Presentation on theme: "The National Special Education Research Agenda: Inside the Matrix."— Presentation transcript:
The National Special Education Research Agenda: Inside the Matrix
The National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES): But… What exactly is the Institute of Education Sciences? (And, what happened to OSERS and OSEP?)
IDEA Reauthorization in 2004 Amended the The Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 to establish the National Center for Special Education Research in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) Transferred responsibility for special education research and “Studies and Evaluations” (except for the Annual Report) from the Office of Special Education Programs to NCSER.
The Charge: Legislative Branch Research, statistical, and evaluation activities supported by the Institute shall “apply rigorous, systematic, and objective methodology to obtain reliable and valid knowledge … and present findings and make claims that are appropriate to and supported by the methods that have been employed.” (ESRA, 2002)
IES Goals develop or identify programs, practices, policies, and approaches that enhance academic achievement and that can be widely deployed identify what does not work and what is problematic, and thereby encourage innovation and further research gain fundamental understanding of the processes that underlie variations in the effectiveness of education programs develop delivery systems for the results of education research that will be routinely used by practitioners and the public when making education decisions
Organizational Structure Office of the Director Grover J. Whitehurst, Director National Board for Education Sciences Robert C. Granger, Chair Sonia Chessen, Executive Director Office of Science Andrew White, Deputy Director for Science Office of Administration and Policy Sue Betka, Deputy Director for Administration and Policy Office of Communication and Outreach Mike Bowler, Director of Communications and Outreach Office of Information Technology Gerald Malitz, Chief Information Technology Officer
Organizational Structure Office of the Director Grover J. Whitehurst, Director National Board for Education Sciences Robert C. Granger, Chair Sonia Chessen, Executive Director National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance Phoebe Cottingham, Commissioner National Center for Education Research Lynn Okagaki, Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics Mark Schneider, Commissioner National Center for Special Education Research Edward J. Kame’enui, Commissioner
The National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in The Institute of Education Sciences (IES): In Appreciation of Hartley’s First Law
Hartley’s First Law You can lead a horse to water, but if you can get him to float on his back, you’ve got something. Bloch, A. (1982). Murphy’s law and other reasons why things go wrong. LA: Price/Stern/Sloan Publishers, Inc.
Five Organizing Principles for National Center for Special Education Research in the Institute of Education Sciences
NCSER Organizing Principles 1. The “science” must come first--
This phenomenon of having a memory for the race, of having an accumulated knowledge passable from one generation to another, was new in the world. But it had a disease in it. It was possible to pass on mistaken ideas. It was possible to pass on ideas which were not profitable for the race… Then a way of avoiding the disease was discovered… And that is what science is: the result of the discovery that it is worthwhile rechecking by new direct experience, and not necessarily trusting the race experience from the past (p. 185). Richard P. Feynman (1999). The pleasure of finding things out. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing. Ode to Feynman
“We’ve done well…now there’s an opportunity to really be amazing--to be amazing as a business, to be amazing in the positive impact that we have on society. But we have to do some things a little bit differently to be as amazing as we hope we can be.” Steve Ballmer, CEO, Microsoft Business Week, June 17, 2002 (http://www.business week.com/magazine/content/02_24/b htm) Invoking the Ballmer Standard
NCSER Organizing Principles 1. The “science” must come first--and it must be the best, perhaps even “amazing.”
Methodological & Statistical Issues Traditional issues: Highly nested nature of student performance in complex systems that provoke complex interactions among range of variables (familial, social, pedagogical, curricular, organizational) compounded by heterogeneity of student characteristics/performance; comorbidity. Quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) of single-case research to identify effective educational interventions; Statistical power for random assignment evaluations of programs and interventions; etc.
Evidence-based Education Using the best available empirical evidence in making decisions about education -- Particularly for students with disabilities
IES NCSER + Practice (TA & D) Simple Formula 1.R - TA & D = Irrelevant 2.TA & D - R = Irresponsible 3.R + TA & D = Relevant & Responsible What Does This Mean? Levels of evidence process & mechanisms
Levels of Evidence on What Works A.Meta-analyses of high quality evidence B.Experiments and well designed quasi-experiments using WWC standards (including small n designs) C.Statistical modeling of correlational and longitudinal data D.Best practice studies with matching and contrastive analysis E.Expert opinion supported by conceptual models and generalizations from high quality research on related topics F.Simple correlational studies, case studies, pre-post studies, and best practice studies w/o matching
What Can CEC Do? Establish a “Scientific Advisory Council” to anchor the primacy of science in CEC Advocate & insist upon rigorous scientific standards in special education research + TA & D (and within organization) Adopt levels of evidence to adjudicate/promote research-to-practice translation Launch a public awareness campaign to inform parents about importance of science
President’s FY 2006 Education Final Appropriations (in millions of dollars) Title I Grants to LEAs = $12,713 million (largest portion of NCLB programs) Reading First/Early Reading First = $1,132 million Research in special education and studies and evaluation = $82 million (0.11% of total ED monies) Total Education Appropriation = $71,545 million Reference:
Comparison of FY2006 Appropriations with other Federal agencies (millions of dollars) Comparison Agency Defense Budget Authority = $419,341 Homeland Security Authority= $34,152 Secret Service Agency = $1,200 Environmental Protection Agency = $7,571 Total Federal Budget = $2,568 (in billions of dollars) Comparative % for NCSER ($82 million): 0.02% monies authorized as compared to DOD 0.24% of monies authorized as compared to DHS 6.83% of monies authorized as compared to Secret Service Agency 1.08% of monies authorized as compared with the EPA 0.003% of total monies authorized Reference:
Federal Research and Development Spending (Proposed: FY 2006) Total Across Federal Agencies = $132,304 million Federal agencies include: DOD, HHS, NASA, DOE, NSF, USDA, DHS, DOC, DOT, DVA, DOI, EPA, and Other “R&D” is characterized as “basic research, applied research, development, R& D equipment or R&D facilities”. NCSER Appropriation = $81.7 million (0.06% of R&D monies) Reference:
NCSER Organizing Principles 2. Because the special education “problem space” is infinitely broad and complex, we must invest wisely and strategically.
To do so requires going “inside” the Special Education Matrix What Special Education Matrix?
Features of NCSER Research Matrix NCSER Statutory responsibilities: 18 Disability Statutory categories: 12+ Total Research Matrix cells: 18 x 12= 216
Matrix of Disability Category by NCSER Duties
NCSER Evidence Map: Just One of 216 Cells Disability Category: Specific Learning Disabilities Age—Growth & Development x Time Content (1) Infants/ Toddlers (2) Pre- school (3) Kinder- garten (4)-(6) Grades 1 through 3 (7)—(16) Grades 4 through 12 (17)—(25) School to post- school, post- secondary, etc. Early Childhood School Age Transition (1) Speech and Language Development (2) Beginning Reading (Learning to Read) (3) Content Reading (Reading to Learn) (4) Etc.
FY 2006 NCSER Research Programs Reading & Writing Special Education Research Math & Science Special Education Research Special Education Teacher Quality – Reading/Writing Special Education Teacher Quality – Math/Science Early Intervention and Assessment for Young Children with Disabilities
FY 2006 NCSER Programs (cont’d) Assessment for Accountability Special Education Research Individualized Education Programs Research Serious Behavior Disorders Special Education Research Secondary and Post-Secondary Outcomes Special Education Research Language and Vocabulary Development Special Education Research
FY 2007 Grant Competitions Early Intervention, Early Childhood Special Education, and Assessment for Young Children with Disabilities Mathematics and Science Reading, Writing, and Language Serious Behavior Disorders Assessment for Accountability
FY 2007 Grant Competitions Individualized Education Programs and Individualized Family Service Plans Secondary and Transition Services Quality of Teacher and Other Service Providers for Students with Disabilities Autism Spectrum Disorders Response to Intervention
R esearch Grant Program Goals Goals differ by topic area, and include: Goal 1: Identifying promising practices. Goal 2: Developing and testing new approaches. Goal 3: Conducting efficacy and replication trials. Goal 4: Conducting large scale evaluations. Goal 5: Developing and validating assessments.
NCSER Organizing Principles 3. Research in “special education” is at the heart of the National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in IES.
Public Law —December 3, STAT th Congress USC 1401 Sec DEFINITIONS “(29) SPECIAL EDUCATION.—The term ‘special education’ means specially designed instruction, at no cost to parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability, including— –“(A) instruction conducted in the classroom, in the home, in hospitals and institutions, and in other settings; and –“(b) instruction in physical education.
Specially Designed Instruction NOT special institutions teaching strategies curricular programs special support special learning general programs Design = Architecture of information Individualized Education Program (IEP) AND “Related Services” Families
NCSER Organizing Principles 4. Building the research capacity of the field is not a “Lone Ranger” endeavor: Collaboration and consultation are essential.
The Charge: Customers Make research more practical Fill gaps in knowledge Provide digested and vetted findings Consider products for end users Consider expanding current IES research grammar and goal structure
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) John Hager, Assistant Secretary Dr. Troy Justesen, Deputy Assistant Secretary Dr. Alexa E. Posny, Director, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Dr. Lou Danielson, Director of Research to Practice Division
Ode to Boren’s First Law 5. Good science is good “business” for everyone; but good science is not enough. Results must lead to the engineering of high quality performance and delivery systems.
“Why the Global Economy Is Here To Stay” Jeffrey E. Garten, Dean, Yale School of Management (Business Week, March 23, 1998, p. 21) Delivering some 2.8 million packages in 210 countries each day, FedEx is pushing globalization faster and deeper…because it is using information technology to reengineer its clients’ worldwide supply and distribution systems…FedEx can…electronically track where any shipment is at any given moment, and it can guarantee on- time delivery.
“Cream of the Crop,” Alison Peacock. Horizon Air, April, 1998, p “A computerized system keeps track of how much milk each cow gives each time. Obrist can look up any cow on his computer and track her milking yields for weeks at a time, noting at a glance when she is at peak production or if her health is ailing” (p. 13).
Engineering Systems IT Systems (including digital technology) that permit, for example: the large scale, real time management of a range of student performance data at the district, school, and classroom levels, including the real time management of individualized education programs (e.g., FedEx; Dairy Farmers); greater and faster accessibility to the full range of print materials; accountability and information management systems linked to student performance and results
Five Harsh Realities to Hartley’s First Law
Harsh Realities 1.We have more cells than research dollars. Most cells are either empty or partially filled. None of the cells are completely filled. Where should NCSER make investments for the short and long term? What organizing principles and values should guide these decisions? 2.Space and time is at least three-dimensional: Investments must reflect a long-term horizontal view (breadth) with vertical short- term investments (depth) that vary over time, complimented with diagonal investments when possible/feasible (depending on quality of research from field).
Harsh Realities (Cont’d) 3.What is the capacity of the field to deliver the research “goods”? The quality of the research infrastructure and capacity is essential to good science and research. Needed: Short and long-term investments in building professional capacity that is interdisciplinary, rigorous, and content intensive in special education as a primary discipline.
Harsh Realities (cont’d) 4.What is the capacity of the U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) to deliver the goods? 5.What are the mechanisms for obtaining input from the field—individuals and parents/ caregivers of children and individuals with disabilities, professional organizations, stakeholders and the general public—on the research investments?
Stockmayer’s Theorem If it looks easy, it’s tough. If it looks tough, it’s damn well impossible. Bloch, A. (1982). Murphy’s law and other reasons why things go wrong. LA: Price/Stern/Sloan Publishers, Inc.