Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMarilyn Woodling Modified about 1 year ago

1
TWO WAY ANOVA WITHOUT REPLICATION Also known as Randomized Block Design (RBD) In RBD there is one factor or variable that is of primary interest. However, there are also several other nuisance factors. Nuisance factors are those that may affect the measured result, but are not of primary interest. The way to control nuisance factor is by blocking them to reduce or eliminate the contribution to experimental error contributed by nuisance factors Blocking variable – A second treatment variable that when included in ANOVA analysis will have the effect of reducing the SSE term.

2
The model for a randomized block design with one nuisance variable can be written as: j th observation from i th treatment, Overall mean, i th effect of treatment, j th effect of block random error.

3
We can use the following layout for this kind of two-way classification: BlocksTotal Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment i Treatment k Total

4
In the two way analysis of variance where each treatment is represented once in each block, the major objective is to test: 1.The effect of treatment: 2.The effect of block:

6
We reject if: 1.The effect of treatment: 2.The effect of block:

7
SOLUTION

8
Solution; 1. Construct the table of calculation, we have k = 4 and n = 3: 2. Set up the hypothesis: 454351 474652 485055 423749 Engine 1Engine 2Engine 3 Detergent A Detergent B Detergent C Detergent D Totals182176207 Totals 139 145 153 128 565

9
3. Construct ANOVA table:

10
4. At = 0.01, from the statistical table for f distribution, we have (treatments) and (blocks). 5. Since, thus we reject and conclude that there are differences in the effectiveness of the 4 detergents at = 0.01 and also since, thus we reject and conclude that there are differences among the results obtained for the 3 engines are significant Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degree of Freedom Mean SquareF Calculated Treatments1113 Blocks1352 Error196 Total26511

11
SUMMARY A two factor randomized complete block design is complete balanced two-factor design in which the effects of one factor (the treatment factor) are of interest, while the effects of other factor (the blocking factor) are not of interest. The blocking factor is included to reduce the uncertainty in the main effects estimates of the treatment factor. A two way analysis variance is used to estimate effects and to perform the hypothesis tests on the main effects of the treatment factor. A randomized complete block design provides a great advantage when the blocking factor strongly affects the response and provides a relatively small disadvantage when the blocking factor has little or no effect.

12
SUMMARY In a two way analysis of variance : i. If the additive model is not rejected, then the hypothesis tests for the main effects can be used to determine whether the row or column factors that affect the outcome. ii. If the additive model is rejected, then the hypothesis tests for the main effects should not be used. Instead the means must be examined to determine how various combinations of rows and column levels affect the outcome.

13
Exercise 4.3 A chemical engineer is studying the effects of various reagents and catalysts on the yield of a certain process. There is a combination among three reagents and four catalysts. The results are presented below : Develop a complete analysis of variance table for two factor and it is possible the main effects of catalyst (Treatments) and reagent (blocks) are all differences at ? CatalystReagent 123 A84.8589.1385.28 B75.3579.4084.65 C70.3076.6578.20 D73.1881.1077.23

14
Exercise 4.4 WARTA, the Warren Area Regional Transit Authority, is expanding bus service from the suburb of Starbrick into the central business district of Warren. There are four routes being considered from Starbrick to downtown Warren. WARTA conducted several tests to determine whether there was a difference in the mean travel times along the four routes. Because there will be many different drivers, the test was set up so each driver drove along each of the four routes. Below is the travel time, in minutes for each driver-route combination. DriverU.S. 6West EndHickory St. Rte. 59 Deans18172122 Snaverly1623 22 Ormson21 2622 Zollaco23222925 Filbeck252428

15
Continue…. At, is there any possible differences in treatments and also in blocks?

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google