Presentation on theme: "Hash-Based Indexes The slides for this text are organized into chapters. This lecture covers Chapter 10. Chapter 1: Introduction to Database Systems Chapter."— Presentation transcript:
1 Hash-Based IndexesThe slides for this text are organized into chapters. This lecture covers Chapter 10.Chapter 1: Introduction to Database SystemsChapter 2: The Entity-Relationship ModelChapter 3: The Relational ModelChapter 4 (Part A): Relational AlgebraChapter 4 (Part B): Relational CalculusChapter 5: SQL: Queries, Programming, TriggersChapter 6: Query-by-Example (QBE)Chapter 7: Storing Data: Disks and FilesChapter 8: File Organizations and IndexingChapter 9: Tree-Structured IndexingChapter 10: Hash-Based IndexingChapter 11: External SortingChapter 12 (Part A): Evaluation of Relational OperatorsChapter 12 (Part B): Evaluation of Relational Operators: Other TechniquesChapter 13: Introduction to Query OptimizationChapter 14: A Typical Relational OptimizerChapter 15: Schema Refinement and Normal FormsChapter 16 (Part A): Physical Database DesignChapter 16 (Part B): Database TuningChapter 17: SecurityChapter 18: Transaction Management OverviewChapter 19: Concurrency ControlChapter 20: Crash RecoveryChapter 21: Parallel and Distributed DatabasesChapter 22: Internet DatabasesChapter 23: Decision SupportChapter 24: Data MiningChapter 25: Object-Database SystemsChapter 26: Spatial Data ManagementChapter 27: Deductive DatabasesChapter 28: Additional Topics1
2 Comments Who checked out Bill Gates speech? Comments on the exam? $1 for anyone who solvedthe puzzle.Rope Puzzle?Who checked out Bill Gates speech?
3 Introduction As for any index, 3 alternatives for data entries k*: Data record with key value k<k, rid of data record with search key value k><k, list of rids of data records with search key k>Choice orthogonal to the indexing techniqueHash-based indexes are best for equality selections. Cannot support range searches.Static and dynamic hashing techniques exist; trade-offs similar to ISAM vs. B+ trees.2
4 Static Hashing# primary pages fixed, allocated sequentially, never de-allocated; overflow pages if needed.h(k) mod M = bucket to which data entry with key k belongs. (M = # of buckets)h(key) mod N2keyhN-1Primary bucket pagesOverflow pages3
5 Static Hashing (Contd.) Buckets contain data entries.Hash fn works on search key field of record r. Must distribute values over range M-1.h(key) = (a * key + b) usually works well.a and b are constants; lots known about how to tune h.Long overflow chains can develop and degrade performance.Extendible and Linear Hashing: Dynamic techniques to fix this problem.4
6 Extendible HashingSituation: Bucket (primary page) becomes full. Why not re-organize file by doubling # of buckets?Reading and writing all pages is expensive!Idea: Use directory of pointers to buckets, double # of buckets by doubling the directory, splitting just the bucket that overflowed!Directory much smaller than file, so doubling it is much cheaper. Only one page of data entries is split. No overflow page!Trick lies in how hash function is adjusted!5
7 Example Directory is array of size 4. LOCAL DEPTH2ExampleBucket A4*12*32*16*GLOBAL DEPTH22Bucket B001*5*21*13*Directory is array of size 4.To find bucket for r, take last `global depth’ # bits of h(r); we denote r by h(r).If h(r) = 5 = binary 101, it is in bucket pointed to by 01.01102Bucket C1110*2DIRECTORYBucket D15*7*19*DATA PAGESInsert: If bucket is full, split it (allocate new page, re-distribute).If necessary, double the directory. (As we will see, splitting abucket does not always require doubling; we can tell bycomparing global depth with local depth for the split bucket.)6
9 Points to Note20 = binary Last 2 bits (00) tell us r belongs in A or A2. Last 3 bits needed to tell which.Global depth of directory: Max # of bits needed to tell which bucket an entry belongs to.Local depth of a bucket: # of bits used to determine if an entry belongs to this bucket.When does bucket split cause directory doubling?Before insert, local depth of bucket = global depth. Insert causes local depth to become > global depth; directory is doubled by copying it over and `fixing’ pointer to split image page. (Use of least significant bits enables efficient doubling via copying of directory!)8
10 Directory Doubling Why use least significant bits in directory? Allows for doubling via copying!6 = 11036 = 1103000000001100220100101001000111106*01100100016*106*01110111016*116*116*110011111111Least Significantvs.Most Significant
11 Comments on Extendible Hashing If directory fits in memory, equality search answered with one disk access; else two.100MB file, 100 bytes/rec, 4K pages contains 1,000,000 records (as data entries) and 25,000 directory elements; chances are high that directory will fit in memory.Directory grows in spurts, and, if the distribution of hash values is skewed, directory can grow large.Multiple entries with same hash value cause problems!Delete: If removal of data entry makes bucket empty, can be merged with `split image’. If each directory element points to same bucket as its split image, can halve directory.9
12 Linear HashingThis is another dynamic hashing scheme, an alternative to Extendible Hashing.LH handles the problem of long overflow chains without using a directory, and handles duplicates.Idea: Use a family of hash functions h0, h1, h2, ...hi(key) = h(key) mod(2iN); N = initial # bucketsh is some hash function (range is not 0 to N-1)If N = 2d0, for some d0, hi consists of applying h and looking at the last di bits, where di = d0 + i.hi+1 doubles the range of hi (similar to directory doubling)10
13 Linear Hashing (Contd.) Directory avoided in LH by using overflow pages, and choosing bucket to split round-robin.Splitting proceeds in `rounds’. Round ends when all NR initial (for round R) buckets are split. Buckets 0 to Next-1 have been split; Next to NR yet to be split.Current round number is Level.Search: To find bucket for data entry r, find hLevel(r):If hLevel(r) in range `Next to NR’ , r belongs here.Else, r could belong to bucket hLevel(r) or bucket hLevel(r) + NR; must apply hLevel+1(r) to find out.11
14 Overview of LH File In the middle of a round. h Level Buckets split in this round:Bucket to be splitIfhLevel(search key value)Nextis in this range, must useh(search key value)Level+1Buckets that existed at theto decide if entry is inbeginning of this round:`split image' bucket.this is the range ofhLevel`split image' buckets:created (through splittingof other buckets) in this round11
15 Linear Hashing (Contd.) Insert: Find bucket by applying hLevel / hLevel+1:If bucket to insert into is full:Add overflow page and insert data entry.(Maybe) Split Next bucket and increment Next.Can choose any criterion to `trigger’ split.Since buckets are split round-robin, long overflow chains don’t develop!Doubling of directory in Extendible Hashing is similar; switching of hash functions is implicit in how the # of bits examined is increased.12
16 Example of Linear Hashing On split, hLevel+1 is used to re-distribute entries.Level=0, N=4Level=0hhPRIMARYhhPRIMARYOVERFLOW1Next=0PAGES1PAGESPAGES32*44*36*32*0000000000Next=1Data entry r9*25*5*with h(r)=59*25*5*001010010114*18*10*30*14*18*10*30*01010Primary01010bucket page31*35*7*11*31*35*7*11*43*0111101111(This infois for illustrationonly!)(The actual contentsof the linear hashedfile)1000044*36*13
17 Example: End of a Round Level=1 PRIMARY OVERFLOW h 1 h PAGES PAGES PAGESPAGESNext=0Level=00000032*PRIMARYOVERFLOWhPAGES1hPAGES001019*25*0000032*0101066*18*10*34*50*001019*25*0111143*35*11*0101066*18*10*34*Next=31000044*36*0111131*35*7*11*43*101115*37*29*1000044*36*101015*14*37*29*1101030*22*14*30*22*31*7*110101111114
18 LH Described as a Variant of EH The two schemes are actually quite similar:Begin with an EH index where directory has N elements.Use overflow pages, split buckets round-robin.First split is at bucket 0. (Imagine directory being doubled at this point.) But elements <1,N+1>, <2,N+2>, ... are the same. So, need only create directory element N, which differs from 0, now.When bucket 1 splits, create directory element N+1, etc.So, directory can double gradually. Also, primary bucket pages are created in order. If they are allocated in sequence too (so that finding i’th is easy), we actually don’t need a directory! Voila, LH.15
19 SummaryHash-based indexes: best for equality searches, cannot support range searches.Static Hashing can lead to long overflow chains.Extendible Hashing avoids overflow pages by splitting a full bucket when a new data entry is to be added to it. (Duplicates may require overflow pages.)Directory to keep track of buckets, doubles periodically.Can get large with skewed data; additional I/O if this does not fit in main memory.16
20 Summary (Contd.)Linear Hashing avoids directory by splitting buckets round-robin, and using overflow pages.Overflow pages not likely to be long.Duplicates handled easily.Space utilization could be lower than Extendible Hashing, since splits not concentrated on `dense’ data areas.Can tune criterion for triggering splits to trade-off slightly longer chains for better space utilization.For hash-based indexes, a skewed data distribution is one in which the hash values of data entries are not uniformly distributed!17
21 HomeworkDiscuss linear hashing.Discuss .net strategy of Microsoft.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.