Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Front-end, Back-end, correlators in Radiastronomy First MCCT-SKADS Training School September, 23-29 2007, Medicina Enzo Natale IRA - INAF Firenze.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Front-end, Back-end, correlators in Radiastronomy First MCCT-SKADS Training School September, 23-29 2007, Medicina Enzo Natale IRA - INAF Firenze."— Presentation transcript:

1 Front-end, Back-end, correlators in Radiastronomy First MCCT-SKADS Training School September, , Medicina Enzo Natale IRA - INAF Firenze

2 Topics Description of a cryo receiver - Feed horn / coupling to the antenna - Polarizer / OMT - Low Noise Amplifier - IF processor Receiver sensitivity How many receiver? - Dense focal plane array - Array of receivers

3 Dewar Layout of a cryogenic receiver

4 Feed horn Mode launching section ( return loss - crosspol ) Flare section ( taper - antenna illumination ) Performances Return loss: > 30 dB Insertion loss: <0.2 dB Off axis crosspol: < -35 dB Bandwidth: 30% or larger Trasformation from free space to guided propagation

5 Optical coupling to the antenna The illumination efficiency (optical coupling) of the antenna is the ratio of the gain of the antenna to that of a uniformely illuminated aperture and is determined by the illumination function or “edge taper”, i.e. the level of the illumination at the edge of the reflector compared to that of the center. Edge taper T e = P(0) / P(r e ) T e (dB) = -10 log 10 (T e ) For gaussian illumination function r e / w = (T e (dB) ln 10 / 20) 0.5 r e : reflector radius w: 1/e radius of the beam

6 Normalized Copolar and Crosspolar beam pattern at 22 GHz Horn for GHz Multibeam Taper 9 dB at the edge of the subreflector (9.5°)

7 Multibeam horn at the Gregorian focus of SRT (simulation with GRASP by R. Nesti) Maximum gain G i = (4    g  g : geometrical area of the antenna

8 G/T ratio G/T = G/(T A + T R ) ; T A : antenna temperature T R : receiver temperature at window T atm = 265 K  =  f = 22 GHz

9 To evaluate the performances achievable at the focus of a large antenna ( D >>  we report here some results based on the approximation of the electromagnetic field distribution in terms of Gaussian beam modes. (Goldsmith: Quasioptical System, IEEE Press, 1998). w 0 waist (1/e)  wavelength r radial distance w(z) beam radius (1/e) at z z distance from the waist R curvature radius of the beam Gaussian beams

10 In this approximation, it can be shown that, for not too large flare angle  a feed horn with aperture radius a and slant length R produces a gaussian beam whose waist radius is w = a located inside the horn at a distance z approximatelye qual to 1/3 of the horn length. In these conditions about 98 % of the power radiated by the horn can be associated with the fundamental Gaussian beam mode. Using the standard formulae for Gaussian beam mode propagation, it is simple to compute the antenna illumination (the edge taper) and consequentely the full width to half maximum (FWHM) beam width in the sky of a in-focus system and unblocked aperture:

11

12 Ortho Mode Transducer (OMT) Differential Phase Shifter (DPS) The feed horn is sensitive to both linear and circular polarizations Linear polarizations are separated by the OMT Circular polarizations needs to be converted in linear (DPS)

13

14 DPS

15 Feed hornCoupler DPS Waveguide to SMA converter Passive GHz Front-end

16 Turnstile junction (Navarrini, Plambeck IEEE MTT 45, Jan. 2006)

17 Planar OMT (Engargiola,Navarrini, IEEE MTT 53, May 2005)

18 Low Noise Amplifiers Typical performances of a cryogenic LNA Gain : >= 30 dB Gain flatness : ~ dB Input return loss : < 15 dB Bandwidth : 30% or larger Power 1dB Compression : +5dBm Working temperature : ~ 20K Noise temperature : ~ K GHz ~ K GHz

19 Devices : GaAs, InP High Electron Mobility Transistors (HEMT) and Heterostructure FET (HFET) : GaAs, InP Integrated circuits 1/f noise (  G / G) 2 = N A f  N number of active devices A constant (i.e. ~ Hz -1 for InP HEMT    GHz 2 stages GaAs HEMT Noise T : 5K (Alma Memo 421)

20 LNA block diagram (inclusion of coupler + calibration source at the input?)

21 MMIC amplifier chip mounted Hybrid amplifier

22 IF processor accurate definition of the receiving band conversion of the RF band to IF band for easy interfacing to the back-end. IF Processor Receiver type : superheterodyne

23 The mixer LO RF RF = E sin (2  s t +  LO = V sin (2  LO t ) I =  RF + LO) 2 =  E   V 2  sin[2 (2  s t +   sin [2 (2  LO t )   E V sin[2  s - LO) ]  V sin[2  s + LO) ] I I = I 0 [exp(q  v /k T ) - 1] For small  v : I  v) 2

24 Receiver Sensitivity T sys ON = T bg + T atm + T opt + T rec + T source T sys OFF = T bg + T atm + T opt + T rec T sys ON  T sys OFF s(t) = k B G T sys If the noises are white :  rms  T sys (B    radiometric noise) (Kraus) T bg = 2.7 K CMB*atm T atm = atmospheric emiss. T opt = spillover T rec = receiver T source = T sys ON - T sys OFF = x s (ON source   - x r (OFFsource   = X   X (  rms  depends on the modulation type

25 But in real detecting system (receiver + atmosphere +..) the low frequency noise is not white: 1/f  (  electronics ( gain variation,..) 1/f  (1<  drift, atmosphere GHz receiver B ~ 400 MHz  msec Measuring system Power spectral density

26 In this case: White noise (radiometric) 1/f noise 1/f 2 noise

27 Allan plot 1/f 2 noise 1/f noise White noise GHz receiver B ~ 400 MHz  msec Measuring system Allan time

28 Mitigation of the 1/f  noise “high” ( >> 1/Allan time ) modulation frequency - ON Source / OFF Source - On The Fly - Two beams Dicke ( equalized channels ) gain stabilization (no effect on the atmospheric noise) - Dicke receiver ( Modulation between sky end reference source) - Correlation receiver - Noise injection receiver

29 Dicke receiver  T / T sys = (  G / G) (T a - T n )/ T sys (Kraus, 1966) For balanced systems T a = T n  T / T sys = (2 / B  

30 Noise injection receiver T sys = T n s1/(s2 - s1) (  T sys ) 2 = (1/B  s2 2 + s1 2 )/(s2 - s1 ) 2 ) s1 = kGBT sys during t off s2 = kGB(T sys + T n ) during t on T n = x  T sys  T sys = (2 / B    x  x 2 ) 0.5 W = (  T sys ) / (2 / B    =  x  x 2 ) 0.5

31 How many receivers? Maximize observing efficiency of an antenna Focal Plane Array Dense FPA (mainly for  GHz) Array of single pixel receiver

32 Dense array Small array elements : about 0.5  Optimization of the beam properties -> high efficiecy low spillover Multi beam capabilities -> increase FOV survey speed Electronic synthesis -> flexibility Operating frequency -> up to ~ 8GHz

33 PHAROS (PHased Arrays for Reflector Observing System) Vivaldi array 13x13 elements pitch 21 mm Optimized for: prime focus f/D GHz Antennas, LNA, beam former cryocooled (PHAROS System Specification, Dec 2006)

34 PHAROS antenna (3D model)

35 Beam former

36 Window problems : mechanical (16 mm plexiglas) thermal (radiation power due to the ambient ~ 45 Watt)

37 Array of single pixel receivers Current technology capabilities still prevent the use of dense arrays at frequencies higher than say 10 GHz. The only possibility is to build-up array by assembling together a certain number of single channel (dual polarization) receivers.. For the sake of simplicity we briefly describe the structure of an hypothetical multibeam for the GHz band for Medicina antenna. Antenna: D = 32 m f eq = 97 m F = f eq /D = 3.04 ~ 80%Optical coupling efficiency : edge taper T e (dB)= 9 dB FWHM = ( T e (dB) ) l /D = 45  = 7 mm Beam at primary (w a ) : 0.5 D / [T e (dB) ln(10) /20] 0.5 ( from the definition of edge taper ) The illuminator (feed horn) must have have w 0 =  f eq /  w a located in the antenna focus Horn radius R = w 0 /0.644 = 21.4 mm 13.8 mm ~ F

38 Sampling Nyquist limit: 0.5  F (in the focal plane) Actual sampling : 2  F Undersampling 4 In practice + : Nyquist positions circle : horn position undersampling 5

39 GHz Multibeam

40 Correction of field curvature (Petzval surface) (distance from the optical axis) Best focus position from the in axix focus Medicina antenna = 7mm  = 500 mm

41 Conclusions Multi beam to increase the observing efficiency - new solutions for “simpler” front-end - integration of cal. source in the LNA - IF integration (Low cost ?) Integrated receiver (MMIC)


Download ppt "Front-end, Back-end, correlators in Radiastronomy First MCCT-SKADS Training School September, 23-29 2007, Medicina Enzo Natale IRA - INAF Firenze."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google