Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Constraining CMSSM dark matter with direct detection results Chris Savage Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics Stockholm University with Yashar.

Published byMadyson Horseman Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Constraining CMSSM dark matter with direct detection results Chris Savage Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics Stockholm University with Yashar."— Presentation transcript:

1 Constraining CMSSM dark matter with direct detection results Chris Savage Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics Stockholm University with Yashar Akrami, Pat Scott, Jan Conrad & Joakim Edsjö JCAP 1104:012, 2011 [arXiv:1011.4318] JCAP 1107:002,2011 [arXiv:1011.4297]

2 Overview 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... CMSSM (e.g.) parameters m 0, m 1/2, A 0, tanβ, sign(μ) WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n PhenomenologyParticle (SUSY) Theory Messy parameter space: statistical scanning required Well behaved parameter space: analytical methods for constraints? Pheno space not fully mapped out by CMSSM

3 Overview 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... CMSSM (e.g.) parameters m 0, m 1/2, A 0, tanβ, sign(μ) WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n PhenomenologyParticle (SUSY) Theory

4 Overview 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... CMSSM (e.g.) parameters m 0, m 1/2, A 0, tanβ, sign(μ) WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n PhenomenologyParticle (SUSY) Theory Messy parameter space: statistical scanning required Well behaved parameter space: analytical methods for constraints? Pheno space not fully mapped out by CMSSM

5 Overview 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n Direct detection signal N, E k=1..N, S m, , ,... CMSSM (e.g.) parameters m 0, m 1/2, A 0, tanβ, sign(μ) WIMP parameters m ,  SI,p,  SD,p,  SD,n PhenomenologyParticle (SUSY) Theory This talk Experimental groups Ji-Haeng Huh talk

6 Overview How will future direct detection results constrain dark matter from supersymmetric theories? Realistic reconstruction of dark matter properties using CMSSM as case study Outline  Basics: CMSSM, direct detection  Analysis: likelihoods, statistics and scanning  Phenomenological parameter constraints Individual/combined experimental results Statistical/scanning issues Halo model, hadronic uncertainties  CMSSM parameter constraints 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

7 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Basics and Analysis Procedure

8 Basics CMSSM (Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model)  Simplest SUSY model: four parameters + one sign  Complicated parameter space: disconnected regions, sharp peaks,…  Results/issues representative of generic SUSY models (e.g. MSSM-7, BMSSM, NMSSM, etc.) Direct detection: future ton-scale experiments  XENON1T (Xe, neutron odd) [LUX, PANDA-X]  CDMS1T (Ge, neutron odd) [EDELWEISS, CRESST?]  COUPP1T (CF 3 I, proton odd) Not included: CoGeNT, CDEX, DAMA, KIMS -like (higher backgrounds) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Detector WIMP Scatter

9 Analysis Realistic analysis  Typical thresholds and efficiencies  Finite energy resolution  Backgrounds at target levels (~ 2 events), known spectrum  Uncertainties in halo model (density, velocity distribution)  Hadronic uncertainties: WIMP-quark → WIMP-nucleon couplings Likelihoods  Direct detection  Nuisance parameters  Halo model  Nucleon structure  SM parameters  …also physicality constraints 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection See paper for technical details COUPP: no spectrum Number of events (Poisson)Event energies (spectrum)

10 Likelihoods Direct detection  Θ: CMSSM, nuisance parametersP(N, μ): Poisson probability  μ: expected number of eventsf(E)  dR/dE (energy spectrum)  N: observed number of events  E i : observed event energies Nuisance parameters 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection CDMS XENON COUPP: no spectrum (Poisson only) Nucleon structureHalo model + SM parameters (not shown) Also: physicality constraints

11 Analysis Procedure  Select CMSSM models that give particular m  and  SI,p : benchmark models  Generate random experimental results  Reconstruct CMSSM model by scanning over CMSSM parameter space DarkSUSY + SuperBayeS (MultiNest) Statistics  Scan: Bayesian (SuperBayes)  Results: Frequentist or Bayesian Profile likelihood (frequentist) Marginalized PDF (Bayesian) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection www.darksusy.org www.superbayes.org Most experimental analyses

12 Benchmark Models 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection BM1: low m , high  SI,p O(100-400) signal events BM2: low m , low  SI,p O(1-3) signal events BM3: moderate m  and  SI,p O(20-30) signal events BM4: high m , high  SI,p O(20-30) signal events + 2 background events (on average) Benchmarks still below most recent XENON constraints

13 Benchmark Models 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

14 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Results (Constraints)

15 BM1: low m , high  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  XENON: ~ 200 signal events (~ 7 SD events) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ  true value  max likelihood  posterior mean

16 BM1: low m , high  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  CDMS: ~ 140 signal events (~ 2 SD events) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

17 BM1: low m , high  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  COUPP: ~ 390 signal events (~ 120 SD events) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

18 BM1: low m , high  SI,p Spin-dependent couplings: neutron vs. proton  a n ≈ -a p : CMSSM prediction (not experimental constraint)  O(5) [CDMS/XENON] vs. O(100) [COUPP] SD events 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

19 BM1: low m , high  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  ~ 140 / 200 / 390 signal events (~ 2 / 7 / 120 SD) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

20 BM2: low m , low  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  XENON: ~ 2.1 signal events (~ 0 SD events) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

21 BM2: low m , low  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  CDMS: ~ 1.4 signal events (~ 0 SD events) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

22 BM2: low m , low  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  COUPP: ~ 3.0 signal events (~ 0.1 SD events) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

23 BM2: low m , low  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  ~ 1.4 / 2.1 / 3.0 signal events (~ 0 / 0 / 0.1 SD) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

24 BM2: low m , low  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  ~ 1.4 / 2.1 / 3.0 signal events (~ 0 / 0 / 0 SD) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

25 BM3: moderate m  and  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  ~ 17 / 23 / 32 signal events (~ 0 / 0 / 0.6 SD) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

26 BM3: moderate m  and  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  ~ 17 / 23 / 32 signal events (~ 0 / 0 / 0.6 SD) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

27 BM4: high m , high  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  ~ 19 / 25 / 36 signal events (~ 0 / 0 / 0.3 SD) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

28 BM4: high m , high  SI,p Spin-independent/dependent cross-sections vs. mass  ~ 19 / 25 / 36 signal events (~ 0 / 0 / 0.3 SD) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

29 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Issues

30 Issue: sampling/coverage  Mass constraint from energy spectrum: degeneracy for heavy WIMPs 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Phenomenological parameter scan Pato et al., PRD 83, 083505 (2011) BM3 BM4

31 Issue: sampling/coverage Scan points without DD likelihood  BM4 in poorly sampled region  BM3 in higher sampled region Degeneracy:  BM3 & BM4 should give similar DD signals (N, E i ) BM4 scan:  Good fit around BM3  Nothing to draw scan towards BM4 region  Too few models to properly evaluate profile likelihood 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

32 Issue: sampling/coverage Real priors and/or effective priors affect scan region Scan may miss some regions of interest or cover them too coarsely Can lead to significant over/under-coverage of confidence regions (frequentist) or credible regions (Bayesian) Possibly improved by higher statistics  …if higher statistics gives sharper likelihood contours (can overcome real/effective priors)  Not for previous case 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

33 Issue: nuisance parameters Halo model  Local density, velocity distribution  Standard Halo Model (SHM): isothermal sphere 3 velocity parameters: v 0, v obs, v esc  Structure? Annual modulation (DAMA, CoGeNT) Directional detection (DRIFT) Hadronic matrix elements  Used in calculating  SI &  SD from  -quark couplings  6 relevant matrix elements (only 3 are important)  Affect CMSSM constraints, not pheno constraints (at least not directly) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Halo models + direct detection: see Strigari & Trotta (2009) and various works by A. Green See Ellis, Olive & CS, PRD 77, 065026 (2008)

34 Local Halo: m  - reconstruction Strigari & Trotta, JCAP 11, 019 (2009) Reconstructing mass and cross-section with/without including halo uncertainties (what if assumed local density is off by  2?) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Actual 0, 3, 7 astrophysical parameters in fit density assumed to be  0.5, 1, 2 of actual

35 Halo model uncertainties With / without uncertainties in halo model (nuisance parameters)  Local DM density most significant See e.g. Strigari & Trotta, JCAP 11, 019 (2009) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

36 Halo model uncertainties With / without uncertainties in halo model (nuisance parameters)  Local DM density most significant See e.g. Strigari & Trotta, JCAP 11, 019 (2009) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

37 Hadronic uncertainties With / without hadronic uncertainties (nuisance parameters)  No change: affects only CMSSM parameter constraints 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

38 Hadronic uncertainties With / without hadronic uncertainties (nuisance parameters)  No change: affects only CMSSM parameter constraints 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

39 Hadronic uncertainties With / without hadronic uncertainties (nuisance parameters)  Only directly affects CMSSM parameter constraints 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

40 Hadronic uncertainties With / without hadronic uncertainties (nuisance parameters)  Only directly affects CMSSM parameter constraints 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

41 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection CMSSM Constraints

42 CMSSM constraints No direct detection likelihood (priors and nuisance only) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

43 CMSSM constraints (BM1) With direct detection likelihood  Gaugino mass (m 1/2 ) best constrained (related to m  )  Weaker constraints on m 0, A 0, tanβ 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

44 CMSSM constraints No direct detection likelihood (priors and nuisance only) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

45 CMSSM constraints (BM1) With direct detection likelihood  Gaugino mass (m 1/2 ) best constrained (related to m  )  Weaker constraints on m 0, A 0, tanβ 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

46 CMSSM constraints No direct detection likelihood (priors and nuisance only) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

47 CMSSM constraints (BM1) With direct detection likelihood  Gaugino mass (m 1/2 ) best constrained (related to m  )  tanβ poorly constrained (not shown) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Profile likelihood: ■ 1σ ■ 2σ

48 CMSSM constraints No direct detection likelihood (priors and nuisance only) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

49 CMSSM constraints (BM1) With direct detection likelihood  Gaugino mass (m 1/2 ) best constrained (related to m  )  tanβ poorly constrained (not shown) 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Marginalized PDF: — 1σ / 2σ

50 CMSSM constraints Can combine with other observational data:  Indirect detection: cosmic-rays, neutrinos  Accelerators  Relic density, etc. 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection  -rays (Fermi-LAT) Segue 1 analysis Scott et al. (2009) Neutrinos (IceCube) IC collab + Edsjö, Scott, CS, in prep. Accelerator (LHC: ATLAS) SU3 benchmark analysis Bridges et al. (2010) See Trotta et al., JHEP 0812:024 (2008)

51 Summary Examined realistic reconstruction of dark matter properties in SUSY (e.g. CMSSM) theories using direct detection results Can reconstruct WIMP properties reasonably well in some cases, not so well in others  Coverage, sampling issues: Accuracy affected by scanning technique  Nuisance parameters Combine DD results with other observations to better constrain SUSY theory parameters 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

52 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection Backup Slides

53 TO DO Update slides: Additional slides: 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

54 Blank 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

55 Blank 9/27/2011C Savage - DSU 2011 - CMSSM and Direct Detection

Download ppt "Constraining CMSSM dark matter with direct detection results Chris Savage Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics Stockholm University with Yashar."

Similar presentations

Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.

Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Combined Energy Spectra of Flux and Anisotropy Identifying Anisotropic Source Populations of Gamma-rays or Neutrinos Sheldon Campbell The Ohio State University.

Combined Energy Spectra of Flux and Anisotropy Identifying Anisotropic Source Populations of Gamma-rays or Neutrinos Sheldon Campbell The Ohio State University.
Limits on the spin-dependent scattering cross section from IceCube Joakim Edsjö Presented by Carlos de los Heros.

Limits on the spin-dependent scattering cross section from IceCube Joakim Edsjö Presented by Carlos de los Heros.
Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.

Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.
Going after the Dark at Colliders David Berge (CERN)

Going after the Dark at Colliders David Berge (CERN)
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.

Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Simplified Models for Dark Matter and Missing Energy Searches at the LHC GIORGIO BUSONI 1 BASED ON: ARXIV:1409.2893 (AND 1307.2253, 1402.1275, 1405.3101,

Simplified Models for Dark Matter and Missing Energy Searches at the LHC GIORGIO BUSONI 1 BASED ON: ARXIV: (AND , , ,
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.

1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
The positron excess and supersymmetric dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University

The positron excess and supersymmetric dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University
IDM 2002, September 4, 2002Joakim Edsjö, Paolo Gondolo, Joakim Edsjö, Lars Bergström, Piero Ullio and Edward A. Baltz.

IDM 2002, September 4, 2002Joakim Edsjö, Paolo Gondolo, Joakim Edsjö, Lars Bergström, Piero Ullio and Edward A. Baltz.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,

Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
A profile likelihood analysis of the CMSSM with Genetic Algorithms Yashar Akrami Collaborators: Pat Scott, Joakim Edsjö, Jan Conrad and Lars Bergström.

A profile likelihood analysis of the CMSSM with Genetic Algorithms Yashar Akrami Collaborators: Pat Scott, Joakim Edsjö, Jan Conrad and Lars Bergström.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.

MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 10 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 10 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.

G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 10 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 10 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.
12/9/04KICP - Spin Dependent Limits 1 Can WIMP Spin Dependent Couplings explain DAMA? Limits from DAMA and Other Experiments Christopher M. Savage University.

12/9/04KICP - Spin Dependent Limits 1 Can WIMP Spin Dependent Couplings explain DAMA? Limits from DAMA and Other Experiments Christopher M. Savage University.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.

Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.

30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Statistical Analysis of Systematic Errors and Small Signals Reinhard Schwienhorst University of Minnesota 10/26/99.

Statistical Analysis of Systematic Errors and Small Signals Reinhard Schwienhorst University of Minnesota 10/26/99.
Discovery Experience: CMS Giovanni Petrucciani (UCSD)

Discovery Experience: CMS Giovanni Petrucciani (UCSD)
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.

SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google