Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byArmando Bridgford Modified over 2 years ago

1
**EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 7)**

Christopher Dougherty EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 7) Slideshow: heteroscedasticity: Monte Carlo illustration Original citation: Dougherty, C. (2012) EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 7). [Teaching Resource] © 2012 The Author This version available at: Available in LSE Learning Resources Online: May 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. This license allows the user to remix, tweak, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as the user credits the author and licenses their new creations under the identical terms.

2
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) 1 standard deviation of u We will illustrate the heteroscedasticity theory with a Monte Carlo simulation in which Y = X, the data for X are the integers from 5 to 54, and u = Xe, where e is iid N(0,1) (identically and independently distributed, drawn from a normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance). 1

3
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) 1 standard deviation of u The blue circles give the nonstochastic component of Y in the observations. The lines give the points one standard deviation of u above and below the nonstochastic component of Y and show how the distribution of Y spreads in the vertical dimension as X increases. 2

4
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) 1 standard deviation of u The standard deviation of ui is equal to Xi. The heteroscedasticity is thus of the type detected by the Goldfeld–Quandt test and it may be eliminated using weighted least squares (WLS). We scale through by X, weighting observation i by multiplying it by 1/Xi. 3

5
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) 1 million samples Slope coefficient estimated using WLS Yi /Xi = 10/Xi ei s.d. = 0.227 Slope coefficient estimated using OLS s.d. = 0.346 The diagram shows the results of estimating the slope coefficient using WLS and OLS for one million samples. 4

6
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) 1 million samples Slope coefficient estimated using WLS Yi /Xi = 10/Xi ei s.d. = 0.227 Slope coefficient estimated using OLS s.d. = 0.346 Both OLS and WLS are unbiased, but the distribution of the WLS estimates has a smaller variance. This illustrates the fact that OLS is inefficient in the presence of heteroscedasticity. 5

7
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 Heteroscedasticity also causes the OLS standard error to be invalidated. The diagram shows the distributions of the OLS and WLS standard errors of the slope coefficient for the million samples. 6

8
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 The standard deviation of the distribution of the WLS estimates of the slope coefficient in the first slide was 0.227, and we can see that the WLS standard errors in the million samples are distributed around this figure. 7

9
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 Sometimes the WLS standard error overestimates the underlying standard deviation of the distribution of the slope coefficient, sometimes it underestimates it, but there is no evident bias. 8

10
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 The standard deviation of the distribution of the OLS estimates of the slope coefficient in the first slide was 0.346, and we can see that the OLS standard error is downwards biased. The mean of its distribution in the million samples is 9

11
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 Because the OLS standard error is downwards biased, the OLS t statistic will tend to be higher than it should be. What happens if we use heteroscedasticity-consistent, or robust, standard errors instead? 10

12
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 Robust s.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.335 Actual s.d. = 0.346 The mean of the distribution of the robust standard errors is This is closer to the true standard deviation, But the dispersion of the robust standard errors is larger. Hence, in this case, it is not clear that the robust standard errors are actually more reliable. 11

13
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 Robust s.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.335 Actual s.d. = 0.346 Robust standard errors are valid only in large samples. For small samples, their properties are unknown and they could actually be more misleading than the ordinary OLS standard errors. 12

14
**HETEROSCEDASTICITY: MONTE CARLO ILLUSTRATION**

Yi = Xi + ui Xi = {5,6, ..., 54} ui = Xiei ei ~ N(0,1) S.e. estimated using WLS Mean of distribution = 0.226 Actual s.d. = 0.227 1 million samples S.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.319 Actual s.d. = 0.346 Robust s.e. estimated using OLS Mean of distribution = 0.335 Actual s.d. = 0.346 We could investigate this In the case of the present model by making the sample larger or smaller than the 50 observations used in each sample in this simulation. 13

15
**Copyright Christopher Dougherty 2011.**

These slideshows may be downloaded by anyone, anywhere for personal use. Subject to respect for copyright and, where appropriate, attribution, they may be used as a resource for teaching an econometrics course. There is no need to refer to the author. The content of this slideshow comes from Section 7.3 of C. Dougherty, Introduction to Econometrics, fourth edition 2011, Oxford University Press. Additional (free) resources for both students and instructors may be downloaded from the OUP Online Resource Centre Individuals studying econometrics on their own and who feel that they might benefit from participation in a formal course should consider the London School of Economics summer school course EC212 Introduction to Econometrics or the University of London International Programmes distance learning course 20 Elements of Econometrics

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google