Presentation on theme: "Social Anxiety and It’s Treatment David M Clark Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London."— Presentation transcript:
Social Anxiety and It’s Treatment David M Clark Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London
Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders Anxiety is a survival mechanism Motivator and sometimes life saver with real dangers Problematic when danger is imagined Anxiety Disorder diagnosed when anxiety is out of proportion to the danger, is persistent, and disabling. One year prevalence: 17% Cost $42 billion per year (US, 1990s).
Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder) Most common anxiety disorder (12 % prevalence) Persistent fear of social or performance situations. Individual fears he/she will act in a way which will be humiliating or embarrassing. Fear recognised as excessive or unreasonable Feared situations are avoided or endured with intense distress
Characteristics and Consequences Typically childhood onset (median 13 yrs). Low natural recovery rate (Bruce et al 2005: 37% over 12 years). Increased risk of suicide, alcohol & drug abuse, depression, other anxiety disorders. Marked under-achievement Low treatment seeking rates
Typical Thoughts What I say sounds stupid I’m boring I will make a fool of myself They don’t like me They’ll see I’m anxious I won’t have anything to say I’ll blush/shake/lose control
Existing Treatments Medication MAOI (phenelzine) SSRIs (paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine) (effective in short-term but problematic relapse ) Psychological Exposure therapy Group cognitive-behavior therapy (effective in short-term & gains well-maintained ) BUT less than 50% recover.
Clark & Wells (1995) SOCIAL PHOBIA PERSISTS DUE TO: shift to internal focus of attention use of internal information to infer how one appears to others safety behaviors
Social Situation Activates assumptions Perceived social danger Processing of Self as a Social Object Safety Behaviours Somatic & cognitive symptoms
Mansell, Clark & Ehlers (2003) Do high socially anxious individuals have an internal attentional bias? High vs Low Socially Anxious Students Detect external and internal probes Threat vs No Threat Source: Behaviour Research & Therapy, 41, 555-572.
Hackmann, Surawy & Clark (1998) Do patients with social phobia experience negative, observer perspective images when anxious in social situations? Structured interview. Frequency, content & perspective of spontaneous imagery
New Cognitive Treatment Derive idiosyncratic version of model Self-focussed attention/safety behaviours experiment Video feedback Shift attention to social situation Behavioural Experiments Construct veridical image of social self
“I’ll sound stupid” Self-Conscious Image of self - looking very strange - twisted mouth and rigid - feel different and apart Safety Behaviours Anxious Delay asking, take deep breaths uncomfortable, Speak quickly, mumble, hand over sweaty palms, mouth, rehearse what about stiff muscles, to say, check memory for what mind goes blank, I have just said
New Cognitive Treatment Derive idiosyncratic model Self-focussed attention/safety behaviours experiment Video feedback Shift attention to social situation Behavioural Experiments Construct veridical image of social self
Attention and Safety Behaviours Experiment Difficult social interaction (twice) Focus on self & safety behaviours versus Focus externally & no safety behaviours Compare subjective anxiety, catastrophes, performance
Video and Audio Feedback shows true observable self but can continue to process internal information or discount accuracy of image therefore run “mental” video first and operationalise conspicuousness of negative behaviours can help patient drop safety behaviours by showing they are more observable than feared symptoms
New Cognitive Treatment Derive idiosyncratic model Self-focussed attention/safety behaviors experiment Video feedback Shift attention to social situation Behavioral Experiments Construct veridical image of social self
SITUATIONPREDICTIONEXPERIMENT What exactly did you think would happen? How would you know? (Rate belief 0-100%) What did you do to test the prediction? Coffee break. Sitting with other teachers. Trying to join in the conversation If I just say things That come into my mind they’ll think I’m stupid. 50% Say whatever comes into my mind and watch them like a hawk. Don’t focus on myself. This only gives me misleading information and means I can’t see them.
OUTCOMEWHAT I LEARNED What actually happened? Was the prediction correct? Balanced view (Rate belief 0-100%)? How likely is what you predicted to happen in future (Rate 0-100%)? I did it and I watched the others; one of them showed interest and we talked: she seemed to quite enjoy it. I am probably more acceptable than I think: 70%
Interrogating the Social Environment 1.Behave in “unacceptable” fashion and observe others’ response (WIDEN BANDWIDTH) - pause in speech, umms and ahs - damp armpits - shake/spill drink - wear blusher - disagree/express opinion - ignore acquaintance 2.Conduct surveys 3.Articulate and discount imaginary critic
Social Phobia Trial 1 (Clark, Ehlers et al, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2003, 71, 1058-1067)
Social Phobia Trial 2 (Clark, Ehlers et al. in press)
Trial 3 (Mortberg, Clark et al. in press) Stockholm