Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

WP 5 Botanical Community Content Provision, Metadata Catalogue and Quality Control Matúš Kempa Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "WP 5 Botanical Community Content Provision, Metadata Catalogue and Quality Control Matúš Kempa Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences."— Presentation transcript:

1 WP 5 Botanical Community Content Provision, Metadata Catalogue and Quality Control Matúš Kempa Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences

2 www.open-up.eu Work package 5 Lead: – Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences (IBSAS), Bratislava Members: – FUB-BGBM, IBSAS, NHM, NHMW, NM, ETI, UCPH, RBGE, UH, RBGK, NCBN, NBGB, UT-NHM, Land OOE Content: – Botanical specimen images, photographs and scans of living plants, natural history artwork scans

3 www.open-up.eu Objectives for Year 2 MS10 – Local provider software and metadata mapping functional for all botanical content data – D5.2.0 – Local botanical provider software and metadata mapping functional for all content data sources [M18] – C5.3.1 Operational content provision (botany), first report (D13) [M18] – C5.4.1 Data quality check feedback (botany)

4 www.open-up.eu D5.2.0 Local botanical provider software and metadata mapping functional for all content data sources (with coop. of WP4, WP7) 14 of 14 botanical data providers connected 36 botanical data sources Mapping – BioCASE Monitor Tool 1.4 (Franck Theeten)

5 www.open-up.eu Most common mapping errors Missing mandatory elements – License URI Multiple data sources with single unit – DataSource for each Unit – Institution‘s metadata table joined with units table – Header for each Unit -> unnecessary overhead

6 www.open-up.eu C5.3.1 Operational content provision, first report (botany) [M18] Providers‘ cooperation – Description of institution, content, optional information being provided 13 of 14 partners are providing botanical content + 1 new (MNHN) 940,000 botanical objects available - BioCASE (March 2013) – 891,600 herbarium objects – 6600 drawings – 40800 photographs More than 750,000 in Europeana

7 www.open-up.eu C5.4.1 Data quality check feedback SurveyMonkey questionaire (Jana Hoffmann) Metadata, objects Metadata level: source – Names unification – checklist – Spelling errors – Data Quality Toolkit – Providers‘ feedback

8 www.open-up.eu C5.4.1 feedback Herbarium labels – Specialized staff, specialized volunteers – Original information, error addressing Specimen identification – Name validity, homonyms – IPNI, Tropicos, Catalogue of Life Authors, collectors – names web-services, paper copy of literature, online literature, collectors databases Enhancing geo-references, coordinates accuracy, types check Medium effort

9 www.open-up.eu C5.4.1 Metadata level: mapping – Required fields and their content – Communication between provider, coordinator, helpdesk – BioCASE Monitor Tool Metadata level: transformation – ABCD to ESE – WP 2

10 www.open-up.eu C5.4.1 objects JSTOR Plants handbook practice – Unique barcode on specimen sheet – Visible measurement scale – Color target

11 www.open-up.eu WP 5 - Year 3 C5.3.2 Operational content provision (botany), review and second report [M28] C5.4.2 Data quality check feedback (botany) [M28] C5.3.3 Sustainable content provision (botany), third report and outlook [M35] C5.4.3 Data quality check feedback (botany) [M35]

12 Thank you!


Download ppt "WP 5 Botanical Community Content Provision, Metadata Catalogue and Quality Control Matúš Kempa Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google