Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SSRC Eurasia Quantitative Methods Webinar Grantwriting for Quantitative Research Professor Jane Zavisca University of Arizona January 25, 2013

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SSRC Eurasia Quantitative Methods Webinar Grantwriting for Quantitative Research Professor Jane Zavisca University of Arizona January 25, 2013"— Presentation transcript:

1 SSRC Eurasia Quantitative Methods Webinar Grantwriting for Quantitative Research Professor Jane Zavisca University of Arizona January 25, 2013 janez@u.arizona.edu

2 Developing a Quantitative Research Agenda  Possible but limited without funding  Why do you need funding?  To buy data: new fieldwork or secondary data  To buy equipment: hardware/software  To buy time: research assistance, course releases  To get/keep a job that values external grants

3 Start small and build up  Be realistic: big grants go to people with proven track records  Be ambitious: apply for leveraging grants to support a longer-term agenda

4 My trajectory  Grants as graduate student  Fulbright-Hays to support qualitative/historical research ($15,000)  NSF dissertation improvement grant (plus internal supplement) to support modest survey in one city ($20,000)  Grants as assistant professor  SSRC postdoctoral fellowship to support pilot qualitative research for new study ($20,000)  NCEEER grant to pay for qualitative data collection and to purchase quantitative data ($32,000)

5  Grants as associate professor. Co-PI with Ted Gerber, full professor at University of Wisconsin  NSF grant to support a large retrospective survey in Russia, to test hypotheses drived from my NCEEER/SSRC-supported research ($250k)  Mystery grant to support four-country, longitudinal survey, building on the NSF work ($3.5 million). [Funder has not yet announced award publicly]

6 Types of quantitative research that warrant external funding  Collect original survey data  Costly, time-consuming risky  Tailor design to your research agenda  Piggyback on existing surveys  Cheaper, logistically simpler  Constrained in length and content  New uses for existing data  Combine existing sources in new ways  Use old data to answer new questions

7 Types of funders  Area studies  NCEEER, SSRC  International/comparative studies  Fulbright. Some fellowships suffice for small scale surveys  Defense/Homeland Security. Minerva Research Initiative, DRTA, DARPA  Basic social science  NSF  NIH  Topic-based funding  Spencer Foundation (education)  Macarthur Foundation (various topics)

8 General advice on proposal writing  SSRC: The art of writing proposals  http://www.ssrc.org/publications/view/7A9CB4F4-815F- DE11-BD80-001CC477EC70/ http://www.ssrc.org/publications/view/7A9CB4F4-815F- DE11-BD80-001CC477EC70/  Great general advice  NIH: Writing a great grant application  http://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/qa/Pages/writing.as px#hypo http://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/qa/Pages/writing.as px#hypo  Geared toward quantitative proposals  Other resources  Ask successful grant-writers for copies of their proposals  If you are at an R1 university, take advantage of internal resources for proposal development (workshops, editing, leveraging funds)

9 Do your homework  Review existing data and literature: to generate hypotheses, and demonstrate novelty of your proposal  Start writing very early – at least 3 months before deadline (your institution’s deadline may differ from sponsor).  Line up collaborators and solicit letters of support

10 Research the funder:  What is the purpose of a given grant, and are you eligible?  What are the selection criteria?  Look for instructions given to reviewers in addition to instructions for applicants.  Structure your proposal around the criteria  Who are the reviewers, and how are they selected?  What are the funder’s broader priorities?  Who are the funder’s own funders? What are their priorities?

11 Pitching quantitative research to Eurasian studies audiences  Appeal to funder’s priorities  NCEEER is funded by US State Department, which has recently called for more quantitative work on the region.  Appeal to novelty/systematicity.  Majority of field research in the region is qualitative  Build on qualitative area expertise to develop quantitative hypotheses

12 Pitching quantitative research to Eurasian studies audiences  Demonstrate your regional knowledge and commitment  Don’t frame only as a theoretical case  Signal commitment to further study in the region  Regional languages: if you don’t know them, explain why you don’t need them for this particular project.  Don’t assume any knowledge of statistics  Use flow charts to depict models  Signal your sophistication to those who do with parenthetical citations, footnotes, appendices

13 Pitching Eurasian context to non- disciplinary audiences  Why should the funder care about your research if they don’t care about your region?  Theoretical advantages  Quasi-natural experiment due to rapid social change  Cross-national variation within comparable contexts  Logistical advantages  Relatively low cost compared to Western contexts  More stable/accessible than other semi-authoritarian regions of the world  OR: …convince them to care about the region  Security issues  Humanitarian concerns  Resources/environment

14 Questions any effective proposal should answer  What is the core question?  Why is it worth answering?  How do you plan to answer it?  What is new about your approach?  What exactly will you do with the time and money provided?  What will you produce?  Why should you be the one to do this research?  Why should the funder pay for it?

15 Writing an effective quantitative proposal  Effective quantitative proposals are more a function of research design than statistics  There should be a tight fit between research questions, concepts, measures, hypotheses, and models

16  At least half of proposal should details the nuts and bolts of what you will do:  what data you will collect (if applicable), how you will ensure its quality, and how you will analyze it.  Justify your specific design choices with reference back to your research questions, theory, and hypotheses

17 Specifics about survey design  Instrument design  Proposed measures—and what concepts they will measure  Survey medium (e.g. face-to-face, computer-assisted, web)  Plans for pretests and pilot tests  Sampling:  Generalizability: how is sample related to population of interest?  Sample size (actual and effective)  Sampling strategy

18 Specifics about survey design  Data collection  Personnel  Field procedures  Quality control  Analytical techniques  Class of statistical models  Examples of models to be tested  Data management plan  Confidentiality, quality, archiving, sharing  Making your data public gives value-added for funder

19 Be careful what you wish for  Is the budget realistic?  Is the timeline realistic?  Do you have adequate institutional support beyond what the grant can provide?  Do you really want to do the proposed research?


Download ppt "SSRC Eurasia Quantitative Methods Webinar Grantwriting for Quantitative Research Professor Jane Zavisca University of Arizona January 25, 2013"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google