Presentation on theme: "Micromodel in Porous Flow. WHO ARE WE? Prof. Laura Pyrak-Nolte, Purdue University James McClure Ph.D. Student, North Carolina University Mark Porter Ph.D."— Presentation transcript:
WHO ARE WE? Prof. Laura Pyrak-Nolte, Purdue University James McClure Ph.D. Student, North Carolina University Mark Porter Ph.D. Student, Oregon State University Hongkyu Yoon Research Scientist, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Fatmir Likrama Ph.D. Student, University of Texas Austin Burcu Uyusur Ph.D. Student, University of Illinois at Chicago Shivam Tripathi Ph.D. Student, Purdue University Wenhao Wang Ph.D. Student, University of Texas at Austin
Outline Introduction Experiment Image Analysis Numerical Model Conclusion& Suggestions
Capillary pressure-Saturation- Interfacial Area (P c -S-IAV) relation Traditional closure relationship assumes capillary pressure is a function of saturation alone, leading to the hysteretic moisture function Held and Celia (2001)
Hysteresis Contact Angle Hysteresis between drainage and imbibition Snap-off of nonwetting phase during imbibition Influence of local fluid configuration on pore-filling during imbibition
Experimental Set-up Two pressure sensors to monitor input and output pressures A video camera interfaced to an optical microscope to image the two phase displacement experiments.
Displacement Measurements 1-Initial saturation with decane (wetting phase) through outlet 2- Introduction of nitrogen (non-wetting phase) through inlet by pressure 3- After each pressure increment the system was allowed to equilibriate 4-Before nitrogen breakthrough, the pressure was reduced stepwise to retreat nitrogen from the system
Functional relationship between Capillary Pressure, Saturation and Interfacial Area In the context of Micro Model Data 1. Does there exist such a relationship? 2. Is it unique i.e. a.Same for Drainage and Imbibition ? b.Can it explain both primary and scanning curves? 3. What is its nature (complex or simple) ? 4. Is it complete?
Analytic model for soil characteristic curve van Genuchten Model
Assumption 1.Analytical form of van Genuchten Model holds for both primary and scanning curves with one set of parameters. 2.What it needs is an additional variable. Added Variable Plot Residuals from existing model New Variable
Key Issues: Interfaces run parallel to each other Mesh alignment –makes it difficult to distinguish between wn, ws interfaces –may be more accurate to compute interfaces in a different way Isovalue determination
Quantification of Pore Space Extract information from the mask which allows to access information needed to construct a network model –Connectivity –Location of pores and throats –Size of Pores and throats
Quantification of Pore Space Compute the solid surface using the MC algorithm Evaluate the signed distance function - local maxima correspond to pores
The Long Road Ahead Use local maxima to construct skeleton graph Topological characterization of the pore space Network model implementation and comparison with experimental results
Invasion Percolation Model Pore radii generated randomly for each lattice site. No information about the pore geometry. Could use statistical representation of pores (i.e.pore size distribution, connectivity, etc…). Relatively easy to code (20 lines or so). Can extract useful information without detailed knowledge of pore geometry (power law behavior, fractals, etc…)
Network Modeling Construct “simple” rules for flow through pore bodies and throats. –Laplace’s Law. –Contact angle considerations. –Need detailed information about pore space. –Construct “
My Too Weak Model Euclidian distance from solid to estimate pore body radii. Use circles to fill pore bodies. Need more information about the throats (namely throat width). Medial Axis (skeleton of the pore space) could provide this data.