Presentation on theme: "Contracts in Writing & Third-Party Rights"— Presentation transcript:
1Contracts in Writing & Third-Party Rights Chapters 18 & 19Contracts in Writing & Third-Party Rights
2HypotheticalOn January 2, Wabash Construction Company, a general contractor, executed a written contract with Anderson Brick, Inc., a subcontractor. The contract relates to a major “strip mall” building project in Morgantown, and Wabash faces a deadline of October 31 in its contract with The Mackie Consortium, L.L.C., the owners of the new mall. In the agreement between Wabash and Anderson, the parties stipulate that “time is of the essence” in terms of performance of the bricklaying work, and that the deadline for Anderson’s completion of the bricklaying work is July 15. There is also a “liquidated damages” clause in the contract between Wabash and Anderson, indicating that if the work is not completed by July 15, Anderson will pay $2,000 in damages for every day the bricklaying is not completed beyond July 15. Anderson does not complete the bricklaying work by July 15. In fact, the project is not finished until August 30, and Wabash now claims liquidated damages from Anderson in the amount of $92,000 (representing 46 days beyond the July 15 deadline, multiplied by $2,000 per day.) Anderson refuses to pay the $92,000, and Wabash sues. At trial, Anderson’s attorney seeks to introduce the following evidence: 1) the testimony of Henry Anderson, Anderson’s owner, who is willing to testify under oath that at the time of the signing of the contract, Wabash’s general manager, Fred Stein, said “Pay no attention to the July 15 deadline in the contract; if you need more time, all you have to do is ask;” and 2) a crumpled index card, purportedly in Fred Stein’s handwriting, indicating “no ‘hard and fast’ deadline on Anderson brick work.” Should the trial court judge admit the foregoing evidence?
3Statute of FraudsRule of state law requiring certain types of contract to be in writing in order to be enforceable
4Purpose of Statute of Frauds Ease contractual negotiations by requiring sufficient, reliable evidence to prove existence and specific terms of contractPrevent unreliable, oral evidence from interfering with contractual relationshipPrevent parties from entering into contracts with which they do not agree
5Contracts Covered by Statute of Frauds Certain types of contracts must be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought to be enforceable.To be enforceable, the following types of contracts must be in writing and signed:Contracts that cannot be performed within one year from the date of their makingPromises made in consideration of marriage (Prenuptial agreements)Secondary Obligations: Contracts to pay the debt/default of another partyReal estate contractsContracts for the sale of goods valued at $500 or more
6Exceptions to Statute of Frauds Writing Requirement Admission: Statement made in court, under oath, or at some state during a legal proceeding in which defendant admits that oral contract existed (even though contract was originally required to be in writing)Partial Performance: Action of both parties demonstrate existence of contractPromissory Estoppel: Legal enforcement of otherwise unenforceable contract, due to party’s detrimental reliance on contractMiscellaneous exceptions recognized by Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): Examples—Oral contracts between merchants, oral contracts for customized (“specially manufactured”) goods
7Statute of Frauds Writing Requirements Common Law--Written contract must clearly indicate:Parties to contractSubject matter/purpose of agreementConsideration given by both partiesSignificant terms (Price, quantity, etc.)Signature of party plaintiff seeks to hold responsible under contract (i.e., signature of defendant)Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)—Written contract for sale of goods must include:Quantity of goodsSignature of defendant
8Parol Evidence RuleCommon law rule stating that oral evidence of agreement made before or contemporaneously with written agreement is inadmissible when parties intended to have written agreement be complete and final version of agreementPurpose: Lends stability, predictability and integrity to written contracts
9Exceptions to Parol Evidence Rule Contracts that are subsequently modifiedContracts conditioned on orally agreed-upon termsContracts that are not final, as they are part written and part oralContracts with ambiguous termsIncomplete contractsContracts with obvious typographical errorsVoidable or void contractsEvidence of prior dealings or usage of trade
10Integrated ContractsMerger Clause: Written contracts within statute of frauds intended to be complete and final representation of parties’ agreementGeneral Rule: Integrated contracts prevent admissibility of parol evidence
11Statute of Frauds & Parol Evidence Rule Parol evidence rule says written contract cannot be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or contemporaneous oral agreement; PER’s exceptions include ambiguity, course of dealing, mistake, validity of contract in disputePER is substantive rule of contract interpretation.What constitutes a legally binding agreement?How do we know what the agreement is?
12Electronic Contract/Signature Under certain conditions, both federal and state laws permit contracts to be formed electronically and allow electronic signatures to satisfy statute of frauds’ “writing” and “signature” requirements.Examples – 15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq.; California Civil Code § et seq.
13Third-Party Rights Hypothetical Barbara Hastings has no children of her own, but she does have a beloved niece named Ellen Laughridge. Attentive to the future financial needs of Ellen, Barbara secures a $500,000 life insurance contract from Chameleon Insurance Company, listing Ellen as the sole beneficiary. Barbara has every intention to inform Ellen of her new life insurance policy, but “life gets in the way,” and she neglects to do so. Hastings dies on January 15, As part of her estate distribution, Ellen receives a chest-of-drawers from her dear aunt. On August 29, 2007, while rearranging her clothing in the chest-of-drawers, Ellen comes upon a secret compartment. In the secret compartment is an original copy of the life insurance contract. Ellen is overjoyed to see her name listed as beneficiary, and she contacts Chameleon Insurance Company immediately. Upon review of the policy, Chameleon denies coverage. Chameleon’s claims representative points to Section 15(b) of the policy, which specifically requires notification of the insured’s death no later than one year after death. It has been over two years and seven months since Barbara Hastings died. Will Ellen recover the $500,000 in insurance proceeds? Is it ethical for an insurance company to deny a claim on the basis of a “technicality?”
14TerminologyObligor: Contractual party who owes duty to other party in privity of contractParty who agreed to do something for the other partyObligee: Contractual party owed duty from other party in privity of contractParty who agreed to receive something from the other partyAssignment: Transfer of rights under a contract to a third partyAssignor: Party to contract who transfers his/her rights to a third partyAssignee: Party (not in privity of contract) who receives transfer of rights to a contract
15Third Party RightsOnly the Parties to a contract have rights and liabilities under the contract.Exceptions:Assignment or Delegation.Third party beneficiary contract.
16Assignments Transfer of rights in a bilateral contract to 3rd party. Obligee/AssignorObligorAssigneeOriginal Contract FormedAssignmentDuties OwedAfter Assignment
17Assignments Rights cannot be assigned: If the assignment is contrary to statute.Prohibited by law/public policyWhen a contract is personal in nature.Assignment materially changes rights or duties of obligor.Rights would increase obligor’s risks/dutiesIf the contract stipulates the right cannot be assigned.Valid notice must be given to all parties.
18DelegationDelegation: Transfer of duty under a contract to a third partyDelegator: Party to a contract who transfers his/her duty to a third partyDelegatee: Party (not in privity of contract) who receives transfer of duty to a contract
19Third-Party Beneficiary Contracts Intended Beneficiary: Third party to contract whom contracting parties intended to benefit directly from contract. Intended beneficiaries can sue to enforce contract obligationsPromisor: Party to contract who made promise that benefits third partyPromisee: Party to contract who owes something to promisor in exchange for promise made to third-party beneficiaryCreditor beneficiary. Third party who benefits from contract in which promisor agrees to pay promisee’s debtDonee beneficiary: Third party who benefits from contract in which promisor agrees to give a gift to third partyVesting: Maturing of rights, such that a party can legally act on the rightsIncidental Beneficiary: Third party who unintentionally gains benefit from contract between other parties. Contracting parties do not intend to benefit incidental beneficiary. Incidental beneficiaries cannot sue to enforce contract obligations