Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byZion Corbridge Modified over 3 years ago

1
Microsimulation of Survey Collection Yves Bélanger Kristen Couture 26 January 2010

2
2 Outline Motivation Main aspects of microsimulation Overview of the system A short demo A few results Future work

3
3 Motivation Ultimate goal: make CATI collection more efficient proactive collection management Recent initiatives in the field Experimentation with time slices, cap on calls, calling priorities, Z-groups,... Takes time, lack of control, costly(?), results not always easy to interpret Need for a controlled environment, where the impact of each aspect can be isolated

4
4 Main Aspects of Microsimulation What is microsimulation? A modelling technique that operates at the level of individual units, such as persons, households, vehicles, etc. For us: a "virtual collection" system What elements are we considering? The cases (sampled units) The servers (interviewers) The call attempts The waiting queue(s) The rules of the call scheduler (flows and priorities)

5
5 Main Aspects of Microsimulation (cont'd) What do we want to simulate? 1.A random component: the result of each call attempt Use existing BTH data with appropriate statistical models 2.A deterministic component: how the cases flow through the system Use a simulation software to replicate Blaise: SAS Simulation Studio

6
6 Overview of the System Pre-existing BTH from Survey Model Call Outcomes Model Call Duration Simulation Collection Parameters

7
7 Overview of the System (cont'd) Call outcome Modeled using CSGVP 2004 BTH data Five outcomes derived from BTH outcome codes Unresolved (eg. Busy signal, wrong #) Out of Scope (eg. Cell phone, Business) Refusal Other Contact (eg. Ans. Machine, appointment) Respondent

8
8 Overview of the System (cont'd) Used Multinomial Logistic Regression 7 parameters entered into model: Afternoon – 1 if call made between 12 and 5 Evening – 1 if call made between 5 and 9 Weekend - 1 if call made on weekend Resid – 1 if initial status was residential Unresolved – 1 if call history is only unresolved Refusal – 1 if history shows at least one refusal Contact – 1 if history shows at least one contact i = 1..n j = 1..k

9
9 Overview of the System (cont'd) Calculate probability for each of the five possible outcomes using estimated betas and collection parameters

10
10 Overview of the System (cont'd) Call duration Modeled using existing CSGVP 2004 BTH data Modeled distributions for each of the 5 outcomes

11
11 Overview of the System (cont'd) Components of model Input Allows user to enter parameters via SAS data sets

12
12 Overview of the System (cont'd) Clock Creates Time Parameters including Afternoon, Evening, Weekend, and Time Slice by reading the current simulation time

13
13 Overview of the System (cont'd) Queuing System Cases are created and enter a queue waiting to be interviewed

14
14 Overview of the System (cont'd) Determining Call Outcome Uses probability formulas to determine call outcome: Unresolved, Out of Scope, Other Contact, Refusal, Respondent

15
15 Overview of the System (cont'd) Call Center Interview takes place Call duration is simulated Ability to control interviewer schedule

16
16 Overview of the System (cont'd) Finalizing Cases Case exits system when… Outcome code = OOS or Respondent Cap on Calls is reached Cap of 20 for Residential Status Cap of 5 for Unknown Status Number of Refusals=3 A BTH file is created as output in terms of a SAS dataset

17
17 A Short Demo

18
18 A Few Results Simulation with 10,000 cases for 30 days of collection Interviewer Agenda Shift 1 (9am-12pm): 10 interviewers Shift 2 (12pm-5pm): 10 interviewers Shift 3 (5pm-9pm): 10 interviewers * Note: No Time Slices in this example

19
19 A few results (cont'd) Finalized Cases and Response Rate Distribution of Outcome Codes

20
20 A few results (cont'd) Impact of Changing Parameters Number of Interviewers Length of Collection Period

21
21 A few results (cont'd) Changing the Time Per Unit Cap on Calls is in Effect

22
22 Future Work Continue improvements to system To outcome model More explanatory variables Distinguish between hhld and person contacts To simulation system Implement time slices Improve priorities Presentation to JSM (incl. article) Potential cooperation with Census Other?... will depend on available budget

Similar presentations

OK

Simulating Single server queuing models. Consider the following sequence of activities that each customer undergoes: 1.Customer arrives 2.Customer waits.

Simulating Single server queuing models. Consider the following sequence of activities that each customer undergoes: 1.Customer arrives 2.Customer waits.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on porter's five forces model template Ppt on power system stability theory Project ppt on product launch Ppt on power grid india Ppt on linear equations in two variables and functions Ppt on life cycle of a butterfly Ppt on electricity from waste heat Powerpoint template free download ppt on pollution Ppt on pricing policy Free ppt on motivational skills