Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Is It Too Late Or Can Developmental Phonological Dyslexia Be Successfully Treated In Adults? Tim Conway, Ph.D. The Morris Center, Inc. University of Florida.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Is It Too Late Or Can Developmental Phonological Dyslexia Be Successfully Treated In Adults? Tim Conway, Ph.D. The Morris Center, Inc. University of Florida."— Presentation transcript:

1 Is It Too Late Or Can Developmental Phonological Dyslexia Be Successfully Treated In Adults? Tim Conway, Ph.D. The Morris Center, Inc. University of Florida Gainesville, Florida Presentation at the Florida Association of Speech Language Pathologists and Audiologists May, 2010

2 u Is It Too Late Or Can Developmental Phonological Dyslexia Be Successfully Treated In Adults? u Abstract: u Children with developmental phonological dyslexia typically grow up to become adults with phonological dyslexia. However, recent treatment studies report successful prevention and treatment of dyslexia in children. This raises the question of whether or not it is too late to help adults with dyslexia improve their phonological processing, phonological decoding, functional reading and language skills. We present a theoretical model of assessment and treatment of dyslexia that relies on an transdisciplinary team approach. Case studies of adults who have completed this approach are presented to highlight that successful remediation may be possible for many adults. Limitations of this model and approach as well as future directions are also discussed. u Three Learning Outcomes: 1. The participants will describe how a transdisciplinary team may guide assessment and treatment of phonological dyslexia. 2. The participants will identify a minimum of 3 disciplines that may collaborate on a transdisciplinary team. 3. The participants will be able to explain evidence that some adults are able to improve their phonological dyslexia following a transdisciplinary treatment. u Three Learning Outcomes: 1. The participants will describe how a transdisciplinary team may guide assessment and treatment of phonological dyslexia. 2. The participants will identify a minimum of 3 disciplines that may collaborate on a transdisciplinary team. 3. The participants will be able to explain evidence that some adults are able to improve their phonological dyslexia following a transdisciplinary treatment. u 4. Participants will understand how evidence from this transdisciplinary model of assessment and treatment may impact the future direction of phonological treatment. u 4. Participants will understand how evidence from this transdisciplinary model of assessment and treatment may impact the future direction of phonological treatment.

3 WHAT DYSLEXIA IS NOT DYSLEXIA… .. is NOT A VISUAL PROBLEM .. is NOT A LACK OF INTELLIGENCE .. is NOT DUE TO LACK OF EFFORT .. is NOT RESPONSIVE TO STANDARD READING INSTRUCTION .. is NOT UNCOMMON: 5–17.5 % OF POPULATION .. is NOT A DEVELOPMENTAL LAG

4 DYS = TROUBLE LEXIA = WORDS DYSLEXIA IS…  N N N NEUROLOGIC IN ORIGIN – GENETIC  L L L LIFELONG – ENVIRONMENT MAY ALTER COURSE  C C C CORE DEFICIT=PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS (LANGUAGE)  R R R READING COMPREHENSION > WORD READING SKILLS DYSLEXIA MAY INCLUDE ACCOMPANYING CHALLENGES AAAADHD (50-70%) BBBBEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS SSSSENSORY MOTOR DIFFICULTY  = = = = MORE CHALLENGING TO REMEDIATE

5 STRENGTHS LEADERSHIP SKILLS THINKING “OUT OF THE BOX” PATTON CHURCHILL POLITICAL&MILITARY THOMAS EDISON BUSINESS SCIENTISTS & INVENTORS INVENTORS THE PICTURE OF DYSLEXIA (ALL STENGTHS DO NOT OCCUR FOR EVERYONE) JFK TED TURNER (Alexander & Conway, 2007)

6 H.C. ANDERSEN Da VINCI SPEILBERG / FORD CREATIVITY WRITERS ARTISTSMUSICIANS ACTORS/DIRECTORS MOZART STRENGTHS THE PICTURE OF DYSLEXIA (ALL STENGTHS DO NOT OCCUR FOR EVERYONE) (Alexander & Conway, 2007)

7 VISUOSPATIAL / MOTOR SKILLS SURGEONS ATHLETES NEUROSURGERY MUHAMMAD ALI NOLAN RYAN THE PICTURE OF DYSLEXIA (ALL STENGTHS DO NOT OCCUR FOR EVERYONE) STRENGTHS (Alexander & Conway, 2007)

8 THE PICTURE OF DYSLEXIA (ALL SYMPTOMS DO NOT OCCUR WITH EVERYONE) ORAL LANGUAGE CHALLENGES LISTENING Auditory Memory (word sequences, phone numbers, remembering directions) Phonological Awareness Foreign Language SPEAKING Word Finding Multi-syllable Words Sequencing Ideas Foreign Language (Alexander & Conway, 2007)

9 WRITTEN LANGUAGE CHALLENGES READING MechanicsComprehension Speed Mechanics Speed SPELLING & WRITING Expressing Ideas THE PICTURE OF DYSLEXIA (ALL SYMPTOMS DO NOT OCCUR WITH EVERYONE) (Alexander & Conway, 2007)

10 ACCOMPANYING SENSORIMOTOR CHALLENGES Up/Down Left/Right Oral Motor Messy Eating Writing/knots Fingers Eyes Tired Words Swim Lose Place Spatial Awareness THE PICTURE OF DYSLEXIA (ALL SYMPTOMS DO NOT OCCUR WITH EVERYONE) (Alexander & Conway, 2007)

11 Postural Security Bilateral Awareness Motor Planning Central Nervous System Body Scheme Reflex Maturity Screen Input Body Scheme Reflex Maturity Screen Input Olfactory Visual Auditory Gustatory Eye-HandOcular-Motor Postural Coord Control Adjustment Auditory Visuospatial Focus Auditory Visuospatial Focus Language Perception Attention ADL’s Behavior ADL’s Behavior Academic Academic Learning Learning Cognition Cognition Perceptual- Perceptual- Motor Motor Sensory- Sensory-Motor Sensory Tactile Vestibular Proprioception Sensorimotor Pyramid

12 ACCOMPANYING CHALLENGES (BEHAVIORAL) Parents with similar challenges Brain / Behavior Disorders Attention & Executive Function Anxiety Depression OCD Oppositional Behavior THE PICTURE OF DYSLEXIA (ALL SYMPTOMS DO NOT OCCUR WITH EVERYONE) (Alexander & Conway, 2007)

13

14 “CHANGES IN SYNAPSES?” AT WHAT AGE DO NEURONS LOSE THE ABILITY TO MAKE NEW CONNECTIONS (SYNAPSES) WITH OTHER NEURONS?

15 u How Many Neurons In The Brain? u ~ 100 Billion u How Many Connections Exist in the Neural Networks Formed in the Brain? u ~ 100 Trillion u How Many “Connections” for a Single Neuron? u ~ 40,000 NEURONS - How the Brain Works

16 TYPICAL LANGUAGE AREAS SPEECH PRODUCTION AREA AUDITORY PROCESSING AREA VISUAL-LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION AREA VISUAL / VERBAL AREA LEFT HEMISPHERE

17 TYPICAL READING AREAS LEFT HEMISPHERE WORD ANALYSIS AUTOMATIC (SIGHT WORD)

18 STG (bilateral) acoustic-phonetic speech codes pMTG (left) sound-meaning interface Area Spt (left) auditory-motor interface pIFG/dPM (left) articulatory-based speech codes Hickok & Poeppel (2000), Trends in Cognitive Sciences Hickok & Poeppel (2004), Cognition STS phoneme representations

19 UNIQUE AND OVERLAPPING NETWORKS SENTENCE/SYNTACTIC, SEMANTIC, PHONOLOGICAL VIGNEAU et al., 2006

20 Developmental Building Blocks for Language 18 MONTHS 1 MONTH 9 MONTHS 5 YEAR S 9 YEARS

21 Is There a Neurobiological Basis to Dyslexia?

22 NEURAL MIGRATION GONE AWRY IN DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA X NEURONAL MIGRATION

23 “OUT OF LINE NEURONS” (ECTOPIAS) FRONT BACK

24

25

26 Galaburda, 2006 NEURONAL MIGRATION (GALABURDA, LOTURCO, RAMUS, FITCH & ROSEN, 2006)

27 From Genes to Behavior in Developmental Dyslexia. Galaburda AM, LoTurco J, Ramus F, Fitch RH, Rosen GD. Nat Neurosci Oct;9(10): Department of Neurology, Division of Behavioral Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. All four genes thus far linked to developmental dyslexia participate in brain development, and abnormalities in brain development are increasingly reported in dyslexia. Comparable abnormalities induced in young rodent brains cause auditory and cognitive deficits, underscoring the potential relevance of these brain changes to dyslexia. Our perspective on dyslexia is that some of the brain changes cause phonological processing abnormalities as well as auditory processing abnormalities; the latter, we speculate, resolve in a proportion of individuals during development, but contribute early on to the phonological disorder in dyslexia. Thus, we propose a tentative pathway between a genetic effect, developmental brain changes, and perceptual and cognitive deficits associated with dyslexia.

28 STRONG ACTIVITY PATTERN weak activation pattern BRAIN ACTIVITY DURING READING “SIGNATURE” DYSLEXIC BRAIN Simos, et al 2002

29 Decreased activity in right hemisphere Treatment = Increased activity in left hemisphere TREATMENT CHANGES the BRAIN’S ACTIVITY (Simos et al 2002)

30 Biology (RAMUS, 2004) Behavior Cognition

31 (Alexander, 2006)

32 PHONOLOGY EXECUTIVE FUNCTION / INTENTION WORKING MEMORY HOLD / MANIPULATE (PERCEPTION & PRODUCTION) ACOUSTICVISUAL ORAL MOTOR ORAL MOTORSOMATOSENSORY ATTENTION / AROUSAL PHONEMICREPRESENTATION PROSODIC (WORD LEVEL) (WORD LEVEL) (Alexander, 2006)

33 THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA: A MOTOR-ARTICULATORY FEEDBACK HYPOTHESIS (HEILMAN, VOELLER, ALEXANDER, 1996) “The inability to associate the position of their articulators with speech sounds may impair the development of phonological awareness and the ability to convert graphemes to phonemes. Unawareness of their articulators may be related to programming or feedback deficits.”

34 Disciplines: u Neuropsychology u Psychiatry u Nursing/Nurse Practitioner/Developmental Pediatrics u Clinical Psychology u Occupational Therapy u Speech-Language Pathology u Education Transdisciplinary Team for Assessment & Treatment

35 Disciplines on the team u Pediatrician/Psychiatrist u Nursing/Nurse Practitioner u Psychologist/Neuropsychologist u Occupational Therapist u Speech-Language Pathologist u Teacher/Special Education Transdisciplinary Team

36 Two Phase Assessment Phase I: Screening & a Broad Neurodevelopmental Evaluation Screening & a Broad Neurodevelopmental Evaluation Phase II: Assessment of Specific Abilities Assessment of Specific Abilities - Identify an Individual Profile of Strengths & Weaknesses (for diagnostic and treatment planning purposes) - Identify an Individual Profile of Strengths & Weaknesses (for diagnostic and treatment planning purposes) Transdisciplinary Team Assessment

37 Phase I Evaluation (broad screening) u Neurodevelopmental evaluation (Nurse Practitioner) u Medical and Developmental History & Exam u Screening of all sensory & cognitive systems including sensorimotor, learning & memory, attention, speech/language, vision, motor planning and cognition vision, motor planning and cognition u Nutrition, sleep, behavior, allergies, genetic history, other concerns… u Psychological evaluation (Psych or Psychiatry) u Diagnostic interview – psychosocial, educational, behavior, & family history

38 Phase II – identify an individual strengths and weakness: u Attention/Intention u Intelligence/Cognition u Oral Language u Memory u Sensorimotor u Written Language u Mathematics u Behavioral Observations Transdisciplinary Team Assessment

39 Transdisciplinary Treatment Program u Key treatment features are based on neuroscience and behavioral treatment research findings u Intensity (# of hours per day) u Frequency (# of days per week) u Specificity (clarity of treatment program) u Selective post-treatment assessment with standardized tests to document treatment gains u Ongoing data collection of program effects for program self-evaluation

40 Transdisciplinary Treatment Program Treatment Targets Within and Across Disciplines u Speech-Language Therapy u Targets improving foundational language skills that may cause the learning difficulty, e.g. phonological processing/decoding u Occupational Therapy u Targets sensory and motor skills that may contribute to learning difficulties, e.g. sensory defensiveness, visual processing/perception, etc. u Psychiatric/Medical u Medication and behavioral management of attention, mood or behavior disorders. u Psychological Treatment u Client - developing adaptive coping skills for academic and life stressors u Parent - better behavior management, conflict resolution training, etc… u Client & Parent/Spouse (separately or combined) - d eveloping adaptive family or marital functioning, relative to learning and other difficulties.

41 Case Study u High school student u History of dyslexia since elementary school u Parent is a school teacher u Years of school-based academic intervention and specialized tutoring at franchised centers… u Starting athlete with scholarship potential, but he has body function and academic deficits in…

42 Case Study - Assessment Findings u Attention u ADHD-Inattentive u Language u Phonological u Reading u Writing u Spelling u Written comprehension u Expression. u Sensorimotor u Visual vigilance u Visual tracking u Vestibular u Visual perceptual u “Low Registration” on Sensory Profile u Poor balance with eyes closed u Poor supine flexion. Deficits in:

43 Case Study: Transdisciplinary Treatments Psychology: u Individual therapy u Therapy with mother Speech-Language: u Phonological Awareness (LiPS Program®) u Mental Imagery (Visualizing & Verbalizing®) u Written Composition (Visual-Kinesthetic Sentence Structure). OT u Sensory modulation & processing - esp. vestibular u Oculomotor skills u Joint stability u Visual perceptual skills u Balance u Movement perception u Sequencing.

44 Case Study: Transdisciplinary Treatment of Dyslexia Treatment Schedule: u Daily u 4-6 hours treatment per day u ~1 hour of OT u ~3-5 hours language u 5 days per week u ~12 weeks Treatment Hours: u Phonological/Cognitive: ~150 (LiPS®) u Semantic/Memory (V/V®): ~50 u Syntax/Cognitive (VKSS): ~50 u Physical Medicine: ~45.

45 Sensorimotor Functions: Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) IQ=101 Standard score

46 Sensorimotor Functions: Test of Visual Processing Skills-3 IQ=101 Scaled score

47 Language Functions: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP) Standard score

48 Improved Sensorimotor Functions  Sensory  Sensory Processing – “Low registration” was improved with medication and arousal strategies for use at home and school.   Processing/ Modulation of Vestibular Information - R & L LE balance without vision = 4 and 7 secs, improved to 21 and 18 secs; impaired supine flexion improved to 90 seconds while counting (without holding shoulders); depressed post rotary nystagmus was improved   Oculomotor Skills- losing his place during reading and poor visual endurance (blinked excessively during visual tasks/testing), both visual tracking and endurance were improved and excessive blinking was markedly decreased   Visual Perception - TVPS=83 SS (below average) to TVPS=110 (high average)   Graphomotor Skills - VMI Motor Coordination = 75 SS improved to 89   Oral Motor Skills - improved oral-motor “feeling” or proprioception

49 Academic Functions: WECHSLER INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST (WIAT-II) Standard score

50 pre-treatment skills post-treatment skills

51 Treatment Summary Participant01 Demonstrated:  Improved Attention, Language, Sensorimotor and  Improved Attention, Language, Sensorimotor and Academic (passed high school proficiency tests and will get a standard diploma)   Planning to enroll in Junior College and play sports on an athletic scholarship

52 Conclusions u Adults with language-based learning difficulties may be able to make significant improvements in areas of attention, sensorimotor, visual perceptual, language and academic functioning. u The multifaceted nature of the challenges for many adults with language-based learning difficulties may be best treated by a transdisciplinary team. u Large scale studies are needed to identify if there are pre-treatment cognitive/sensorimotor profiles that may be more responsive to these types of intervention.

53 Thank You Questions or Comments?


Download ppt "Is It Too Late Or Can Developmental Phonological Dyslexia Be Successfully Treated In Adults? Tim Conway, Ph.D. The Morris Center, Inc. University of Florida."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google