Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byCamila Bristol Modified over 2 years ago

1
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 1 Combining p-values i.e. what happens to SIGNIFICANCE when next event comes ? There are two ways: 1) difficult, correct 2) easy, approximate Frequentist way Bayesian way

2
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 2 I assume that everybody knows what are - p-values - H 0 /H 1 hypothesis (otherwise please refer to e.g. http://pdg.lbl.gov/2010/reviews/rpp2010-rev-statistics.pdf ) For a short cut: p-value = probability of less probable region of H 0 hypothesis 1-p = Significance of the H 1 hypthesis (power 1- , error of type II) (only in case of 1 random variable !!! )

3
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 3 1rst way

4
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 4

5
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 5

6
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 6 Excercise: suppose the 2° event owns similar p-value than the 1rst one 2.98 sigmas Of course, with the FISHER rule we forgot about any correlation! Moreover is somehow wrong in case of 2 p-values quite different: p 1 = 0.1 p 2 =0.0001 → p TOT = 0.00012 > p 2

7
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 7 It turns out that the FISHER rule is too conservative in case of two independent Poissonians, being the lowest limiting p-value: In the simplest case of no correlation, with 2 candidates as before, the result provides: 3.39 sigmas BUT the final result should be even greater since that probability is: This is a simple demonstration that the FISHER rule is CONSERVATIVE and no so good for Discrete Cases

8
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 8 WHY it is “difficult” the Bayesian way ? If we simulate 1 million of pseudo-experiments for 1candidate, for 2 candidates a priori we should simulate (1 million) 2 = 10 12 !! Some tricks may be applies by - Integrating the likelihood over a “normal domain” (simply connected) - Computing 1-p - Decoupling variables as much as possible (this is formally correct) Then, a Multivariate Likelihood computation is affordable.

9
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 9 In the example of the simplest OPERA case the correct result is: 3.60 sigmas 98.22%1.77%0.01% 98.22% 1.77% 0.01% 96.452%1.739% 1.742% 0.018% 0.031%0% Error due to limited exps.

10
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 10

11
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 11 Backup

12
Luca Stanco – INFN - Padova2 December 2010 12 Feldman-Cousins is “no meaning” in case of few events (<5) and more than 1 random variable Junk may be used (Modified Frequentist Technique): (arXiv:hep-ex/9902006v1 5 Feb 1999) Valid only for fully independent searches For example it is used by D0 for the Higgs search but: - CDF uses Bayes - the two methods agree within 10% on the single channel and 1% overall - Tevatron decided to release the official result based on the CDF/Bayes analysis.

Similar presentations

OK

Module 1: Statistical Issues in Micro simulation Paul Sousa.

Module 1: Statistical Issues in Micro simulation Paul Sousa.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on meaning of colors Read ppt online Ppt on different types of internet access devices Ppt on intel core i3 processor Ppt on power generation using speed breaker Ppt on atrial septal defect sound Ppt on world photography day Ppt on body language gestures Download ppt on civil disobedience movement in 1930 Ppt on statistics in maths what does median