Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byDevin Beckey Modified over 2 years ago

1
Wavelength Assignment in Optical Network Design Team 6: Lisa Zhang (Mentor) Brendan Farrell, Yi Huang, Mark Iwen, Ting Wang, Jintong Zheng Progress Report Presenters: Mark Iwen

2
Wavelength Assignment Motivated by WDM (wavelength division multiplexing) network optimization Input A network G=(V,E) A set of demands with specified src, dest and routes demand d i = (s i, t i, R i ) WDM fibers U: fiber capacity, number of wavelengths per fiber Output Assign a wavelength for each demand route Demand paths sharing same fiber have distinct wavelengths

3
Example

4
Model 1: Min conversion Routes given L(e): load on link e u: fiber capacity f(e) = L(e) / u Deploy f(e) fibers on link e : no extra fibers Use converters if necessary Min number of converters Fiber capacity u = 2 Demand routes: AOB, BOC, COA A B C O converter

5
Model 1: Min conversion Routes given L(e): load on link e u: fiber capacity f(e) = L(e) / u Deploy f(e) fibers on link e : no extra fibers Use converters if necessary Min number of converters converter Each demand path assigned one wavelength from src to dest – no conversion Deploy extra fibers if necessary Min total fibers Model 2: Min fiber

6
Model 1: Min conversion Routes given L(e): load on link e u: fiber capacity f(e) = L(e) / u Deploy f(e) fibers on link e : no extra fibers Use converters if necessary Min number of converters converter Each demand path assigned one wavelength from src to dest – no conversion Deploy extra fibers if necessary Min total fibers Model 2: Min fiber Extra fiber

7
Complexity Perspective of worst-case analysis NP hard Cannot expect to find optimal solution efficiently for all instances Hard to approximate Cannot approximate within any constant [AndrewsZhang] For any algorithm, there exist instances for which the algo returns a solution more than any constant factor larger than the optimal.

8
Heuristics Focus: Simple/flexible/scalable heuristics “Typical” input instances: not worst-case analysis A greedy heuristic For every demand d in an ordered demand set: Choose a locally optimal solution for d

9
Why greedy? Viable approach for many hard problems Set Cover Problem (NP-hard) SAT solving (NP-hard) Planning Problems (PSPACE-hard) Vertex Coloring (NP-hard) …

10
Vertex coloring: A closely related problem A classic problem from combinatorial optimization and graph theory Problem statement Graph D Color each vertex of D such that neighboring vertices have distinct colors Minimize the total number of colors needed

11
Connection to vertex coloring Create a demand graph D from wavelength assignment instance G: One vertex for each demand Two demands vertices adjacent iff demand routes share common link Demand graph D is u colorable iff wavelength assignment feasible with 0 extra fibers and 0 conversion.

13
What we know about vertex coloring Complexity – worst case NP-hard Hard to approximate: cannot be approximated to within a factor of n 1- [FeigeKilian][KnotPonnuswami] Heuristic solutions – common cases Greedy approaches extremely effective For vertex v in an ordering of vertices: Color v with smallest color not used by v’s neighbors Example: Brelaz’s algorithm [Turner] gives priority to“most constrained” vertex

14
Try greedy wavelength assignment For every demand d in an ordered demand set: Choose a locally optimal solution for d - Is there good ordering? - Is it easy to find a good ordering? - Local optimality is easy!

15
Local optimality for model 1 : min conversion 1.Starting at first link, assign wavelength available for greatest number of consecutive links. 2.Convert and continue on a different wavelength until the entire demand path is assigned wavelength(s). Strategy locally optimal

16
Local optimality for model 1 : min conversion 1.Starting at first link, assign wavelength available for greatest number of consecutive links. 2.Convert and continue on a different wavelength until the entire demand path is assigned wavelength(s). Strategy locally optimal

17
Local optimality for model 2: Min fiber 1.Choose wavelength w such that assigning w to demand d requires minimum number of extra fibers

18
Local optimality for model 2: Min fiber 1.Choose wavelength w such that assigning w to demand d requires minimum number of extra fibers Extra fiber on first link

19
Ordering in Greedy approach Global ordering: 1.Longest first : Order demands according to number of links each demand travels. 2.Heaviest : Weigh each link according to the number of demands that traverse it. Sum the weights on each link of a demand. 3.Ordering suggested by vertex coloring on demand graph 4.Random sampling: choose a random permutation.

20
Ordering in Greedy approach Local perturbation: d1, d2, d3, d4, … 1.Coin toss : -Reshuffle initial demand ordering by: -Flipping a coin for each entry in order -With a success, remove the demand and move it to new ordering 2.Top-n : -Reshuffle initial demand ordering by: -Randomly choosing a first n demands -Removing the demand to new ordering

21
Iterative refinement Global ordering Greedy Local perturbation Greedy

22
Generating instances Characteristics of network topology: Sparse networks; average node degree < 3 Planar Small networks (~ 20 nodes) Large network (~ 50 nodes) Characteristics of traffic: Fiber Capacity ~ [20,100] Lightly loaded networks: 1 fiber per link, fibers half full Heavily loaded networks: ~ 2 fibers per links

23
Topologies of real networks

26
Experimental data Group 1: real networks (light load)

27
Experimental data Group 1: real networks (light load)

28
Probability of No Wavelength Conflict vs. Link Load -O(log u) approx.: choose a wavelength uniformly at random for each demand -Birthday Paradox!

30
Experimental data Group 2: simulated networks (heavy + small)

31
Experimental data Group 2: simulated networks (heavy + small)

32
Experimental data: Large Networks Group 3: simulated networks (heavy + large)

33
Experimental data Group 3: simulated networks (heavy + large)

34
Summary – Preliminary observations Small + light (real networks) All greedy solutions close to optimal Log approx behaves poorly Small + heavy Random sampling has advantage Longest/heaviest less meaningful for shortest paths in small networks Large + heavy Longest/heaviest more meaningful

35
Combined minimization New territory: Ultimate cost optimization Combined minimization of fiber and conversion Proposed approach Compute a min fiber solution (x extra fibers) From empty network, add one fiber at a time Compute a min conversion solution for fixed additional fibers.

36
Combined minimization

37
QUESTIONS???

Similar presentations

OK

CWI PNA2, Reading Seminar, Presented by Yoni Nazarathy EURANDOM and the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, TU/e Eindhoven September 17, 2009 An Assortment.

CWI PNA2, Reading Seminar, Presented by Yoni Nazarathy EURANDOM and the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, TU/e Eindhoven September 17, 2009 An Assortment.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on credit default swaps and derivatives Ppt on paintings and photographs related to colonial period of america Ppt on op amp circuits filter What does appt only means of transportation A ppt on storage devices Open ppt on ipad free Cns anatomy and physiology ppt on cells Ppt on 3d geometry maths class 11 Ppt on two point perspective paintings Ppt on nutrition in plants of class 7th