Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Listen to audio over your computer speakers. If you are not able to listen via the Internet, you can dial-in by phone using 866-910-4857 and code 6291543.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Listen to audio over your computer speakers. If you are not able to listen via the Internet, you can dial-in by phone using 866-910-4857 and code 6291543."— Presentation transcript:

1 Listen to audio over your computer speakers. If you are not able to listen via the Internet, you can dial-in by phone using and code If you disconnect, simply repeat instructions to reconnect to the program. If listening to audio by phone, you can adjust the volume by pressing *4. To submit a question, type in the chat window and click “Enter” to send. CPE and CEU Credits are NOT available for this forum.

2 Welcome to FYI Our Intent and Purpose – Strategic Plan Outreach and Mentorship Effort for New and Newer PASBO Members in all aspects of School Business Management – Use PASBO Experts to Help New Entrants 2

3 Today’s Agenda I.What's Due Calendar of State and Federal Reports II.Basic Education Funding III.PASBO Tools You Can Use Resources to Help You IV.Your Questions Answered An Open Forum for Your Questions About Topics Covered and Uncovered! 3

4 What’s Due Feb Adopt Preliminary BudgetAnnual School Board must pass by then if not adopting an Act 1 ResolutionFinancePDE 23- Feb PDE-2028/Real Estate Tax Rate ReportAnnualSubmit Preliminary Budget to PDEFinancePDE 26- Feb Notice to Apply For Referendum ExceptionsAnnual Newspaper Notification of Intent to Apply for Exceptions 1- MarNew Hire ReportMonthlyReport of New HiresHR Dept. of Labor & Industry 1- MarNSL Report on PEARSMonthlyReimbursement for Lunches Served each Month Food ServiceCN PEARS 1- Mar Upload NPAS Reports and Send On-lineMonthlyReport of Wages & Retirement ContributionsFinance PSERS/NPA S 5- Mar Referendum Exception ApplicationAnnualApplication for Act 1 referendum exceptionsFinancePDE 10- Mar2030QuarterlyReconciliation of cash on handFinance Comptrolle r

5 What’s Due 31- Mar Dept. of Revenue PIT FilersAnnual Re-assignment of taxpayers who do not live in the district.Finance Dept. of Revenue 31- Mar Dept. of Labor &Industry UC-2QuarterlyReport of Unemployment Comp. WagesFinance Dept. of Labor & Industry 31- MarFuel Tax RefundAnnualFuel Tax Refund ReportFinance Dept. of Revenue 31- MarPDE-4625AnnualTemporary Assistance to Needy FamiliesFinancePDE 31- MarEarned Income TaxQuarterlyReport of Local Wage Tax WithholdingsFinance Local EIT Collector 31- MarIRS- 941QuarterlyFICA & Federal Income TaxFinanceIRS 31- MarPA Dept. of RevenueQuarterlyReport of State Tax WithholdingsFinance Dept. of Revenue 31- MarPDE-339 (Act 29)QuarterlySocial Security & Medicare ContributionsFinance 31- MarPSERS - EmployerQuarterlyDeposit of Employer Retirement DueFinancePSER 31- Mar All State and Federal Grant reportingQuarterly Submit all grant reporting for State and Federal programs.Finance 31- Mar819QuarterlySales and Use Tax ReportFinanceREV 5

6 Sources of Filing and Reporting Info PIMS Data Collection Calendar  pennsylvania_information_management_system/8959 pennsylvania_information_management_system/8959 Comptroller Forms  _and_procedures/ _and_procedures/13472 Food Service Calendar  nal_school_lunch/7487/activity_calendar/ nal_school_lunch/7487/activity_calendar/

7 Sources of Filing and Reporting Info PIMS Data Collection Calendar  pennsylvania_information_management_system/8959 pennsylvania_information_management_system/8959 Comptroller Forms  _and_procedures/ _and_procedures/13472 Food Service Calendar  nal_school_lunch/7487/activity_calendar/ nal_school_lunch/7487/activity_calendar/

8 Today’s Expert, Jeffrey Ammerman Previous business manager at State College Area SD, South Middleton SD, and Philipsburg-Osceola Area SD Worked in the Business Office at Tuscarora Intermediate Unit Answer Man: Part of his role at PASBO is to answer questions and provide technical information to members

9 The Short History of Basic Education Funding It’s not a formula It used to be a formula We then enacted a formula with an adequacy target Now we have BEF targeted by gerrymandering 9

10 1966 Formula (Act 580) The law transitioned funding based on teaching units to a formula: district wealth (Aid Ratio) times Actual Instructional Expense (AIE) per Weighted Average Daily Membership (WADM) times the district's WADM. Additional state support based on poverty, density or sparsity, home bound instruction and vocational education. Additionally, Act 580 set the level of state support at 50% of reimbursable costs. This funding framework remained in place until

11 1983 Equalized Subsidy for Basic Education (Act 31) The ESBE formula: – Aid Ratio times Factor For Educational Expense (FEE) and times WADM. – The FEE was set at $1,650 and – Additional funding by an Economic Supplement that used poverty, local tax effort and population per square mile as factors. The legislation creating ESBE removed the 50% state share and added a minimum annual increase of 2%. The ESBE formula determined state funding for schools through the fiscal year. 11

12 Since Hold Harmless (funding level from previous year) + supplemental funding “…made on an ad hoc basis with the purposes and target of additional funding changing annually depending on transient administrative and legislative priorities. The bases for supplemental payments have included: low wealth, low expenditure, poverty, limited revenue, small district assistance, enrollment growth, minimum funding increases, tax effort, meeting foundation levels, limited English proficiency and performance.” Dr. William T. Hartman, Penn State University 12

13 Except for the Costing-Out Study (Act ) 13

14 14 In the absence of a funding formula, the distribution criteria are changed each year through the budgeting process Over the past 20-years, 30 different factors have been used in one year or another to distribute Basic Education Funding Budgeting with No Formula

15 State Budget 21 school districts Represented by 37 lawmakers, 33 of whom held leadership positions Special language written in fiscal code to provide each district a share of $30 million in additional Basic Education Funds Budgeting with No Formula

16 16 Wide Funding Disparities Lowest Resourced SD - $9,803 per student Highest Resourced SD - $26,808 per student Difference $17,005 per student Average Elementary class of 25 students = $425,125 difference ( data) Consequences of No Basic Education Funding Formula

17 Legislative commission authorized by Act 51 of 2014 Made up of 12 legislators and 3 administration officials Must issue a report and recommendations for a new basic education funding formula by June 10, Basic Education Funding Commission

18 Who Needs Another Commission? A commission is a good idea because… It creates a bi-partisan sand box The end result will position champions in each chamber An issue as complex and as big as BEF ($5.5 billion) cannot be crafted without in-depth and technical discussions that do not easily fit into a committee or floor deliberation; a commission approach allows a singular focus by knowledgeable legislators and outreach to external experts. 18

19 Special Education Funding Commission (Act 3 of 2013) Led by Sen. Patrick Browne and Rep. Bernie O’Neill, and made up of 12 legislators and administration officials Tasked specifically with: – developing a special education funding formula and identifying factors that may be used to determine the distribution of a change in special education funding among the school districts in the Commonwealth. – gathering information on charter and cyber charter school funding reimbursements for special education students and draft proposed legislation based upon those findings. Had 6+ months to hold hearings across the state to examine the issue of special education funding and issue a report with recommendations 19 Successful Commission Work

20 Commission Recommendations New special education dollars should be allocated to districts based primarily upon the number of students in each of three categories determined by the cost of each student’s special education services. School district-specific factors, such as aid ratios, equalized millage rates, and a sparsity/size factor that targets small, rural school districts, should be used to provide adjustments in the new formula. Act 126 of

21 MV/PI Aid Ratio Equalized Millage Multiplier Category 1: Student Count X Weight Category 2: Student Count X Weight Category 3: Student Count X Weight Total Weighted Student Count Small, Rural School District Factor Total Weighted Student Count District Total District Total to Prorate Proposed Special Education Formula 21

22 Two Democrats west of Harrisburg One Republican west of Harrisburg Three members (two Rs, one D) from IU 13 (Lancaster-Lebanon Counties) and now the Secretary of Education Three members from the Philadelphia suburban counties (Chester, Montgomery and Bucks) Four members representing large urban districts—Philadelphia, Allentown, Harrisburg and Lancaster Under-represented: The “T” (central PA and northern tier (largely hold harmless districts). 22 BEF Commission Representation

23 BEF Commission Discussion What factors increase the cost of providing an education? Should an adequacy target be identified? Eliminate or maintain hold harmless? How to define state/local share of education funding? How to determine an accurate measure of local wealth? 23

24 BEF Commission Formula Progress In the process of identifying student-specific factors that increase the cost of education and weights: – Poverty – English language learners – Homelessness, transiency, trauma – Charter school enrollment – Vo-tech enrollment – High performing districts Examining district-factors that should provide an adjustment – Small, rural school districts – Local wealth – Tax effort 24

25 BEF Commission Next Steps Commission report will likely be released in late April/early May Legislation implementing the Commission’s recommendations must then be passed by both chambers of the General Assembly Unclear if this will be completed to go into effect for school year Unclear how much (if any) additional BEF dollars will be available to districts 25

26 PASBO Basic Education Funding Formula Proposal

27 What We Avoid: Using indicators and measures that may have outlived their reliability That continue to be used because “that’s the way we have always done it” Trying to address all localized situations and circumstances in hopes of creating the “perfect formula” Adding complexity when simplicity works

28 The PASBO Proposal: Does NOT use Aid Ratio Does NOT use Equalized Mills Does NOT establish a base cost Does NOT apportion state and local costs Does NOT differentiate between elementary and secondary education costs (WADMs) Does NOT use free/reduced lunch to measure poverty Avoids cliffs that draw arbitrary eligibility lines Applies only to new money

29 School District ADM Poverty Adjustment Charter Adjustment ELL Adjustment Residential Taxation Index Sparsity/Size Adjustment TOTAL Adjusted School District ADMs to prorate available $ Adjusted School District ADM Student-Specific Factors District-Specific Factors Median Household Income Index PASBO Proposal Framework

30 Begin with the ADM of each school district Could also use a weighted ADM that considered changing ADM over 5 years. – Example: 0.52 multiplied by the ADM 0.26 multiplied by the ADM 0.13 multiplied by the ADM 0.06 multiplied by the ADM 0.03 multiplied by the ADM Step 1: Count Students

31 Step 2: Adjustments for Student Factors Poverty – Measure using Federal census data, which counts the number of individuals ages 5-17 living at or below the poverty line. – Recognizing the additional resources needed to educate students living in acute poverty are significant, weight total number of students in poverty in each school district by 1.0. This high weight also functions to cover some of the other categories that have been discussed but may be difficult to measure.

32 English Language Learners – Measure using PIMS data reported to PDE annually. – Using an average across all states, weight the total number of ELL students in each school district by 0.3. Step 2: Adjustments for Student Factors

33 Charter School Enrollment – Measure using charter ADMs per district – To replace the eliminated charter reimbursement, apply a weight of 0.3 to the total charter ADM count. Step 2: Adjustments for Student Factors

34 Step 3: Adjustment for Sparsity/Size Provide additional ADMs to small, rural school districts that can’t benefit from economies of scale. – Use modified formula from Act 126 Sparsity Ratio-measures district ADM/square mile compared to state average Size Ratio-measures district 3 year average ADM compared to state average – Weight size ratio and sparsity ratio 50/50 – Provide adjustment for those districts with a ratio above the 70 th percentile

35 Replace Aid Ratio with Median Household Income Index – Use Federal census data to determine median household income by school district – Compare median district household income to state median household income ($52,667), setting the median at 1.0 > 1 = district median is below state median < 1 = district median is above state median Step 4: Adjustment for Local Wealth

36 Replace Equalized Mills with Residential Taxation Index – Use STEB data to estimate the amount of residential property taxes (deduct property tax reduction $) – Combine residential property tax and other non- business taxes to determine non-business tax per household – Take average non-business tax per household as a percentage of district median household income, expressed as mills – Use a multiplier of 1.0 for school districts at or above the 80 th or 50 th percentile. Step 5: Adjustment for Tax Effort

37 Example: Hamburg Area SD Total ADM( ): 2,415 Students in Poverty( ): 361 * 1.0 = 361 ELL Students( ): 18 * 0.3 = 5.4 Charter School Students ( ): 54 * 0.3 = 16.2 School District ADM 2,415 Poverty Adjustment 361 Charter Adjustment 16.2 ELL Adjustment 5.4 Adjusted School District ADM 2,798

38 Example: Hamburg Area SD Sparsity/Size Adjustment 0 ADMs/square mile = year avg. ADM = 2,458 Sparsity Ratio = Size Ratio = Sparsity/Size Ratio = BELOW the 70 th percentile (0.755) = NO adjustment

39 Example: Hamburg Area SD SD median household income = $55,774 State avg. median household income = $52,667 Median Household Income Index = 1/($55,774/$52,667) Median Household Income Index 0.944

40 Example: Hamburg Area SD Number of households = 6,851 Residential taxes = $14,265,079 Residential taxes/household = $2,082 SD median household income = $55,774 Residential taxes/household as share of median household income as millage = Multiplier if use 50 th percentile = 1.0 Multiplier if use 80 th percentile = 0.94 Residential Taxation Index 1.0

41 Residential Taxation Index 1.0 Sparsity/Size Adjustment 0 TOTAL Adjusted School District ADMs=2,642 Adjusted School District ADM 2,798 Median Household Income Index Example: Hamburg Area SD

42 42

43 43

44 There’s a doc for that… Delivering Best Practices and Good Ideas at the E lectronic R esource C enter

45 Follow PASBO Like PASBO Add PASBO to your social networks

46 Easily manage your cards and earn rebates for your LEA with every purchase Streamline your procurement payment process— and earn a rebate! It’s a return on expenditure! For more info visit

47 Next Session In-person at PASBO Conference March 12, 2:30 pm, Cocoa 4/5 Focus group about mentoring 47

48 Time for Questions! Send text questions using the “Chat” function at the left side of your screen. Type message in box and click “Enter” to send.

49 CPE and CEU Credits are not available for this forum. Next FYI is in-person at the PASBO Annual Conference March 12 at 2:30 pm in Cocoa 4/5. Visit pasbo.org/FYI Thank you for your participation!


Download ppt "Listen to audio over your computer speakers. If you are not able to listen via the Internet, you can dial-in by phone using 866-910-4857 and code 6291543."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google