Presentation on theme: "What I Learned About Assessment From the AP Program Dan Kennedy Baylor School NCTM Louisville Regional Meeting November 8, 2013."— Presentation transcript:
What I Learned About Assessment From the AP Program Dan Kennedy Baylor School NCTM Louisville Regional Meeting November 8, 2013
True Confession of a Veteran Mathematics Teacher: For many years I never thought much about assessment. I graded my students in what I thought was an appropriate variety of ways: Tests … Quizzes … and Homework. This model had stood the test of time.
In 1986 I was invited to become a member of the AP Calculus Test Development Committee. From 1990 to 1994 I would serve as chair. My experience with this group changed my views of assessment forever.
I had already learned one important fact about classroom assessment merely by teaching an AP course: It changes the entire classroom dynamic when the teacher honestly does not know what will be on the test. The teacher has no other option but to teach the students how to think for themselves!
Why students don’t think on tests: Thinking takes time. Thinking is only necessary when you cannot do something “without thinking.” If you can do something without thinking, you can do it very well. Students who can do something very well have been well-prepared. Therefore, if you prepare them well, your students will proceed through your tests without thinking!
Were AP Calculus exams predictable? 1987 BC Exam: 1. Differential equation 2. Implicit Differentiation 3. Area/volume 4. Series 5. Particle problem 6. Theory problem (stretch) Of course, this was just one exam. But there were others like it.
But if we tried to change anything, teachers would notice. Then, in AP workshops all over the country, teachers would find themselves uttering to AP consultants the words they dreaded most when spoken by their students: Will this be on the test?
And why should teachers NOT ask that question? It is how the game is played. We show the students how to do math. We let them practice at it for a while. Then we give them a test to see how well they can mimic what we did. The game is won and lost for BOTH of us on test day.
This was just another example of the educational paradigm that was leading my student not to think on tests! But how can teachers change the game if we want our students to succeed?
Teachers have one secret weapon: We define what it means to succeed. We control the grade!
Something I learned about assessment from the AP program: It is perfectly OK, perhaps even necessary, to scale grades! 75%= 5
At our school, 75% is not a good grade. In fact, 65% is a minimal pass. Is this reasonable? Think about it. The all-time NBA record for field goal percentage in a season is 72.7%. The all-time record batting average for major league baseball is.440 (44%). A salesperson who makes a sale on 75% of first contacts is a genius. So how can we expect 75% success from someone who is just learning?
(a) it wouldn’t be much of a test, and (b) the distribution would be skewed rather than normal. If the AP exam were constructed so that the average student could get 75% of the possible credit,
An Important Disclaimer: Scaling grades is not about building self-esteem. Scaling grades is about teaching mathematics. Assessment should support your efforts to teach your students mathematics. It should not get in the way.
Some things that ETS worried about that I didn’t: r-biserial Content validity Speededness True score Grading rubrics
r-biserial (r-bis) “A correlation coefficient relating performance on a test question and performance on the measure used as a criterion. It is an index of discrimination measuring the extent to which examinees who score high on the measure used as the criterion tend to get the question right and those who score low tend to get it wrong.”
1969 Multiple-choice question #26: The answer is (C).
AB Stats: A 3% B 57% C 7% D 3% E 20% BC Stats: A 1% B 70% C 11% D 2% E 9% Projected Chimpanzee Stats: A 20% B 20% C 20% D 20% E 20%
Correct responses to problem #26: AB 7% BC 11%Chimps 20%
Content Validity “Validity is the extent to which a test measures what it is supposed to measure. The content validity of an (AP) test is the extent to which the content of the test represents a balanced and adequate sampling of the universe of content in which the test is intended to measure achievement.”
The AP Calculator Experiment (1983-84) In 1983 the AP Calculus Committee decided to allow (but not require) the use of scientific calculators on the AP Calculus examinations. This was not to be a very happy debut for technology on the AP stage.
AP readers found that students were losing points on the free-response section because of calculator misuse. The calculators affected the scores. But calculators were not being tested! This compromised the content validity. The committee had two choices: 1. Forbid calculators and test as usual; 2. Require calculators and alter the test. They chose to forbid the calculators.
One of my Precalculus tests from 1990: Note the emphasis on computation. Note that there is nothing here to suggest that any of this stuff is worth knowing!
Here is a more recent test on the same material. There are some computations, but also some applications and more function analysis. And they can use graphing calculators!
There is also some graphical analysis, a logistic function, and a “stretch” problem to see if they can identify a log function by its properties. It’s still not perfect, but it’s a much more interesting test!
Speededness “The appropriateness of a test in terms of the length of time allotted. For most purposes, a good test will make full use of the examination period but not be so speeded that an examinee’s rate of work will have an undue influence on the score he receives.”
Exam Format for AP Calculus AB Exam Format Allowing for speededness
True Score “A score entirely free of errors of measurement. True scores are hypothetical values never obtained in actual testing. A true score is sometimes defined as the average score that would result from an infinite series of measurements with the same or exactly equivalent tests, assuming no practice effect or change in the examinee during the testings.”
Why teachers don’t need to worry about true score: We can assess our students all year long! The more often the better. Sorry, kids. Yessss!
AP Calculus Grading Rubrics If the AP readers can give partial credit fairly to 300,000 students, I ought to be able to do it for my own students. In AP Calculus, I can even use the AP rubrics to do it.
AP Calculus Exams are: Designed to test knowledge Designed to test cleverness Scaled reasonably Not made up by the teacher Open assessments Comprehensive assessments (valid) Honest about technology
Two Fundamental Principles: 1. Assess what you value. 2. Value what you assess.
Some problems with traditional tests: They assess only a fraction of what we value. They depend too much on luck. There is often no feedback (as with final exams). They are usually taken alone. (Is this what we value?) They are usually timed. (Is this a good model for quality work?) They are frequently taken under artificial, stressful conditions. They are dependent on teacher stimulus. They are often devoid of creativity (if students are “prepared”). They favor one narrow kind of student performance. Success is usually short-term and non-transferable. The emphasis in the end is what the student can NOT do. They can inhibit further learning.
Some assessment strategies I like: Assess what you value and value what you assess! Assess often, with different kinds of assessments. Give meaningful and prompt feedback. Give partial credit for partially correct work. Explain all your expectations to your students from the start. Test diligence, knowledge, and cleverness in focused ways. Encourage creativity through your assessments. Scale grades to control the standard deviation. Only fail students who are failures. Keep everyone in the game. Encourage collaboration in class and on homework. Assess diligence. Find a way to grade homework frequently. Try portfolios. Remember: This is not about self-esteem. It’s about teaching mathematics to all your students!
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.