Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CLASSIFICATION (U) GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment) Program Manager Name Review Date PROGRAM NAME The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CLASSIFICATION (U) GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment) Program Manager Name Review Date PROGRAM NAME The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all."— Presentation transcript:

1 CLASSIFICATION (U) GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment) Program Manager Name Review Date PROGRAM NAME The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all files are properly marked with the correct classifications in accordance with SECNAV M-5510.36.

2 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U)

3 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Key Performance Parameters Program Requirements PARAMETER STATUS Improving ConstantDegrading Legend Meets Objective Meets Threshold Below Threshold KPPThresholdPerformanceObjective Status/ Basis Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Basis Legend E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy

4 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Program Requirements PARAMETER STATUS Legend Meets Objective Meets Threshold Below Threshold Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. KSAs / Other Attributes KSA Status/ Basis Other Attribute Status/ Basis E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy

5 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Program Resources BUDGET AND PLANNING Program Funding & Quantities

6 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Program Resources Obligations and Expenditures BUDGET AND PLANNING Legend Greater than or equal to benchmark 1% to <10% below the benchmark Greater than 10% below benchmark Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Not Applicable

7 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Program Resources MANNING Staffing Adequacy Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Not ApplicableMeets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Contractor Support Services MilitaryCivilian

8 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Program Resources MANNING Staffing Adequacy SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADERS / PROJECT MANAGERS O-5/6 / PAYBAND III NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT ELEMENT NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT COMPONENT’S SUBSYSTEM ELEMENTS MAY BE ALIGNED WITH PROGRAM OFFICE OR OTHER COMPETENCIES PAPM / TOC Reduction MANAGER PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD T&E PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD BFM PROGRAM MANAGER DEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER ALIGNED WITH OTHER COMPETENCIES AND ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO PROGRAM OFFICE PAPM / IPT LEADER OF MAJOR PRODUCT “X” PAPM / IPT LEADER OF MAJOR PRODUCT “Y” PAPM / IPT LEADER OF MAJOR PRODUCT “N”..... FUNCTIONAL LEAD SE FUNCTIONAL LEAD COST FUNCTIONAL LEAD CONT FUNCTIONAL LEAD LEGAL PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER COMMON ACROSS ALL SYSCOMS SUB-PRODUCT LEVEL POSITIONS POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE PROGRAM OFFICE (PO) POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCY AND ASSIGNED TO THE PO POSITIONS THAT ARE EITHER POSITIONS THAT ARE MISSION FUNDED POSITIONS THAT CAN BE MISSION FUNDED OR WCF “CORE” PROGRAM OFFICE “SUB-PRODUCT” LEVEL “CORE” FUNCTIONS REPORTING ALIGNMENT FUNDING ALIGNMENT MODEL Program Management Office Framework PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD LOG

9 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST ESTIMATING EventRatingRationale Post-IOC/FDD cost estimates and the projection of the TOC Objective versus SCP baseline are substantiated by assessed fielded systems performance, operations, and sustainment related expenditure to date. Post-IOC/FDD Cost Estimating Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Program Planning / Execution

10 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) T&E ItemRatingRationale Major deficiencies identified in IOT&E and/or FOT&E reports are available for review. Approved Test Plans for correction of deficiencies and/or system modifications are aligned with deployment and sustainment strategies and schedules. TEST AND EVALUATION Program Planning / Execution Test and Evaluation Status Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria

11 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) TEST AND EVALUATION Note: This slide should be used to report on Operational Test Agency (OTA) findings of deficiency. If all deficiencies are resolved, delete this slide. Program Planning / Execution Deficiency Rating/ Basis Rationale Vehicle failed to meet Radar Detection Range Threshold Single Engine Acceleration below threshold Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Status of Major T&E Deficiencies E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy

12 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Technology Assessment Maturity Summary (As Applicable) TECHNICAL MATURITY Program Planning / Execution Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Basis Legend TRL Legend Does Not Meet TRL 8 Does Not Meet TRL 9 Previous Current E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy LV = Level B = Basis Key Critical Technology Elements Previous GateCurrent TRL MRLIRLTRLMRLIRL LVB B B B B B Rotors 8C8C8C9T9T8C Propulsion 8E8E8T9E9T8T Actuators 8C7C8C9C9T8T UHF Antenna Assembly 7T8T8E8T8E8E Digital Receiver 8C8C7C8T8T8T

13 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) TECHNICAL MATURITY Program Planning / Execution PCA and ISR Technical Assessment Summary SETR EventSETR Date Close-Out Date Critical Requests for Action Non-Critical Requests for Action TotalOpenClosedTotalOpenClosed PCA ISR Creation Date

14 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Sustainment ItemRatingRationale Sustainment program logistically supports all system performance capabilities introduced to date, such that KPP/KSA capability parameters are assessed to meet threshold levels. The Sustainment Program is executing per the LCSP/LRFS. Sustainment related performance metrics are measured, assessed, reported, and used to revise Sustainment Program planning and execution. Supply Chain Management to include a program of DMSMS is operating effectively to support operations and maintenance. SUSTAINMENT Program Planning / Execution Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Sustainment and Logistics Activities Page 1 of 2

15 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Sustainment ItemRatingRationale Maintenance is operating to specified levels of repair and is supporting operations. The training system is operating to plan, is supporting the manpower KPP threshold (if applicable), and is supporting operations and maintenance. Facilities are in place and environmentally ready to support scheduled systems fielding, deployment, operations, and maintenance. SUSTAINMENT Program Planning / Execution Sustainment and Logistics Activities Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Page 2 of 2

16 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Independent Logistics Assessment Item RatingRationale ILS Management Budgeting and Funding Maintenance Planning/Execution Design Interface RAM Maturity Growth Supply Support Support and Common Equipment Human Systems Integration (MPT&E) Facilities & Platform Integration Safety & Environment Product/Technical Data Computer Resources & SW Support PHS&T Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Supports Activities Some Gaps Exist Significant Gaps Exist Independent Logistics Assessment SUSTAINMENT Program Planning / Execution

17 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) SOFTWARE Software Sub-Metric Ratings Program Planning / Execution Sub-MetricEventsRatingRationale Organization Software sustainment capability (e.g. SSA), facilities, and infrastructure have been established and are supporting systems operations. Experienced software maintenance staff are in place and are being retained. Quality Software sustainment is being conducted, as detailed in the LCSP, and is being tracked, analyzed, and reported per established software metrics. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

18 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Size / Stability Sub-Metric Software Size / StabilityRemarks / Notes Program Planning / Execution SOFTWARE Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

19 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Organization Sub-Metric Software Organization Program Planning / Execution Remarks / Notes SOFTWARE Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

20 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Cost/Schedule Sub-Metric Software Cost/Schedule Program Planning / Execution Remarks / Notes SOFTWARE Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

21 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Quality Sub-Metric Software Quality Program Planning / Execution Remarks / Notes SOFTWARE Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

22 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Contract Execution Breakdown Contractor/Government Performer RatingRationale Contractor/Government Performer 1 Contractor/Government Performer 2 Program Planning / Execution Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Criteria: Contractor/government work performance is meeting program performance metrics and contractual delivery requirements in accordance with scheduled milestones.

23 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Contractor/Government Performer 1 Rating Contractor/Government Performer 1 Program Planning / Execution Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION

24 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Contractor 1 Earned Value Metrics CPI/SPI Legend >= 0.95 >= 0.90 and < 0.95 <.90 TCPI Legend | TCPI-CPI | <= 0.05 | TCPI-CPI | <= 0.10 and > 0.05 | TCPI-CPI | > 0.10 CPI/SPI Summary CPISPITCPI Jul 20090.900.921.02 Jun 20090.930.941.02 May 20090.950.961.00 Apr 20090.97 1.00 Mar 20090.980.961.00 Feb 20091.210.961.00

25 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION

26 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Non-EVMS Contract Status MetricValue Schedule Used / Allocated: Budget Used / Allocated: Behind Schedule (Y/N): Overspending (Y/N): Program Planning / Execution Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION

27 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Contractor Performance Assessment Report B Exceptional P Very Good G Satisfactory Y Marginal R Unsatisfactory ► No Change ▲ Improving ▼ Degrading Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION B Outstanding P Excellent G Good Y Satisfactory R Unsatisfactory CPAR Legend IPAR Legend

28 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) EVMS Contractor Staffing Plan / Execution Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION

29 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) EVMS Work Package Status Program Planning / Execution Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION

30 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Government Performance Assessment EventRatingRationale Program Office releases funding to contractor(s)/government performer(s) to maintain program schedules and to ensure effective and timely logistics and sustainment products and services. RMB has been established. Risks are being mitigated per established timelines and are not being realized as issues. Program Planning / Execution Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. GOVERNMENT PROGRAM OFFICE PERFORMANCE

31 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Sub-metricEventsRatingRationale Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) SCRM is active and continually assessing supply chain threats associated with design, procurement, and life cycle sustainment. TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION Status of Technology Protection Sub-Metrics Program Planning / Execution

32 PROGRAM NAME GATE 6 Sustainment (PoPS) DATE CLASSIFICATION (U) External Influencers INTERDEPENDENCIES Solid denotes current system Dash denotes future system Arrow to Program XYZ denotes supports Program XYZ Arrow from Program XYZ denotes Program XYZ supports Indicates program are interdependent No known issues affecting inter-related programs Resolvable interface issues affecting programs Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs Program H Program I (upgrades) Program J Program K Program L Program M Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Program F Program G Program XYZ C S P Programs, plus major public/private Sustainment infrastructure Interdependencies


Download ppt "CLASSIFICATION (U) GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment) Program Manager Name Review Date PROGRAM NAME The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google