Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byBrianne Sidman Modified over 2 years ago

1
Genetic Algorithms for Real Parameter Optimization Written by Alden H. Wright Department of Computer Science University of Montana Presented by Tony Morelli 11/01/2004

2
Background ● Usual method of applying GAs to real-parameter is to encode each parameter using binary coding or Gray coding – Parameters are concatenated together to create a chromosome. – Each Bit position corresponds to a gene – Each Bit value corresponds to an allele ● This paper's approach – Chromosome – Vector of real parameters – Gene – A real number – Allele – A real value

3
Binary Coding ● Binary Coding – Break valid range into segments and associate value based on segment ● If 0 < x < 4 and 5 bits are used – 32 Segments – Each segment = 1/8 (.125) – 3/8 = 00011 and 7/16 = 00011

4
Gray Coding ● Gray Encoding – Increase of 1 step changes only 1 bit. – Example: ● 0 0000 ● 1 0001 ● 2 0011 ● 3 0010 ● 4 0110 – Convert Bin-Gray:Gray-Bin:

5
Crossover ● One Point Binary Crossover – 1 Crossover point is selected – Bits from 1 parent and to the left of the crossover point are combined with bits from the other parent and to the right of the crossover point – Crossing over 5/32 (00101) and 27/32 (11011) between bits 3 and 4 yields 7/32 (00111) and 25/32 (11001)

6
Mutation ● Binary Coded GA – Probability of mutation is low – If mutation occurs, bit changes from 1 to 0 or 0 to 1 – If change from 0 to 1 ● Binary coding – Change is in the positive direction ● Gray coding – Change in either direction – If change from 1 to 0 ● Binary coding – Change is in the negative direction ● Gray coding – Change is in either direction

7
Schemata ● Similarity Template ● Describes a subset of the space of chromosomes – {01*} = {010, 011} ● Connected schemata are the most meaningful – They capture locality info about the function

8
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm ● Standard GA – 1. A method for choosing the initial population – 2. A Scaling function that creates a nonnegative fitness function – 3. Find the sampling rate of an individual – 4. Pick which individuals are allowed to reproduce – 5. Reproduction operators to produce new individuals – 6. A method for choosing which reproduction operator to apply

9
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm ● Standard GA, only steps 5 and 6 require bitwise manipulation. ● Real crossover is almost the same is in binary – Take the list of real numbers from one parent, combine them with a list from the other parent – {5,6,7,8},{1,2,3,4} combine at crossover point between 2 and 3 to create children {5,6,3,4} and {1,2,7,8}

10
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm ● Real Mutation – Mutation is performed if chromosome is selected – Direction is then chosen (50/50 either positive or negative – Amount of mutation is determined ● Original parameter is x, range [a,b], mutation size M ● Direction is positive – Mutated parameter is uniformly chosen from [x,min(M,b)]

11
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm Problems with real crossover

12
A Real Coded Genetic Algorithm ● Linear Crossover – From 2 parent points, 3 new points are generated: ● (1/2)p1 + (1/2)p2, (3/2)p1 - (1/2)p2, (-1/2)p1+(3/2)p2 – (1/2)p1 + (1/2)p2 is the midpoint of p1 and p2 – The others are on the line determined by p1 and p2 – The best 2 of the 3 points are sent to the next generation – Disadvantage - Highly disrupted of schemata and is not compatible with the schema theorem described in the next slide.

13
Schemata Analysis for Real-Allele Genetic Algorithms ● Restrict some or all of the parameters to subintervals of their possible ranges ● Ii denotes the interval ● If parameter space is [-1,1]x[-1,1]x[-1,1] and schema is [-1,1]x[0,1]x[-1,0], the m-tuple would be *I2I3 ● The probability of an individual being selected for reproduction is the ration of its fitness to the average fitness of the entire population

14
Schemata Analysis for Real-Allele Genetic Algorithms The expected proportion of individuals of schema s that are selected after reproduction is shown by:

15
Experimental Results Tested on DeJongs 5 problems, 2 other problems (Schaffer, Caruana, Eshelman, and Das)

16
Experimental Results ● 2 Point Crossover ● The Elitist Strategy ● Bakers Selection Procedure ● Population size of 20 ● Crossover rate of 0.8 ● Gray coding was used for Binary-Coded ● GA was run for 1000 trials, except for one of the cases which was run for 5000 ● Best Performance – Min value over all trials ● Best Offline Performance – Average over function evaluations of the best value obtained up to that function evaluation

17
Experimental Results ● Multiple runs were done to tune parameters ● Binary – 1000 experiments at each mutation rate from 0.005 to 0.05 in steps of 0.005 ● Real – 1000 experiments were done at each combination of a mutation size and mutation rate ● Mutation sizes 0.1-0.3 steps of 0.1 ● Mutation rate from 0.05 to 0.3 steps of 0.05 – 50% real crossover and 50% linear crossover

18
Experimental Results

19
Experimental Results Summary ● Real Coded algorithm with 50% real crossover and 50% linear crossover performed better than 100% real crossover on all problems ● Real-Coded with both types of crossover performed better than the binary-coded on 7/9 problems ● Real-Coded algorithm with real crossover performed better than the binary-coded on 5/9 problems.

20
Experimental Results Summary ● On problems F4 and F7 the mixed crossover real- coded did much better than the other 2 ● On F5 (Shekel's Foxholes) the binary coded algorithm did much better than the real-coded algorithms. – This problem is well suited for binary GAs – When it was rotated 30 degrees, the difference between the real-coded and the binary was less, but the binary GA still outperformed.

21
Conclusions ● Results showed that the real-coded GA based on a mixture of real and linear crossover gave superior results to binary-coded GAs on most test problems ● Real-Coded GA with both linear and real crossover outperformed the GA with only 1 of them. ● Strengths of a real-coded GA – 1. Increased Effeciency (No need to convert bit strings) – 2. Increased Precision (Using real numbers) – 3. Can use different mutation and crossover techniques

22
Questions/Comments ● Word of the day: ENVISAGE – en·vis·age – 1. To conceive an image or a picture of, especially as a future possibility: envisaged a world at peace. – 2. To consider or regard in a certain way.

Similar presentations

OK

Content Based Image Clustering and Image Retrieval Using Multiple Instance Learning Using Multiple Instance Learning Xin Chen Advisor: Chengcui Zhang Department.

Content Based Image Clustering and Image Retrieval Using Multiple Instance Learning Using Multiple Instance Learning Xin Chen Advisor: Chengcui Zhang Department.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on fiscal policy 2012 Ppt on astronomy and astrophysics impact Animated ppt on magnetism experiments Raster scan display and random scan display ppt online Ppt on water transport in india Ppt on earth movements and major landforms in brazil Ppt on south african culture and society Ppt on power system harmonics analysis Civil engineering ppt on environmental Ppt on power line carrier communications