Presentation on theme: "JUDICATA Deep Data: Mapping the Legal Genome. COMMON LAW Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) Arizona v."— Presentation transcript:
JUDICATA Deep Data: Mapping the Legal Genome
COMMON LAW Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
DEEP DATA Three metallurgic morals
GOLD Sit down and make gold data.
LEAD It may take a lot of lead bullets…
APPROACH Start with rule-based approaches Reviewable, not black boxes …but dont completely ignore AI, of course
SILVER …but it can pay dividends and lead to a silver bullet.
With respect to the pervasiveness of harassment, courts have held an employee generally cannot recover for harassment that is occasional, isolated, sporadic, or trivial; rather, the employee must show a concerted pattern of harassment of a repeated, routine, or a generalized nature.
STRUCTURE As much as possible algorithmically Acknowledge that code cant do it all 2/3 Engineers, 1/3 Legal
RESOURCES A Jailhouse Lawyers Manual The Oyez Project