Download presentation
1
Information processing
Class outline Cognitive issues in L2 learning Information processing Consciousness Attention Skills aspect First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
2
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
L2 learning Linguistic aspect Skills aspect First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
3
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
L2 learning Linguistic aspect Skills aspect Explicit and implicit knowledge Controlled & automatic processes First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
4
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Learners have a limited processing capacity (channel capacity: “room in the mind”) How can L2 learners maximize this processing ability? By routinizing skills, that is by automatizing certain processing skills. By restructuring stored information First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
5
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Automization (Johnson, 2001): When a skill is newly learnt it takes up a great deal of conscious attention (channel capacity) Lower level skills must become automatic (e.g. tense, differentating sounds this/thing, etc) for higher level skills to occur (ensure a message is properly conveyed). How? For example, by giving the learner increasingly demanding activities, pushing him towards producing the tense with less and less channel capacity available. First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
6
Controlled processes:
Short-term memory Require attention & effort Operate in linear sequence First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
7
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Automatic processes: Long-term memory No attention required Operate in parallel First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
8
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Restructuring (McLaughlin in Johnson, 2001): As people learn, the way they “view” what they are learning changes. Example: Simple mathematical problem of adding up ten twos. (2+2=4+2=6 and so on) Restructuring 2. (2x10=20) First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
9
The role of attention: Noticing
Does input processing require noticing features in the input, that is, conscious attention? Noticing Features in the input are attended to and so become intake (stored in temporary memory), but may or may not be subsequently accommodated in the interlanguage system. First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
10
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Attention: “The control process that transfers information into focal awareness.” (Schmidt, 1990) Noticing the gap Schmidt and Frota suggest that for noticed input to become intake, learners have to carry out a mental comparison of what they have observed in the input with what they are producing (output). First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
11
FACTORS THAT FAVOR NOTICING
FREQUENCY PERCEPTUAL SALIENCE: how prominent is a form? (Cf. unstressed forms) INSTRUCTION: The role of instruction is not necessarily in the clarity or explanation it provides, but rather in the way it channels attention and brings L2 features into awareness (Schmidt´s learning experience: what had been unstructured undifferentiated input became noticeable and analyzable.) First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
12
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
OUTPUT in SLA “Practice makes perfect” Audiolingualism (Behaviorism, 60s) Only a sign of the second language acquisition that has taken placeKrashen (80s) Plan de clase Desde esta diapo hasta questionnaire 70´ Presentar tema con esta diapositiva Presentar Internet site en alemán. What is it about? Well what knowledge and processes were at stake in this task? OK. They were mainly semantic. That is the basis of Krashen´s theory of SLA. Comprehensible input. Continue with slides until definition of pushed output. Do not go into detail (functions). Do dictogloss and then ask about processes to present functions (continue with pps) Dictogloss Slide about functions First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
13
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
14
Rediscovering OUTPUT in SLA
SKILLS ASPECT LINGUISTIC ASPECT First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
15
Rediscovering OUTPUT in SLA
SKILLS ASPECT FLUENCY Proceduralization of declarative knowledge (ACT*Model) Routinization (Mc Laughlin) First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
16
Rediscovering OUTPUT in SLA
LINGUISTIC ASPECT The Output Hypothesis (Swain, 1995) ACCURACY (Form & function in a context-sensitive task) “PUSHED” OUTPUT Helps to stretch interlanguage to meet communicative goals (p.127) Has a role in the development of syntax and morphology (p.128) First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
17
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Endangered Species First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
18
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Teachers: Endangered Species First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
19
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Teachers are leaving their profession at an alarming rate. 2. A recent poll showed that the number of teachers with more than twenty years´experience has dropped by half in the last fifteen years. First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
20
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
3. One third of the teachers contacted in the poll said that they would not choose teaching if they had the chance over again. 4. Only sixty per cent of those polled said they planned to teach until retirement. First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
21
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
5. Many interviewed said that factors like stress isolation, powerlessness, and alienation had contributed to the current climate of dissatisfaction within the profession. First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
22
DICTOGLOSS (also dictocomp)
WHAT IS A DICTOGLOSS? Note-taking of a text Individual reconstruction Small group reconstruction Error analysis First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
23
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
FEATURES Context-based task procedure designed to help L2 students towards a better understanding of how grammar works on a text basis First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
24
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Learner-needs based: exposes learner´s language shortcomings Interaction provides scaffolding for SLA Teaching while testing First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
25
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
STEPS Preparation: arouse interest / pre-teach vocabulary / explain stages of procedure /organize learners in groups First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
26
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Dictation: Learners just hear the dictation Learners write down content words Text is dictated at normal spoken speed Pauses are made between sentences (5´´) First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
27
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Reconstruction: Individual reconstruction of text Collective reconstruction through “scribe” Teacher monitors but does not help Teacher may help to correct peripheral errors First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
28
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Analysis and correction: The first sentence of each group is discussed Original text´s sentence is shown First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
29
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
CONTRIBUTION TO SLA Learners understand and use grammar in discourse Learners develop explicit knowledge by reflecting on their hypotheses (negotiation about form) Motivation is fostered by spotting learners´ language needs and satisfying affiliation needs First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
30
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
The Output Hypothesis Function 1: Noticing/Noticing the gap Consciousness-raising role Notice an L2 feature or a gap in interlanguage Function 2: Implicit Hypothesis-testing Trying out new forms (well-formedness and comprehensibility) Stretch interlanguage to meet communicative needs Modified or reprocessed utterances represent the leading edge of a learner’s interlanguage First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
31
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
The Output Hypothesis Function 3: Explicit hypothesis-testing (Metalingual function: Conscious reflection, Swain) Negotiation about form in the context of a meaning-based task (E.g. Dictogloss, planned conversations, etc) Context-sensitive knowledge of grammar (form, function and meaning) First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
32
Dialogic interaction & SLA
Vygotsky (1986) cognitive processes arise from interaction inter-mental intra-mental (linguistic change) Donato Scaffolding (supportive conditions to outperform competence) L2 features in 80% of negotiated solutions were learned in post-tests First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
33
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Vygotsky´s Zone of proximal development: The distance between the actual developmental level as determined by independent problem-solving and the level of potential development as determined thru problem-solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers (scaffolding). First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
34
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Information gap activity. Instructions for drawing. Example of negotiation of meaning. What type of knowledge does it contribute to? A: A man is uh drinking c-coffee or tea with the saucer of the uh uh coffee set is uh in his knee B: In him knee A: uh on his knee B: Yeah A: on his knee B: so sorry. On his knee (Gass and varonis 1986:81) First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
35
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Dictogloss. What type of knowledge does it help to develop? Example: Keith and George are trying to determine whether the correct form is nous tracasse or nous tracassons. Keith: Nous tracassons George: Oh (beginning to realize what is happening) Keith: Yeah? George: The problems which are worrying us. Like the …it’s the problems …like, that concerns us. Keith: Yes, but tracasse isn’t it o-n-s? George: Tracasse it’s not a, it’s not a, yeah, I dunno Keith: OK, it says, the problems which worry us. Therefore is tracasse a verb? That you, that you have to conjugate? Teacher: Uh huh. Keith: So is it tracassons? Teacher: It’s the problems which are worrying us. George: Us, it’s, it’s not, it’s not, yeah, it’s the problems, it’s not, it’s not us. Keith: Ah! E-n-t (third person plural ending), OK, OK. First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
36
Pedagogical implications
Different pedagogical implications arise: Opportunities for both intentional and incidental language learning are needed Pedagogy should provide opportunities for practice to ensure that controlled processes are automatized (skill-building) Pedagogy should find ways of promoting “noticing” (e.g. by means of interpretation tasks) Pedagogy should focus on developing explicit knowledge and enabling learners to make use to facilitate acquisition. First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
37
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
LET´S RECAP Answer the following questionnaire based on the article by Swain on output. Why is output referred to as “pushed” output in the article? How do processes involved in comprehension differ from those involved in production? In general terms, how does pushed output contribute to develop more accurate interlanguages? Complete: Negotiation of meaning may help to develop ……… knowledge. Negotiation about form may develop ……………… knowledge. What is the connection between Vygotskyan theory and the metalinguistic function of output? First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
38
First & second language acquisition – Prof. Pampillo
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.