WOVeN Model WrittenOralVisualNumerical Critically Analyze Reading research articles Reading literature Reading magazine or newspaper articles Listening to speeches Listening to lectures or presentations Exploring visual art Examining graphs and figures Examining physical specimens or objects Exploring physical demonstrations Working with numbers and formulas Examining data and statistics Exploring spreadsheets Effectively Communicate Writing essays Writing journals or reaction papers Writing research reports Presenting speeches Debating topics Explaining thoughts or positions Creating visual art Creating graphs and figures Creating physical objects Creating data Creating spreadsheets Creating statistics
Reporting Results “ENG101 students demonstrated an average of 16.3 out of 20 (81.5%) on the Written Communication rubric.”
But How Do We Use That Data? “ENG101 students demonstrated an average of 16.3 out of 20 (81.5%) on the Written Communication rubric.”
Criterion-Based Outcomes “545 out of 625 (87.2%) ENG101 students achieved the 70% competency level on the Written Communication Rubric.”
Can We Get Even More Precise?
Future Considerations Pros Precise feedback Actionable data Faculty can see the benefit Encourages “scaffolding” Cons Worse reliability? Reductionistic Overwhelming data? Demands precise rubrics
Creating a Rubric Choosing Learning Outcomes – What are the things that a “successful” student should be able to do after the class, etc.? Measureable – What would tell you that a student can do those things? What would they be able to do? Organize – Which outcomes are related to each other?