Presentation on theme: "Goddard Space Flight Center Fast X-ray Oscillations During Magnetar Flares Three events to date: March 5 th 1979: SGR 0526-66 August 27 th 1998: SGR 1900+14."— Presentation transcript:
Goddard Space Flight Center Fast X-ray Oscillations During Magnetar Flares Three events to date: March 5 th 1979: SGR August 27 th 1998: SGR December 27 th 2004: SGR Powered by global magnetic instability (reconfiguration), crust fracturing. Short, hard, luminous initial pulse. Softer X-ray tail persists for minutes, pulsed at neutron star spin period. Emission from a magnetically confined plasma G magnetic fields implied (Thompson & Duncan 95) Hurley et al. (1998): Ulysses
Goddard Space Flight Center NASA’s Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) Launched in December, 1995, in orbit for 11.5 yr! 12th Observing cycle currently underway ://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xte/xte_1st.html RXTE’s Unique Strengths Large collecting area High time resolution High telemetry capacity Flexible observing
Goddard Space Flight Center SGR , 2004 December Giant Flare Israel et al. (2005)
Goddard Space Flight Center Israel et al Oscillations in the 2004 December SGR Flare RXTE recorded the intense flux through detector shielding. Israel et al. (2005) reported a 92 Hz quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) during a portion of the flare. Oscillation is transient, or at least, the amplitude time dependent, associated with particular rotational phase, and increased un-pulsed emission. Also evidence presented for lower frequency signals; 18 and 30 Hz. Suggested torsional vibrations of the neutron star crust.
Goddard Space Flight Center A Look Back at the SGR , 1998 August Flare SGR flare was observed in a manner very similar to the SGR 1806 flare. Same time resolution, but non-optimal read-out time resulted in data gaps. Initially searched each good data interval as a whole. 84 Hz QPO detected in 4 th data interval searched. The first after the pulse structure had re-emerged. Strohmayer & Watts (2005)
Goddard Space Flight Center SGR : 84 Hz signal 84 Hz signal localized in time (rotational phase). ~20 % (rms) amplitude Not centered on a pulse peak. No other impulsive signals found, but what about weaker, persistent modulations?
Goddard Space Flight Center SGR : Other QPO Signals Computed average power spectra centered on the rotational phase of the 84 Hz QPO. A sequence of frequencies was detected: 28, 53.5, and 155 Hz! Amplitudes in the 7 – 11% range. Strong phase dependence: no signals detected from phases adjacent phase regions. 4 frequencies in SGR , a sequence of toroidal modes?
Goddard Space Flight Center SGR : RHESSI Confirmation of the Oscillations Timing study by Watts & Strohmayer (2006) confirms 92 Hz oscillation, and evidence for higher frequency (626 Hz) modulation. Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) also detected the December, 2004 flare from SGR (Hurley et al. 2005).
Goddard Space Flight Center SGR : RHESSI Confirmation of the Oscillations Timing study by Watts & Strohmayer (2006) reveals evidence for much higher frequency oscillation in SGR flare, at 625 Hz. Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) also detected the December, 2004 flare from SGR (Hurley et al. 2005).
Goddard Space Flight Center The SGR Flare Re-visited Data now public. Phase averaging of power spectra confirms strong 92 Hz QPO. Used Phase averaging analysis as in SGR hyperflare. Detect several new frequencies.
Goddard Space Flight Center The SGR Flare Re-visited II Strong detection of 625 Hz signal in latter portions of the flare. Evidence for higher frequencies too! Phase averaging reveals a 148 Hz QPO feature with high significance, but lower amplitude.
Goddard Space Flight Center The SGR Flare Re-visited: Additional Oscillation Frequencies SGR 1806 flare data now public. Phase averaging of power spectra confirms strong 92 Hz QPO. Phase averaging also shows 625 Hz oscillation with high significance. Detected 200 – 250 s after initial spike.
Goddard Space Flight Center Neutron Star Crusts: A Brief History Existence of a crust in a “normal” neutron star is not “controversial.” Ruderman (1968) suggested that radio pulsations from the first pulsars were due to torsional vibrations of crust. To good approximation crust is a Coulomb solid, that solidifies at = ( Ze) 2 / akT > 175. Implies shear modulus, , scales as n(Ze) 2 / a Ogata & Ichimaru (1990), Strohmayer et al. (1991) calculated and explored oscillation mode implications. Crust properties also linked with other observables, ie. Glitches and spin-down of pulsars, for example. Piro (2005)
Goddard Space Flight Center Shear Waves Credit: Larry Braile, Purdue Univ.
Goddard Space Flight Center SGR : Toroidal (torsional) Oscillation Modes An l=7, m=4 toroidal mode (Anna Watts) A neutron star crust supports shear (toroidal) modes. Purely transverse motions. Modes studied theoretically (McDermott, Van Horn & Hansen (1988), Schumaker & Thorne (1983), Duncan (1998), Strohmayer et al. (1991), Samuelsson & Andersson (2007). Angular dependence of modes described by spherical harmonic functions (l, m); and a radial eigenfunction (n), l t n l gives the total number of nodal planes, and m the number of azimuthal planes. ( 2 t 0 ) = 29.8 (R 10 ) -1 Hz ( M 1.4 /R 10 ) 1/2 ( M 1.4 /R 10 2 ) ( l t 0 ) = ( 2 t 0 ) [ l(l+1)/6 ] 1/2 [1 + (B/B ) 2 ] -1/2
Goddard Space Flight Center The SGR Flare: thickness of the crust For n = 0 modes, effective wavelength is R, for n > 0 it is R, if V s = constant, then f n=0 / f n>0 ~ R/R. Frequencies at 625 Hz and higher are likely n > 0 modes. Detection of n = 0 and n = 1 constrains crust thickness! Strohmayer & Watts (2006)
Goddard Space Flight Center Torsional modes: shear modulus, magnetic fields, and mode periods 30 – 150 Hz frequencies are consistent with current estimates of n = 0 mode frequencies, with n > 0 modes above 600 Hz. Speed of shear waves, V s, set by the shear modulus. V s ~ const (1,000 km/sec) not too bad an approximation. Piro (2005)
Goddard Space Flight Center Mode Excitation, the Earth Analogy Crust fracture in general will excite global modes. Many such modes observed in the days after the 2004 December Sumatra – Andaman great earthquake. Spectrum of modes excited depends on fracture geometry, but non-trivial patterns possible. Park et al. (2005)
Goddard Space Flight Center Implications for Neutron Star Structure Recently, Samuelsson & Andersson (2007) computed torsional modes in full GR (Cowling approximation). Determine “allowed” regions in M - R plane that can match observe mode sequences in SGRs and Caveat: No magnetic field corrections at all.
Goddard Space Flight Center Implications for Neutron Star Structure Determine “allowed” regions in M - R (B-field) plane that can match observed frequencies. Calculations in progress for a range of realistic EOS (Schwarz & Strohmayer 2008, in preparation). APR (A18+UIX+ v) Sahu, Basu & Datta (1993) Frequencies (Hz) 29.0 : 2 t : 6 t : 10 t : 1 t : 2 t : 1 t 4
Goddard Space Flight Center Constraints on Quark Stars? Watts & Reddy (2007) investigated crusts on strange quark stars. Computed torsional mode periods for thin nuclear crusts, and also quark nugget crusts. In general, such stars have thinner crusts. Computed modes very difficult to reconcile with observed periods. Watts & Reddy (2007)
Goddard Space Flight Center Time and Frequency Variations Strohmayer & Watts Hz QPO shows rather complex temporal, phase, and frequency variations. Amplitudes not constant in time (episodic). Several factors could be at work; changes in field and particle distributions. Energy exchange with the core.
Goddard Space Flight Center Persistence of QPOs
Goddard Space Flight Center Theoretical Issues Recognized that magnetic coupling of crust with core will likely be significant. Need “global” mode calculations (Levin 2006; Glampedakis et al. 2006; Sotani et al. 2006). Levin (2006) initially argued that torsional modes will radiate Alfven waves into the core and damp too quickly to be observed (~ 1 sec). Feedback, energy exchange between crust and core (Levin 2007). Excitation of modes in the crust, analogies with earthquake fractures. We see modulations in the X-ray flux, can these be produced by crust motions. Signal amplification, perhaps modest amplitudes are visible (beaming?)
Goddard Space Flight Center Crust - Core coupling Levin argues that energy exchanges between the crust and a continuum of MHD modes in the core. Solving initial value problem, finds QPOs excited at the so called “turning points” or edges of the MHD continuum. Lowest frequency modes (18, 25 Hz). Also finds drifting QPOs, and amplification of these features near pure crust mode frequencies. Levin (2007)
Goddard Space Flight Center X-ray Modulation Mechanism Timokhin, Eichler & Lyubarsky (astro-ph/ ) Suggest that modulation of the particle number density in the magnetosphere by torsional motion of the crust produces the oscillations. Estimate that 1% amplitude of crust motion needed to explain the observed QPO amplitudes. The angular dependence of the optical depth to resonant Compton scattering may account for phase dependence.
Goddard Space Flight Center Conclusions, and many questions! Detection of multiple frequencies with consistent l-scaling, and frequencies consistent with n>0 modes is highly suggestive of torsional oscillations, but need more data! Two (three, March 5 th ?) out of three with similar phenomena, suggests fundamental property of magnetars. Further understanding and detections could help constrain neutron star properties (EOS, and crust properties, magnetic fields). Unfortunately, giant flares are rare! More theory needed: new mode calculations (with magnetic fields, etc.) How are modes excited and damped? How do the mechanical motions modulate the X-ray flux? Could magnetic mode splitting be observed, constrain field geometry?
Goddard Space Flight Center Inside Neutron Stars ??? ~ 1 x g cm -3 Superfluid neutrons The physical constituents of neutron star interiors still largely remain a mystery after 35 years. Pions, kaons, hyperons, strange quark matter, quark-gluon plasma?
Goddard Space Flight Center QCD phase diagram: New states of matter Rho 2000, thanks to David Kaplan Aspects of QCD still largely unconstrained. Recent theoretical work has explored QCD phase diagram (Alford, Wilczek, Reddy, Rajagopal, et al.) Exotic states of Quark matter postulated, CFL, color superconducting states. Neutron star interiors could contain such states. Can we infer its presence??
Goddard Space Flight Center Implications for Neutron Star Structure For SGR , 28, 53.5, 84, and 155 Hz sequence is plausibly consistent with l=2, 4, 7, 13 modes (n=0)! Mode frequencies depend on stellar mass, radius and magnetic field. If modes correctly identified, then it places constraints on the stellar structure, though, with some caveats (such as magnetic field effects). SGR 1806 SGR 1900 Strohmayer & Watts (2005)
Goddard Space Flight Center Magnetar hyper-flares: Whole lotta shakin’ goin’ on Tod Strohmayer, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
Goddard Space Flight Center Fundamental Physics: Existence of New States of Matter? Theoretical work suggests quark matter could exist in neutron stars, possibly co- existing with a nuclear component. Mass – Radius measurements alone may not be enough to discriminate the presence of quark matter. Other observables, such as global oscillations might be crucial. Alford et al. (2005)
Goddard Space Flight Center Anatomy of a Hyperflare Three events to date: March 5 th 1979: SGR August 27 th 1998: SGR December 27 th 2004: SGR Powered by global magnetic instability (reconfiguration), crust fracturing. Short, hard, luminous initial pulse. Softer X-ray tail persists for minutes, and reveals neutron star spin period. Emission from a magnetically confined plasma G magnetic fields implied (Thompson & Duncan 95) Hurley et al. (1998): Ulysses
Goddard Space Flight Center The Neutron Star Equation of State Lattimer & Prakash 2004 Mass measurements, limits softening of EOS from hyperons, quarks, other exotic stuff. Radius provides direct information on nuclear interactions (nuclear symmetry energy). Other observables, such as global oscillations might also be crucial. dP/dr = - G M(r) / r 2