Presentation on theme: "James A. Purdy, Ph.D. Professor and Director"— Presentation transcript:
1Acceptance Testing and Quality Assurance of Radiation Treatment Planning Systems James A. Purdy, Ph.D.Professor and DirectorDivision of Radiation PhysicsDepartment of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis, Missouri, USAEvolving Strategies in Radiation OncologyRome, Italy, June 3-5, 2004
2Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Treatment planning and delivery of radiation therapy are undergoing significant change with continuous advancements in computer hardware computational power and computer graphics.Image-based 3D planning including IMRT inverse planning is driving a complete shift in the paradigm for the treatment-planning process.Can be very large difference in functional capabilities and clinical utilization of planning systems.Acceptance testing and commissioning of planning system is quite complex and may vary from institution to institution.
3Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Basic Componentscomputer workstationinput and output devices for graphics and imagesComplex parts of a planning system aredose-calculation algorithm codeprograms used to manipulate 3D graphic displays of the patient, beam geometry, and doseoptimization engine
4Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Testing all components of a treatment-planning process can be a formidable task.Physicist must ascertain extent and complexity of treatment-planning needs of clinicBased on this information, physicist must establish elements of acceptance, commissioning, and QA of the 3D RTP system.
5Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Van Dyk et al.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Computers. IJROBP 26, , 1993
6Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems AAPM Task Group 40:Comprehensive QA for Radiation Oncology. Med. Phy. 21, (1994)
7Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems AAPM Task Group 53:Quality Assurance for Clinical Radiotherapy Treatment Planning. Med. Phy. 25, (1998)
8Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. IMRT CWG. Med. Phys., 30(8): , 2003.
9Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems QA program must consider how RTP system is used as well as how it interacts with the treatment planning process.Creation of a treatment planning process that incorporates self-consistency and procedural checks is a major component of a QA program for treatment planning.
10Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Physicist must be afforded adequate time to ascertain extent and complexity of treatment planning needs of radiation oncology clinic.Based upon this information, physicist must design and implement an appropriate QA program.For a treatment planning process of a given complexity, QA requirements in a small radiation oncology facility should be no less than those in a large, academic medical center.
11Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems performed to confirm that the RTP system performs according to its specifications.If there is little rigor in the specifications of the RTP system, then there will be little need to design an acceptance test.
12Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems AT specification divided into 3 categories:Computer hardware: Includes CPU and all peripheral devices that are part of RTP system, such as display monitor(s), printer, plotter, etc.Software features and functions: Many software feature specifications will be of the yes/no or exists/does-not exist type, rather than quantitative.Benchmark tests: Performance on benchmark tests indicates accuracy of dose calculation algorithm under very specific circumstances with specific beam data. Calculation times can also be measured.
13Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Test procedures document should be written that clearly describes individual procedures in detail.Order of tests important to minimize total work necessary and to correlate optimally with other tests.Procedures to be used must be agreed to by both the user and the vendor.Acceptance testing should be carried out on the system after it has been installed in the clinic but before it is used clinically.
14Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Significant time may be required to perform detailed benchmark testing of dose calculation algorithm accuracy.Most tests of the hardware and the software features should be performed by the user.If some tests are performed by vendor, user may want to repeat some or all of the tests to verify results.Results from acceptance testing should be carefully documented, along with any variation from defined procedures, and kept as long as RTP system is used in the department.
15Acceptance Testing and QA of Treatment Planning Systems Modern RTP process includes many aspects not directly related to dose calculations.RTP QA program must also handle these important non-dosimetric issues.Non-dosimetric issues apply to 2-D systems and 3-D planning systems.
16Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Image Input Tests Image Geometry:Document and verify parameters used to determine geometric description of each image (e.g., number of pixels, pixel size, slice thickness)Geometric Location and Orientation of scan:Document and verify parameters used to determine geometric location of each image (i.e., left- right and head-foot orientations.
17Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Image Input Tests Text Information: Verify that all text information is correctly transferredIncorrect name or scan sequence identification could cause misuse or misinterpretation of scans.Imaging Data: Verify accuracy of grayscale values, particularly for conversion of CT number to electron density.Wrong grayscale data may cause incorrect identification of anatomy or incorrect density corrections.
18Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Image Input Tests Image Unwarping (Removing Distortions): Test all features, including the documentation tools which assure that the original and modified images are correctly identified within the system.Methodologies which modify imaging information may leave incorrect data in place.
19Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Contour Tests Manual contour acquisitionDigitization process (hardware & software)Contouring on 2-D imagesAutotracking contoursBifurcated structuresContours on projection images (DRRs, BEVs)Contours on CT scannogramsExtracting contours from surfaces
20Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Image Use and Display Tests Verify functionality of window and level setting.Determine whether displayed window/level values agree with those on scanner/film.Verify accuracy of the geometric location of the image.Verify accuracy of the grayscale reconstruction and of any interpolation performed during that reconstruction.Check consistency between new images and original images.Verify the capability to remove unwanted imaging information, such as the patient support table.
21Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Image Use and Display Tests Verify accuracy of the geometrical location of the slices with respect to the rest of the patient anatomy.Verify mean, minimum and maximum CT number inside a region of interest (slice and volume) for a range of situations.
22Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Image Use and Display Tests Verify point coordinates, distances and angles in each coordinate system for each display type.Confirm color and other rendering functions.Verify that each panel of a multiple window is kept current as the planning session proceeds.
23Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Beam Description/Configuration Tests Verify that all beam technique functions work, using a standard beam description provided by the vendor.Verify that library of available machines and beams is correct.Verify that availability of machine and beam-specific accessories, such as electron cones or wedge is correct.
24Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Beam Description/Configuration Tests Verify correct use and display of user- defined beam names and numbers.Verify correct use and display of angle readouts for gantry, collimator, and table.Verify correct use and display of linear motion readouts of table, collimator jaws, and MLC.Check readout names and motion limitations.
25Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Beam Description/Configuration Tests Verify correct functionality of tools such as those to move isocenters or set SSDs.Verify correct wedge characterizations (coding, directions, field size limitations,and availability).Verify correct use and display of compensators.
26Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Beam Geometry Display Tests BEV/DRR DisplaysVerify projection of contours/structures defined on axial slices into BEV-type displays. (Compare with the grayscale images for DRR displays. This is most easily done with a simple phantom containing only a few internal structures).Verify projection of divergent beam and aperture edges.Check at several different SSDs and projection distances.
27Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Beam Geometry Display Tests Beam Display: Verify thatPositions and field sizes are correct.Wedges are shown and the orientation is correct.Beam edges and apertures are shown correctly.Patient and Beam LabelsVerify patient orientation with respect to beam and orientation annotations.Verify correctness of orientations and annotations for machine position views or icons associated with 2-D or 3-D displays.
28Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Field Shape Design Tests Verify that system distinguishes between "island" blocks, in which aperture delineates block shape, and"aperture" or "conformal" blocks, for which the drawn aperture encloses the open irradiated area.Verify correct specification of transmission or block thickness for full blocks and partial transmission blocks.Test methods used to fit MLC leaves to field shape.Verify availability/size of electron applicators.Check all output showing beam apertures used for beam aperture fabrication (e.g., MLC leaf positions, BEV plots).
29Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Wedge Tests Confirm that wedge orientation and angle specifications are consistent throughout RTP system, including hardcopy output. (If possible, they should agree with treatment machine conventions).Check display of wedges in different 2D planes for different beam directions, coll. rotations, wedge orientations.Check display of wedges in room view 3D displays for situations described above.Verify that wedge orientations and field sizes not allowed by treatment machine (energy) are not allowed in RTP system.
30Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Wedge Tests Autowedges (wedges inside the head of the machine) : Confirm that the division of a field into fractional open and wedged fields agrees in the RTP system and on the treatment machine.Dynamic wedge. Verify that the implementation in the RTP system has the same capabilities, limitations, orientations and naming conventions as on the treatment machine.
31Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose Calculation Tests Verifies that dose calculation program correctly computes doses with respect to algorithm usedDocuments limitations of algorithm and its’ implementationReviews all input data for all radiation sources for consistency and validityProvides information required to guide treatment decisions based on documented algorithm limitations
32Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose Calculation Tests Photon Beam Dose Calculations: Perform dose calculations for a standard photon beam dataset. Tests should include:various open fieldsdifferent SSDsblocked fieldsasymmetric jaw fieldsMLC-shaped fieldswedged fieldsinhomogeneity test casesmulti-beam plansother tests
33Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose Calculation Tests Electron Beam Dose Calculations: Perform a set of dose calculations for a standard electron beam dataset. Tests should include:open fieldsdifferent SSDsshaped fieldssurface irregularitiesinhomogeneity test casesother tests
34Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose Calculation Tests Brachytherapy Dose Calculations: Perform dose calculations for single sources of each type, as well as several multi-source implant calculations. Tests examples include:standard implant techniques such as a GYN insertion with tandem and ovoidstwo-plane breast implantprostate seed implant
35Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose Display Tests Dose Points: Verify thatpoint is defined at the desired 3-D coordinates.point is displayed at the correct 3-D position.dose at point is displayed correctly.Interactive Point Doses: Verify thatpoint coordinates correctly correspond to cursor position on display.Consistency: Verify thatdoses in intersecting planes are consistent.different dose display techniques are consistent.
36Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: MLCs - Dose within the Field Tests Leakage through leaf (~2%)Between neighboring leaves (~5%)At abutting leaf pairs (15% or higher if rounded ends)
37Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: MLCs - Dose within the Field Tests MLCs must be very accurate for subfields to add together properly
38Leaf Positioning and Gap Width Dose delivered with IMRT is very sensitive to errors in the calibration of leaf positionSegment 1Segment 2Segment 3Segment 4
39Leaf Calibration and Film Test 1) Displacement of both leaves2) Overtravel of Left leaf3) Overtravel of Right leaf
40Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose Display Tests Dose Grids: VerifyDose is correctly interpolated between grid points for both small and large spacing.2-D Dose Displays: VerifyIsodose lines (IDLs) are correctly located.Colorwash display lines up correctly with IDLs and agrees with point dose displays.
41Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose Display Tests Isodose Surfaces: VerifySurfaces are displayed correctly.Surfaces are consistent with isodose lines on planes.
42Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: IMRT Commissioning All tests that are required to verify a 3D-TPSTG-53 requirementsAccurate beam data is essential IMRT modelingPenumbra model is extremely criticalSmall field output factors are requiredCombination of micro-chambers, diodes and film may be usedFilm, TLD, MOSFET, diode and Ion-chamber dosimetry are used for commissioning tests
43Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: IMRT Commissioning MLC leaf positioning accuracyBetter than a millimeterMLC leaf end locationGap widthBeam characteristics for small MUsDose/MU constancyFlatness and symmetry of the beamLeaf speed accuracy
44Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: IMRT Commissioning - Plane Film Analysis RTPS applies the planned fluence on a solid water phantom at a known depthComputes the dose at that depth and generates a dose map fileExpose a film – Convert OD to doseCompare with dose map generated by RTPSPlain Field 1Plain Field 3
45Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: IMRT Commissioning - Total Plan Validation Transfer the patient plan to a phantomTreat the phantom and measure the dosesIon-chambers, Films, MOSFET dosimetersCompare the doses generated by the TPS
46Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose-Volume Histogram Tests Structure IdentificationTest Boolean combinations of objects (VROI and DVH Normal Tissue - Target), and how voxels which belong to multiple structures are handled.Normal StructureGTV (target)PTV (target)
47Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose-Volume Histogram Tests Histogram Bins and LimitsVerify appropriate histogram bins and limits are used.DVH CalculationTest DVH calculation algorithm with known dose distributions.DVH TypesVerify that differential, and cumulative type of DVH are calculated/displayed correctly.DVH Plotting/OutputTest DVH plotting/output using known dose distributions.
48Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Dose-Volume Histogram Tests Dose Display, Dose-Volume HistogramsUser-created volumes/dose distributions may also be used for additional tests.Int StructTV1TV2TV3Unspec. Tissue
49Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Multiple Beam Dose Distributions Tests Multiple beam dose distribution summation (and subtraction - deletion)Arc beam simulation and verification (for algorithms which use static field superposition)Spot check isodose plots and display using point dose samples and comparing to overlying curves
50Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Hardcopy Output Tests Print out all hardcopy documentation for a given series of plans, and confirm that all textual and graphical information is output correctly.
51Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Connectivity Tests LinacCT ScannerVirtual SimulationWorkstationTreatment PlanningWorkstationMLC ControllerRecord & VerifyFilmPrinterNetworkCT/MR ImageCT ImageRT Structure SetMR ScannerRT PlanRT PlanRT ImageIt is imperative that the RTPS vendors demonstrate the connectivity as a part of the system acceptance testing
52Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Summary and Conclusions Physicist must establish elements of acceptance, commissioning, and QA of the RTP system.Software validation testing should be independent of the manufacturer’s testsDose calculation verification testing should be independent of the manufacturer’s testsAlignment and immobilization systems must be in place to enable accurate, reproducible implementation of 3DCRT/IMRT planning.
53Acceptance Testing and QA of RTPS: Summary Plan implementation and treatment verification systems and procedures must be in place to augment RTP system QA programPhysicians, physicists, dosimetrists, and therapists must work as a team to ensure a safe, high quality treatment planning and delivery system