Presentation on theme: "Gerald T. Keusch, M.D. Associate Provost and Associate Dean for Global Health, Boston University."— Presentation transcript:
Gerald T. Keusch, M.D. Associate Provost and Associate Dean for Global Health, Boston University
Health disparities - scene setting Where have we come from? Where are we now? Where are we going Partnerships Intended and unintended consequences
Populations with Equal Access to Health Care SOURCE: Gomes and McGuire Unequal Treatment, Confronting Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Health Care National Academy of Sciences, 2001
Life expectancy at birth by world region, 2001 AreaTotalMalesFemales World Developed countries Less developed countries Africa Asia Latin America and Caribbean Europe North America (U.S. and Canada) SOURCE: Population Reference Bureau World Population Data Sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2001.
,00010,00015,00020,00025,000 About 1900 About Life Expectancy (Years) Income Per Capita, 1991 International Dollars
Population (Millions) Ave. Annual Income per Capita ($) Life Expectancy (y) Infant Mortality /1000 Births Least Developed Countries (38) 643 $ Other Low Income Countries (23) 1,777 $ High Income Countries 858 $23, WHO Macroeconomics Report, 2001
Its why its called a fortune cookie!
Imaging, X-ray to MRI Immunology, a new science New vaccines, from polio to HPV Eradication of an ancient pathogen Behavioral risk factors – tobacco, diet Pathology to molecular/cellular biology Receptors, signaling, molecular cross-talk Genetic sciences and the human genome Omics, systems biology, bionics, designer meds
Increasing disparities in health Failure to use available technology Increasing disparities in health research Knowledge doesn’t equal problem solving More people affected by neglected diseases Rise of a for profit pharmaceutical industry that must focus R&D on the business bottom line Impact on access, availability, affordability, appropriateness, acceptability Excessive attention to life-style drugs Inattention to neglected tropical diseases
Public health is the art and science of making sure nothing happens When nothing happens, nobody notices Politicians worry when nothing happens – “nothing” is a political vacuum When asked to pay for nothing they balk When they pay and nothing happens they get mad When they balk or they get mad the public health system suffers…until something happens When something happens, everybody is blamed, especially the public health system and its “failed” leadership who “mislead” the politicians
Poverty: billions live on less than $2/day; health expenditures are woefully inadequate. Population: > 6 billion and growing. Environment: Continuing degradation, climate change, pollution and disease spread. Civil Society: Civil and foreign wars, genocide, displaced persons, refugees and migration, failed states. Health: 95% of global disease burden is in the developing countries and local expenditures are grossly inadequate. Research: > 90% of $$ is for first world diseases so little is spent on disease affecting the majority – too much oriented to highly technical, expensive drugs, diagnostics or devices.
Globalism as the 21 st century theme The response to a changing world The social conscience of students Health as a key global concern Health is the basis for development Health as a human right Health as a security issue Centrality of health to international policy Core aspiration of all nations Role of health in “soft” diplomacy
The Essential Premise: There are many sectors but just one, health, is central to all others ECONOMICSPOLITICS BUSINESSHEALTH CIVIL SOCIETY AGRICULTURE ARTS AND CULTURE
Global health is a field of study, research and practice that places a priority on improving health and achieving equity in health for all people worldwide. Global health emphasizes transnational health issues, determinants and/or solutions; involves multiple disciplines within and beyond the health sciences and promotes interdisciplinary collaboration; and is a synthesis of population-based prevention with individual level clinical care.
More old, more young More poor, more hungry More crowding, more pollution More degradation of environment More discrepancy in access to resources More resentment, political instability, violence More social disruption, failed states, terrorism
Figure out what the problems are Applied as well as basic and translational research Can involve students as well as faculty Get into the field, in facilities and the community Identify potential solutions Facility or community based Be sure they are culturally appropriate Implement interventions Funding/staffing Capacity building
Increased scientific knowledge has accounted for much of the dramatic improvement in health that has occurred in this century—by providing information that forms the basis of household and government action and by underpinning the development of preventive, curative, and diagnostic technologies… Because the fruits of science benefit all countries, internationally collaborative efforts, of which there are several excellent examples, will often be the right way to proceed.
Universities have four critical roles Education – (including education of the public at large), but this may be relegated to 2 nd place in some research intensive institutions Research – generation of new knowledge Service – translation and application of knowledge in society Policy – inform the political sector, influence decision making
Teach global literacy – business students need to understand the magnitude of disparities in health, science students need to understand the practical value of their work, all students need to know about the real world Make global studies a required part of the core curriculum Contribute to improvement of K-12 education in science and technology Promote public access to the health literature Encourage publication in open access journals Find venues to publish work that doesn’t work Speak in plain language to the public
Embrace a global culture of science with high ethical standards, open and free communication, concern for global public goods Reduce barriers between academic faculties and promote interdisciplinary research Connect basic and applied research within the research culture Reward applied research productivity by faculty through recognition, support, academic promotions Establish thoughtful socially relevant intellectual property policies and licensing terms: knowledge as a global public good
Contribute to capacity building in science, clinical medicine, and public health Support training of developing country health workers in a manner that does not lead to emigration Work more directly with international agencies to improve health and health capacity in developing countries Promote the good side of globalization, correct the bad Enter national policy decision making process to insure that evidence is used effectively University Consortium for Global Health National Academy of Science/Institute of Medicine Advocacy
Traditional Business model Innovative PH model
From “layer cake” (tasks taken on separately by different sectors) to “marble cake” (cross sectoral partnerships). In research we call it interdisciplinarity There are three key questions: What’s in it for me (my institution)? What will my partner contribute? What will it cost me?
1. Trust 2. Trust 3. Trust
1. Respect 2. Respect 3. Respect
1. Relationships 2. Relationships 3. Relationships Who your “ambassadors” are does really matter.
Improve access to information, globally – publish in open access journals Develop sustained collaborations with developing country scientists for training, research, and improving clinical services Advocate for “better” (more enlightened) tech transfer policies – understand IP and TT Organize and become vocal advocates for appropriate assistance to developing countries for capacity building and service Canadian version of the newly announced Obama initiative in Global Health Work with IRDC – an inherently good agency Science for Humanity
Value applied research in career development, e.g. work on rapid low-tech low-cost diagnostics
Progression to integrative partnership model Capacity improvements Managerial competence Good governance – transparent, fair, ethical Meaningful health benefits Learning lessons become bidirectional
Neocolonialism – control issues Introduction of inappropriate technology Displaced concern – e.g. from local problems to hosting international students Cultural clashes Facility based focus Research dominance – leadership roles, authorship/presentation of data
“I think I can make you very happy if I can get funded.” McGill Partner