Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Levee Seepage: Concerns, Evaluations, and Solutions Pete Nix, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Tetra Tech, Inc. May 18, 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Levee Seepage: Concerns, Evaluations, and Solutions Pete Nix, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Tetra Tech, Inc. May 18, 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 Levee Seepage: Concerns, Evaluations, and Solutions Pete Nix, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Tetra Tech, Inc. May 18, 2011

2 Levee Underseepage Evaluations  Current Corps criteria presented in EM , Design and Construction of Levees and ETL , Design Guidance for Levee Underseepage  Based on exit gradient, i = Δh/L, where Δh is the change in head over a given distance L at the seepage exit point  High exit gradients near the landside levee toe can cause sand boils to form which can lead to piping (internal erosion) in the foundation soils; piping often results in the failure of the levee

3 TM Investigation of Underseepage and Its Control, Lower Mississippi River Levees (1950 Flood) Exit Gradient, iSeepage Condition 0 to 0.5Light/no seepage 0.2 to 0.6Medium seepage 0.4 to 0.7Heavy seepage 0.5 to 0.8Sand boils Mathematically impossible to have a first time sand boil in the top stratum with a saturated unit weight above 110 pcf and with an exit gradient less than 0.8 (ETL ). exit gradient of 0.8 or higher required to form new sand boils exit gradient of 0.5 to 0.8 required to reactivate old sand boils for seepage evaluations of existing levees, we consider that exit gradients must be less than or equal to 0.5

4 Typical Levee Section

5 Seepage Analyses

6 Potential Solutions May 18, 2011

7 Seepage Cutoff very expensive (generally sheet pile or slurry walls) generally not effective unless they’re installed into an underlying impervious layer

8 Seepage Berm may still have high exit gradients but they’re further way from the toe of the levee relatively inexpensive requires extensive space on the landside of the levee

9 Toe Drain relatively inexpensive; cost could vary depending on need to provide pumping good where thin, surface clay layers can be easily penetrated requires sufficient space on the landside of the levee for a large excavation may need to pump water from wells to upstream side to prevent interior ponding if space is available, locate toe drain away from levee and use excavated material for berm

10 Relief Wells relatively expensive and must be maintained good where clay layers cannot be easily penetrated by a toe drain excavation good in areas where space is limited at landside toe may need to pump water from wells to upstream side to prevent interior ponding

11 Questions?


Download ppt "Levee Seepage: Concerns, Evaluations, and Solutions Pete Nix, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Tetra Tech, Inc. May 18, 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google