Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Offshore Communications 2002 October 2, 2002 Houston, TX

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Offshore Communications 2002 October 2, 2002 Houston, TX"— Presentation transcript:

1 Offshore Communications 2002 October 2, 2002 Houston, TX
Satellite RF Links In The Disadvantaged Marine Environment John Borden Dr. Jeffrey N. Shaumeyer Wavix, Incorporated Offshore Communications 2002 October 2, 2002 Houston, TX

2 Offshore Communications 2002
Topics Wavix Background Disadvantaged Marine Applications Marine Environment Characteristics Common Protocol Solutions Wavix Solution Project Synergies October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

3 Offshore Communications 2002
Wavix Background Concept development work started in 1995 Initial funding via NASA/GSFC SBIR teamed with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Additional funding from Navy, NSF, NASA/SSC Incorporated Wavix in January 1999 Original idea was to commercialize oceanographic data collection from buoys Developed WavSat in response to lack of affordable, high-throughput communications Received financing for satellite system from Linsang Partners in Nov 2000 October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

4 Wavix Satellite System
Store-and-forward satellite communication service in underserved areas Humanitarian workers in developing countries Crewmen onboard merchant ships at sea Recreational use of the oceans Data transmission Oceanography/Meteorology Oil and gas exploration and production Shipping Stasia 906 Satellite Groundstation Custom-designed in-house for our applications October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

5 Offshore Communications 2002
Current Projects Ocean Data Telemetry Microsat Link Phase 1 SBIR with Office of Naval Research Conceptual design of a satellite system to support oceanography Leading to ONR-funded design, construction and launch of a satellite Robust Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Satellite Communications Protocol for UUVs Phase 1 SBIR with Naval Undersea Warfare Center Advanced satellite-communication protocol for use in harsh marine environments Leading to use on Navy’s next-generation military satellite communication system October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

6 Disadvantaged Marine Applications
Applications where the antenna is close to the water surface Data Collection Buoys Moored buoys for oceanography, meteorology Drifters and profilers UUVs/AUVs Military systems for reconnaissance Research applications October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

7 Offshore Communications 2002
Typical Applications October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

8 Offshore Communications 2002
October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

9 Marine Environment Characteristics
Marine channels are prone to large scale errors Burst errors and signal fading are the major contibutors Wash over of the near-surface antenna causing signal fading from ground-plane disruptions and possible transients in conductance will contribute burst errors. Wave motions rocking the UUV may contribute to signal fading Shadowing by waves will contribute to signal fading High seas may contribute to fading and burst errors by coating the antenna with sea water or altering local RF propagation characteristics October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

10 Marine Environment Characteristics
Surface waves create reflections with dynamic multipath contributions to signal interference Along the path of propagation, changeable atmospheric conditions contribute to signal fading and burst errors The open-air RF channel is noisy with Additive White Gaussian Noise that contributes to Bit-Error Rates If the noise environment is predominantly bursty in nature, describing a channel as having a high BER can obscure the fact that the Gaussian noise itself is actually rather small Contention for available channel space and interference from datagram collisions Bit-error rates (BER) 10-5 or worse compared to 10-9 achieved by many terrestrial systems October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

11 Common Protocol Solutions
Modify existing protocols at the Network or Transport layers of the OSI Model. TCP/IP has considerable inefficiencies due to the long round-trip time Slow start and congestion avoidance slows link speed Window size limits throughput Requirement for positive acks slows link speed The Space Communications Protocol Standard is an improvement on the TCP/IP suite of protocols Scaled windows and time stamps Fast retransmit and recovery Selective acknowledgment Assumes error-free or very low bit-error link Adds overhead - using more of the limited throughput October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

12 Offshore Communications 2002
Illustration courtesy Catherine Werst October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

13 Wavix Protocol Solution
Needs to be attacked at the lowest levels Physical layer the physical characteristics of the RF signaling Data-Link layer reliable data delivery across the physical layer Diverse array of noise-mitigation techniques Metaframing Time-Division, Multiple-Access Operation Data Backcapture Bit Interleaving DC Balance & Scrambling Forward Error Correction (FEC) October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

14 Wavix Protocol Solution (cont.)
Metaframing imposes structure on the bitstream structure adds information to mitigate synchronization problems allows multiple, simultaneous user channels on the RF link Time-Division, Multiple-Access (TDMA) Operation metaframes are issued by the satellite node at fixed time intervals user synchronizes its timing to uplink in the allotted channel Data Backcapture receiver maintains a buffer of recently received bits receiver can locate previously received frames in the already-received bitstream by counting backwards frame synchronization appears to be nearly instantaneous October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

15 Wavix Protocol Solution (cont.)
Bit Interleaving Frames are written sequentially into a buffer When the buffer is full, bits are transmitted by column As bits are received they are written into columns Frames are read out by rows. DC Balance & Scrambling avoid low-frequency components in the RF signal Forward Error Correction (FEC) number of bit errors that can be corrected determines the size of the FEC code FEC mechanisms are best implemented in the frame October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

16 Offshore Communications 2002
Protocol Advantages Metaframing creates a DC-balanced, hierarchical structure that makes synchronization more robust Metaframing and TDMA allows multiple, simultaneous user channels on the RF link Individual channels can operate with independent transmission protocols Metaframing with Data Backcapture can increase data-transmission efficiency Priority allocation of channels fits easily into the metaframe structure Additional techniques to increase error immunity in the bitstream, such as Interleaving, Data Scrambling, and FEC, are easily accommodated October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002

17 Offshore Communications 2002
Project Synergies Oceanography Argo profilers Navy UUVs Mine detection Oil exploration Current monitoring Delay-Tolerant Networking Interplanetary Internet October 3, 2002 Offshore Communications 2002


Download ppt "Offshore Communications 2002 October 2, 2002 Houston, TX"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google