisation as a distinct valid diagnostic category (DSM III) Named - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

8 Trauma Results from a person experiencing, witnessing or confronting an event(s) that involve actual or threatened death or serious injury, or threat to physical integrity of self or others The response involves intense fear, helplessness or horror (DSM IV)

9 Traumatic event Event is sent to active memory Active memory Avoidance strategies and development of secondary symptoms aim to reduce distress, but maintain the PTSD symptoms causing conflict Responses are re-experienced Past memories information either filed or sent back to active memory If unable to integrate trauma memories, PTSD develops

10 Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) ….. Is an extreme stress reaction where symptoms are prolonged and chronic There is a development of characteristic symptoms following a psychologically distressing event that is outside human experience… ….. It is usually experienced with intense fear, terror and helplessness. (DSM IV)

11 Common Indicators of Post Traumatic Stress PHYSICAL –Increased arousal, restlessness, fatigue, nightmares, hyper-vigilance BEHAVOURAL –Avoidance of reminders of incident, inability to stop talking about it or detach from event MENTAL –Flashbacks, cannot stop thinking about the event,

12 Common Indicators of Post Traumatic Stress EMOTIONAL –Fear of it happening again, lack of feelings, guilt, numbness, SOCIAL –Avoid people, places, feel threatened wanting contact and assurance, poor relationships with others EXISTENTIAL –Loss of job and work satisfaction, purpose, motivation, career plan. Sense of self and values may change

13 Debriefing and Defusing Critical Incident Stress Debriefing(CISD ) ‘Mitchell model’ developed in 1983. Influenced from the military, police, emergency services psychology (crisis intervention) and disasters. (Robinson & Mitchell 1995) Recommendations That debriefing be used as part of other procedures and be incorporated into a total approach People who run debriefings be properly trained Debriefers follow the debriefing protocol

14 Defusing The main purpose is so people can talk about what they are thinking A time to give information and ensure they are cared for at the time and when they return home It is short and deals with what happened and what was the worst part

15 Debriefings Seven Stages; Introduction What we see What we think What we feel How we have reacted physically and psychologically Teaching and learning what to do with these reactions and the event Re-entry and completion.

16 Current debate on debriefing Following a disaster often deluge of “counsellors” will offer various forms of debriefing and counselling We are all eager to help Are we becoming “Trauma tourists” Experts say, ‘surely the worker and victims deserve interventions that are legitimised by research’

17 Current debate on debriefing CISD Mitchell approach Model never meant to be a stand alone method It is not a cure for PTSD Needs to be part of a CISM Plan in any organisation or Disaster

18 Current debate on debriefing Mitchell says, “Assessment teams are sent in to identify groups or individuals who need individual help...” “...then timing and interventions are planned....” “...resources and personal provided...” “...demobilisation and information given”

19 Current debate on debriefing One to one support given Group defusing may be done Debriefings sometimes occur weeks or months after event CISD is not a therapy: “ what has happened is they have taken what is a group process model which is designed for support and changed it into a therapy” (Mitchell 2003 )

20 Current debate on debriefing CISD was used as “one size fits all” Mitchell argues that his work has been misunderstood, misinterpreted and taken out of context Mitchell has written guidelines, 250 articles and 10 books on the subject matter.


22 Supporting debriefing Rob Gordon (2003) says “debriefing is a great tool for helping people make sense of traumatic situations in the work-place. If they are debriefed you can help them recapture their own sense of competence Dr Rob Gordon Clinical Psychologist, Victorian Department of Human Services and Consultant to the Redcross

23 Supporting debriefing (Rob Gordon) We need to adjust the technique for –Type of culture –type of people involved –type of situations

24 Supporting debriefing (Rob Gordon) Broad principle –Go through the facts –Clarify what happened –Take stock of their thoughts and what meaning it has –Then move on, the symptoms –Advice about taking care of themselves “That is the core of CISD, and what I find very valuable”

25 Arguments against debriefing 1 (Gist 2003) Gist says some people are more resilient in the face of crisis, people naturally will talk to people they know, not strangers people already have loved ones friends spiritual beliefs Dr Richard Gist, Associate Professor, University of Missouri Kansas City

26 Arguments against debriefing 2 (Wessley 2003) Wessely says that debriefing is actually impairing the normal ways we understand, process and deal with emotion and normal networks. It could be too early and often we do not want to talk about it. We need to chose the time and place. Dr Colin Wessley, Professor of Psychology, Kings College London

27 Arguments against debriefing 3 (Raphael 2003) Is debriefing the professionalization of distress? Are people psychologically able to process information when they are in a hyper- vigilance state? Every persons’ trauma is unique Professor Beverly Raphael Director of Mental Health, NSW Department of Health

28 Arguments against Debriefing 4 Raphael 2003 (cont) Raphael was a supporter but it was the consistency of negative reports and research showing either no or a negative response to debriefing “I would really like there to be something simple that made it better, this is not the answer, maybe there are bits of it that are.” Professor Beverly Raphael Director of Mental Health, NSW Department of Health & Social Services

29 Arguments against debriefing Raphael 2003 (cont) Beverly states it is important to do no harm Not used in proposal for NSW Health Outcome of Consensus Conference (USA) –58 experts from 6 countries found that one to one debriefings is not recommened

30 Outcomes of debate Australian defence Force no longer use debriefing Use instead focussing on information Screening referral and social support No longer the emotional retelling of the trauma NSW Police force no longer use the Mitchell debriefing Model

31 Outcomes of the Debate Red Cross use a 4 stage form of debriefing Disclosure of events Talking about feelings Reactions Coping Strategies

32 Demobilisation… Step 1Gather the staff Step 2Summarise the events Step 3Questions and issues are discussed Step 4Arrangement for the next period Step 5Stress information is supplied Step 6Immediate needs are considered Step 7Problem Solving

33 Conclusion 1 Important to asses what, when and the type of intervention that is needed Trauma is unique so the timing for everyone is different, debriefing does not prevent PTSD 80% will not go on and develop PTSD Debriefing needs to be part of an overall plan to address trauma in the workplace and the community CISM

34 Conclusion 2 More research and discussion is needed although it is a difficult area for research Research to date has shown that to one debriefing does not have a positive response and is not recommended 2.Non-voluntary debriefing is not recommended

35 Conclusion 3 It is important to put together a variety of techniques that may include debriefing to deal with peoples reactions to trauma. Focus on clear information and assessment Mobilisation Individual counselling/crisis counselling Ongoing support systems


Download ppt "Trauma and Debriefing Louise Bailey BA (SocWork) MAASW February 2010."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google