We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDemarcus Matthey
Modified about 1 year ago
Systematic on Rear Leakage correction Observation : Different behaviour between Data & MC
Data TB 2007 / TB 2010 C_leak = A(E) – Slope * F2 Slope : no dependance with E in first approximation
F2 Erec/Ebeam With Approximate option
MC : 20 – 300 GeV Example of fits F2 Erec/Etrue
Comparison TB/MC Compatible with flat for MC -Trend to drop with E with TB data -Flat or increasing for MC E_TB / Etrue (GeV)
TB2010 : A Fit with /without : Approximate option A currently calculated on event by event basis - Reflect the tendancy - Point at 300 GeV ? Current approximation of A(E) event per event
ISS Data Approximate Etrue with the energy of the integrated profile. Black/Red : 4 month data Grey/Orange : profile H Green : current guess of A per event
TB2010 : slope Etrue (GeV)
Systematics on Cleak A : - 2% Difference observed at 300 GeV (TB) Slope : + 15 % Change of slope in MC >> 300 GeV 1 TeV
MC : Fit of “0.025”
New MC set summary Old MC set summary 400k events generated for each set in STARlight Radius adjusted for matching exponential slope of t-spectrum Fully.
ECAL Alignment with e and π data D. BOUMEDIENE LPC Clermont-Ferrand CALICE meeting – Argonne 19/03/2008.
Z’ analysis status M.Levchenko 1PNPI M.Levchenko.
Responsibles: Jon Butterworth (UCL), Claire Gwenlan (Oxford), Daniela Rebuzzi (Pavia, INFN) ATLAS MC Validation Meeting, 24 May 2011 HERWIG validation.
FSI and Mw(qqqq) 1 FSI and Mw(qqqq) Marie Legendre, Djamel Boumediene, Patrice Perez, Oliver Buchmüller … an alternative approach … PFCUT and PCUT update.
Optimization of exclusion cut for the + and (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
1 6 th September 2007 C.P. Ward Sensitivity of ZZ→llνν to Anomalous Couplings Pat Ward University of Cambridge Neutral Triple Gauge Couplings Fit Procedure.
20 Jan 2009SiD Benchmark Meeting1 Chargino / Neutralino Analysis Update Yiming Li University of Oxford.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Longitudinal shower profile - CERN electron runs Valeria Bartsch University College London.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive 0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
Cross Section meeting, 5 Nov 1999 Maria Girone1 Preliminary results on the WW fully leptonic cross section for the LEPC Maria Girone Imperial College.
ORCA from ANTARES modules J. Brunner 06/10/2012. Detector Hexagonal layout a la IceCube 37 lines, distance 20m 25 ANTARES storeys z = 4.5m Equipped.
Theoretical and Experimental Probability Today you will learn to: calculate the theoretical and experimental probabilities of an event. M07.D-S.3.1.1:
Recent Results on (3770) Physics at BES Ming-gang Zhao (For BES Collaboration) The 44 th Rencontres de Moriond, QCD and High Energy Interactions March.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, August, 2005 GLAST 1 Energy Method Selections Data Set: All Gamma (GR-HEAD1.615) Parametric Tracker Last Layer Profile 4 Methods.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
FCal TB2003 Shower profiles: G4/MC - Test beam DATA comparison A.Artamonov and ITEP group /afs/cern.ch/user/g/gorbunov/public/prof_note.pdf.
Beam profile vs time Analyzed Vx vs Vy distributions vs time for –Run 72 (13:26:02 – 28:25) –Run 73 (13:36:10 – 13:37:30) –Run 74 (43:12 – 44:21) Binned.
Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.
1 Studies on Exclusion Limits N.Andari, L. Fayard, M.Kado, F.Polci LAL- Orsay LAL meeting 23/07/2009.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
SANE Asymmetries Hovhannes Baghdasaryan. Measurement We are measuring Assumption is that background asymmetry is small Then Measured asymmetry is the.
CDF Workshop 2003 University of Toronto April Shabnaz Pashapour University of Toronto Under supervision of Professor Pekka K. Sinervo Towards a.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Π 0 and η meson production in pp collisions at 0.9, 2.76 and 7 TeV measured with ALICE LHC on the march November 2011 Boris Polishchuk (IHEP, Protvino),
BESIII Cell-type EMC Photon Position Measurement Zhe Wang Mar
1 The comparisons between with and without JES uncertainty. jet with pt > 30 GeV, |eta| 40. Jet Y is calculated by 0.5*log[(E+pz)/(E-pz)] CMS Data.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models Four predicted Far CC spectrum.
Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Inclusive charm cross-section and charm hadrons production fractions F. Di Capua.
MKD Reliability run Viliam Senaj TCM meeting 18/11/2014.
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B + D 0 D 0 K + B + D.
Developing and Using a Simple Regression Equation. The simple regression model is based on the equation for a straight line: Yc = A+BX.
Observation in BaBar of a narrow resonance in the D + s 0 system at 2317 MeV Roger Barlow Manchester University For the B A B AR Collaboration.
Measurement of b-tagging Fake rates in Atlas Data M. Saleem * In collaboration with Alexandre Khanov** F. Raztidinova**, P.Skubic * *University of Oklahoma,
1 May 27, 2005 Comparison tower A data and Montecarlo OVERVIEW Comparison of MC (EM- v 4r060302p18 ) and tower A data using the “baseline” run (Run )
Improved measurements of the b quark mass at LEP María José Costa (IFIC-València) ICHEP 2002 Amsterdam Motivations to measure m b at M Z. Observables sensitive.
Calculating Slope of a Line What you should have remembered from Gr. 9! See…your teachers told you you’d see it again…..and??? They were correct!!
Status of Tracking at DESY Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Hakan Yilmaz, Anne Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis, Fabrizio Salvatore.
Ideas for in-situ calibration for the EMC S.Paganis, K.Loureiro ( Wisconsin ) input from+discussions with T.Carli, F.Djama, G.Unal, D.Zerwas, M.Boonekamp,
Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.
Certifying Geant4-based calorimeter simulations for the LCD Dhiman Chakraborty, Guilherme Lima, Jeremy McCormick, Vishnu Zutshi NICADD, NIU ALCWG-Cal Meeting.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL Towards paper Naomi van der Kolk.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.
Matteo Volpi, Luca Fiorini Timing study with Muons at 90º from first beam PRELIMINARY STUDY (Barcelona) 1 Tile Timing Group meeting 17 September 2008.
Day 8, Topic: Relating X-t and V-t graphs Objective: I will correctly illustrate the comparison of the x-t and v-t graphs for acceleration. Science.
Klaus Rabbertz Hamburg, Germany, Terascale Workshop Klaus Rabbertz, KIT 6. Physics at the Terascale Workshop, Hamburg, 2012 Determination.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.