Presentation on theme: "New Institutional Economics: its theory and practical implications for environmental research."— Presentation transcript:
New Institutional Economics: its theory and practical implications for environmental research
What is science? §“…a state or fact of knowing ” (Oxford Encyclopedia) §Puzzle solving within an unquestioned “paradigm” (set of assumptions, values, practices) (T. Kuhn 1931). §“…knowledge infused on conscience”. Science (especially social science) is not value-free
What is science? Limitations... Humans are subject of science and therefore there are following limitations: cognitive high complexity of reality non-effectiveness of reductionism Science has got limits
Paradigm dilemma of social science: 2 approaches to reality §Institutionalism, constructivism l individuals are constrained by social rules (which are of primary interest), and individual behavior is secondary §Behaviorism/ rational choice/neo- classical economics l individuals are self-interested (primary value) and this brings in the societal order - social rules (secondary value)
Institutions defined “Institutions are the rules of the game in a society; more formally, they are the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction. In consequence they structure incentives in exchange, whether political, social, or economic.” D.C. North (1997)
Features of institutions §Institutions are a structural feature of the society or polity. They are created with the only reason: decrease uncertainty. §Stable over time. §They must pose constraints and affect individual behavior of its members.
Challenges for institutional analysis §Confusion with definition §Institutions are invisible §Multiple inputs from different disciplines are needed §Given multiple disciplines and concepts a coherent institutional framework is needed. §Multiple level of analysis §Configural analysis rather that additive
Why institutions matter in economics? §Adam Smith said that the productivity of an economic system depends on specialization. §Specialization will be useful only if there is an exchange, and the lower the costs of exchange (transaction costs) the more specialization there will be and the higher economic productivity will be. §Level of transaction costs however depend on institutions, its legal system, its political system, its culture etc.
Existence of Transaction Costs §TC are the costs that an actor bears in order to engage in exchange (political, economic, social etc.). §TC exist because info is costly to obtain as well as due to “bound rationality”, cognitive limits and the opportunism (self-interested individuals will not readily disclose the information about their preferences).
Institutional change 2 (D. North) §Path dependence l (when the institutional framework poses certain constraints for the downstream institutional choices and therefore influence the whole process of institutional change) §Power l (institutional change is the result of the power circles action in their own interest)
Old Institutional economics. What is that? §Emerged as the protest against methodological individualism of the mainstream Neo-classical Economics. § Emphasized importance of institutions but lacked rigorous and systematic theoretical foundations, as well as empirical support. Often it was country specific or even case specific. §Concerned more with description of institutions.
New Institutional Economics (NIE) The purpose of NIE is two-fold: 1) Explain (opposed to describe) the determinants of institutions and analyze the institutional change; 2) Evaluate impact on economic efficiency and distribution.
New Institutional Economics §Coase R. (1937) “The Nature of §the Firm” §Coase R. (1960) “The theory of social cost”. §Williamson O. (1971) coins the term “New Institutional Economics”. §North D. (1990) “Institutions”. §International Society for NIE (ISNIE) established in Coase R. and North D.
Williamson’s framework: 4 level of social analysis §Level 1: Embeddedness. Informal institutions, customs, traditions, norms and religion; Frequency of change is y. §Level 2: Institutional environment. Formal rules of the game: property, bureaucracy. Frequency of change is y. §Level 3: Governance: play of the game - contract. Frequency of change is §Level 4: Resource allocation and employment (prices and quantities; incentive alignment). Continuos.
NIE as a scientific “umbrella” NIE New Economic History (North, Fogel) Public Choice and Political Economy (Buchanan, Olson) New Social Economics Transaction Costs Economics (Coase, North, Williamson) Theory of Collective Action (Ostrom, Hardin) Law and Economics Social Capital Property rights literature Economics of information (Akerlof, Stiglitz, Stigler)
How good is NIE? §NIE is the framework for social scientists that puts institutions and transactions costs on the forefront of analysis. §NIE is evolutionary and rapidly developing being focused on institutional change (dynamics). §NIE is very good in empirical testing and analysis; however: §Is the forum for scientists with different background to “de-isolate” knowledge. §Major weaknesses are associated with methodologies and thinness of empirical application
PART II: NIE AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH §Theoretical framework of NIE for environmental research §Case study of Forestry in Ghana §Conclusions
Theoretical framework for environmental research informed by NIE §From neoclassical “externality” to institutional “interdependence” §Transaction Cost Economics §Rejection of Cost-Benefit Analysis §Focus on implementation rather than policy formulation ( different from NCE)
Interdependence broadens Externality §“Interdependence prevails when a choice of one agent influences that of another. Interdependent agents cannot simultaneously realize their incompatible interests in scarce environmental resources and their conflict should be resolved by defining or redefining the initial endowment” (Coase 1960).
Rejection of CBA §Due to TC and methodological pluralism the choices of an actor does not reveal his/her preferences and the CBA (Contingent valuation) cannot be applied effectively.
Case Study: NIE and Forestry in Ghana §NIE helps to illuminate how private interests interact with public interest §Rent-seeking, Public Choice, Rational Choice theories.
Forestry in Ghana Capital: Accra Population: 18,8 mln Rain Forest covers area: 35% Forestry is the 3rd export item; Many Ghanaians depend on forest for firewood and cooking; Reduction in forest cover from 8.2 mln ha in 1900 to 1.6 mln. in Reduced by 75%!
Participants in the forestry on Ghana §Logging firms – primary treatment §Timber millers – secondary treatment §Furniture workers – tertiary treatment §Ghana Timber Association (IO) §Ghana Timber Millers’ Organization (IO) §Furniture and Woodworkers Association of Ghana (IO) §Small-scale Carpenters Association (IO) Chainsaw operators
Technological change triggered socio-political change. §Chainsaw operation is very mobile and 2 people are enough and they are difficult to be controlled. §They competed with millers by: converting wood into lumber and by offering loggers better price than millers.
Timber Management Resources Act (1997) §Adopted in 1997 as the action to fight de-forestation §Prohibits timber harvesting without Timber Utilization Contract (TUC), which is the ecological contract. §Holders of TUC have to pay stumpage fee to the Administration of Stool Lands. § Holders of TUC have to: l Submit proposal for reforestation of at least 10 ha from km2 l Submit Social Responsibility Agreement (not more than 5% of annual royalty) l Implement obligations promptly §Chainsaw operators were forbidden to convert felled trees into lumber for sale.
Implications for chainsaw operators 1.Pushed out from the lumber processing industry and restored monopoly of timber millers 2.TUC created interest for local community as the beneficiary of the legal logging. 3.TUC created interest for environmental bureaucrats to enforce compliance with the TMRC.
Implication for deforestation §TRMA controlled chainsaw operators from entering the market, but did not restrict loggers (by restricting the season or the amount of timber to be harvested). Moreover, it had worse implications for deforestation as it forced loggers to engage in TUC and pay fees, and given oligopoly of millers to harvest more than previously. More timber on the market means decrease in price and a new incentive posed for loggers to increase logging.
Why did TRMA fail? The NIE perspective §Because the true rationale for TRMA was not the environmental protection (in line with “multiple streams theory” by Zahariadis) but to protect timber for mill owners – which it did successfully. §Looking at the incentives of the participants and the dynamics of institutional change the NIE allowed us to spot the main reason for failure of TRMA and these insight would have value if applied prior to developing new policies.
NIE and Environment §NIE is relatively well advanced in local CPR problems (Ostrom) and International Environmental Governance (Young) §NIE has not been applied to environmental research in the consistent way on the national level: there is a niche §IAD framework (Ostrom) can be interesting for analysis on any level as a universal framework.
The mandate of NIE §“There is no greater challenge facing today’s social scientist than the development of a dynamic theory of social change that will fill in many of the gaps in the foregoing analysis and give us an understanding of adaptive efficiency”. §(D. North 1993)
Organizations actively involved in NIE research §1) International Society for New Institutional Economics; §2) Ronald Coase Institute §3) European School on New Institutional Economics §4) Garrett Hardin’s Society §5) Center for new institutional social sciences §6) University of Paris (Sorbonne) §7) University of Chicago §8) MIT §9) Indiana University §10) University of California, Berkeley §11) University of Cambridge