Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAylin McIntyre Modified over 2 years ago

1
Analysis of RT distributions with R Emil Ratko-Dehnert WS 2010/ 2011 Session 09 – 18.01.2011

2
Last time... Recap of contents so far (Chapter 1 + 2) Hierarchical Interference (Townsend‘s system) Functional forms of RVs – Density function (TAFKA „distribution“) – Cumulative distribution function – Quantiles – Kolmogorov-Smirnof test 2

3
RT DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE FIELD 3 II

4
RTs in visual search 4

5
Why analyze distribution? 1.Normality assumption almost always violated 2.Experimental manipulations might affect only parts of RT distribution 3.RT distributions can be used to constrain models e.g. of visual search (model fitting and testing) 5

6
RT distributions Typically unimodal and positively skewed Can be characterized by e.g. the following distributions 6 Ex-Gauss Ex-Wald Gamma Weibull

7
Ex-Gauss distribution Introduced by Burbeck and Luce (1982) Is the convolution of a normal and an exponential distribution Density: 7 Ex-Gauss CDF of N(0,1)

8
Convolution... is a modified version of the two original functions It is the integral of the product of the two functions after one is reversed and shifted: 8 Ex-Gauss

9
9

10
10

11
11

12
12

13
Why popular? Components of Ex-Gauss might correspond to different mental processes – Exponential Decision; Gaussian Residual perceptual and response-generating processes It is known to fit RT distributions very well (particularly hard search tasks) One can look at parameter dynamics and infer on trade-offs 13 Ex-Gauss

14
Further reading Overview: – Schwarz (2001) – Van Zandt (2002) – Palmer, et al. (2009) Others: – McGill (1963) – Hohle (1965) – Ratcliff (1978, 1979) – Burbeck, Luce (1982) – Hockley (1984) – Luce (1986) – Spieler, et al. (1996) – McElree & Carrasco (1999) – Spieler, et al. (2000) – Wagenmakers, Brown (2007) 14 Ex-Gauss

15
Ex-Wald distribution Is the convolution of an exponential and a Wald distribution Represents decision and response components as a diffusion process (Schwarz, 2001) 15 Ex-Wald

16
Ex-Wald density where 16 Ex-Wald

17
Diffusion Process 17 A B z drift rate ~N(ν,η) time Evidence Boundary separation Mean drift ν Respond „A“ Respond „B“ Information space Ex-Wald

18
Qualitative Behaviour 18 A2A2 0 A1A1 time lax criterion strict criterion larger drift rate smaller drift rate Decision times for lax and strict criterion Ex-Wald

19
19

20
20

21
Why popular? Parameters can be interpreted psychologically Very successful in modelling RTs for a number of cognitive and perceptual tasks Are neurally plausible – Neuronal firing behaves like a diffusion process – Observed via single cell recordings 21 Ex-Wald

22
Further reading Theoretical Papers: – Schwarz (2001, 2002) – Ratcliff (1978) – Heathcote (2004) – Palmer, et al. (2005) – Wolfe, et al. (2009) Cognitive+perceptual tasks: – Palmer, Huk & Shadlen (2005) Visual Search: – Reeves, Santhi & Decaro (2005) – Palmer, et al. (2009) 22 Ex-Wald

23
Gamma distribution Series of exponential distributions α = average scale of processes β = reflects approximate number of processes 23 Gamma

24
24

25
25

26
Why popular? In fact, not too popular (publication-wise) It has very decent fits, when assuming a model, that sees RT distributions as composed of three exponentially distributed processes (Initial feed-forward search response selection) 26 Gamma

27
Further reading Dolan, van der Maas, & Molenaar (2002): A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distri- butions given optional truncation or censoring (in Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34(3), 304-323) 27 Gamma

28
Weibull Distribution Like a series of races (bounded by 0 and ∞) the weibull distribution renders an asymptotic description of their minima Johnsons (1994) version as 3 parameters: α, γ, ξ – For γ = 1 exp. distr., for γ ~ 3.6 normal distr. – Hence γ must lie somewhere in between 28 Weibull

29
29

30
30

31
Why popular? Has been used in a variety of cognitive tasks Excels in those, which can be modeled as a race among competing units (e.g. Memory search RTs) Has decent functional fits 31 Weibull

32
Further reading Logan (1992) Johnson, et al. (1994) Dolan, et al. (2002) Chechile (2003) Rouder, Lu, Speckman, Sun & Jiang (2005) Cousineau, Goodman & Shiffrin (2002) Palmer, Horowitz, Torrabla, Wolfe (2009) 32 Weibull

33
Comparing functional fits Null hypothesis is fit of data with normal distribution (standard assumption for mean/var analysis) All proposed distributions beat the gaussian, but not equally well 1) Ex-Gauss, 2) Ex-Wald, 3) Gamma, 4)Weibull Also the first three have similar parameter trends For further reading, see the simulation study by Palmer, Horowitz, Torrabla, Wolfe (2009) 33

34
EXCURSION: BOOTSTRAPPING 34

35
Basic idea In statistics, bootstrapping is a method to assign accuracy to sample estimates This is done by resampling with replacements from the original dataset By that one can estimate properties of an estimator (such as its variance) It assumes IID data 35

36
Ex: Bootstrapping the sample mean Original data: X = x 1, x 2, x 3,..., x 10 Sample mean: X = 1/10 * (x 1 + x 2 + x 3 +... + x 10 ) Resample data to obtain a bootstrap means: X 1 * = x 2, x 5, x 10, x 10, x 2, x 8, x 3, x 10, x 6, x 7 μ 1 * Repeat this 100 times to get μ 1 *,..., μ 100 * Now one has an empirical bootstrap distribution of μ From this one can derive e.g. the bootstrap CI of μ 36

37
Pro bootstrapping It is... – simple and easy to implement – straightforward to derive SE and CI for complex estimtors of complex parameters of the distribution (percentile points, odds ratio, correlation coefficients) – an appropriate way to control and check the stability of the results 37

38
Contra bootstrapping Under some conditions it is asymptotically consistent, so it does not provide general finite- sample guarantees It has a tendency to be overly optimistic (under- estimates real error) Application not always possible because of IID restriction 38

39
Situations to use bootstrapping 1.When theoretical distribution of a statistic is compli- cated or unknown 2.When the sample size is insufficient for straight- forward statistical inference 3.When power calculations have to be performed and a small pilot sample is availible How many samples are to be computed? As much as your hardware allows for... 39

40
AND NOW TO 40

41
Creating own functions new.fun <- function(arg1, arg2, arg3){ x <- exp(arg1) y <- sin(arg2) z <- mean(arg2, arg3) result <- x + y + z result } A <- new.fun(12, 0.4, -4) 41 „inputs“ „output“ Algorithm of function Usage of new.fun

Similar presentations

OK

Bootstrap Event Study Tests Peter Westfall ISQS Dept. Joint work with Scott Hein, Finance.

Bootstrap Event Study Tests Peter Westfall ISQS Dept. Joint work with Scott Hein, Finance.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on bank lending index Ppt on world diabetes day logo Ppt on cloud computing pdf Ppt on operating system memory management Ppt on leadership theories Ppt on conservation of environment poster Ppt on electric current and circuits Ppt on cross site scripting internet Ppt on hard gelatin capsule market Ppt on classical economics versus