We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPhoebe Huskey
Modified about 1 year ago
VirtuCo Implementation 1 Project Review
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Project status –achieved goals in the iteration –project metrics Used work practices Completed work –Mobile demo Plans for the next iteration Agenda
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Status of planned goals Develop message transmission capable architecture –A basic architecture build with future requirements in mind. –Kept simple. –Produced in MIDP2.0, MIDP1.0 proxies will be done later. Produce simple conversation demo –Working demo is ready. –Is presented later on.
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Status of planned deliverables Project plan and requirements documents –Updated to match current situation Technical documentation done in a general perspective –UML used, but not strict –Slideshow format Test case specifications –Done for the implemented software Test report –Done for executed tests
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Realization of the tasks –Client architectural design Trapoli –Requirements –Prepare testing Test plan –Setup development environment Problems with emulators –Unplanned
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Working hours by person Unfamiliar with technology More to do than first anticipated RealPlanDiff Hannu Jorma Kaarle Kai Petteri Sami Ville Total Realized hours in this iterationPlan in the beginning of this iteration PPI1I2I3DETotal Hannu Jorma Kaarle Kai Petteri Sami Ville Total Latest plan (inc. realized hours and other updates) PPI1I2I3DETotal Hannu Jorma Kaarle Kai Petteri Sami Ville Total
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Quality metrics Results of system testing PPI1Total Reported92496 Closed92395 Open011 Issue metrics Implementation 1BlockersCriticalMajorMinorTrivialTotal Total open This iteration reported110204
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Quality assessment Overall quality is good enough for a demonstration Further testing needed for product use More thorough unit testing –Test MIDLet Functional areaCoverageQualityComments Conversation2 Some defects found and all above minor were fixed. Legend Coverage: 0 = nothing 1 = we looked at it 2 = we checked all functions 3 = it’s tested Quality: = quality is good = not sure = quality is bad
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Software size Lines of code I1I2I3DE Client total 2114 Client comments 946 Server total 2006 Server comments 941 Common total 204 Common comments 109 Total 4324 Comments 1996 Lines of code per programming hour I1I2I3DE Functional lines of code 15 Any line of code 27
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Changes to the project
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Risks Risk management document refactored –Contains only 8 risks –Previous one merged and generalized Risk for development tool problems –Risk realized –Produced work-around for problems
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Work practices Process construction and tuning Design patterns Software Configuration Management Automated unit tests
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Results of the iteration Software –Message transmission capable architecture Server and client –Demonstration New documentation –Technical specification –Test plan –Test cases –Test report
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Demonstration
VirtuCo v©v© Sami Hanhijärvi Plans for the next iteration Goals –Community architecture –Community demo Deliverables –User’s guide Risks –Practices not followed –Tools produce problems Schedule –Task dependencies
T Project Review VirtuCo PP Iteration
T Project Review Groupname [PP|…|DE] Iteration
T Project Review ITSUPS Implementation
T Project Review X-tremeIT I1 Iteration
T Project Review Rajoitteiset I2 Iteration
T Project Review Sotanorsu I2 Iteration
T Project Review Wellit I1 Iteration
T Project Review Sotanorsu I3 Iteration
T Project Review RoadMappers I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Team DTT Project planning (PP) Iteration
T Iteration Demo Team DTT I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Group name [PP|I1|I2] Iteration
T Iteration Demo Team 13 I1 Iteration
T Project Review RoadRunners [IM3] Iteration
T Iteration Demo BitPlayers I1 Iteration
T Project Review WellIT I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo BitPlayers I2 Iteration
T Project Review eGo I3 Iteration
T Project Review X-tremeIT I2 Iteration
T Project Review WellIT PP Iteration
T Project Review eGo PP Iteration
T Iteration Demo BaseByters [I1] Iteration
T Project Review Sotanorsu I1 Iteration
T Project Review eGo I2 Iteration
T Project Review I3 Iteration T Project Review X-TremeIT Valeria, Konstantin, Roman, Olesia, Vladislav, Seppo, Aleksandr 2 Agenda.
T Project Review Tetrastone [Iteration 2]
T Project Review Muuntaja I1 Iteration
T Project Review MalliPerhe Iteration 3 Implementation
T Project Review RoadRunners [IM1] Iteration
T Project Review (Template for PI and I1 phases) Group name [PI|I1] Phase
T Project Review TeXlipse [I2] Iteration
T Project Review BigBrother I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Tempus I1 Iteration
T Project Review X-tremeIT PP Iteration
VirtuCo :: Process description ::. :: Reference ::
T Iteration Demo BetaTeam PP Iteration
T Iteration Demo Group 1 Project Planning Iteration
T Iteration Demo BetaTeam I1 Iteration
T Project Review MTS [PP] Iteration
T Project Review BigBrother PP Iteration
Implementation I - demo. Schedule * Project status -achieving the goals of the iteration -project metrics * Used work practices * Work results -presenting.
T Iteration Demo LicenseChecker I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Hermes Team [I1] Iteration
T Project Review RoadRunners [PP] Iteration
T Iteration Demo BitPlayers PP Iteration
Gaining Support for a Sustainable Agile Transformation Dennis Stevens, VP Enterprise Engagements LeadingAgile November 12, 2013.
Software Testing. What is Testing? The process consisting of all life cycle activities, both static and dynamic, concerned with planning, preparation.
FINAL DEMO Apollo Crew, group 3 T SW Development Project.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.