Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
Online Algorithms Amrinder Arora Permalink: http://standardwisdom.com/softwarejournal/presentations/

2
2

3
Ski Rental Problem Classic toy problem of rent/buy nature Rental cost = 1$, Buying cost = $k Algorithm –Rent for k-1 days –Buy skis on day #k –If you stop skiing during the first (k-1) days, it costs the same –If you stop skiing after day #k, your cost is $(2k-1) which is (2- 1/k) times more than best possible ($k) This is the best algorithm. (But we will look for a better one shortly.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ski_rental_problem 3

4
Agenda What are online algorithms? (And why?) How to analyze them? Some example problems and algorithms Categories of online algorithms 4

5
What does “Online” mean? “Online” means - Input arrives a little at a time, need instant response –E.g., stock market, paging Question: what is a “good” algorithm? 5

6
Applications Variety of Applications –Scheduling –Memory Management –Routing Sample Problems –Ski Rental –Job Scheduling –Paging –Ambulances –Graph Problems 6

7
Analyzing Online Algorithms Competitive Analysis Probabilistic Analysis Other/newer methods 7

8
Competitive Analysis For any input, the cost of our online algorithm is never worse than c times the cost of the optimal offline algorithm. 8 Very robust Pessimistic

9
Probabilistic Analysis Assume a distribution generating the input Find an algorithm which minimizes the expected cost of the algorithm. 9 Can incorporate information predicting the future Can be difficult to determine accurately

10
Competitive Analysis Input sequence: Full knowledge optimum (also called offline optimum): k-competitive if for all input sequences : Sometimes, to ignore boundary conditions 10

11
1966 – Online Era Begins! We are given a set of m identical machines. A sequence of jobs arrives online. Each job must be scheduled immediately on one of m machines without knowledge of any future jobs. The goal is to minimize the completion time of the last job The must basic scheduling problem was introduced in 1966 11

12
List Scheduling Schedule the job on the least loaded machine. Graham showed that the List Scheduling Algorithm is (2-1/m) competitive This analysis is tight. This is the optimal algorithm for m = 2 and m = 3. 12

13
Fancier Results In 1992 Bartal gave an 1.986-competitive "New Algorithms for an Ancient Scheduling Problem" Karger in 1996 generalized the algorithm and proved an upper bound of 1.945 "A Better Algorithm for an Ancient Scheduling Problem" The best algorithm known so far achieved a 1.923 competitive ration Lower Bounds –Susanne Albers proved a bound of 1.852 –Current best lower bound of 1.88 13

14
Extending Research Many variants of basic problem is studied: –Jobs may be preempted –Jobs may be rejected at a penalty –Online algorithms may use randomization –In addition they are results for different machine types 14

15
15

16
Paging Problem Maintain a two level memory system, consisting of a small fast memory and a large slow memory The goal is to serve a sequence of requests to memory pages so as to minimize number of page faults. Hit: Page found 16

17
Minimizing Paging Faults On a fault evict a page from cache Paging algorithm ≡ Eviction policy Goal: minimize the number of page faults 17

18
Paging Algorithms LRU, FIFO, LIFO, Least freq use LIFO, LFU not competititive LRU, FIFO k-competitive. Theorem: No deterministic online algorithm can be better than k-competitive 18

19
Worst case In the worst case page, the number of page faults on n requests is n. E.g. cache of size 4, request sequence p 1 p 2 p 3 p 4 p 5 p 6 p 7 p 8 p 9 p 10 p 11 p 12 19

20
Compare to optimal p 1 p 2 p 3 p 4 p 5 p 6 p 7 p 8 p 9 p 10 p 11 p 12 p 13 … is hard for everyone (i.e. 13 faults) p 1 p 2 p 3 p 4 p 5 p 1 p 2 p 3 p 4 p 5 p 1 p 2 p 3 p 4 … 8 faults Optimal algorithm knows the future 20

21
k-Server problem Ambulance location problem Metrical Task Systems Somewhat, ice cream vending problem 21

22
Online Graph Theory Online Minimum Spanning Tree Online Graph Coloring Online Shortest Paths 22

23
Randomization If ski rental costs $1, and buying costs $10, then with probability=0.5, buy after 8 days, and with probability=0.5, buy after 10 days. 23

24
Randomization 3 kinds of adversaries Oblivious (weak): Does not know the randomized results Adaptive Online (medium): Knows the decision/random output of algorithm, but needs to make their decision first. Adaptive Offline (strong): Knows everything – randomization does not help. 24

25
Summary Online Problem – Problem is revealed, one step at a time. Online Algorithm – Needs to respond to the request sequence that has been shown, not knowing next items in the sequence Competitive Ratio – The worst ratio of the online algorithm to the optimal offline algorithm, considering all possible request sequences. Basic Concepts Online algorithms show up in many practical problems. Even if you are considering an offline problem, consider what would be the online version of that problem. Research areas including improving algorithms, improving analysis of existing algorithms, proving tightness of analysis, considering problem variations, etc. Importance and Research Topics 25

26
Extra Material Adversary Approach to prove that 3n/2 – 2 comparisons are always needed to find both the minimum and the maximum given an unsorted array of n numbers: Notes at: http://is.gd/csp1abhttp://is.gd/csp1ab 26

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google