Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byHaleigh Kendle Modified over 2 years ago

1
Pre and Post Condition Rules Definition : If R and S are two assertions, then R is said to be stronger than S if R -> S (R implies S). –Example : the assertion i < 0 is stronger than the assertion i < 3 because i < 0 implies that i < 3 ( i < 0 is true implies that i < 3 is true) draw the set and subset diagram to get a better “feel,” if needed –Note that if R is stronger than S, then all states that satisfy R will satisfy S. But there is at least one state that satisfies S which will not satisfy R. So the number of states that satisfies S is larger than that of R. Thus one may view the notion of “stronger” as “more selective” because less states will satisfy the stronger condition. –Of course, if R is stronger than S, then S is weaker than R

2
Precondition Strengthening Rule 1: If P’ is stronger than P and if {P}C{Q} triple is correct, then with the strengthened precondition assertion, {P’}C{Q} triple is also correct –Example : if {P}C{Q} is correct, for P which is (x>0), then for P’, which asserts (x>2), the triple {P’}C{Q} will also be correct. Rule 1 - More formally : P’ -> P (strengthening p to p’) {P}C{Q} {P’}C{Q} –Example : if {x <5} x:= x+1 {x < 6} is correct, then strengthening {P} to {x < 3} should give us {x<3} x:=x+1 {x<6} as also correct because : {x {x<5} {x<5} x := x+1 {x<6} {x<3} x := x+1 {x<6}

3
Post Condition Weakening Rule 2: If Q -> Q’ and {P}C{Q} triple is correct then {P}C{Q’} triple is correct –Rule 2 : Formally we have: {P}C{Q} Q -> Q’ {P}C{Q’} –Example : if { } max := b {max=b} then show { } max:=b {max >= b} { } max := b {max =b} {max = b} -> {max >= b} { } max:=b {max >=b }

4
Conjunction (AND) and Disjunction (OR) Rules Rule 3: If C is a piece of code, {P}C{Q} AND {P’}C{Q’} are correct (note that both of the conditions have to be True simultaneously), then {P AND P’} C {Q AND Q’} is also correct –Formally : {P} C {Q} {P’} C {Q’} {P AND P’} C {Q AND Q’} Rule 4: If C is a piece of code, {P}C{Q} AND {P’}C{Q’}, then {P OR P’} C {Q OR Q’} is also correct –Formally : {P} C {Q} {P’} C {Q’} {P OR P’} C {Q OR Q’}

5
Example using Conjunction Rule & more Problem : given the following Hoare Triples: –{ } x:= x+1 { x = x+1 } AND [note that x:= x + 1 has multiple meanings here !] –{x>0} x:= x +1 {x > 0} –show that {x>0} x:=x+1 {x > -1} Proof : (a little more detailed than needed) –a) using conjunction rule, we get {x>0} x:= x+ 1{x=x+1 AND x>0} –b) using the weakening the post-condition rule, we have {x=x+1 and x>0} -> {x>0}; thus the conjunction triple {x>0} x:=x+1 {x=x+1 AND x>0} also imply {x>0} x:=x+1 {x>0} is correct by weakening the post condition Furthermore {x > 0 } -> { x > - 1} (or x > 0 is stronger than x > -1) –Therefore we have {x>0} x := x+1 {x>-1} (by weakening the post condition) –Alternatively : note that the weakening of post condition can be achieved through dropping x=x+1 and also directly weakening x > 0 to x > -1.

Similar presentations

OK

The Substitution Principle SWE 332 – Fall 2010. 2 Liskov Substitution Principle In any client code, if subtype object is substituted for supertype object,

The Substitution Principle SWE 332 – Fall 2010. 2 Liskov Substitution Principle In any client code, if subtype object is substituted for supertype object,

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on upper airway obstruction Ppt on quality educational programs Download ppt on water conservation in india Ppt on l&t finance share price Ppt on producers consumers and decomposers worksheets Ppt on wings of fire Ppt on life study of mathematician blaise Ppt on network switching methods Animated ppt on magnetism perfume Ppt on urbanism as a way of life as opposed to rural ways of life