We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byQuintin Carroll
Modified about 1 year ago
Mine dewatering for pit slope stability Concepts and Studies By Dr Houcyne El Idrysy Astana, Kazakhstan, 31 March 2014
Presentation Topics Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. 1.Groundwater flow and pore pressure concepts 2.Hydrogeological conceptual models 3.Development of numerical groundwater models 4.Optimisation of pit dewatering/depressurization and input into mine design 5.Design of pit dewatering/depressurization and monitoring 6.Conclusions
Relationship between pore water pressure and rock strength Effective stress (σ') acting at a point is calculated from two parameters, total stress (σ) and pore water pressure (u) as follows (Terzaghi, 1943): ' = - u(1) The relationship between the shear strength of a rock material and pore pressure can be expressed as (Freeze and Cherry, 1979): = ( - u) tan + c(2) where is the shear strength on a potential failure surface, σ the total normal stress, u is pore water pressure, c the cohesion available along the potential failure surface, and φ is the angle of internal friction of the material on the potential failure surface. © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Dewatering leads to increased rock mass strength and hence more stable and steep slopes in the mine. In a saturated ore body, pore water pressure exerts a significant control on the effective stress of the rock mass (in both porous and fractured media)
Pore water pressure versus phreatic surface © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Considering only a phreatic surface in the slope stability analysis is not enough for the design of optimal pit slopes Dewatering well Drain Open pit Profile Dewatered formation Depressurised formation
Mine Dewatering/Depressurisation Study for Slope Optimisation and Design Required tasks Regional and local numerical groundwater modelling Transient simulation of mine dewatering for the mine life Optimisation and design of mine dewatering system Surface water hydrology and flood risk assessment Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Objectives Estimate potential inflows into the mine Assess the ability and time to dewater/depressurise the pit Design dewatering system to achieve stable slope and acceptable mining conditions Prepare surface water control and flood protection if needed
Approach to groundwater modelling for slope design input Advanced modelling of pore pressure is not usually required for input to the analysis of a pit slope stability. It is required only when pore water pressure and groundwater regime are identified as controlling factors due to the geotechnical setting of the pit Therefore, before embarking in an advanced modelling and simulation of pore pressure, assess if this is a controlling factor in the pit stability When required, the process of interaction between both studies can be very complex but rewarding Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved.
Step 1: Conceptual Hydrogeological Model Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. 3D View 3D View
Step 2: Numerical Groundwater Model (Example) © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Criteria: Scale Layers Resolution Boundaries GMS
Numerical Groundwater Model: Criteria Select a suitable groundwater modelling software: MODFLOW, MODFLOW-SURFACT, FEFLOW, MineDW Type and purpose of model: transient/steady state, flow/salt/contaminant migration? Model Parameters should be obtained from site specific investigations and lab testing; Constrain the model calibration using groundwater level and stream flow observations, if both available; If the data available not enough, consider not building a model Use pit shells (or the UG mine design) in the predictive model to estimate inflows and optimise a dewatering system © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved.
Model Calibration (mostly pre-mining conditions) Other criteria to verify/check: Stream flows - Flow budget (balance) © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. BH ID Observed head (mAD) Simulated head (mAD) Error / Residual, m GW1262.18261.50.69 GW2262.4261.580.82 GW3260.74260.82-0.08 GW4260.75260.470.28 GW5260.5259.950.55 GW6259.2259.080.12 GW7258.3260.03-1.73 GW8256.17256.38-0.21 GW9263.72266.46-2.74 GW10263.51260.063.45 GW11260.39266.12-5.73 GW12263.43272.7-9.27 GW13264.85273.15-8.3 GW14257.63258.25-0.62 GW15259.65262.01-2.36 GW16259.88261.6-1.72 GW17258.04258.26-0.22 GW18259.13257.461.67 GW19259.38262.11-2.73 GW20260.43261.61-1.18
Groundwater Model Sensitivity Analysis Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved.
Predictive Modelling: Dewatering Impact © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Local Model extent Regional Model extent Other possible impact could be: Loss in river or spring flow
Predictive Modelling: Inflows into the Mine Other possible results could be: – Prediction of variation of water quality over time (e.g. salinity) – Prediction of ISL potential and design – Groundwater rebound and pit lake formation after closure © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved.
Predictive Modelling: Pore Pressure Distribution Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Hydraulic Head (masl) Pit floor Drains
NorthSouth Predictive Modelling: Achieved depressurization © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. X section Pit floor Open pit Profile
Diagram of Interaction between slope stability analysis and mine dewatering optimisation © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Optimisation of mine dewateringSlope stability analysis Detailed iterative analysis level Refined numerical models and various dewatering scenarios tested Must provide optimal pore water pressure for the required slope angles Regional analysis level Regional Numerical modelling carried out and simplistic dewatering system assumed The predicted pore water pressure still indicate risk of potential slope failure Initial analytical level assessment Worse case scenario of pore water pressure: no dewatering assumed Simple phreatic surface is used in slope stability. if this indicates instable slopes:
Technologies for controlling pore water pressure in pit slopes © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. Vertical dewatering wells around and/or within the pit mine; Wick drains in low permeability materials; Passive vertical and sub-horizontal drains driven in to pit slopes or from existing underground workings; Drainage galleries installed below or behind the pit slope; Blasting can theoretically reduce pore pressure around the blast hole, but the actual extent of this still remains unknown Sequential planning of mine dewatering is important and, in cases, active dewatering may be required ahead of mining
Conclusions (I) The challenges of mine dewatering for the objective of pit slope stability depends primarily on the geological structures, rock/soil mass properties and hydrogeological setting; the level of detail of the groundwater modelling and optimisation for the purpose of providing input to pore water pressure analysis varies dramatically from one case to another Pit slope stability is more critical in low strength, low permeability saturated rock/soil masses in the proximity of the pit walls; When pore water pressure is a controlling factor in pit stability, very advanced numerical modelling of pore pressure simulation and optimisation of dewatering/depressurisation systems are required, and vice versa The optimisation of mine dewatering system must be carried out iteratively with the slope stability analysis to achieve optimal pit slope angles © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved.
Conclusions (II) Value should be added to a mine project by: Opting for international best practices that bring up to date investigation and processing tools, and new design and analytical approaches; Accepting new design ideas: dewatering wells installation, flexible and cost effective planning; Updating and Re-running coupled dewatering models and slope stability analysis during the mine development; and Using monitoring data to keep close control on the dewatering system performance, and updating the models accordingly Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved.
Thank you for your attention Take Away Statement © SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. firstname.lastname@example.org Dr Houcyne El Idrysy Senior Hydrogeologist SRK Consulting
Design Parameters. Classification in Design Stage and Assessment of Design Parameter All the efforts of the engineering geological investigation steps.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department EENV 5326 Groundwater Modeling.
Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELLING AND SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION FOR DEEPENING OF MAE MOH OPEN PIT LIGNITE MINE GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELLING AND SLOPE STABILITY.
Hydrogeology, High Lake Rob Dickin Hydrogeologist, GLL.
Induced Slip on a Large-Scale Frictional Discontinuity: Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Antonio Bobet Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Virginia Tech,
SCT Operations Investigation into Abnormal Subsidence above a Longwall Panel in the Southern Coalfield, Australia Winton Gale Managing Director SCT Operations.
Ground Water Mounding & P Evaluations Dan Wheeler Research Fellow – Soil Scientist Univ. Minnesota.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Approaches to Groundwater Modeling Conceptual Model.
CVE 515 EMBANKMENT DAM ENGINEERING ENGR S.O ODUNFA DEPT. OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA.
Direct Shear Test CEP 701 PG Lab. Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion ( in terms of total stresses ) f is the maximum shear stress the soil can take without.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 21: Groundwater Hydrology Concepts – Part 1 1.
A PRESENTATION TITLED ON SLOPE STABILITY IN OPENCAST MINES PREPARED BY: MAMTA JASWAL ( ) Government Engineering College Palanpur.
1 Interpretation and Visualization of Model Test Data for Slope Failure in Liquefying Soil Bruce L. Kutter Erik J. Malvick R. Kulasingam Ross Boulanger.
FACTORS AFFECTING SLOPE FAILURE Introduction Sr. No Name of the parameters and properties Details 1Geological DiscontinuitiesFault, Joint, bedding plane,
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 2: Surface and Groundwater Hydrologic Systems.
A Comparison of Numerical Methods and Analytical Methods in Determination of Tunnel Walls Displacement Behdeen Oraee-Mirzamani Imperial College London,
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
Getahun Wendmkun Adane March 13,2014 Groundwater Modeling and Optimization of Irrigation Water Use Efficiency to sustain Irrigation in Kobo Valley, Ethiopia.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Monitoring in the Lake Michigan Basin Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council.
§7 Stability of slopes Introduction Stability analysis of granular materials The method of slices Development for the analytical method.
A Brief Introduction to Groundwater Modeling A Brief Introduction to Groundwater Modeling Karl Payne.
Impacts of Seismic Stress on Pore Water Pressure in Clayey Soil By: Qazi Umar Farooq Lecturer Civil Engineering Dept Univ of Engg & Tech Taxila.
The Calibration Process Calibration of a flow model refers to a demonstration that the model is capable of producing field-measured heads and flows which.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
CIRCULAR FAILURE ANALYSIS Circular failure is generally occurs in slope of soil, mine dump, weak rock and highly jointed rock mass. The following information.
Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel © NERC All rights reserved Investigative modelling for the ZIGARF project… Chris.
1 Groundwater Pollution Week 03 – 0324 Continuity and Flow Nets.
1 FEM study of the faults activation Technische Universität München Joint Advanced Student School (JASS) St. Petersburg Polytechnical University Author:
Objective: conceptual model definition and steady state simulation of groundwater flow.
1 Terramin TSF Base Lining Examining the design criteria :– a risk based design process Agenda for Strathalbyn CCC Meeting Review of the relevant components.
Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.
Direct Shear Test. Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion ( in terms of total stresses ) f is the maximum shear stress the soil can take without failure,
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 8 Physical processes and tools for levee assessment and design.
1 8. Permeability (Das, chapter 7) Sections: All except 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.10.
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: –Quickly estimate certain aspects.
RP 213: LANDSLIDE AND SLOPE STABILIZATION USING PILES AND MICRO-PILES ON THE LRFD Donald L. Williams, P.E. Section Head West Virginia Department of Transportation.
10. In-Situ Stress (Das, Chapter 9) Sections: All except 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9.
Today’s Lecture: Grid design/boundary conditions and parameter selection. Thursday’s Lecture: Uncertainty analysis and Model Validation.
CHAPTER SEVEN INTRODUCTORY WELL HYDROLOGY. GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE.
-Kazem Oraee (Prof) - Arash Goodarzi (Eng) - Nikzad Oraee-Mirzamani (Phd) -Parham Khajehpour (Eng) 34th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining.
A Deterministic Bank-Stability and Toe-Erosion Model (BSTEM Version 5.4) Andrew Simon, Robert Thomas, Andrea Curini and Natasha Bankhead USDA-ARS National.
ANT11 Presentation, October, 10-13, 2011 David Vardiman Project Engineer Geotechnical Design and Excavation 1 Sanford Lab at Homestake, Lead, SD 4850L.
Lateral Earth Pressure John Sturman Rutgers University 180:473.
Vadose-zone Monitoring System key to groundwater protection and optimization of remediation strategies Dr. Ofer Dahan Ben-Gurion University
Geodynamics-based Core the University of Minnesota (UMN) - Twin Cities Martin O. Saar Donna L. Whitney 2)Overview.
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil Eng. Haytham Besaiso 1.
Comparison of Estimated Areas Contributing Recharge to Selected Springs in North-Central Florida by Using Multiple Ground-Water Flow Models Prepared in.
Advanced Hydrogeology Malcolm Reeves Civil and Geological Engineering.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.