Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Northwest company in the pursuit of excellence

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "A Northwest company in the pursuit of excellence"— Presentation transcript:

1 A Northwest company in the pursuit of excellence
The Seventh Annual Providers Conference Lynnwood Convention Center Lynnwood, WA April 18, 2013

2 Unraveling the Mysteries of Urine Drug Testing
Jim Heit, BS, MT(ASCP) Technical Support Manager STERLING Reference Laboratories

3 Unraveling the Mysteries of Urine Drug Testing

4 DRUG TESTING How are Drug testing results Obtained?
Screening Assays – indicate the presumptive presence of drugs. Confirmation Assays – identify the drug detected in the screening assay

5 DRUG TESTING Immunoassay Screening tests What are they?
How do they work? How accurate are they?

6 DRUG TESTING U + R = UR Appropriate reagents
(Urine) + (Reagent) = (Reaction Product) Appropriate reagents Method for recognizing or measuring the reaction product

7 DRUG TESTING Screening Tests for Drug Class
Enzyme Immunoassay Presumptive Presence of Drugs Indicates the presence of a drug by recognizing that substance’s unique structure. Relatively Inexpensive, easily automated False Positives are Possible Essential to Confirm all POSITIVE Screens False Negatives are Rare

8 THE QUESTION “Paul’s explanation for his positive THC result of 45 ng/mL was because he was in his friend’s car. He wasn’t smoking but two of his buddies were.”


10 WEIGHT LOSS?? My client, who is very much over weight, has a history of heavy use of marijuana for many years. He recently started exercising and lost a lot of weight. He claims he tested POSITIVE for THC because THC was released from his fat cells. There is no evidence that rapid weight loss results in release of THC from adipose tissue. 10

11 CONFIRMATION ASSAYS What are the criteria?
Better specificity and sensitivity than the screening test The “Gold Standard” - Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)

12 CONFIRMATION TESTING Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Gold Standard for Confirmation Chemical “Fingerprint” of Drugs Sensitive and Specific Legally Defensible Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) Emerging Standard for Confirmation

13 Confirmation Testing Quantitative Results ???
The higher the result, the more recent the use or a much larger dose of drug was used. Debate on use of quantitative results. 13

14 THE EXCUSE My client tested POSITIVE for morphine at 739 ng/mL. He has no history of opiate abuse. He claims that he tested positive because he ate a large poppy seed muffin for breakfast on the morning of the day of the specimen collection. Poppy seeds contain morphine. Morphine levels up to 5,000 ng/mL are possible from ingestion of poppy seeds in baked goods. 14

15 WINDOW of DETECTION Depends on Drug Class Amphetamines Cocaine Opiates
2 - 3 Days Cocaine 2 - 4 Days, Longer for Chronic Use Opiates 3 - 4 Days PCP 5 – 8 Days THC Less than 2 Weeks most people Heavy, Chronic use, up to 6 – 8 Weeks

16 Specimen Validity Testing
Is the specimen sufficiently concentrated to interpret negative screening results? Has the specimen been tampered with or adulterated in some manner to make negative screening results invalid?

Components Visual examination Olfactory examination Chemical Evaluation Creatinine Specific Gravity (S.G.) if creatinine is < 20 mg/dL General oxidant pH

Dilution Creatinine <20 mg/dL Inert metabolite from skeletal muscle, concentration dependent on hydration status Most sensitive indicator of dilution Specific Gravity <1.003 Measurement of dissolved solids Determined only if Creatinine <20 mg/dL

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that can be taken by mouth, except WATER or other fluids, that will produce a Negative Urine Drug Test. Excessive fluid intake results in Low Creatinine levels. 19

20 Creatinine Distribution

21 THE QUESTION So what is the big deal about a dilute specimen? Why should I care that it is dilute?

22 Excessive Fluid Intake
Adequate Fluid Intake Excessive Fluid Intake Kidney Kidney BLADDER

23 THE QUESTION I received the report that said that the urine was “dilute”. How much water did the person drink?

Pre-Collection Dilution consumption of large quantities of fluids prior to collection Post-Collection Dilution adding fluid to specimen at the time of collection

High-volume ingestion of fluids (water loading, flushing, hydrating, etc.) Flushing or detoxifying products Gold Seal, Clean ‘n Clear, Test-Free, etc No evidence these products have any additional effect on drug elimination

Medical Causes for Dilute Urines Diabetes Insipidus Anorexia Nervosa or other muscle wasting syndromes Kidney Disease Diuretics Pharmaceutical Toxicity Lithium, others

pH Testing – SAMHSA Guidelines Acceptable pH: 4.5 to 9.0 SAMHSA Guidelines for Adulteration: ≤3.0 or ≥11.0 SAMHSA Guidelines for Invalid Result: >3.0 to <4.5 or >9.00 to <11.00

Iodine Producing Adulterants (Urine Luck 6.5) Strong Acid and Fluorine (Urine Luck 6.3 and 6.4) Chromium VI (various formulations of PCC and potassium dichromate) Peroxidase/Peroxide (Stealth) Bleach Nitrite (Klear, Whizzies) NaCl (table salt)

Oxidants Hypochlorite (Bleach) Persulfate Fluorine Others Vinegar Sodium Hydroxide (Drano®) Soap

pH The uses of Iodine and Fluorine containing compounds results in pH of 2.6 – 5.5 Drano (NaOH) is the only common adulterant that can raise the pH

31 EXAMPLES Creatinine <2 mg/dL Specific Gravity 1.0005 pH 6.5
Interpretation – Substituted – Creatinine <2.0, S.G. <or= 1.001 Most likely pure water

32 EXAMPLES Creatinine <2 mg/dL Specific Gravity 1.032 pH 3.2
Interpretation – Substituted/invalid; Creatinine <2.0, S.G. =or> 1.020; pH invalid 3.2 Fruit juice?

33 EXAMPLES Creatinine <1 mg/dL Specific Gravity 1.011 pH 7.8
Interpretation – Creatinine <2.0, specific gravity acceptable Actual results from an artificial urine encountered frequently in Northern WA

Substitution is now more prevalent than adulteration Quick Fix Clear Test Ultra Pure


36 WHIZZINATOR AD Available in a variety of natural lifelike skin tones
Fully adjustable latex belt 4 oz vinyl bag One dehydrated, toxin free urine specimen Four organic heat pads $150.00

Synthetic Urine Mimics normal human urine Creatinine Electrolytes (Na ,K, Cl, Ca, Mg) Urea, Phosphate Difficult to detect by standard testing Depends on knowledge and skill of chemist Non-Human Urine Difficult to Detect

38 SYNTHETIC URINE Is it legal to make or sell synthetic urine? YES
Is it Illegal to substitute synthetic urine? In most states NO WA has no statute Illegal in ten states PA, TX, NE, NC, SC, NJ, VA,OR, MD, AL

39 ARTIFICIAL URINE TEST STERLING has found a unique analyte that is lacking in synthetic urine. Five Synthetic Urines Purchased 12 Components Screened 3 Compounds Studied 1 Analyte Chosen Missing in all synthetic urines studied. Unobserved Employment Urines Screened 5.7% of 567 specimens synthetic urine

40 ALCOHOL TESTING Blood or Breath Alcohol Urine Alcohol Gold Standard
Legally Defined Limit of Impairment 12 Hour Window of Detection Urine Alcohol Does not correlate with Blood Alcohol 14 Hour Window of Detection Fermentation is Potential Problem

41 ALCOHOL TESTING Ethylglucuronide Direct Bio-Marker of Ethanol Exposure
Stable, Water Soluble Minor Metabolite of Ethanol Synthesis in Liver EtOH +glucuronic acid = EtG Window of Detection 72 – 96 Hours Dependent on amount and frequency of consumption No False Positives Fermentation NOT a Factor

42 ETHYLGLUCURONIDE Not a marker of impairment
Does not correlate with BAC Not a marker for amount of alcohol consumption

Screening Assays LC/MS/MS Immunoassay Confirmation Assays EtS Detected and Quantified No False Positives Legally Defensible

44 ETHYLGLUCURONIDE Voluntary Exposure to Ethanol
Voluntary consumption of alcoholic beverage Incidental Exposure to Ethanol Alcohol exposure without intent Not a FALSE POSITIVE Result Alcohol exposure in both situations

45 ETHYLGLUCURONIDE SAMHSA Advisory Analytical Methods are Valid!
What are Appropriate Cut-Offs? Interpretation of Low Positive Results? Incidental Exposure?

46 Ethylglucuronide-Incidental Exposure
10% % % % % 14% % – 6 %

47 Ethylglucuronide

48 Ethylglucuronide

49 THE EXCUSE “My job requires me to wash dirty car parts in denatured alcohol. Every 20 – 30 minutes I have my hands in the alcohol. That is why my EtG level was 2600 ng/mL”

Common Positive Cut-Off Values 100 ng/mL Used in “zero tolerance” programs Susceptible to incidental exposure 250 ng/mL Used in most programs Less susceptible to incidental exposure 500 ng/mL Used in more “liberal/tolerant” programs Least susceptible to incidental exposure

51 Alternate Matrices Hair Oral Fluid On Site Devices 51

52 HAIR ADVANTAGES Provides a longer estimate of time of drug use
Observed collection Ease of obtaining, storing, and shipping specimens Second specimen can be obtained from original source 52

53 HAIR Recent use not detected Casual user may not be detected
DISADVANTAGES Recent use not detected Casual user may not be detected Possible hair type biases Possible false positives from external contamination Expensive 53

54 ORAL FLUID ADVANTAGES Gender neutral collections
Non-invasive collection Detects recent use Possible correlation with state of impairment 54

55 ORAL FLUID DISADVANTAGES Short window of detection
Quality of specimen is collection device dependent Specimen recovery from stimulant abusers difficult Drug recovery, especially cocaine, is pH dependent Limited test menu 55

56 Onsite Devices Advantages Instant Results Ability to confront donor
May be cheaper Disadvantages Qualitative results and subjective interpretation No accurate cut-offs High false positive rate Specimen validity tests unreliable 56

57 Others Sweat Patches Finger/toe nails Skin scrapings Meconium


59 SPICE and BATH SALTS Calls to Poison Control Centers SPICE BATH SALTS
,870 calls about spice Jan calls Projected = 4,620 ,890 actual calls BATH SALTS calls about bath salts Jan calls Projected = 3,012 actual calls

60 SPICE: Synthetic Cannabinoids
Synthetic cannabinoids started out as legitimate scientific endeavors. More than 250 synthetic cannabinoids synthesized.

61 SPICE: HISTORY 2004 First Appearance in Europe
2008 Wide Spread use in Europe 2008 First Appearance in United States 2008 First Analysis of SPICE at University of Freiburg, Germany 2009 Wide Use in United States 2010 Laboratory Testing of Spice Available

62 SPICE: Preparation Botanical Material Herbal Incense
Synthetic cannabinoids sprayed on herbs, allowed to dry Residual solvent No quality control Batches inconsistent Expensive compared to marijuana Caveat emptor

63 SPICE: Pharmacology Euphoria (“high”) similar to Marijuana Relaxation
Altered state of consciousness Distortion of sensory experiences Impaired motor control Increased reaction time Decreased cognition NO effect on appetite

64 SPICE: Adverse Side Effects
Elevated Blood Pressure Increased Heart Rate Hyperventilation Anxiety and Agitation Paranoia Seizures Vomiting Death (unsubstantiated media reports)

65 SPICE: International Legal Status
All or some Synthetic Cannabinoids Banned Australia Austria France Germany Japan New Zealand Poland Romania Russia Slovak Republic South Korea Switzerland United Kingdom

66 SPICE: Legal Status in U.S. States
Some or all Synthetic Cannabinoids Banned Alabama Arkansas Georgia Illinois Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Missouri Nevada (?) New Hampshire New Mexico Oklahoma Oregon Tennessee Utah (?) Washington West Virginia

67 SPICE: Legal Status U.S. Military
Banned in All Branches of Military U.S. Army U.S. Air Force U.S. Coast Guard U.S. Marine Corps U.S. Navy

68 SPICE: Legal Status U.S. Federal
Schedule Status November 24, 2010 DEA published in Federal Register intent to place five synthetic cannabinoids on Schedule 1 of CSA. March 1, 2011 final rule published. STATUS: Schedule 1, therefore ILLEGAL

69 SPICE: Laboratory Testing
Synthetic Cannabinoids not detected in THC screening immunoassays or THC confirmatory GC/MS testing. Immunoassays now available. On-Site screening tests now available, but high cutoff severely limits usefulness. LC/MS/MS technology available. Few labs perform testing. Expensive $30 - $100 per sample

70 SPICE: Lab testing Current Metabolites STERLING screens for:
JWH018 (2 metabolites) JWH019 (1 metabolite) JWH073 (2 metabolites) JWH250 (2 metabolites) AM2201 (1 metabolite)

71 SPICE: ANALYSIS Future of Spice Testing Alternative Matrix
More compounds to be tested as SPICE formula evolves. New metabolites. Alternative Matrix Blood Measure Parent Drug Oral Fluid Hair Enhanced Window of Detection


73 CATHINONES Fresh leaves chewed or consumed as tea
Originated in Ethiopia Causes release of dopamine from brain areas Sale of Khat legal in - Australia by permit Oman Yemen United Kingdom

Central Nervous System Stimulants Similar in action to methamphetamine Thought to be highly addictive MDPV is 5–8x potency of methylphenidate Available as research chemical in 2007 Popular in Europe and Australia Legal Banned in Louisiana and Florida Jan. 2011

75 BATH SALTS: Adverse Side Effects
Elevated Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Anxiety and agitation Hallucinations Extreme Paranoia Delusions Seizures Nausea and Vomiting Death

76 PREVALENCE: Urine MDPV 88.0% Methylone 20.7% Mephedrone 3.1%
Butylone 1.2%

77 BATH SALTS: ANALYSIS Bath Salts are not detected in Amphetamine Screening Immunoassays or Confirmatory GC/MS assays Immunoassays available, but expensive. Rapid On-Site Tests not available LC- or GC/MS assays available for MDPV and Others Available at STERLING March 1, 2011

They are here to stay. The problem will get worse long before it gets better. DEMAND = SUPPLY Analytical Labs Will Always Lag Behind the Synthetic Chemists

79 Contact Information QUESTIONS???

Download ppt "A Northwest company in the pursuit of excellence"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google