Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CORPORATE PRESENTATION NOVEMBER, 2011. Reader's Advisory Forward-looking Statements: All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CORPORATE PRESENTATION NOVEMBER, 2011. Reader's Advisory Forward-looking Statements: All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking."— Presentation transcript:

1 CORPORATE PRESENTATION NOVEMBER, 2011

2 Reader's Advisory Forward-looking Statements: All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or Southern Pacific Resource Corp.’s (the “Company”) future performance. Forward- looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as "seek", "anticipate", "plan", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "project", "predict", "potential", "targeting", "intend", "could", "might", "should", "believe" and similar expressions. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. The Corporation believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in this presentation should not be unduly relied upon by investors. These statements speak only as of the date of this presentation and are expressly qualified, in their entirety, by this cautionary statement. In particular, this presentation contains forward-looking statements, pertaining to the following: – supply and demand for oil and natural gas; – the quantity of reserves; – the quantity and economic viability of resources; – the value of reserves; – the flow rates of wells; – capital expenditure programs; – development of reserves; – potential acquisitions; and – expectations regarding the Corporation's ability to raise capital. With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this presentation, the Corporation has made assumptions regarding, among other things: – the legislative and regulatory environment; – information regarding reserve and resource potential; – the Corporation's ability to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms; – ability to develop reserves and resources and costs regarding such development; – availability and costs of infrastructure; The Corporation's actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this presentation: – volatility in the market prices for oil and natural gas; – uncertainties associated with estimating reserves and resources; – geological, technical, drilling and processing problems; – liabilities and risks, including environmental liabilities and risks, inherent in oil and natural gas operations; – incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; – incorrect estimates of costs; – competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; and – weather conditions. The forward-looking statements or information contained in this presentation are made as of the date hereof and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward ‑ looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by applicable securities laws. Certain of the forward-looking statements regarding the Corporation’s financial outlook, anticipated revenue, future expenditures and cash flow forecasts may constitute future-orientated financial information (“FOFI”). Management of the Corporation approved the inclusion of the FOFI in the presentation based on the assumptions listed above on May 1, The FOFI included in this presentation has been provided only for the periods listed and for the sole purpose of providing an estimated guideline for the Corporation’s possible future financial position and the FOFI may not be appropriate for other purposes. Reserves Definitions References to "contingent resources" or "resources" in this presentation do not constitute, and should be distinguished from, references to "reserves". "Reserves" are those remaining quantities of oil and gas anticipated to be economically recoverable from these known accumulations from a given date forward. "Resources" are oil and gas volumes that are estimated to have originally existed in the earth's crust as natural accumulations but are not capable of being classified as "reserves", and "contingent resources" are a sub-category of resources that means those quantities of oil and gas estimated to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations but which cannot be classified as "reserves" for a variety of reasons, including that they may not be currently economic. There is no certainty that any portion of the resources will be discovered. If discovered, there is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the resources. “Contingent Resources” means those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies may include factors such as economic, legal, environmental, political, and regulatory matters or a lack of markets. It is also appropriate to classify as contingent resources the estimated discovered recoverable quantities associated with a project in the early evaluation stage. “Low (P90)” means a conservative estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the low estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90 percent probability (P90) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the low estimate. “Best (P50)” means the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent probability (P50) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate. “High (P10)” means an optimistic estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the high estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10 percent probability (P10) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the high estimate. “Probable reserves” means those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated Proved plus Probable reserves. “Possible reserves” means those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of the estimated Proved plus Probable plus Possible reserves. “Proved reserves” means those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated Proved reserves. Future net revenues associated with reserves and resources do not necessarily represent fair market value. The estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation. Barrel of Oil Equivalent: Where amounts are expressed on a barrel of oil equivalent (“boe”) basis, natural gas volumes have been converted to boe at a ratio of 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent. This conversion ratio is based upon an energy equivalent conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent value equivalence at the wellhead. Boe figures may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. 2

3 The Southern Pacific Strategy FOCUSED: We develop and produce bitumen and heavy oil using horizontal wells and steam. INDEPENDENT: We control and operate 90% of our lands, allowing us to develop at a pace that fits our objectives. DEMONSTRATED EXECUTION: Solid operations & construction expertise, plus proven financing capacity. FOCUS ON CAPITAL EFFICIENCY: Scalable projects can be managed cost effectively, avoid unproven technologies, improve existing technologies by reducing cost or increasing throughput 3

4 STP Overview 4 Contingent Resources (MMbbl) Corporate Reserves (MMbbl) 2P = & 3P = mmbbl Refer to slide 2 for definitions of reserves and contingent resources categories. Estimates prepared by GLJ Petroleum Consultants effective June 30, 2011, except for the Red Earth contingent resource estimate, which was completed by Sproule and Associates. Trading symbolTSX:STP Shares outstanding - basic340 million Shares outstanding - fully diluted364 million Average daily trading volume (last 6 mo avg.) 1.2 million Market Capitalization (Oct. 31, 2011) $498 million Working Capital Estimate (Sept ) $185million Total Corporate Debt (Sept. 30, 2011) $401 million Insider Ownership - fully diluted5% Number of Employees80 (office & field)

5 Strategic Land Position Alberta: 436 sections (242,176 net acres) of oil sands leases with 87% average working interest Saskatchewan: 12 month average of ~4,300 barrels per day (bbl/d) of 100% working interest heavy oil 5

6 STP-Senlac Thermal Project 6 4, ,000 bbl/d for the next years Best in class SOR of 2.0 – 2.2 Experienced operations personnel ~ $65 million/year net operating income ~ $20 million/year of capital for next two years 4, ,000 bbl/d for the next years Best in class SOR of 2.0 – 2.2 Experienced operations personnel ~ $65 million/year net operating income ~ $20 million/year of capital for next two years Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information. (drilling)

7 STP-Senlac: Historical Production STP plan is to accelerate drilling frequency, and keep the plant filled between 4,000 – 5,000 bbl/d on average Allows more consistent operation and reduces peak individual well rate demands which may enhance recovery 7 A B C D E F G H J K - AAPHASE Optimal plant throughput range STP Operates Senlac

8 Commodity Hedging 8 WTI Natural Gas Purchase Conservative hedging strategy to protect existing cash flow which is then used for growth projects

9 Netback Comparison: Senlac and McKay 9 Actual Netbacks from Senlac Assumptions: WTI = $US 90/bbl; FX = $US 1.00/$C; management estimates of future costs, differentials, tariffs, royalties and transportation. Forecast2013 Netbacks at ~ 90% Design Capacity

10 STP-McKay Thermal Project 10 STP-McKay Thermal Project STP Lands 45 km NW Ft. McMurray 10.5 section project area 100% STP working interest Regulatory approvals in place Phase 1 construction fully underway Phase 1 Design: 12,000 bbl/d oil 33,600 bbl/d steam 45 km NW Ft. McMurray 10.5 section project area 100% STP working interest Regulatory approvals in place Phase 1 construction fully underway Phase 1 Design: 12,000 bbl/d oil 33,600 bbl/d steam Suncor MacKay SAGD Project (Analog) Suncor MacKay SAGD Project (Analog) STP Lands

11 STP-McKay Phase 1: Project Overview SAGD well pairs: successfully drilled through high quality reservoir Phase 1 - Central Plant Facility 29 km all season access road & 14 km natural gas pipeline - complete Phase 2- Future Central Plant Facility location Future Phase 1 Well pads

12 STP-McKay Phase 1: Construction Update Central Process Facility Over 4,100 of 5,300 piles have been set Electrical work to has commenced Largest pieces are now on site 12 Tank Farm: 6 of 7 tanks erected, facility and piperack modules arriving on site and being placed on piles Steam Generators – on site and being assembled Cogen – major components placed, assembly underway

13 STP-McKay Phase 1: Construction Update Well Pads 12 SAGD well pairs + 1 HZ CSS well successfully drilled, completions underway Piling at pads nearly complete Surface facilities on 1 st pad will commence construction in November 13 Surface steam and effluent pipelines from CPF to well pads under construction Service rig completing slant SAGD wells SAGD Wellheads ready from installation

14 STP-McKay Phase 1: Construction Update Camps and Infrastructure 29 km all season access road complete 14 km 8” natural gas fuel pipeline complete Over 57% of permanent operations staff positions filled, including 90% of management/senior personnel Water source wells drilled, equipped and pipeline connected to plant person operations camp - complete by December Service rig completing slant SAGD wells SAGD Wellheads ready from installation 300 person operations camp – to be removed after start -up McKay River single span bridge

15 STP-McKay Phase 1: SAGD Well Completions: Leading Edge in Wellbore Design Wellbores have been completed to allow optimal flexibility for steam distribution and production gathering points along wellbores Distributed temperature and pressure monitoring along wellbores Will provide operational flexibility to ensure wellbore conformance 15 3 steam distribution points 3 production entry points 800 – 1100 m length Gas Lift: coiled tubing strings

16 STP McKay Phase 1: Spending Update Capital forecast reduced $10 million to $440 million This includes ~ $15 million of unbudgeted scope changes including –Additional 40,000 bbl dilbit storage tank –Increased water recycle on evaporators –Expanded truck loading facilities 72% of costs are now considered firm $30 million contingency within this forecast 16 Spend breakdown as of Sept. 30 th, 2011 Fixed costs represent items bid out or flat rate Reimbursable costs represent hourly or rate based variable costs

17 STP-McKay Phase 1: Timeline to Production 17 Current Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information. Q1Q2Q3Q

18 Senlac and McKay Phase 1: Production Profile 18 Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information.

19 Corporate Cash Flow - Base Case Model (STP-Senlac and STP-McKay Phase 1 Only) 19 Assumptions: WTI = $US 90/bbl flat FX $US/$CDN Heavy Differential = $US 13.50/bbl, NYMEX = $US 6.43mcf Assumptions: WTI = $US 90/bbl flat FX $US/$CDN Heavy Differential = $US 13.50/bbl, NYMEX = $US 6.43mcf Simple model assumes cash sweep to pay down debt is first priority Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information.

20 STP-McKay Phase 1: Solid Reserve Value 20 Even conservative GLJ 1P forecast with SOR average of 3.2 delivers strong cash flow and value All of the current reserves forecasts are capped by current design capacity of 12,000 bbl/d Forecasts as per GLJ & Associates effective June 30, 2011 By definition: 1P forecast must have a high degree of certainty on being recovered.

21 STP-McKay Phase 2: High Quality Resource Base 21 Total of 43 coreholes (31 drilled this past winter) on Phase 2 project area High quality bitumen pay encountered on all wells: No lean zones No shale barriers Continuous and exploitable McMurray and Wabiskaw oil sands deposits m exploitable pay thickness, average of 19 m

22 STP-McKay: Phases 1 and 2 Layout (circa 2014) 22 Well pads Phase 2 Phase 1 Continuous pay fairway Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information. STP-McKay Phase 2 is being designed to add 24,000 bbl/d of bitumen processing capacity, bringing the total to 36,000 bbl/d

23 Phase 2B Highlighted in red Phase 2A +Pre-build for Phase 2B Phase 2A +Pre-build for Phase 2B STP-McKay Phase 2: Construction Strategy Southern Pacific plans to stagger the construction of Phase 2 in two integrated 12,000 bbl/d pieces Provides maximum flexibility both operationally and financially Expect Phase 2 application to be submitted by mid- November

24 STP-McKay Phase 2: Post Application Value Change 24 Upon successful application submission for Phase 2 expansion, management expects a significant revision to the 2P reserve category 2P reserves production profile will be accelerated and is estimated to increase before tax NPV10% by more than $450 million including expansion capital STP believes years is the optimal project life to maximize value of the facility capital investment 2P forecast is currently capped by approved design of 12,000 bbl/d 50 years 25 years 2P forecast will be capped at 36,000 bbl/d upon submission of expansion application Reserves accelerated and additional contingent resources can be reclassified to reserves Phase 1 design capacity Phase 1 & 2 design capacity

25 Wabiskaw Bitumen: Additional Resource at McKay 25 Wabiskaw zone lies directly above McMurray over most of McKay Phase 1 and 2 Approximately 200 mmbbl of OBIP (management est.) Recovery mechanism planned: Combination of cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) and conductive heating from SAGD in McMurray Modeling has demonstrated up to 50% recovery (budgeting 25% until tested) Benefits: Additional recovery Steam source available from SAGD operations Low incremental cost Timing CSS well drilled; will be an observation well until further Wabiskaw technical work is completed Production could start 2-3 years after SAGD start up Clearwater Shale (Caprock) Wabiskaw Bitumen (CSS) Wabiskaw Shale McMurray Bitumen (SAGD) Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information.

26 McMurray Bitumen Wabiskaw Bitumen Clearwater Shale Caprock STP-McKay: Full Bitumen Exploitation Plan 26 Conduction and cyclic steam SAGD injector Infill horizontal well SAGD producer

27 Southern Pacific’s Existing Project Growth Plan 27 Forecast represents real projects that are on production, being constructed or in the application process Timing of STP-McKay Phase 2 represents two stages of growth, designed for optimal operating and financing flexibility Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information.

28 Corporate Cash Flow - Base Case Model (STP-Senlac and STP-McKay Phase 1 and 2) 28 Assumptions: WTI = $US 90/bbl flat FX $US/$CDN Heavy Differential = $US 13.50/bbl, NYMEX = $US 6.43mcf Assumes Phase 2 constructed at $38,000 per design bbl/d Assumes future phases funded with cash flow and debt, no additional equity issued Assumptions: WTI = $US 90/bbl flat FX $US/$CDN Heavy Differential = $US 13.50/bbl, NYMEX = $US 6.43mcf Assumes Phase 2 constructed at $38,000 per design bbl/d Assumes future phases funded with cash flow and debt, no additional equity issued Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information. Simple model assumes cash sweep to pay down debt is first prio rity

29 STP-McKay: Future Upside 29 Phase 1 Phase 2 Potential Phase 3 Expansion area (environmental background work underway) South McKay (contingent resources already assigned) STP-McKay Thermal Project boundary Under-explored, needs more work to determine potential 100% working interest in 59 sections Will have full-time operations in this area in 2012 Other operators in area currently in application preparation or waiting for project approval STP’s Phase 2 expansion application will add 6.5 sections to existing project area to prepare for a possible Phase 3

30 STP-Red Earth Thermal Project: Pilot Testing Underway 135 sections (100% WI) Existing 1,000 bbl/d thermal project 105 MMbbl of P50 contingent resource Pilot project started up in June wells currently being steamed and tested Evaluate through summer and make recommendations in fall 135 sections (100% WI) Existing 1,000 bbl/d thermal project 105 MMbbl of P50 contingent resource Pilot project started up in June wells currently being steamed and tested Evaluate through summer and make recommendations in fall 6 miles Pilot Project Refer to slide 2 for a definition of contingent resources. 1,000 bbl/d thermal facility 30

31 STP’s Upside: Additional Oil Sands Leases 31 Hangingstone 29 coreholes 2D seismic 66 Sections Hangingstone 29 coreholes 2D seismic 66 Sections Anzac 14 coreholes 2D seismic, ERT 75 Sections Anzac 14 coreholes 2D seismic, ERT 75 Sections Leismer & Kirby 29 coreholes 2D & 3D seismic 51 Sections Leismer & Kirby 29 coreholes 2D & 3D seismic 51 Sections Ells 15 coreholes 2D seismic 50 Sections Ells 15 coreholes 2D seismic 50 Sections These exploration blocks represent significant upside potential for future in-situ oil sands projects Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information.

32 Summary of STP’s Recent Financing Activities $ million – equity financings –$108.4 million in May 2010 (STP-McKay Phase 1) –$ 52 million in October 2009 (STP-Senlac) –Remaining in 4 offerings during (Land and Exploration) $ 173 million – convertible debentures –6% annual interest rate –Convertible to common equity at $2.15/share –5.5 year term $US 275 million – 2 nd lien term loan facility –10.5% annual interest rate (LIBOR + 8.5%, LIBOR 2.0%) –5 year term –Payout cost: 12%-year 1, 2%-year 2, 1%-year 3, par thereafter –Ability to pay back $US 50 million with no penalty after McKay Phase 1 is commercial $ 30 million – 1 st lien secured bank facility (revolver) –Undrawn – to be used for general corporate purposes –BA discount rate % interest rate –Expandable to $80 million after McKay Phase 1 is commercial 32 Demonstrated financing ability Refer to slide 2 for cautionary statements about forward-looking information.

33 Jan June Unrisked NAV Total Proved Reserves 2 $254 $726 Probable Reserves 2 $660 $383 Best Estimate (P50) Contingent Resources 2 $970 $1,768 Stock Option Proceeds$30 Working Capital$453 $260 Sub-total$2,367 million $3,167 million Less: Long Term Debt 3 -$275 -$261 Total Net Asset Value$2,092 million $2,906 million Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding359 Convertible Debentures 4 80 Total 439 million Estimated Pre-Tax NAV per Share$4.76 $6.62 Net Asset Value: Solidifying as Proven Assets Grow 33 Significant reclassification of reserves from Probable to Total Proved due to 2011 winter drilling program and increased confidence in reservoir quality and overall project value. Notes: 1. Represents then current estimates of all data including reserves, resources, working capital, long term debt, and share balance. 2. All reports completed by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., values reflect the ‘then relevant’ bt 3. Long Term debt incorporating the McKay financing with the $275M US$ Term Loan converted to CDN $ at an f/x rate of $ Assumes the convertible debenture would all be issued for shares given NAV is > strike price.

34 : What’s next for STP? Execution of STP-McKay Thermal Project –Construction on time and on budget will be primary focus of 2011 –2012 will be focused on bringing production on line Preparation of STP-McKay Phase 2 –Expect to submit an application in the fall of 2011 Development Plan for STP-Red Earth –Currently testing using existing pilot facilities –Development plan for growth in late fall Maintain STP-Senlac at high levels of production –Phase J (3 SAGD well pairs) currently drilling –Examining de-bottlenecking options Continued exploration and acquisition opportunities –Developing plays on all STP land blocks –Continuing to seek accretive A&D opportunities 34

35 Contact Information 35 Suite 1700, th Ave. SW Calgary, AB T2P 2V7 Phone: Fax: TSX:STP For more information: Byron Lutes, President & CEO Ron Clarke, COO Howard Bolinger, CFO


Download ppt "CORPORATE PRESENTATION NOVEMBER, 2011. Reader's Advisory Forward-looking Statements: All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google