Presentation on theme: "‘Twin Peaks’ regulatory architecture"— Presentation transcript:
1‘Twin Peaks’ regulatory architecture 1997: THE WALLIS INQUIRYThe origins of ‘Twin Peaks’ in Australia‘Twin Peaks’ regulatory architectureAPRAASIC
2DAVID MURRAY, THEN AND NOW How times have changed[$160 billion]Savings and loan (S&L) associations, or ‘thrifts’, are the equivalent of building societies in the UK and Australia.
3FINANCIAL SYSTEM INQUIRY: INTERIM REPORT Twin Peaks has proven “robust and effective”
4WHO WATCHES THE WATCHERS? A FINANCIAL REGULATORY ARCHITECTURE FOR THE POST-LEHMAN WORLDMartin Foo | The TreasuryFSC Deloitte Future Leaders Award Program13 October 2014
5PRESENTATION OVERVIEW HISTORY: How did we arrive at Twin Peaks?GLOBAL COMPARISON: What are the alternatives to Twin Peaks?CASE STUDIES: AIG, FSA, US Treasury BlueprintREFINEMENTS: Optimal structure for the futureCONCLUSIONS: Six propositions
6IT’S SHORTER THIS TIME, I PROMISE! Argumentum verbosium
7THE HISTORY OF FINANCIAL REGULATION Financial institutions operate underState legislationBanking Act 1945:First attempt at (partial) prudential regulationInsurance and Superannuation Commission (ISC)Australian Financial Institutions Commission (AFIC)APRA190019201940196019802000FederationPRUDENTIAL REGULATIONBUSINESS CONDUCT AND MARKETS REGULATIONASICAustralian Securities Commission (ASC)Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v MooreheadUniform Companies Acts of the six StatesAustralian Stock Exchange (ASX)Interstate Corporate Affairs Commission (ICAC)National Companies and Securities Commission (NCSC)
8REGULATORY FRAGMENTATION Supervisory boundaries are determined by the distribution of Constitutional powers51. Legislative powers of the Parliament The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: (xiii) banking, other than State banking; also State banking extending beyond the limits of the State concerned, the incorporation of banks, and the issue of paper money; (xiv) insurance, other than State insurance; also State insurance extending beyond the limits of the State concerned;
9WHAT IS A BANK?Is there a functional difference between banks, building societies and credit unions?*“… to give an inclusive and exclusive definition of such a conception as banking is almost impossible”– JUSTICE OWEN DIXON (1947)* Most judgments took the view that ‘banking’ was defined primarily by the acceptance of deposits. Perhaps the only genuine difference between banks and building societies / credit unions, in terms of activities they undertook, was that the latter had been excluded from direct participation in the payments system. But from 1997, building societies and credit unions were able to issue cheques in their own right.
10CASE STUDY 1: PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION IN THE U.S. The US Treasury’s “Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory Structure”
11PROPOSITION 1Financial institutions that undertake similar activities should be regulated in similar ways.Why?Administrative efficiencyCompetitive neutralityEconomic function matters more than legal identityFlexibility to respond to non-traditional entrants (e.g. supermarkets, tech companies)
12GLOBAL COMPARISON: PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION Prudential supervision of banks, insurers and securities firms (including private pension funds) pre-GFC*Single prudential supervisor (33%)*For a dataset of 85 countries analysed by the IMF, based on data in Central Banking Publications (2004).
13GLOBAL COMPARISON: PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION Prudential supervision of banks, insurers and securities firms (including private pension funds) pre-GFC*One agency supervises two sectors (26%)Three or more prudential supervisors (41%)*For a dataset of 85 countries analysed by the IMF, based on data in Central Banking Publications (2004).
14CROSS-SECTOR CONSOLIDATION The emergence of financial conglomerates (e.g. the Big Four banks) and the ‘blurring of boundaries’Superannuation funds managementBig four banks’ share of industry FUM2004-0524%2012-1326%Life insuranceBig four banks’ share of industry premium and investment revenue2009-1011%2012-1327%Financial planningand adviceBig four banks’ share of industry revenue2007-0815%2012-1336%Source: Macroeconomics, 2014, Review of the Major Banks’ Control of the Wider Financial Sector
15INTEGRATED PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION Is one watchdog better than three?NUMBER OF FULLY-INTEGRATED SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES WORLDWIDENetherlandsJapanAustraliaSouth AfricaKorea,United KingdomNorwayDenmarkYear of Establishment
16CASE STUDY 2: AIG AND REGULATORY ARBITRAGE The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission’s findings on the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS)
17Prevalence of conglomerates that operate in multiple sectors PROPOSITION 2A single agency should regulate deposit-taking institutions, insurers and private pensions.*Why?Economies of scaleClear accountabilityPrevalence of conglomerates that operate in multiple sectorsConsistent with international trends (e.g. EU Financial Conglomerates Directive)*** In Australia, health insurers are not (yet) regulated by APRA. Self-managed superannuation funds are regulated by the ATO.** Foreign companies doing business in Europe are required to have the equivalent of a “consolidated supervisor” in their home country.
18GLOBAL COMPARISON: BUSINESS CONDUCT REGULATION Five different approaches, for selected high-income countriesWHICH AGENCY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCT REGULATION?Twin PeaksCentral bankUniversal regulator(integrated prudential and business conduct regulator)Sectoral prudential supervisors(‘lead regulator’ for each sector)N/A* – Ombudsman, complaints board, financial consumer agency**AustraliaBelgiumNetherlandsNew ZealandUnited KingdomCzech RepublicIrelandGermanyHungaryIcelandJapanKoreaPolandSwitzerlandItalyIsraelLuxembourgPortugalSpainUAEAustriaCanadaDenmarkGreeceSingaporeSlovak RepublicSweden* No agency with statutory responsibility for business conduct regulation of the banking sector. ** In the United States, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was officially opened in July 2011.Source: Melecky, M. and Podpiera, A.M., 2012, Institutional Structures of Financial Sector Supervision, Their Drivers and Emerging Benchmark Models; author’s own research
19PROPOSITION 3A single agency should be responsible for business conduct regulation, but not necessarily financial consumer protection too.Why?Administrative efficiencyPrevalence of conglomerates that operate in multiple sectorsBut: synergies associated with placing conduct regulation and financial consumer protection in the same agency may be overstated
20THE UNIVERSAL REGULATOR MODEL E pluribus unum?Universal Regulator(Integrated Prudential and Conduct Regulation)Separate Prudential and Conduct RegulationNo. of Countries25101Examples(G20)GermanyJapanKoreaUnited Kingdom (1998–2012)ArgentinaAustralia*BrazilCanadaChinaFranceIndiaIndonesiaItalyMexicoRussiaSouth AfricaTurkeyUnited States* Interestingly, the former Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry, floated the idea of merging APRA and ASIC before the 2007 election.
21DIFFERENT REGULATORY CULTURES Two heads are better than oneASICFocus on enforcementEstablishment of a credible deterrentAPRAFocus on rehabilitationMaintenance of financial health
22CASE STUDY 3: FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (FSA) Prudential regulation plays second fiddle
23PROPOSITION 4Prudential supervision and conduct regulation responsibilities should continue to be housed in different agencies.Why?Clarity of purposeRespond to differing forms of market failurePrevents the subordination of one form of regulation to the other
24REGULATORY COORDINATION Key relationships between CFR agencies and other entities*ASX | Chi-XFinancial Reporting CouncilStandard Business ReportingMOUDirector of Public ProsecutionsMOUMOUMOUTreasuryASICBoard MembershipMOUPHIACMOUMOUMOUCFR MOU Financial Distress ManagementMOUEx-Officio AppointmentMOUBreach Notification AgreementMOUACCCMOUTransfer of FunctionsMOUATOMOUMOURBAAPRAMOUCoordination CommitteeMOUMOUMOUCoordination CommitteeAUSTRACMOUPayments System BoardMOUAustralian Bureau of Statistics* Representative sample only. APRA and ASIC have MOUs with approximately 14 domestic bodies apiece.
25PROBLEM 1: REGULATORY OVERLAP (AND UNDERLAP) How should APRA and ASIC coordinate?ASIC thought it could rely on APRA, says KnottThe Age, 15 November 2002Prudential role for ASIC may be considered by parliamentary inquiryMoney Management, 30 April 2009ASIC plans call for ‘super-regulator’The Sydney Morning Herald, 16 September 2009APRA and ASIC have case to answer on Trio CapitalSuper Review, 17 May 2012Big banks want Murray inquiry to cut regulatory uncertaintyThe Australian Financial Review, 15 April 2014
26PROBLEM 2: MOUs DON’T ALWAYS WORK Trans-Tasman relations: The introduction of a deposit guarantee in Australia
27PROBLEM 2: MOUs DON’T ALWAYS WORK Trans-Tasman relations: The introduction of a deposit guarantee in Australia
28PROBLEM 3: ARE WE OVER-REGULATED? The costs of implementing Basel III$228m
29PROPOSITION 5The Council of Financial Regulators should be given statutory recognition and serve as a forum for resolving regulatory overlap – and the ACCC should be made a permanent member.Why?Enhanced inter-agency coordinationDemocratic accountability (rather than clubby cooperation)Greater focus on systemic stabilityReduction in the dominance of the RBAHigher priority on competition
30FINAL REMARKS: PROPOSITION 6 Sound regulatory architecture is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a well-functioning system.Why?Regulation involves considerable unpredictabilityMany other factors, including regulatory culture, funding and management – as well as broader elements like macroeconomic fundamentals and corporate governance – matter
31THANK YOU FOR LISTENING Who Watches the Watchers? A Financial Regulatory Architecture for the Post-Lehman WorldFSC Deloitte Future Leaders Award ProgramFinal Presentation – 13 October 2014Martin FooPhone: (02)
32ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe author would like to thank FSC and Deloitte staff for organising the FSC Deloitte Future Leaders Award Program, as well as judges and fellow participants, in what has been a motivating and rewarding journey. Thanks are also due to Kate for her unwavering encouragement and support.The views expressed in this presentation are the author’s own and should not be attributed to the Treasury or the Australian Government.PowerPoint slides based on templates by DesignDistrict
33REFERENCESAbrams, R.K. and Taylor, M.W., 2000, Issues in the Unification of Financial Sector Supervision, IMF Working Paper.Access Economics, 2009, Navigating Reform: Australia and the Global Financial Crisis, Published by FINSIA.APRA and ASIC, 2010, Memorandum of Understanding Between the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.Aylmer, S., 1997, Commonwealth Bank Doubt Over Wallis Plan, The Age, 24 April. Republished in CEDA Bulletin, July 1997, p. 11.Bakir, C., 2009, The Governance of Financial Regulatory Reform: The Australian Experience, Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 910 – 922.Barth, J.R., Caprio, G. and Levine, R., 2013, Bank Regulation and Supervision in 180 Countries from 1999 to 2011, NBER Working Paper.Berg, C., 2008, The Growth of Australia’s Regulatory State, Institute of Public Affairs.Bird, J., 2012, Regulating the Regulators: Accountability of Australian Regulators, Sydney Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper.Black, J. and Jacobzone, S., 2009, Tools for Regulatory Quality and Financial Sector Regulation: A Cross-Country Perspective, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 16, OECD Publishing.Blees, W., 2010, Prudence Pays, Risk Australia, Spring Issue.Blinder, A.S., 2013, After the Music Stopped: The Financial Crisis, the Response, and the Work Ahead, Penguin Books.Bora, B. and Lewis, M.K., 1997, The Australian Financial System: Evolution, Regulation, and Globalization, Law and Policy in International Business, 28, 3, pp. 787 – 811.Boyd, T., 2014, APRA Warns Hockey, Australian Financial Review, 30 June, p. 1.Brown, E.F., 2010, A Comparison of the Handling of the Financial Crisis in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, Villanova Law Review, Volume 55, No. 3, pp. 509 – 576.Carling, R.G., 2012, Regulation or Strangulation? Banking After the Global Financial Crisis, The Centre for Independent Studies, CIS Policy Forum 23.
34REFERENCES (CONT.)Carmichael, J., 2002, APRA – The Way Forward, Address to CEDA Conference, 22 November.Carmichael, J., 2014, Implementing Twin Peaks: Lessons from Australia, Institutional Structure of Financial Regulation: Theories and International Experiences, Chapter 5, Taylor & Francis.Carmichael, J., Fleming, A. and Llewellyn, D.T. (eds), 2004, Aligning Financial Supervisory Structures with Country Needs, World Bank Institute.Chaaya, M., 2011, The Regulation of Trustee Governance in Australia: Time for a Rethink?, IPEBLA 13th International Conference, 23 May.Chapman, G. (Senator), 2001, Speech to the Senate, 21 June, 4.05pm. Available via Commonwealth Hansard.Cihak, M. and Podpiera, R., 2006, Is One Watchdog Better than Three? International Experience with Integrated Financial Sector Supervision, IMF Working Paper.Cooper, J., 2006, The Integration of Financial Regulatory Authorities – The Australian Experience, Paper presented to the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil) 30th Anniversary Conference, Rio de Janeiro.Economics References Committee, 2014, Performance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, The Senate.Eisenbeis, R.A., 2009, What We Have Learned and Not Learned from the Current about Financial Reform, The Australian Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 457 – 469.Enriques, L. and Hertig, G., 2010, The Governance of Financial Supervisors: Improving Responsiveness to Market Developments, European Corporate Governance Institute, Law Working Paper No. 171/2010.Erskine, E., 2014, Regulating the Australian Financial System, Australian Centre for Financial Studies, The Funding Australia’s Future Project.Ferguson, A., Butler, B. and Williams, R., 2013, Scrutinising ASIC: Is it a Watchdog or Dog with No Bite?, The Age, 23 November.Ferran, E., 2014, Institutional Design for Financial Market Supervision: The Choice for National Systems, University of Cambridge Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 28/2014.
35REFERENCES (CONT.)Flamee, M. and Windels, P., 2009, Restructuring Financial Sector Supervision: Creating a Level Playing Field, The Geneva Papers, 34, pp. 9 – 23.Gadinis, S., 2013, From Independence to Politics in Financial Regulation, California Law Review, Vol. 101, pp. 327 – 406.Group of Thirty, 2008, The Structure of Financial Supervision: Approaches and Challenges in a Global Marketplace.Haldane, A.G., 2012, The Dog and the Frisbee, Speech given at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s 366th Economic Policy Symposium, “The changing policy landscape”, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, 31 August.Hill, J., 2012, Why Did Australia Fare So Well in The Global Financial Crisis?, Sydney Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper.HM Treasury, 2011, A New Approach to Financial Regulation: Building a Stronger System.International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2012, Australia: Financial System Stability Assessment, IMF Country Report No. 12/308.Jones, R.M., 2010, Back to Basics: Why Financial Regulatory Overhaul is Overrated, Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal, 4, No. 2, pp. 391 – 406.Lui, A., 2012, Single or Twin? The UK Financial Regulatory Landscape after the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009, Journal of Banking Regulation, 13, pp. 24 – 35.Macroeconomics, 2014, Review of the Major Banks Control of the Wider Financial Sector, Report Commissioned by Customer Owned Banking Association.Maddock, R., 2014, Red Tape in Finance and its Discontents, Economic and Political Overview 2014, CEDA, pp. 48 – 55.Maddock, R., Dimasi, J. and King, S.P., 2014, Rationalising Rustic Regulators, Monash Business Policy Forum.Masciandaro, D., Nieto, M. and Quintyn, M., 2009, Financial Supervision in the EU: Is There Convergence in the National Architectures?, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 17, No. 2, pp. 86 – 95.Mees, B. and Ramsay, I.M., 2008, Corporate Regulators in Australia ( ): From Companies’ Registrars to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Melbourne Law School, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation.
36REFERENCES (CONT.)Melecky, M. and Podpiera, A.M., 2012, Institutional Structures of Financial Sector Supervision, Their Drivers and Emerging Benchmark Models, Munich Personal RePEc Archive.Mwenda, K.K., 2006, Legal Aspects of Financial Services Regulation and the Concept of a Unified Regulator, The World Bank.Owen, N. (Justice), 2003, The Failure of HIH Insurance, HIH Royal Commission, Vol. 1.Pan, E.J., 2010, Four Challenges to Financial Regulatory Reform, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 55, 3, pp. 743 – 772.Pan, E.J., 2011, Structural Reform of Financial Regulation, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 19, pp. 796 – 867.Pellerin, S.R., Walter, J.R. and Wescott, P.E., 2009, The Consolidation of Financial Regulation: Pros, Cons, and Implications for the United States, Economic Quarterly, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 121 – 160Productivity Commission, 2011, Identifying and Evaluating Regulation Reforms, Productivity Commission Research Report.Quintyn, M., Ramirez, S. and Taylor, M.W., 2007, The Fear of Freedom: Politicians and the Independence and Accountability of Financial Sector Supervisors, IMF Working Paper.Surowiecki, J., 2008, Parsing Paulson, The New Yorker, April 28.Surowiecki, J., 2010, The Regulation Crisis, The New Yorker, June 14.The Department of the Treasury (US), 2008, Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory Structure, United States of America.The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, 2011, The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, United States of America.The Treasury, 2012, Strengthening APRA’s Crisis Management Powers, Consultation Paper.Thomson, D. and Abbott, M., 2000, Australian Financial Prudential Supervision: An Historical View, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), pp. 75 – 88.Turner, A., 2009, The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis, Financial Services Authority.Weber, R.H., Arner, D.W., Gibson, E.C. and Baumann, S., 2014, Addressing Systemic Risk: Financial Regulatory Design, Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 149 – 200.World Bank, 2013, Global Financial Development Report, The State as Regulator and Supervisor, Chapter 2.