Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAlanna Newlin Modified over 2 years ago

1
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 1/15 Discussion #27 Closures & Equivalence Relations

2
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 2/15 Topics Reflexive closure Symmetric closure Transitive closure Equivalence relations Partitions

3
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 3/15 Closure Closure means adding something until done. –Normally adding as little as possible until some condition is satisfied –Least fixed point similarities

4
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 4/15 Reflexive Closure Reflexive closure of a relation: R (r) –smallest reflexive relation that contains R (i.e. fewest pairs added) –R (r) = R I A (R is a relation on a set A, and I A is the identity relation 1’s on the diagonal and 0’s elsewhere.) 111 3 100 2 010 1 321 111 3 110 2 011 1 321 R = R (r) = x (xRx)

5
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 5/15 Symmetric Closure Symmetric closure of a relation: R (s) –smallest symmetric relation that contains R (i.e. fewest pairs added) –R (s) = R R ~ (R ~ is R inverse) 111 3 100 2 010 1 321 110 3 101 2 100 1 321 R = R ~ = 111 3 101 2 110 1 321 R R ~ = x y(xRy yRx)

6
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 6/15 Transitive Closure Transitive closure of a relation: R (t) = R + –smallest transitive relation that contains R (i.e. fewest pairs added) –for each path of length i, there must be a direct path. (This follows from x y, y z x z; since, if we also have v x, we must have v z, a path of length 3.) –R (t) = R R 2 R 3 … R |A|. (No path can be longer than |A|, the number of elements in A.)

7
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 7/15 R R 2 R 3 = R×R 2 = R 3 = Transitive Closure – Example 1 111 3 100 2 010 1 321 111 3 111 2 100 1 321 R = R 2 = 111 3 111 2 111 1 321 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 All paths of length 3 All paths of length 2 All paths of length 1 111 3 111 2 111 1 321

8
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 8/15 Transitive Closure – Example 2 010 3 100 2 000 1 321 100 3 010 2 000 1 321 R = R 2 = 010 3 100 2 000 1 321 R×R 2 = R 3 = 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 110 3 110 2 000 1 321 R R 2 R 3 = 1 2 3 All paths of length 3 All paths of length 2 Paths of any length All paths of length 1

9
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 9/15 Reflexive Transitive Closure Reflexive transitive closure of a relation: R * –smallest reflexive and transitive relation that contains R –R * = I A R + = R 0 R + = R 0 R 1 R 2 …R |A| Example: 100 3 010 2 001 1 321 I A = R 0 = 110 3 110 2 001 1 321 1 2 3 R 1 R 2 R 3 = 110 3 110 2 000 1 321 R 0 R 1 R 2 R 3 =

10
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 10/15 Equivalence Relations A relation R on a set A is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. –Equivalence relations are about “equivalence” –Examples: = for integersx = xreflexive x = y y = xsymmetric x=y y=z x=ztransitive = for setsA = Areflexive A = B B = Asymmetric A=B B=C A=Ctransitive Let R be “has same major as” for college students xRx reflexive: same major as self xRy yRx symmetric: same major as each other xRy yRz xRz transitive: same as, same as same as

11
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 11/15 Partitions A partition of a set S is –a set of subsets S i=1,2,…n of S –such that n i=1 S i = S, S j S k = for j k. Each S i is called a block (also called an equivalence class) Example: –Suppose we form teams (e.g. for a doubles tennis tournament) from the set: {Abe, Kay, Jim, Nan, Pat, Zed} then teams could be: { {Abe, Nan}, {Kay, Jim}, {Pat, Zed} } Note: “on same team as” is reflexive, symmetric, transitive an equivalence relation. Equivalence relations and partitions are the same thing (two sides of the same coin).

12
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 12/15 Partitions (continued…) Since individual elements can only appear in one block (S j S k = for j k), blocks can be represented by any element within the block. e.g.Nan’s Team Jimmer’s 2011 sweet-16 team Formally, [x] = set of all elements related to x and y [x] iff xRy e.g.[Nan] represents {Abe, Nan}, Nan’s team [Abe] represents {Abe, Nan}, Abe’s team [Jimmer] represents the set of players who played on BYU’s 2011 sweet-16 team

13
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 13/15 Partitions & Equivalence Relations The mod function partitions the natural numbers into equivalence classes. –0 mod 3 = 0 so 0 forms a class [0] –1 mod 3 = 1 so 1 forms new class [1] –2 mod 3 = 2 so 2 forms new class [2] –3 mod 3 = 0 so 3 belongs to [0] –4 mod 3 = 1 so 4 belongs to [1] –5 mod 3 = 2 so 5 belongs to [2] –6 mod 3 = 0 so 6 belongs to [0] –… Thus, the mod function partitions the natural numbers into equivalence classes. –[0] = {0, 3, 6, …} –[1] = {1, 4, 7,…} –[2] = {2, 5, 8, …} Example:

14
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 14/15 Partitions Equivalence Relations Theorem: If {S 1, …, S n } is a partition of S, then R:S S is an equivalence relation, where R is “in same block as.” Note: to prove that R is an equivalence relation, we must prove that R is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Proof: Reflexive: since every element is in the same block as itself. Symmetric: since if x is in the same block as y, y is in the same block as x. Transitive: since if x and y are in the same block and y and z are in the same block, x and z are in the same block.

15
Discussion #27 Chapter 5, Sections 4.6-7 15/15 Equivalence Relations Partitions Theorem: If R:S S is an equivalence relation and [x] = { y | xRy }, then { [x] | x S } is a partition P of S. Note: to prove that we have a partition, we must prove (1) that every element of S is in a block of P, and (2) that for every pair of distinct blocks S j and S k (j k) of P, S j S k = . Proof: (1) Since R is reflexive, xRx, every element of S is at least in its own block and thus in some block of P. (2) Suppose S j S k for distinct blocks S j and S k of P. Then, at least one element y is in both S j and S k. Let S j = {y, x 1, … x n } and S k = {y, z 1, … z m }, then yRx i, i=1, 2, …, n, and yRz p, p=1, 2, …, m. Since R is symmetric, x i Ry, and since R is transitive x i Rz p. But now, since the elements of S j are R-related to the elements of S k, x 1, …, x n, y, z 1, …, z m are together in a block of P and thus S i and S k are not distinct blocks of P.

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Chapter 3 Relations. Section 3.1 Relations and Digraphs.

Chapter 3 Relations. Section 3.1 Relations and Digraphs.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on suspension type insulators for sale Ppt on circuit switching network Ppt on human rights and social equality Ppt on airbag working principle Ppt on remote operated spy robot technology Ppt on marketing management Ppt on coalition government canada Training ppt on etiquette and manners Ppt on contact management system in java Ppt on bionics