Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byDevon Harre Modified over 3 years ago

1
DOCTORAL SEMINAR, SPRING SEMESTER 2007 Experimental Design & Analysis Analysis of Covariance; Within- Subject Designs March 13, 2007

2
Outline Blocking vs. analysis of covariance ANCOVA Within-subject designs Greenwald

3
Randomized Block Design Completely randomized designs based on assumption that random assignment diminishes systematic bias Blocks are experimental counterparts of covariates Identify “nuisance” variable Randomly assign within blocks

4
Randomized Block Design Example: Experiment about effect of 4 types of training programs on learning Completely randomized design: N=60, a=4 levels, randomly assign 15 subjects to each of 4 levels Randomized block design: assume intelligence could confound results, categorize subjects according to IQ or GPA (high, medium, low), assign 20 to each “block” and randomly assign within each block to one of 4 conditions

5
Randomized Block Design Code block as a factor Do not want treatment x block interaction More blocks require more subjects

6
Analysis of Covariance The main purpose of ANCOVA is statistical control of variability when experimental control can not be used Statistical method for increasing power of ANOVA by reducing mean square error (within-condition error) ANCOVA can be used to correct for extraneous variables and rule out rival explanations

7
Analysis of Covariance ANCOVA is like ANOVA on the residuals of the values of the dependent variable, after removing the influence of the covariate, rather than on the original values themselves In so far as the measures of the covariate are taken in advance of the experiment and they correlate with the measures of the dependent variable they can be used to reduce experimental error Based on partial correlation analysis

8
Analysis of Covariance Examples of covariates If we have a theory about two different methods of learning and our dependent variable is memory, level of education, intelligence, IQ, experience and age may all be covariates If we have a theory about the effect of management style on firm profitability, some covariates may be firm size, competition, length of CEO tenure If we have a theory about the relationship between number of outstanding shares and share price, we may consider market capitalization, earnings per share and IPO year as covariates If we have a theory about the interactive effects of advertising and sales force training, some covariates to consider may be brand equity of product, size of sales force and past advertising

9
Analysis of Covariance One way of understanding ANCOVA is in terms of deviations from a common regression line If the regression lines of the dependent variable vs. covariate have same slopes but different intercepts, the effect of the treatment is consistent If the regression lines of the dependent variable vs. covariate have different slopes, the effect of the treatment depends on the value of the covariate

10
Analysis of Covariance ANCOVA is based on the sums of squares and sums of products It is used to test the same hypothesis as standard ANOVA The only difference is that each of the sums of squares are adjusted on the basis of the covariate variable The covariate reduces the amount of experimental error In calculations, reduce degree of freedom by 1 for each covariate

11
ANCOVA Assumptions Dependent variable continuous Covariate may be continuous (like regression) or discrete (like ANOVA) Factor has discrete levels Variables are normally distributed Relationship is linear

12
ANCOVA Multiple covariates possible Should be theoretically motivated How much variance does covariate account for?

13
Within-Subject Designs Advantages of within-subject designs Economy Power In fully crossed designs, random assignment permits the assumption of equivalence (subject comparability). In within- subject designs, subjects are the same, thus removing source of unwanted variability and reducing the error term Usefulness Allows study of behavioral/attitudinal change and learning

14
Within-Subjects Designs Within-subjects designs involve applying all treatments to the same individuals Think about within-subjects designs as a 2-way ANOVA where the columns are the treatments and the rows the individuals, with one observation per cell This design introduces the idea of individuals as a random factor that crosses or intersects other factors in the design Within-subjects, or repeated measures design, has advantages and disadvantages Advantage is that each individual serves as his or her own control, thus a source on experimental error resulting from individual difference is controlled for Disadvantage is that it introduces dependencies across the treatments, known as carryover effects

15
Within-Subject Designs: Economy For a 2x2 fully- crossed factorial N=40 (different subjects in each cell) For a 2x2 within- subject design N=10 (same 10 subjects in each cell) a1 a2 b1 b2 n=10 a1 a2 b1 b2 n=10

16
Within-Subject Designs: Power Consider example in which 1 factor (A) is manipulated Because factor A is completely crossed with subjects factor S, we denote as AxS Analogous to two-factor design AxB in which variability is SS total = SS A + SS B + SS AB + SS error Examine claim of greater power SS error = SS total – SS effects In one-factor example: SS error = SS total – SS A - SS S

17
Within-Subject Designs Consider complete within-subjects 2x2 design (each subject sees a 1 b 1, a 1 b 2, a 2 b 1, a 2 b 2 conditions) Sources of variability: A, B, S, AxB, AxS, BxS, AxBxS To test effects: compare mean square of effects (A, B, AxB) with mean square for effects with subjects (MS AxS, MS BxS, MS AxBxS )

18
Within-Subjects Designs Example Let’s say that we are interested in the effect of different types of exercise on memory We use two treatments, aerobic exercise and anaerobic exercise In the aerobic condition, participants run in place for five minutes, after which they take a memory test In the anaerobic condition they lift weights for five minutes, after which they take a different memory test of equivalent difficulty In a within-subjects design all participants begin by running in place and taking the test, after which the same group of people lift weights and then take the test We compare the memory test scores in order to answer the question as to what type of exercise most aids memory

Similar presentations

OK

Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.

Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Download ppt on global warming Ppt on windows vista operating system View ppt on ipad Ppt on amazon web services Ppt on automobile related topics about computer The nervous system for kids ppt on batteries Ppt on network theory migration Ppt on indian culture and heritage Ppt on game theory john Ppt on reproductive health for class 10