Presentation on theme: "IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Passive Neutron Assay of Uranium Mass Measurements in Scraps and Wastes V. Nizhnik, M. PickrellSGTS/TND."— Presentation transcript:
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Passive Neutron Assay of Uranium Mass Measurements in Scraps and Wastes V. Nizhnik, M. PickrellSGTS/TND
IAEA Conventional Passive Multiplicity Passive multiplicity is based on a theoretical hierarchy called the Point Model So named, because it is a zero dimensional. Therefore, spontaneous fission, multiplication, and alpha-n production are UNIFORM across the sample. Therefore, the sample nuclear material is evenly distributed in a homogenous matrix.
IAEA The Modification Necessary to Measure Uranium Wastes What happens when the material is not uniform and evenly distributed? The conventional method develops a bias error. This work developed a modification of the Point Model / Passive Multiplicity equations to analyze non-uniform, inhomogeneous samples. Applied to uranium wastes with metal ingots mixed with diffuse oxide powder.
IAEA Passive Multiplicity (PM) Assumptions Kill this slide Homogeneous distribution of nuclear material through an item matrix material The same chemical form of Uranium material in the item, i.e. uniform (a,n)-neutron production rate in the item volume Uniform physical property of uranium material (mostly concerns material density) If item properties are in compliance with listed statement: all the neutrons are equal in the term of multiplication Alpha parameter is the same for any point of item material Then Passive Multiplicity Analysis can be applied for precise U mass analysis
IAEA Wastes: “Close Look” Example Uranium Metal Production Process Ideal Case UF 4 + 2 Mg U metal + 2 MgF 2 Product: Single U metal piece and burnt matrix material; both of known mass In reality UF 4 + 2 Mg X · U chunks + Y · UF 4 + Z · MgF 2 + W · Mg Product: Number of U metal chunks, un- burnt UF 4 in un-burnt Mg+MgF 2 matrix. Their mas ratios are unknown. Impact on Neutron Multiplicity: Non-homogeneous distribution of U material Multi-component chemical composition Unknown mass ratio for uranium material components Non-uniform (a,n)-neutron production rate Spatial dependent neutron multiplication
IAEA Passive Multiplicity Conventional Passive Multiplicity Equations Modified Passive Multiplicity Assumptions and known parameters: Assign: x –U metal fraction in total U mass in item Then: (1-x)– fraction of UF 4 in total U mass in item U metal chunks are pure: no (a,n)-neutrons production (a = 0) Dispersed un-burnt UF 4 material in Mg+MgF 2 matrix is non- multiplying media due to low density (M = 1) Alpha value for UF 4 is known, based on U isotopic information Long Crocs
IAEA Modified Passive Multiplicity M – multiplication in the metal chunks x –U metal fraction in total U mass in item m U – total U mass in measured item U metal term UF 4 term Corrects for non-uniform distribution of multi-component Uranium material Determines total Uranium mass in measured item Determines U mass in metal and UF 4 form Determines neutron Multiplication in metal phase (gives information on average metal chunks size)
IAEA Example of U Waste Measurements Plutonium Scrap Multiplicity Counter Counter: Efficiency 55%: allows fast acquisition of neutron multiplicity data with good statistics Size of the measurement cavity: d=20cm, h=42cm Items: 34 Uranium waste items with various Gross Weight (up-to 30kg) Packed in Poly bags to fit in the measurement cavity Target total uncertainty: Not more than 2.3% for 1 Sigma confidential interval
IAEA Rejection of Cosmic Rays Bursts Cosmic rays prompt neutron “bursts” when interacting with High-Z (Uranium) material nuclei; they produce high multiplicities of detected neutron and affect counting rates. Good Cycle Cycle-by-Cycle Multiplicity Distribution Bad Cycle Rejected by RSD based rejection logic Rejected by Multiplicity Distribution analysis logic
IAEA Analysis with Modified PM Conventional vs Modified Method Results Measurement of a batch of uranium waste items (individual item U mass and Total U mass) Theoretical bias of Conventional vs Modified PM for NU U metal average multiplication: M=1.05 UF 4 Alpha value a=3.85 Bias of Total U mass in the measured batch The bias is higher in case of analysis of enriched Uranium since values of Multiplication in metal phase and Alpha in UF 4 phase are higher then for natural Uranium Relative content of UF 4 (1-x) Theoretical Bias