We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrayden Dobkins
Modified over 2 years ago
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com Impact of ponderosa pine thinning on Abert’s squirrel (Sciurus aberti) populations in Boulder County, CO Kelly J. Worden 1 and Catherine Kleier 2 (1) Red Rocks Community College, Lakewood, CO; (2) Regis University, Denver, CO INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS LITERATURE CITED RESULTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Abert’s squirrel ( Sciurus aberti ) is generally assumed to be ecologically dependent on southwestern ponderosa pine forests for food, cover, and nest sites (Nash and Seaman 1977; Keith 2003), but the structure of this habitat has changed dramatically since European settlement. Once open and park-like (Covington and Moore 1994; Moore et al. 1999), with logging, grazing, and wildfire suppression, ponderosa pine forests have typically become thick, uniform stands of even-aged young pines (Mast 2003). Efforts to restore ponderosa pine forests to pre-settlement conditions are widespread throughout the southwest; these efforts most often include aggressive thinning and prescribed burns (Covington and Moore 1994; Covington et al. 1997; Moore et al. 1999; Allen et al. 2002). Intensive thinning treatments may be detrimental to Abert’s squirrel because they remove interlocking canopy trees, dramatically decrease tree density often resulting in densities of <60 trees/ha, decrease both the number of large trees and forest structure diversity, and alter the availability of fungi (Mast et al. 1999; Allen et al. 2002; Keith 2003; Dodd et al. 2006). On the other hand, restoration initiatives that involve only “thinning-from-below” (removal of saplings) may improve Abert’s squirrel habitat as characteristics of presettlement forests are achieved; recently, the recruitment and survival of Abert’s squirrel showed a negative correlation with the number of small saplings (Dodd et al. 2006). METHODS Figure 1. Study location. This work was funded by Boulder County Parks and Open Space. Special thanks to Norris Dodd and Jennifer Frey for their expertise in identifying feeding sign, to BCPOS personnel for their guidance, and to Rebecca Auger, Veronica Given, Geoff Greenfield, Nicole Hupp, and Patrick Sawyer for their help in the field. Twenty seven 4-hectare monitoring plots were established in 9 different areas of Heil Valley Ranch (Figure 1). Each monitoring plot consists of 5 parallel transects, 50m apart, forming a 200x200m area. Within each plot, 1m 2 quadrats were used to quantify the abundance of Abert’s squirrel over-wintering feeding sign. Quadrats were placed every 12.5m along each of the 5 transects, giving a total of 85 samples per monitoring plot. General vegetation characteristics reported to influence Abert’s squirrel populations were measured using the point-centered-quarter method to collect data on 40 trees per plot. This allowed calculation of basal area and of density corresponding to size classes. Only one plot in thinned forest (N=8) and one plot in unthinned forest (N=19) had no evidence of Abert’s squirrel feeding sign (see Table 1 for frequency of sign type). The highest squirrel density (0.315 squirrels/ha) was found in an unthinned plot. The second highest squirrel density (0.101 squirrels/ha) was found in a plot that had been thinned in 2006. When all feeding sign is considered, there is a mean of 0.061 squirrels/ha. When cones are excluded, the density drops to 0.032 squirrels/ha. Feeding sign without cones was considered as other herbivores may also chew cones. Plots located in unthinned stands have greater canopy cover than plots in thinned stands (Table 2). In areas that have been thinned, medium sized trees make up the majority of the stand while in unthinned areas, the proportion of medium and small sized trees is nearly equal (Figure 2). The density of Abert’s squirrels tends to be higher in unthinned stands but the difference is not significant (Figure 3). When the sampling areas are ranked according to Abert’s squirrel density, Abert’s squirrel tends to prefer forest with relatively high density of large sized ponderosa pines (also see Table 3). Table 1. Frequency of Abert’s squirrel feeding sign. Table 2. Vegetation characteristics. Size classes are according to DBH measurements as follows: small = 0 to 20cm; medium = 20.5 to 50cm; large = >50.5cm. * indicates significant difference at p<0.05. Figure 2. Relative density of ponderosa pine size classes. Figure 3. Abert’s squirrel density. Table 3. Relationship of squirrel density to vegetation chars. The direction and strength of the relationship is indicated by the correlation coefficient (r). We found no differences between Abert’s squirrel densities in thinned and unthinned ponderosa pine stands at Heil Valley Ranch in 2008. Many studies have indicated that Abert’s squirrels prefer forests that include trees over 40cm DBH (see Keith 2003). Importantly, Heil Valley Ranch showed no difference in the density of large trees between the thinned and unthinned stands. Therefore, although the overall tree density may differ, the major determining factor for the squirrels, large trees, was not different, and so a difference in squirrel density may not have been expected. The forest data also show that while there are more medium sized trees in the thinned plots, this difference did not affect squirrel densities. So, while some authors have argued that thinning is good for squirrel densities (Keith 1965) and others have argued that thinning is bad for squirrel densities (Koprowski 2005), our study indicates that thinning may not have an effect if the density of trees with DBH over 40cm remains the same. a ab b b Figure 3. Abert’s squirrel density as estimated by all over-winter feeding sign and by peeled twigs and terminal branch clippings only (mean±SE). Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05). Allen, C.D., M. Savage, D.A. Falk, K.F. Suckling, TW Swetnam, T. Schulke, P.B. Stacey, P. Morgan, M. Hoffman, and J.T. Klingel. 2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecological Applications 12: 1418-1433. Covington, W.W., P.Z. Fule, M.M. Moore, S.C. Hart, T.E. Kolb, J.N. Mast, S.S. Sackett, and M.R. Wagner. 1997. Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the southwest. Journal of Forestry 95: 23-29. Covington, W.W. and M.M. Moore. 1994. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure: changes since Euro-American settlement. Journal of Forestry 92: 39-47. Dodd, N.L., R.E. Schweinsburg, and S. Boe. 2006. Landscape scale forest habitat relationships to tassel-eared squirrel populations: implications for ponderosa pine forest restoration. Restoration Ecology 14: 537-547. Keith, J.O. 2003. The Abert’s squirrel ( Sciurus aberti ): a technical conservation assessment. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/abertsquirrel.pdf. http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/abertsquirrel.pdf Koprowski, J.L. 2005. Management and conservation of tree squirrels: the importance of endemism, species richness, and forest condition. Pages 245-250 in Gottfried, G.J., B.S. Gebow, L.G. Eskew,, C.B. Edminster, comps. Connecting mountain islands and desert seas: biodiversity and management of the Madrean Archipelago II. Proc. RMRS-P-36. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p036/rmrs_p036_245_250.pdf. http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p036/rmrs_p036_245_250.pdf Mast, J.N. 2003. Tree health and forest structure. Pages 215-232 in P. Freiderici, ed. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Island Press, Washington D.C. Mast, J.N., P.Z. Fule, M.M. Moore, W.W. Covington, and A.E.M. Waltz. 1999. Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecological Applications 9: 228-239. Moore, M.M., W.W. Covington, and P.Z. Fule. 1999. Reference conditions and ecological restoration: a southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecological Applications 9: 1266-1277. Nash, D.J. and R.N. Seaman. 1977. Sciurus aberti. Mammalian Species 80: 1-5. Figure 2. Relative density of ponderosa pines by size class (see Table 2).
Effects of Restoration Thinning Treatments on Water Relations and Photosynthesis of Four Size Classes of Pinus ponderosa Kjerstin R. Skov, Kimberly F.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Thesis Erin Harrington Advisors Bobbi Low Phil Myers.
Precipitation Effects on Tree Ring Width for Ulmus americana L
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2.  USGS Western Ecological.
4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview of Vegetation Data, Modeling and Strategies Used to Develop the Proposed Action Neil McCusker Silviculturist 4FRI.
Silvicultural experiments exploring linkages between stand structural diversity and ecological variables in California Carl Skinner, Martin Ritchie, Eric.
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Introduction Methods Results and Conclusions References Acknowledgements Figures and Tables Table 1. Habitat suitability index for forests with different.
Incorporating knowledge of natural and human disturbances in the management and conservation of montane pine-juniper forests in Pakistan Asbjornsen 1,
Changing competitors and dynamics in a desert rodent community Glenda M. Yenni, Department of Biology, Utah State University Abstract: Recently, attempts.
Tree distribution patterns in the southwest Jemez Mountains Kamal Humagain 1, Robert Cox 1, and James Cain 2 1 Texas Tech University 2 New Mexico State.
Estimating Variation in Landscape Analysis. Introduction General Approach –Create spatial database (GIS) –Populate polygons with sample data –Simulate.
Forest Dynamics on the Hickory Ridge of St. Catherines Island Alastair Keith-Lucas Forestry and Geology Department, University of the South Introduction.
Baseline Urban Landscape C D Agricultural Extensification of Urban Landscape Weak Regulating & Supporting Ecosystem Services Weak Food Provisioning Services.
Kim Tarde Vegetation Ecology Summer 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Changes in fire regime, forest structure, and tree spatial patterns in ponderosa pine forests of the northern Colorado Front Range, 1860 to 2012 Peter.
Results I) Regional Survey Rarefaction curves leveled off across sites, suggesting that the sample effort was sufficient to capture differences between.
Things just don’t add up with SDI… Martin Ritchie PSW Research Station.
Implications of Beetle Killed Lodgepole Pine Effects on the Red Squirrel in Winter Taylor Loen Winter Ecology Spring 2009 University of Colorado Boulder.
Effects of hillslope terracing on productivity and soil properties in semi-arid Ponderosa Pine habitat in Western Montana L. Cerise¹ ², D.S. Page-Dumroese¹,
Subnivean Access in Forests of Varying Density Patrick Ellsworth Winter Ecology, Spring 2013 Mountain Research Station.
Range of Natural Variability Pete Fulé Northern Arizona University What is RNV? RNV relates to … Ecosystem Management … Ecological Restoration … Conservation.
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Effects of Prairie Management on Soil Characteristics and Bees METHODS RESULTS Soil Characteristics Analysis of variance (ANOVA) suggests that there.
Structure and Demography of Tree Communities in Tropical Secondary Forest Recovering From Logging Keala Cummings and Dr. Diane Thomson 2007 Keala Cummings.
Selection of sap well trees by a keystone species: the red-naped sapsucker (Sphyrapicus nuchalis) Conserving keystone species requires understanding their.
EFFECTS OF FIRE ON MONTANE FOREST BIRDS IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA Chris Kirkpatrick and Courtney J. Conway Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research.
Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Survey of a Sky.
Module 14: Exotic Species Introduction Cameron, Barney, Puja, Nate, Crystal, Rachael Atlantic Forest, Brazil SEE-U 2000.
o What were we looking at? o The Pit Crew studied soil patterns throughout the landscape.
Comparing Pre-settlement, Pre-treatment and Post-treatment Stand Structure at Lonetree Restoration Site: Incorporating GIS into Restoration By Christine.
Habitat Use of the Snowshoe Hare Melissa Pacheco Winter Ecology Spring 2010 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Ecological determinants of nest-site selection by a keystone engineer: the red-naped sapsucker Chris Floyd, Jessica Lowney, and Evan Weiher Department.
“Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning” Heather E. Erickson Recent soils research from the Teakettle.
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY I: BIODIVERSITY Community: Any assemblage of populations [of plants and/or animals] in a given area or habitat.
A snowpack comparison between a limber pine site and a spruce site within a spruce forest Sam Sartwell, Winter Ecology, EBIO 4100, Spring 2014, CU Mountain.
Forest Ecological Relationships: Teakettle and Plumas Lassen Administrative Study Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Davis, CA
Native Bees Along Elevation Gradients as Bioindicators of Climate Change Scott Daniels 1, Dave Smith 2, Neil Cobb 3 1. Cesar Chavez High School, Laveen,
Primary Invertebrate Reef Grazers on Little Cayman Tara Bonebrake and Leah Brandt.
Determining Reference Conditions for Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests.
Demonstration: FVS-FEE with SVS1 Forest Change and Fire in Colorado’s Front Range A presentation that uses computer-generated drawings and animations to.
Community and landscape ecology of forest interiors at Merry Lea Aradhana J. Roberts and Jonathon Schramm Goshen College Abstract Introduction Materials.
Gishwati Forest Boundary Kinyekanda Results Introduction Methods (continued) References Discussion Gishwati forest lies within the Albertine Rift and contains.
Vegetation Density and Snow Accumulation Evan Esfahani Winter Ecology 2014 Mountain Research Station.
TREE WELLS: COMPARISON OF CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS TREES Magali Weissgerber, Winter Ecology, Spring 2015, CU Mountain research Station.
The Effect of a Nitrogen-Fixing Tree (Robinia pseudoacacia) on the Productivity and Diversity of Understory Shrub Communities. Redding, K. Michael* and.
Tree-rings: records of the past, insights into the future
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Ch 20 Community Ecology: Species Abundance + Diversity.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.