Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH
Sealing the deal on a greener CAP? Croke Park Confernce Centre, Dublin, Ireland April 10, 2013 INNOVATION – THE WAY FORWARD: BIOLOGICAL PLANT PROTECTION Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

2 Current tools available from the biocontrol industry
Microbials Viruses, Bacteria & Fungal Pathogens Macrobials Predatory mites & insects, nematodes Semiochemicals Pheromones, Plant volatiles Natural Products Plant extracts, Seaweed products & Basic substances Tools have been available for many decades

3 nematodes, fungi + bacteria for IPM
e~nema SME, producing nematodes, fungi + bacteria for IPM

4 Success Story: Biological Control in European Greenhouse Industry
Pests developed resistance against synthetic pesticides Farmers used pesticides more frequencly and in higher dosis Serious problems with pesticide residues in food

5 Problems with residues

6 Accepted Residues (MRL) Supermarkets go beyond governmental levels
100% Legal MRL 50% 40% 30% 33% 70% 80% Maximal pesticide Residue Level requested by Supermarket chains in Italy Maximal pesticide Residue Level requested by Supermarket chains in Germany Source: (Waldner W. Frutta e Vite, 2009) Fruitlogistica 2013 6

7 Concerted Action of government, farmer organisations and biocontrol industry in Spain
Governmental support of 1000 €/ha to pay for technical support 2004: 100 ha use of biocontrol 2010: All ha use BCAs Today greenhouse vegetables are produced by IPM including biological control agents In outdoor agriculture, however, biocontrol is not yet part of IPM

8 Why? Exaggerating regulation of biological control agents (micro-organisms, pheromones, botanicals)

9 Risk Management + Registration
Biocontrol agents regulated according to EU Reg. 1107/2009, following rules developed for synthetic chemical compounds EU Policy Support Action REBECA gave recommendations for improvement, but proposals have not been implemented

10 What is necessary (incomplete list)
Accelerate registration process (9 years is too long) Formation of expert teams to handle BCAs only Priorities for BCAs

11 Why? Exaggerating regulation following rules developed for synthetic chemical compounds Although EU pesticide legislation and political outreach is supporting non-chemical measures, the support for introduction of biocontrol in MS is half-hearted

12 Integrated Pest Management in European PP legislation
The Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market: Point 35: To ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment, plant protection products should be used properly, in accordance with their authorisation, having regard to the principles of integrated pest management and giving priority to nonchemical and natural alternatives wherever possible. 12

13 MS violate existing EU legislation
MS give Art. 53 “emergency authorisations” although biocontrol agents are available. Member States do NOT used PPP properly MS give priority to chemical products

14 Why? Exaggerating regulation following rules developed for synthetic chemical compounds Although EU pesticide legislation and political outreach is supporting non-chemical measures, the support for introduction of biocontrol in MS is half-hearted Implementation of pesticide reduction programmes exclude biological control

15 Sustainable Use Directive 2009/128 EC
Article 14: “the MS shall take all necessary measures to promote low pesticide-input pest management, giving wherever possible priority to non-chemical methods, so that professional users of pesticides switch to practices and products with the lowest risk to human health and the environment As a consequence, MS must developed NAPs to reduce pesticide use in the EU 15

16 Instead of promotion of biocontrol, MS seem to protect markets for chemical PPPs
NAPs hardly consider biological control as a possible means to reduce pesticides EU funded projects like ENDURE and PURE „re-invent“ IPM, but do little for implementation of biological control

17 Summary Biological control is supporting greening of CAP
EU policy supports introduction of biocontrol MS could do much more for implementation of biocontrol in the EU


Download ppt "Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google