Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

E-Rate? Why YOU Should be Filing Jeannene Hurley (517) 241-0898.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "E-Rate? Why YOU Should be Filing Jeannene Hurley (517) 241-0898."— Presentation transcript:

1 E-Rate? Why YOU Should be Filing Jeannene Hurley hurleyj@michigan.gov (517) 241-0898

2 Grants and Education Technology2 National Totals Funding Year Commitment Amount National TotalNational % 2005*$36,939,833.70$1,529,424,262.802.4% 2004$50,140,141.51$2,301,688,489.162.2% 2003$54,970,811.30$2,695,504,694.842.0% 2002$55,298,283.14$2,178,834,892.692.5% 2001$75,444,456.44$2,208,170,850.223.4% 2000$53,484,397.58$2,084,578,867.032.6% 1999$80,062,888.37$2,154,013,190.863.7% 1998$58,362,932.72$1,714,316,267.943.4% *Through Wave 45

3 Grants and Education Technology3 Michigan One Page Impact Sheet Funding YearTelco ServiceInternet Access Internal Connections IC for Basic Maint Lowest % ICTotals 1998 - 1 $27,498,581.42$3,176,091.96$27,688,259.34 70% $58,362,932.72 1999 - 2 $22,643,796.94$5,489,978.51$51,929,112.92 20%$80,062,888.37 2000 - 3 $27,647,072.82$5,420,168.99$20,475,062.41 82% $53,542,304.22 2001 - 4 $24,479,157.73$6,580,176.74$44,396,641.97 87% $75,455,976.44 2002 - 5 $28,340,154.25$8,057,286.35$18,875,339.10 81% $55,272,779.70 2003 - 6 $21,674,422.34$7,462,244.34$15,319,793.44 70% $44,456,460.12 2004 - 7 $21,152,396.16$7,495,520.89$15,705,674.22 81% $44,353,591.27 2005 - 8* $28,573,553.83$6,060,723.19$2,039,528.23$266,028.45 88%** $36,939,833.70 Totals $202,009,135.49$49,742,190.97$196,429,411.63$266,028.45$448,446,766.54 * Through Wave 45**Threshold may go as low as 77%

4 Grants and Education Technology4 Funding Year Ranking for 2005 RankState Cuml. thru 45 Wave 45 1CALIFORNIA $ 236,823,128.37 $ 8,498,674.86 2NEW YORK $ 165,702,514.33 $ 5,154,102.95 3TEXAS $ 154,377,147.62 $ 5,933,302.35 4ILLINOIS $ 95,109,368.49 $43,886,949.87 5OHIO $ 62,948,537.96 $ 2,405,142.83 6FLORIDA $ 60,571,583.43 $ - 7PENNSYLVANIA $ 57,030,761.08 $ 712,147.92 8GEORGIA $ 50,380,014.52 $ 3,376,816.73 9TENNESSEE $ 49,116,035.27 $ 89,610.00 10NORTH CAROLINA $ 47,336,815.14 $ 1,154,850.92 11OKLAHOMA $ 39,539,137.53 $ 9,200,034.12 12NEW JERSEY $ 38,064,836.32 $ 1,193,915.32 13MICHIGAN $ 36,943,343.70 $ -

5 Grants and Education Technology5 2006 Stats from the DRT  Data Retrieval Tool http://www.sl.universalservice.org/funding/ opendatasearch/Search1.asp  Total FRNs 4034  Total Amount $105,682,915.70

6 Grants and Education Technology6 Other Tools at SLD  Automated Search of Commitments www.sl.universalservice.org/funding/  Schools and Libraries Timetable and List of Deadlines:  www.universalservice.org/sl/tools/calendar-reminders.aspx www.universalservice.org/sl/tools/calendar-reminders.aspx  Search Tools www.universalservice.org/sl/tools/search-tools/

7 Grants and Education Technology7 More Info  E-Rate Central (New York) http://www.eratecentral.com  E-Rate Manager (Funds for Learning) http://eratemanager.com/

8 Grants and Education Technology8 Reasons for Denial…  The FRN references a Form 470 which has not been certified.  During application review, you were asked to demonstrate that when you filed your Form 471 you had secured access to the funds needed to pay your portion of the charges, and you were unable to do so.

9 Grants and Education Technology9 Reasons for Denial…  Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation to determine the eligibility of this item.  Documentation was not provided to demonstrate that price was the primary factor in selecting this service provider's proposal.

10 Grants and Education Technology10 Reasons for Denial…  A contract for service was signed prior to the due date specified in the RFP.  Applicant has not provided Service Provider Identification Number required to process funding request.  No contract or legally binding agreement was in place when the Form 471 certification was filed.

11 Grants and Education Technology11 Reasons for Denial…  Associated Form 470 contains service provider (SP) contact information. Competitive bidding violation occurs when SP associated with Form 470 participates in competitive bidding process.  This FRN is a request for Telecommunications Service from a carrier that does not provide telecommunications on a common carriage basis.

12 Grants and Education Technology12 Reasons for Denial…  Funding is denied because the written technology plan you provided does not cover the required funding year of 2005- 2006.  Funding is denied because the written technology plan you provided is substantially deficient, in that one or more of the required elements is missing.

13 Grants and Education Technology13 Reasons for Denial…  A contract for a new service was signed prior to the required 28-day waiting period computed from the date of the posting of the Form 470 to the SLD Web Site.

14 Grants and Education Technology14 30% Denials…  30% or more of this FRN is for service to pre-K students, who are ineligible recipient of this service, based on program rules.  30% or more of this FRN includes a request for Early Termination fee which is an ineligible product(s)/service(s) based on program rules.  30% or more of this FRN includes a request for video monitoring/security network equipment which is ineligible.

15 Grants and Education Technology15 30% Denials www.universalservice.org/sl/tools/eligible-services-list.aspx www.universalservice.org/sl/tools/eligible-services-list.aspx  30% or more of this FRN is for duplicate service which/who are/(is an) ineligible recipient(s) of this service, based on program rules.  30% or more of this FRN includes a request for a Web server used for software applications which is an ineligible product based on program rules.  30% or more of this FRN includes a request for CATV cable infrastructure which is an ineligible product/service based on program rules.

16 Grants and Education Technology16 2006, Year 9, Wave 1  Issue Date: April 26, 2006  Amount Committed in Wave (P1): $2,355,345.67  Total Committed Nationwide: $126,415,000  Total Number of Funding Letters Issued for Wave: 4,599

17 Grants and Education Technology17 Tech Plan Questions?  Ron Faulds fauldsr@michigan.gov (517) 241-3525 www.techplan.org

18 Grants and Education Technology18 MEGS Questions?  Judy Brynes byrnesj@michigan.gov (517) 241-3895 http://megs.mde.state.mi.us/megs/

19 Grants and Education Technology19 Mi-Gal Questions?  Jill Bradshaw bradshawj@michigan.gov (517) 335-2716 http://www.michigan.gov/migal

20 Grants and Education Technology20 E-Rate Questions?  Jeannene Hurley hurleyj@michigan.gov (517) 241-0898 www.michigan.gov/erate


Download ppt "E-Rate? Why YOU Should be Filing Jeannene Hurley (517) 241-0898."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google