Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMadeline Ishman Modified about 1 year ago

1
Regional frequency analysis of hydrological droughts Henrik Madsen DHI Water & Environment

2
About This PowerPoint includes a self-guided tour on regional frequency analysis of hydrological droughts. It has been prepared as part of the text book Hydrological Drought - Processes and Estimation Methods for Streamflow and Groundwater, Chapter 6. To navigate through this presentation different options are available: 1. To move forward or backward following the chronological order of the presentation use the Arrow Buttons in the lower right corner. 2. To move to a specific category use the Category Buttons in the lower panel. 3. Main categories may be divided into subjects. In this case you can move to a subject using the Subject Buttons to the left. Within each category or subject page numbers are shown in the upper right corner. Introduction Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example 1/1

3
Introduction Main objectives of regional frequency analysis: 1.To reduce the sampling uncertainties in the estimation of extreme drought events by combining streamflow records at different sites in a region that can be assumed to have similar drought characteristics (space substitutes time). 2.To provide the basis for estimation of extreme drought events at ungauged sites by relating drought statistics with catchment characteristics. Motivation: The mean value at a site can usually be estimated adequately even if the available record is short. Second and higher order moments, however, have large sampling uncertainties. Regional data are applied to obtain more reliable estimates of these statistics. Introduction Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example 1/1

4
Index method Assumptions: 1.Product moment ratios or L-moment ratios of order 2 and higher (coefficient of variation (CV), skewness (CS), kurtosis) are constant in the region. 2.Data at the different sites in the region follow the same statistical distribution except for scale. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Introduction 1/3

5
Index method L-moment approach (Hosking & Wallis, 1997): 1.At each site calculate L-moment ratio estimates (L-CV, L-CS and L-Kurtosis). 2.Calculate regional record-length-weighted average L-moment ratio estimates. 3.Based on the regional L-moment ratio estimates determine the parameters of the normalised regional distribution. 4.Calculate the normalised regional T-year event using where (s) is the average annual number of drought events (at- site or regional estimate), and F -1 (.) is the inverse of the cdf of the normalised regional distribution Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Introduction 2/3

6
Index method 5.Calculate the T-year event estimate of the drought characteristic at an arbitrary site by multiplying the at-site mean value estimate (s) with the regional normalised quantile An estimate of the associated uncertainty (variance) is given by where Var{ (s)} is the variance of the at-site mean value estimate and Var{z T (s)} is the variance of the normalised quantile estimate Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Introduction 3/3

7
Regional procedure - outline Building of the regional model includes: 1.Grouping of sites into homogeneous (or fairly homogeneous) regions. 2.Determination of a regional distribution in each of the defined regions. 3.Estimation of regional parameters (L-Cv and L-Cs) and associated uncertainties. 4.Determination of regression model that relates the mean value with catchment characteristics. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction 1/2 Split Sample Grouping

8
Regional procedure - outline Tools available for the regional analysis: L-moment analysis - testing of regional homogeneity - determination of a regional distribution Generalised least squares (GLS) regression - estimation of regional parameters and associated uncertainties - testing of regional homogeneity - determination of regression model Split sample grouping - grouping of sites into homogenous regions Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Split Sample Grouping Introduction 2/2

9
L-moment analysis Objective: L-moment analysis is applied for testing regional homogeneity and determination of a regional distribution. L-moment ratio diagram: For a visual judgement an L-moment ratio diagram is constructed. In an L-moment ratio diagram sample estimates of the L-moment ratios L-Cv, L-Cs and L-kurtosis are compared to the theoretical relationships for a range of probability distributions. L-moment statistics: For a more formal evaluation Hosking and Wallis (1993) proposed a test statistic for regional homogeneity and a goodness-of-fit statistic for determination of a regional distribution. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 1/11

10
L-moment ratio diagram L-moment ratio diagram illustrating the relationship between L-skewness and L-kurtosis for the generalised Pareto (GP), generalised extreme value (GEV), log-normal (LN), gamma (GAM), Weibull (WEI), Gumbel (GUM) and exponential (EXP) distributions. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 2/11

11
L-moment ratio diagram Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression L-moment ratio diagram illustrating the relationship between L-Cv and L-skewness for the two-parameter generalised Pareto (GP), log-normal (LN), gamma (GAM), and Weibull (WEI) distributions and the one-parameter exponential (EXP) distribution. Introduction Split Sample Grouping 3/11

12
Test of regional homogeneity The dispersion of points in the L-moment diagram of the L-moment estimates from the different sites in the region gives an indication of the regional homogeneity. The question is if the observed variability is significant (i.e. the points form a heterogeneous group) or can be explained by sampling uncertainties. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 4/11

13
Test of regional homogeneity Regional homogeneity measure: Comparison of observed regional variability of L-moment statistics with the variability that would be expected in a homogeneous region. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 5/11 ObservedSimulated

14
Test of regional homogeneity Test statistic: where V is the record-length-weighted standard deviation of the L-CV estimates, and v and v are, respectively, the mean and standard deviation of V in a homogeneous region (determined by simulation). Evaluation of H-statistic: H < 1:Acceptably homogeneous region 1 < H < 2: Possibly heterogeneous region H > 2: Definitely heterogeneous region Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 6/11

15
Choice of regional distribution The grouping of points in the L-moment ratio diagram is compared with the theoretical L-moment relationships for a number of candidate distributions. To discriminate between different 3-parameter distributions the L-skewness/L-kurtosis diagram is used. The L-Cv/L-skewness diagram is used to discriminate between various 2-parameter distributions. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 7/11

16
Choice of regional distribution Goodness-of-fit measure for a 3-parameter distribution: Comparison of regional average L-kurtosis and the theoretical L- kurtosis for the considered distribution corresponding to the regional average L-skewness. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 8/11

17
Choice of regional distribution Test statistic: where 4 R is the regional average L-kurtosis, 4 DIST is the L- kurtosis of the fitted regional distribution, and β 4 and σ 4 are, respectively, the bias and the standard deviation of the regional average L-kurtosis obtained from simulations. Evaluation of Z-statistic: The test statistic is evaluated against the quantiles of a standard normal distribution, i.e.|Z|< 1.96: Acceptable fit (corresponding to a 5% significance level). Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 9/11

18
Choice of regional distribution Goodness-of-fit measure for a 2-parameter distribution: Comparison of regional average L-skewness and the theoretical L-skewness for the considered distribution corresponding to the regional average L-CV. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 10/11

19
Choice of regional distribution Test statistic: where 3 R is the regional average L-skewness, 3 DIST is the L- skewness of the fitted regional distribution, and σ 3 is the standard deviation of the regional average L-skewness obtained from simulations. Evaluation of Z-statistic: The test statistic is evaluated against the quantiles of a standard normal distribution, i.e.|Z|< 1.96: Acceptable fit (corresponding to a 5% significance level). Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 11/11

20
GLS regression Objective: Generalised least squares (GLS) regression is applied for estimation of regional parameters and testing of regional homogeneity. For parameters that show a significant regional variability the GLS regression procedure is subsequently applied to evaluate the potential of describing the variability from catchment characteristics (Stedinger & Tasker, 1985; Madsen & Rosbjerg, 1997). Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 1/6

21
Regional mean model The regional mean model is a special case of the GLS regression model. It is used for estimation of regional parameters of L-moment ratios (L-Cv and L-Cs) and their associated uncertainties. In addition, the regional mean model provides a heterogeneity measure for testing regional homogeneity. Input: - L-moment ratio estimates L-Cv and L-Cs. - Sampling variances of L-Cv and L-Cs estimates. Output: - Regional L-moment ratio estimates. - Variance of regional L-moment ratio estimates. - Residual model error variance (heterogeneity measure). Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 2/6

22
Regression model The GLS regression model is used for estimation of mean drought statistics from catchment characteristics. The following log-linear model is considered: where i is the mean value of the drought characteristic, A ik are the considered catchment characteristics, k are the regression parameters, i is a random sampling error, and i is the residual model error. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 3/6

23
Regression model The sampling error and the residual model error are assumed to have zero mean and covariance structures where 2 i is the sampling error variance, ij is the correlation coefficient due to concurrent observations at stations i and j (intersite correlation coefficient), and 2 is the residual model error variance. Note: Compared to ordinary least squares regression GLS regression accounts explicitly for heteroscedastic (different variances) and cross-correlated sampling errors. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 4/6

24
Regression model Input: - Mean value and associated variance of drought characteristic - Catchment characteristics Output: - Regression parameters and associated covariance - Residual model error variance Application: For given catchment characteristics the mean value and the associated variance are estimated from the GLS regression equation. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 5/6

25
Regression model In the case where some at-site data are available the sample mean AS and the mean value obtained from the regression equation R can be combined using (Madsen & Rosbjerg, 1997): where Var{ AS } is the variance of the at-site estimate and Var{ R } is the variance of the regional estimate obtained from the regression model. The variance of the weighted estimator is: Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Introduction Split Sample Grouping 6/6

26
Split sample grouping Objective: Grouping of sites into homogeneous (or fairly homogeneous) regions according to catchment characteristics. Procedure (Wiltshire, 1995): 1.The method splits a set of catchments into two groups based on a single partitioning value of one chosen catchment characteristic. Measures of variability of drought characteristics within each group are aggregated into one statistic, and the optimum grouping is achieved at the point where this statistic is minimum. 2.Step 1 is repeated for all the considered catchment characteristics. The catchment characteristic that provides the minimum variability statistic is chosen as the optimal two-way grouping. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Split Sample Grouping Introduction 1/2

27
Split sample grouping 3.Steps 1-2 are repeated for a multiple partitioning, i.e. a four-way grouping based on 2 characteristics, an eight-way grouping based on 3 characteristics etc. 4.After each split sample grouping regional homogeneity is tested using the L-moment H-statistic or the GLS regression statistic. Variability measure (Pearson, 1991; Madsen et al., 1997): where e j,i is the deviation of the jth L-moment ratio estimate at site i from its group record-length-weighted average. In this case the L-Cv is weighted ahead of the L-skewness, which in turn is weighted ahead of L-kurtosis, so that homogeneity is primarily influenced by L-Cv and less so by L-kurtosis. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Outline L-moment Analysis GLS Regression Split Sample Grouping Introduction 2/2

28
Application example - data The regional frequency analysis procedure was applied to the regional data set with daily streamflow series from Baden-Würtenberg, Germany Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Quantile Estimation Introduction 1/6 Freiburg Stuttgart Karlsruhe Strassburg (France) Basel (Switzerland) Regional Distribution

29
Streamflow drought series Streamflow data: Stations with a record length larger than 20 years were included in the regional analysis, which comprises 46 stations with recording periods ranging between 20 to 37 years with an average of 30.2 years. Drought series: For definition of drought events the threshold level approach was applied using the 70% quantile of the daily flow duration curve as the threshold level (Tallaksen et al., 1997). From the drought series annual maximum series of drought duration and deficit volume were extracted. Of the 46 stations, 20 stations experience no zero drought years, whereas the remaining 26 stations have one or more zero drought years. The regional average annual number of drought events is equal to years -1. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Quantile Estimation Introduction 2/6 Regional Distribution

30
Streamflow drought series Empirical distributions of AMS of drought duration Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Quantile Estimation Introduction 3/6 Regional Distribution

31
Streamflow drought series Empirical distributions of AMS of deficit volume (normalised with the catchment area) Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Quantile Estimation Introduction 4/6 Regional Distribution

32
Catchment characteristics Climate: Mean annual precipitation [mm] Land use: Fraction of urbanisation [-] Fraction of forest [-] Morphometry: Catchment area [km 2 ] Drainage density [km/ km 2 ] Highest elevation [m a.m.s.l.] Average elevation [m a.m.s.l.] Lowest elevation [m a.m.s.l.] Maximum slope [%] Average slope [%] Minimum slope [%] Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Quantile Estimation Introduction 5/6 Regional Distribution

33
Catchment characteristics Soil: Fraction of soils with high infiltration capacity [-] Fraction of soils with medium infiltration capacity [-] Fraction of soils with low infiltration capacity [-] Fraction of soils with very low infiltration capacity [-] Mean hydraulic conductivity of the soils [cm/d] Fraction of soils with low hydraulic conductivity [-] Fraction of soils with high water-holding capacity in the effective root zone [-] Mean water-holding capacity in the effective root zone [mm] Hydrogeology: Fraction of rock formations with a very low hydraulic permeability [%] Weighted mean of hydraulic conductivity [m/s] Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Quantile Estimation Introduction 6/6 Regional Distribution

34
Grouping of sites Testing of regional homogeneity of all 46 catchments: Duration: H = 5.76 Deficit volume: H = 4.08 Both for duration and deficit volume the H-statistic indicates that all 46 catchments form a “definitely heterogeneous” group with respect to L-Cv. Split sample grouping (two-way grouping): The global minimum value of the variability statistic V as a function of the different catchment characteristics is obtained with the mean annual precipitation (MAP). “Dry catchments”: MAP < 1000 mm “Wet catchments”: MAP > 1000 mm Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 1/10 Regional Distribution

35
Grouping of sites Variability measure as a function of mean annual precipitation Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 2/10 Regional Distribution

36
Grouping of sites Testing of regional homogeneity (two-way grouping): MAP < 1000 mm: Duration:H = 1.64 (Possibly heterogeneous) Deficit volume: H = 0.60 (Acceptably homogeneous) MAP > 1000 mm: Duration: H = 1.94 (Possibly heterogeneous) Deficit volume: H = 1.29 (Possibly heterogeneous) The grouping of sites with respect to MAP provides more homogeneous groups. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 3/10 Regional Distribution

37
Grouping of sites Split sample grouping (four-way grouping): MAP < 1000 mm: For the “dry catchment” group the available catchment characteristics did not provide a well-defined partitioning. MAP > 1000 mm: For the “wet” catchments a well-defined partitioning was obtained with the catchment average hydraulic conductivity of the upper hydrogeological unit (HCMEAN) with a minimum variability measure for HCMEAN = 2.5 m/s. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 4/10 Regional Distribution

38
Grouping of sites Variability measure as a function of average hydraulic conductivity Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 5/10 Regional Distribution

39
Grouping of sites Testing of regional homogeneity (four-way grouping): Region A (MAP < 1000 mm): Duration:H = 1.64 (Possibly heterogeneous) Deficit volume: H = 0.60 (Acceptably homogeneous) Region B (MAP > 1000 mm, HCMEAN < 2.5 m/s): Duration: H = (Acceptably homogeneous) Deficit volume: H = (Acceptably homogeneous) Region C (MAP > 1000 mm, HCMEAN > 2.5 m/s): Duration: H = 0.24 (Acceptably homogeneous) Deficit volume: H = (Acceptably homogeneous) Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 6/10 Regional Distribution

40
Grouping of sites L-Cv and L-Cs estimates of the three regions for drought duration Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 7/10 Regional Distribution

41
Grouping of sites L-Cv and L-Cs estimates of the three regions for deficit volume Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 8/10 Regional Distribution

42
Grouping of sites L-Cs and L-kurtosis estimates of the three regions for duration Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 9/10 Regional Distribution

43
Grouping of sites L-Cs and L-kurtosis estimates of the three regions for deficit volume Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 10/10 Regional Distribution

44
Goodness-of-fit statistics Duration (3-parameter distribution): Duration (2-parameter distribution): Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites Regional Distribution GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 1/7 Distributions accepted at a 5% significance level marked in red

45
Goodness-of-fit statistics Deficit volume (3-parameter distribution): Deficit volume (2-parameter distribution): Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 2/7 Distributions accepted at a 5% significance level marked in red Regional Distribution

46
Goodness-of-fit statistics Distributions accepted at a 5% significance level: 3-parameter distributions (out of 3 regions): GP:Duration: 2; Volume: 1 GEV:Duration: 0; Volume: 0 LN:Duration: 0; Volume: 0 GAM:Duration: 2; Volume: 2 WEI:Duration: 2; Volume: 2 2-parameter distributions (out of 3 regions): GP:Duration: 2; Volume: 0 LN:Duration: 0; Volume: 0 GAM:Duration: 2; Volume: 3 WEI:Duration: 1; Volume: 2 2-parameter Gamma distribution chosen for both duration and volume in all 3 regions. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 3/7 Regional Distribution

47
Regional parameters Regional parameters (duration): Regional parameters (deficit volume): Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 4/7 Regional Distribution

48
Normalised regional distributions The regional L-Cv estimates and average annual number of drought events (average rates) are used to estimate the normalised regional quantile in the three regions for both drought duration and deficit volume. Region A catchments have heavier tailed distributions than the Region C catchments, which in turn have heavier tailed distributions than the Region B catchments. In each region the deficit volume have heavier tailed distributions than the duration. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 5/7 Regional Distribution

49
Normalised regional distributions Drought duration Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 6/7 Regional Distribution

50
Normalised regional distributions Deficit volume Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 7/7 Regional Distribution

51
GLS estimation of L-Cv To further analyse the regional homogeneity and estimate the uncertainty of the regional L-Cv estimate the GLS regional mean model is applied. Results for drought duration: Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites Regional Distribution GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 1/9

52
GLS estimation of L-Cv Results for deficit volume: Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 2/9 Regional Distribution

53
GLS estimation of L-Cv The residual model error variance can be used to assess regional homogeneity. In this case only Region B for drought duration and Region C for deficit volume can be assumed homogeneous (residual model error variance = 0). This contradicts the results of the H-statistic where only Region A for duration was flagged as possibly heterogeneous and illustrates the lack of power of the H- statistic in the case of significant intersite correlation as observed in this case. The estimated variance of the regional L-Cv estimator can be used to produce confidence bands on the regional normalised frequency curve. In this case the uncertainty of the regional quantile estimate can be obtained by Monte Carlo simulation of a gamma distribution using a normal distribution of the regional L-Cv estimator. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 3/9 Regional Distribution

54
GLS estimation of L-Cv Normalised regional frequency curve for deficit volume in Region B with associated 95% confidence limits Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 4/9 Regional Distribution

55
GLS estimation of mean value For quantile estimation at an ungauged site an estimate of the mean drought duration and deficit volume is needed. In addition, if only a short record is available at the considered site the sample mean and the regional estimate of the mean value can be combined to obtain a more reliable estimate. For estimation of the mean drought characteristics log-linear regression models that relate the mean duration and deficit volume to the catchment characteristics for the three different regions are evaluated using the GLS regression procedure. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 5/9 Regional Distribution

56
GLS estimation of mean value The GLS regression procedure was applied using all combinations of the catchment characteristics. To evaluate the predictive capabilities of the different regression models the average mean square error (MSE) of prediction is used as a performance index. The model that produces the smallest average MSE is generally chosen. However, taken the principle of model parsimony into account, if only a minor improvement is obtained by including an additional catchment characteristic, that characteristic is not included. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 6/9 Regional Distribution

57
GLS estimation of mean value Results for drought duration: Region A: Region B: Region C: Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 7/9 Regional Distribution

58
GLS estimation of mean value Results for deficit volume: Region A: Region B: Region C: Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 8/9 Regional Distribution

59
GLS estimation of mean value Catchment descriptors used in regression equations: FOREST: Fraction of forest [-] SOILL: Fraction of soils with low infiltration capacity [-] SOILHCMEAN: Mean hydraulic conductivity of the soils [cm/day] ROOTSMEAN: Mean water-holding capacity in the effective root zone [mm] DD: Drainage density [km/km 2 ] ROOTSHIGH: Fraction of soils with high water-holding capacity in the effective root zone [-] MAP: Mean annual precipitation [mm]. Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Introduction Quantile Estimation 9/9 Regional Distribution

60
Regional quantile estimation 1.Based on MAP and HCMEAN at the considered site, the catchment is assigned a region (A, B or C) with specified normalised frequency curve and associated variance. 2.Based on additional catchment characteristics the mean drought duration and deficit volume are obtained from the regression equations together with an estimate of the associated variance. 3.If data are available at the considered site, the at-site mean duration and deficit volume are estimated. These estimates are combined with the regression estimates using the weighted estimator described in Regional Procedure - GLS Regression.Regional Procedure - GLS Regression 4.The T-year drought duration and deficit volume are obtained by multiplying the estimated mean values with the normalised quantile estimate. The quantile estimate and associated variance are described in Index Method.Index Method Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Data Grouping of Sites GLS Regression Quantile Estimation Introduction 1/1 Regional Distribution

61
References Hosking, J.R.M. & Wallis, J.R. (1993) Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis, Water Resour. Res., 29(2), Correction, Water Resour. Res., 31(1), 251, Hosking, J.R.M. & Wallis, J.R. (1997) Regional Frequency Analysis, An Approach Based on L-moments, Cambridge University Press, UK. Madsen, H. & Rosbjerg, D. (1997) Generalized least squares and empirical Bayes estimation in regional partial duration series index-flood modeling, Water Resour. Res., 33(4), Madsen, H., Pearson, C.P. & Rosbjerg, D. (1997) Comparison of annual maximum series and partial duration series for modeling extreme hydrologic events, 2. Regional modelling, Water Resour. Res., 33(4), Pearson, C.P. (1991) New Zealand regional flood frequency analysis using L-moments, J. Hydrol. NZ, 30(2), Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Introduction 1/2

62
References Stedinger, J.R. & Tasker, G.D. (1985) Regional hydrologic analysis, 1. Ordinary, weighted and generalized least squares compared, Water Resour. Res., 21(9), Correction, Water Resour. Res., 22(5), 844, Tallaksen, L.M., Madsen, H. & Clausen, B. (1997) On the definition and modelling of streamflow drought duration and deficit volume, Hydrol. Sci. J., 42(1), Wiltshire, S.E. (1985) Grouping basins for regional flood frequency analysis, Hydrol. Sci. J., 30(1), Index Method Regional Procedure References Application Example Introduction 2/2 End

Similar presentations

© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google