We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMariana Congdon
Modified about 1 year ago
Milo Orsic Common IMS MMD X.S B impact (Discussion)
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 2 | Presentation Title | Month 2006 Common IMS – MMD Part-4 Support of IPv6 and IPv4 IMS -For SIP signaling (hop-by-hop) -For media (end-to-end) -Current 3GPP procedures vs. MMD procedures -RFC-4091 and RFC-4092 (ANAT) -Dual anchoring vs. single IP address
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 3 | Presentation Title | Month 2006 Common IMS – MMD Part-4 P-CSCF location Home IMS Network Visited IMS Network IP Point of attachment Home IP network Visited IP Network MMD-yes 3GPP-no MMD-yes MMD-no MMD-yes 3GPP-no 3GPP-yes Impact: P-CSCF discovery and provisioning (R-UIM) NAT location and traversal [for signaling and media]
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 4 | Presentation Title | Month 2006 Common IMS NAT traversal ( IPv4 address shortage and “pin-hole” punching ) 3GPP assumptions: Single IP address (i.e. no dual anchoring) Pv6 addressing (no IPv6 address shortage); UE IP attachment is at GGSN. GGSN and P-CSCF in the same network. There is no need for NAT insertion between the GGSN and P-CSCF. For Fixed Broadband (NAT at customer premise). NAT traversal for signaling specified (UDP encapsulation of tunneled IPsec).
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 5 | Presentation Title | Month 2006 Common IMS 3GPP2 MMD assumptions: Pv6 and IPv4 addressing (IPv4 address shortage – where to place the NAT?); UE IP attachment in the visited IP network – P-CSCF in the home IMS network (e.g. the NAT is in the visited network). Dual IP addressing (i.e. no dual anchoring). Separation of signaling from media hence e.g. STUN Relay, ICE?). Mobile IP (e.g. DS-MIPv6 – IPsec inside IPsec?)
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 6 | Presentation Title | Month 2006 Common IMS – MMD Part-4 Other differences: 3GPP supports link-level mobility (GPRS). There is a need (e.g. QoS and charging) for IP flow grouping (see RFC-3388 and RFC-3524) and mapping the group onto particular link (i.e. “pdp context”). 3GPP2 supports IP level mobility (MoIP) [no need for IP flow grouping?] P-Charging-Vector: icid-value= icid-generated-at= orig-ioi= term-ioi= generic-param (access network charging info)
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### 7 | Presentation Title | Month 2006 Common IMS – MMD Part-4 ISIM vs. R-UIM/no R-UIM Impact: - R-UIM - Temporary PUID derivation - Home P-CSCF address [FQDN or IP address?] - Authentication procedure (IMS-AKA, Digest, tls, 3GPP2-CAVE?)
D1 - 16/05/2014 Le présent document contient des informations qui sont la propriété de France Télécom. L'acceptation de ce document par son destinataire.
Future Mobile Networks Policy and Regulatory Requirements for Future Mobile Networks June 22nd 2005 F. COURAU M. OLSSON.
1 IMS/MMD Dallas Nov North American IPv6 Task Force IMS/MMD The IPv6 Factor APAN 21 IPv6 Workshop Tokyo January th 2006 Yves.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Network Controlled Network Selection and HO scenarios Date Submitted: September,
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IPv6 via IPv4 SP Networks - 6rd draft-townsley-ipv6-6rd-01.txt (also.
The 3GPP2 Architecture Sridhar Machiraju CS294-3, Spring 2002, University of California at Berkeley.
© 2004 SafeNet, Inc. All rights reserved. Mobike Protocol Design draft-ietf-mobike-design-00.txt Tero Kivinen
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: sec Title: Security Group TR Date Submitted: 20 th January, 2009 Presented at IEEE
1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Inter-Tech Handover Activity Date Submitted: September, 2007 Presented at IEEE.
The leader in session border control for trusted, first class interactive communications.
Asian institute of medicine, science and technology (aimst) Towards IPv6 Globalisation IPv6 for 3G Gopinath Rao Sinniah Asian Institute of Medicine, Science.
MUSE Policy Control Framework in FMC Govinda Rajan
Omniran ecsg 1 IEEE 802 OmniRAN ECSG Results and Proposals Scope of IEEE 802, gaps and proposed ways forward
VON Europe SIP Update Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist co-chair, IETF SIP Working Group.
1 TURN Server for WebRTC in the Firewall © 2014 Ingate Systems AB Prepared for:Ingates SIP Trunking, UC and WebRTC Seminars ITEXPO January 2014 Miami By:Karl.
Nomadism/FMC Use Cases and AAA Impact Mohit Thakur 14th December, 2006.
1 Global Standards, the Key Enabler for the Next Generation Network Anthony Wiles Manager, ETSI PTCC David Boswarthick Technical.
1 NAT Tutorial Dan Wing, IETF77, Anaheim March 22, 2010 V2.1.
Identity and Locators in IPv6 IAB Meeting IETF 60 August 2004.
The Location of Header Compression (HC) and User Data Ciphering (UDC) Lucent Technologies Nortel Networks Qualcomm Inc. Notice Contributors grant a free,
Document IPW-111 TIPHON Perspective on VoIP Numbering John Horrocks (DTI) Tiphon WG4 Chair.
ITU-TSG16 ITU-T Standardization Seminar – Madrid, December 2002 H.323 and some Security-related issues – a presentation in two parts Simão Ferraz.
Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Interactive Connectivity Establishment: ICE.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Possible MIH security approaches and issues Date Submitted: September.
November 021 IP Technology Geoff Huston. November 022 Overview A quick skate across the top of an entire suite of technology- based issues that exist.
Architectural Approaches to Multi-Homing for IPv6 A Walk-Through of draft-huston-multi6-architectures-00 Geoff Huston June 2004.
Copyright line. IP Addressing and Services EXAM OBJECTIVES Configuring IPv4 and IPV6 Addressing Configuring IPv4 and IPV6 Addressing Configuring Dynamic.
SIPPING 3GPP Requirements Ad Hoc Meeting Georg Mayer IETF#53, Minneapolis.
IETF ECRIT SDO Emergency Services Coordination Workshop 5 & 6 Oct 2006 – New York Alain Van Gaever DG Information Society & Media European Commission.
Voice over WiMax Development Trends Amnon Gavish VP TBU Business Development
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.