Presentation on theme: "How do we know what is right to do?"— Presentation transcript:
1How do we know what is right to do? ETHICAL DILEMMASHow do we know what is rightto do?
2IntroductionYou can save the life of only one of the following. Which one would you choose?A child or an adultA stranger or your dogHitler or lassieYour spouse or a Nobel LaureateA dog or a weaselYour entire family or the entire canine speciesA bottle with the cure for cancer or your brotherA bottle with the cure for cancer or your brother who just gave you one of his kidneys
3Introduction What would you choose to do? Your teacher accidentally left the final exam paper on the photocopier. You couldtake itleave itYou just found that your roommate A has been stealing from roommate B. A is a very selfish brat that everyone dislikes. You coulddo nothingtell A in private to stoptell BYou just saw Bill Gates dropping a $100 bill on the street in front of you. You couldcall out to Bill
5ETHICAL SYSTEM #1 – DIVINE COMMAND Description – “God says so”Moral standards depend on God who is all-knowingAny act that conforms to the law of God is right; an act that breaks God's law is wrongExampleChristian religions point believers to rules like the Ten CommandmentsProblemsCan be arbitrary depending on interpretationCan we know the true divine authority?What if there are multiple divine authorities?
6ETHICAL SYSTEM #2 - DEONTOLOGY Description – “It is my duty / the rule to do so”Emphasis is on independent moral rules and duties, not on consequences“deon” – duty“logos” – scienceDeontology – the science of dutyTo make the correct moral choicesWhat are our moral duties?What are the correct rules which regulate those duties?Need to follow moral rules with the correct intentions or motivationsBut, a correct motivation alone is never a justificationIt is also not enough to simply believe that something is the correct duty to followDuties and obligations must be determined objectively and absolutely, not subjectivelyExamplesEx-UWC student as soldier in Israeli armyTeacher-on-call at RCNUWC
7ETHICAL SYSTEM #2 - DEONTOLOGY TypesDuty TheoriesAn action is morally right if it is in accord with some list of duties and obligationsRights TheoriesPeople should be legally free to do whatever they wish so long as their actions do not impinge upon the rights of othersAlso called LibertarianismContractualismAn action is morally right if it is in accordance with the rules that rational moral agents would agree to observe upon entering into a social relationship (contract) for mutual benefit
8ETHICAL SYSTEM #2 - DEONTOLOGY ProblemsWhich rules or duties to follow, regardless of consequences?Duties valid in the 18th century may no longer be valid todayBut who to decide? How to decide?There is no clear way to resolve conflicts between moral dutiesHow to choose between two moral duties?Not to lieNot to harm othersChoose lesser of two evils?But based on which evil has more harmful consequencesTherefore choice no longer based on absolute principles, rules
9ETHICAL SYSTEM #3 - TELEOLOGY Description – “Only consequences matter”Focus on the consequences which any action might haveoften referred to as consequentialist moral systems“telos” – the end“logos” - scienceTeleologoy: the science of endsActions are judged right or wrong solely by their consequencesIf actions have the correct consequences, one has acted morallyTo make decisions, need to askWhat will be the consequences of this action?What will be the consequences of inaction?How do I weigh the harm against the benefits of this action?
10ETHICAL SYSTEM #3 - TELEOLOGY TypesEthical EgoismConsequences of the action to the moral agent performing the action.Ethical AltruismConsequences of the action to everyone except the moral agent.Ethical UtilitarianismConsequences of the action to everyone.Choose the action that brings the greatest ‘utility’ or happiness to the greatest number of peopleExampleUS dropping atomic bomb on Japan
11ETHICAL SYSTEM #3 - TELEOLOGY ProblemsCannot know the full consequences of actionsHow to quantify the consequences in terms of ‘human happiness’?The end justifies the meansWhy should one take responsibility for ALL the consequences of one’s actions?One may not know what they areOne may not be able to control the consequences – unintended consequencesDeterminism – we do not deserve to be punished
12ETHICAL SYSTEM #4 – VIRTUE ETHICS Description – “Only intentions matter”Virtue ethics focuses on helping people develop good character traits, which will, in turn, allow a person to make the correct decisions later on in lifePlato’s four virtues: wisdom, courage, temperance and justiceEmphasis is on intentions and motives, not consequencesWe should desire certain outcomes and that we should want to accomplish certain goals by our actionsExample:A school faculty determines that a student council officer with a genuine interest to serve deserves more recognition than one who just wants to beef up his resumeKey questions to ask to make decisionsWhat sort of person do I want to be?What virtues are characteristic of the person I want to be?What actions will cultivate the virtues I want to possess?What actions will be characteristic of the sort of person I want to be?
13ETHICAL SYSTEM #4 – VIRTUE ETHICS ProblemsMany moral dilemmas require a great deal of careful reasoning and thinking — simply having the right character cannot be enough to even make the right decisionWhat are the “right” sort of character is which a person should have?Ask a “virtuous” personAsk a “happy” personBut one person’s virtue may be another person’s vice
14ETHICAL SYSTEM #5 - RELATIVISM Description – “Ethics is relative”No principles are universally validAll moral principles are valid relative to cultural tastesThe rules of the society serve as a standardExampleSouth Seas Islanders practice cannibalismCannibalism is strictly prohibited in the U.S.StrengthsBrings about tolerance of other cultures.ProblemConfuses what ought to be done with what is currently doneDoes not provide guidance on how to decide what to do!
16ETHICAL SYSTEMS – CASE STUDIES Enu, the old grandmother of an Shoshone tribe, could no longer chew the buffalo hides to make them supple enough for making items of clothingWhen winter came and food supplies were not sufficient for all, it was decided by the tribe that Enu would be left alone on a nearby hill to dieEthical relativismThe decision was based on the mores or traditions of the tribeCase 2Rachel has fallen in love with Nathan, a schoolmate in a small religious school set up by a Christian sectHer parents forbid a marriage with Nathan and make arrangements for Rachel to marry Peter, another youth in the churchRachel married PeterDivine commandThe decision was based on one of The Ten Commandments - honor thy mother and father, for instance
17ETHICAL SYSTEMS – CASE STUDIES Rachel visited her friend Sarah in the hospitalSarah had been badly burned and blinded in a car accident and seemed most concerned about how disfigured she might lookShe asks Rachel how awful she looksRachel lies to Sarah and tells her the effects of the burn are not bad at allTeleology (Ethical altruism)The decision was based on the best consequence for SarahCase 4Hank is not religiousHe witnesses a man known to be quite wealthy drop a money clip containing several large billsHank could definitely use the money to help buy clothes for his eight foster childrenHand returns the money to the manDeontologyThe decision was based on the worth of the individual who should never be used as a means to an end. ORVirtue EthicsHe acts out of spontaneous goodness
18ETHICAL SYSTEMS – CASE STUDIES In Germany during 1942A Christian soldier, whose close friend is imprisoned in Dachau concentration camp, finds himself in a crowd with his leader, Adolf HitlerHe views the Fuhrer as ruthless and dangerous to his countryBeing armed, he considers killing HitlerAfter a few moments of hesitation, the soldier assassinates Adolf HitlerTeleology (ethical utilitarianism)The decision was based on the best consequence for the most people
20Dilemma #1 – Rules and Exceptions Stick to the Rule, or Make an Exception for a Good Student?James is a fourth-grade classroom teacher whose homework policy is thatHomework for the week goes home on Friday and is due the following ThursdayIt is the students' choice to do it or notIf homework is not completed and handed in on Friday, students will serve detention during one recess period.Raoul is an excellent student who always finishes his work and he does it well.He is a sensitive and dedicated student, who strives hard to please.One Wednesday, Raoul was sick and out of school, and the following day he forgets to bring his homework to class.This is the first time Raoul does not have his homework.Raoul could have gotten a day's extension for being sick.The thought of serving detention is devastating to Raoul.James needs to choose toFollow the rule and have Raoul serve the detention, orMake an exception based on the fact that Raoul had been sick.
21Dilemma #1 – Rules and Exceptions James should enforce the rule and require Raoul to serve detention:Raoul did not hand in his homework.The other children need to know that their teacher is fair and does not play favorites.They also need to know that if they choose to break a rule or policy, they are choosing to pay the consequences.James should make an exception for Raoul:He is a model student who does more work than asked to do, and the homework policy was established to encourage those students who would not do even the minimum required work without an incentive.Is it fair to punish a student who works hard for forgetfulness?After all, he could have said he did not finish his homework because he was sick and needed an extensionIs it fair to punish him for choosing to tell the truth?Would punishing him now encourage him to lie in the future when a situation like this came up?
22Dilemma #2 – Save Life or Let Die Save someone’s life, or let him die?Don, an emergency medical doctor, was driving on the highway when he saw a car stopping on the side of the roadElderly driver at the wheel was slumped forward and seemingly unconscious. The driver's wife jumped out of the vehicle and waved her arms at him, seeking helpDon put in a call to emergency and pulled over to the breakdown laneAs Don was beginning to apply cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the man's wife confronted Don, saying, "No! Please don't try to revive him. He's had a serious heart condition for some time now, and he has a living will stating that he doesn't want to be resuscitated."The woman was adamant, but did not have the living will with her.Don rechecked the man's pulse: It was weak, but the man was alive.What should Don do?
23Dilemma #2 – Save Life or Let Die Don should try to revive the elderly manAs an emergency medical doctor, Don is sworn to uphold the preservation of life, and, in a sense he is a representative of the community's interest in overseeing the welfare of its citizens.Also, without seeing the proper papers, Don cannot be certain the man really would want him to do otherwise.Don should honor the wife's demand that her husband's personal wishes be respected.Don cannot really know the circumstances that have preceded this moment, and he ought not to second guess the process of consideration that has resulted in the "do not resuscitate" order.The Golden Rule: Treat others only in ways that you're willing to be treated in the same exact situationPut in the other man's position--and assuming that the living will has been drawn up--Don would probably want the "do not resuscitate" order to be upheld. After all, why else would one put together a living will?Still, the living will itself is not at hand, and a third way out seems unlikely to appear.
24Dilemma #4 – Crime and Punishment In Dostoyevsky's novel Crime and PunishmentThe main character plots and carries out the murder of an old woman who has a considerable amount of money in her apartment.After killing her, he steals the money.He argues thatShe is a malicious old woman, petty, cantankerous and scheming, useless to herself and to society (which happens to be true), and her life causes no happiness to herself or to others; andHer money if found after her death would only fall into the hands of chisellers anyway, whereas he would use it for his education.Is this action justified?