Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDarnell Pask Modified over 9 years ago
1
SOCIOLOGY’S THREE BIG QUESTIONS THREE SMALL DUTCH QUESTIONS Wout Ultee Interuniversity Center for Sociology (ICS) at Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Netherlands Presentation at the Danish Institute for Social Research Copenhagen, Denmark December 11-12, 2003 and
2
THE ‘OLDER’ POPPER SURPASSED THE DILEMMA OF THE PRIMACY OF THEORY OR THE PRIMACY OF RESEARCH BY STATING THAT ANY SCIENCE, INCLUDING SOCIOLOGY, STARTS WITH QUESTIONS WHICH ARE TENTATIVELY ANSWERED BY THEORIES, THESE PROPOSITIONS ARE TESTABLE AND THE MORE INFORMATION THEY CONVEY THE BETTER; AND THESE PROPOSITIONS SHOULD BE TESTED
3
THAT IS: QUESTIONS INSTEAD OF TOPICS PROPOSITIONS RATHER THAN CONCEPTS APPROACHES ARE TO ARRIVE SOMEWHERE BY DEVELOPING INTO INFORMATIVE PROPOSITIONS NO ILUSTRATIONS BUT TESTS (COUNTEREXAMPLES INSTEAD OF EXAMPLES)
4
THE BEST QUESTIONS ARE CONTRADICTIONS BETWEEN THEORIES AND RESEARCH FINDINGS APART FROM THEORY-GUIDED RESEARCH THERE SHOULD BE QUESTION-DRIVEN THEORIZING MORE SOUND BITES
5
THE SUPPOSEDLY SORRY STATE OF SOCIOLOGY: IS SOCIOLOGY NOTHING BUT AN APPROACH, DOES IT ADDRESS AT BEST A LONG LIST OF HETEROGENEOUS TOPICS? THE HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY MAKES CLEAR THAT SOCIOLOGY ADDRESSES THREE BIG QUESTIONS THESE BIG QUESTIONS COMPRISE AN EXPANDING ARRAY OF SMALL SIMILAR QUESTIONS
6
SOCIOLOGY’S HOLY TRINITY RAISED QUESTIONS ABOUT SOCIETIES, BUT DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS OF THEM: MARXINEQUALITY DURKHEIMCOHESION WEBERRATIONALIZATION THESE QUESTIONS ARE BIG ONES, THEY FORM AN ARRAY OF SIMILAR SUBQUESTIONS
7
WEBER’S PROBLEM OF RATIONALIZATION
8
RISE OF SCIENCE
9
WEBER’S PROBLEM OF RATIONALIZATION RISE OF SCIENCE TECHNICAL ARTS
10
WEBER’S PROBLEM OF RATIONALIZATION RISE OF SCIENCE TECHNICAL ARTS FORMAL STATE
11
WEBER’S PROBLEM OF RATIONALIZATION RISE OF SCIENCE TECHNICAL ARTS FORMAL STATE RISE OF CAPITALISM
12
WEBER’S PROBLEM OF RATIONALIZATION RISE OF SCIENCE TECHNICAL ARTS FORMAL STATE RISE OF CAPITALISM BANK CAPITALISM
13
WEBER’S PROBLEM OF RATIONALIZATION RISE OF SCIENCE TECHNICAL ARTS FORMAL STATE RISE OF CAPITALISM BANK CAPITALISM ENTREPRENEURIAL CAPITALISM
14
WEBER’S PROBLEM OF RATIONALIZATION RATIONALIZATION AS WESTERN UNIQUENESS RISE OF SCIENCE TECHNICAL ARTS FORMAL STATE RISE OF CAPITALISM BANK CAPITALISM ENTERPRENEURIAL CAPITALISM
15
THE EMERGENCE OF THE PROBLEM OF COHESION
16
HOBBES ON THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL AND THE WAR OF ALL RULERS AGAINST ALL RULERS
17
THE EMERGENCE OF THE PROBLEM OF COHESION HOBBESON THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL AND ON THE WAR OF ALL RULERS AGAINST ALL RULERS LOCKE ON THE REBELLION OF SUBJECTS AGAINST RULERS
18
THE EMERGENCE OF THE PROBLEM OF COHESION HOBBES ON THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL AND ON THE WAR OF ALL RULERS AGAINST ALL RULERS LOCKE ON THE REBELLION OF SUBJECTS AGAINST RULERS BENTHAM ON SWIFT, SEVERE AND CERTAIN SENTENCING
19
THE EMERGENCE OF THE PROBLEM OF COHESION HOBBES ON THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL AND ON THE WAR OF ALL RULERS AGAINST ALL RULERS LOCKE ON THE REBELLION OF SUBJECTS AGAINST RULERS BENTHAM ON SWIFT, SEVERE AND CERTAIN SENTENCING COHESION
20
THE EMERGENCE OF THE PROBLEM OF COHESION HOBBES ON THE WAR OF ALL AGAINST ALL AND ON RULERS AGAINST RULERS LOCKE ON THE REBELLION OF SUBJECTS AGAINST RULERS BENTHAM ON SWIFT, SEVERE AND CERTAIN SENTENCING COHESION DURKHEIM ON SUICIDE
21
ONCE MORE DURKHEIM ON COHESION
22
COHESION
23
ONCE MORE DURKHEIM ON COHESION COHESION VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHERS
24
ONCE MORE DURKHEIM ON COHESION COHESION VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHERSISOLATION / TIES
25
ONCE MORE DURKHEIM ON COHESION COHESION ECONOMIC TIES THROUGH THE DIVISION OF LABOUR VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHERSISOLATION / TIES
26
ONCE MORE DURKHEIM ON COHESION COHESION ECONOMIC TIES THROUGH THE DIVISION OF LABOUR SUICIDE AS CUTTING THE LAST TIE TO SOCIETY VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHERSISOLATION / TIES
27
ONCE MORE DURKHEIM ON COHESION COHESION ECONOMIC TIES THROUGH THE DIVISION OF LABOUR SUICIDE AS CUTTING THE LAST TIE TO SOCIETY PARTAKING IN RELIGIOUS RITES VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHERSISOLATION / TIES
28
ONCE MORE DURKHEIM ON COHESION COHESION ECONOMIC TIES THROUGH THE DIVISION OF LABOUR SUICIDE AS CUTTING THE LAST TIE TO SOCIETY PARTAKING IN RELIGIOUS RITES MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHERSISOLATION / TIES
29
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX
30
FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS
31
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS INEQUALITY
32
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX FERGUSON ON UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS INEQUALITY MILLAR ON LAWS STIPULATING UNEQUAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF PERSONS
33
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX FERGUSON ON UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS INEQUALITY MILLAR ON LAWS STIPULATING UNEQUAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF PERSONS
34
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX FERGUSON ON UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS INEQUALITY MILLAR ON LAWS STIPULATING UNEQUAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF PERSONS MEN AND WOMEN
35
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX FERGUSON ON UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS INEQUALITY MILLAR ON LAWS STIPULATING UNEQUAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF PERSONS MEN AND WOMEN PARENTS AND CHILDREN
36
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX FERGUSON ON UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS INEQUALITY MILLAR ON LAWS STIPULATING UNEQUAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF PERSONS MEN AND WOMEN PARENTS AND CHILDREN MASTERS AND SERVANTS
37
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY BEFORE MARX FERGUSON ON UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS INEQUALITY MILLAR ON LAWS STIPULATING UNEQUAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF PERSONS MEN AND WOMEN PARENTS AND CHILDREN MASTERS AND SERVANTS RULERS AND SUBJECTS
38
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY WITH MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS
39
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY WITH MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
40
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY WITH MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS HUNGER WAGES MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
41
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOY- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
42
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOY- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES BERNSTEIN ON WAGES RELATIVE TO PROFITS MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
43
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOY- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES BERNSTEIN ON WAGES RELATIVE TO PROFITS SOMBART ON MOBILITY MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
44
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOY- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES BERNSTEIN ON WAGES RELATIVE TO PROFITS WEBER ON CLOSURE SOMBART ON MOBILITY MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
45
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOY- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES BERNSTEIN ON WAGES RELATIVE TO PROFITS WEBER ON CLOSURE SOMBART ON MOBILITY CONNU- BIUM MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
46
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOY- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES BERNSTEIN ON WAGES RELATIVE TO PROFITS WEBER ON CLOSURE SOMBART ON MOBILITY CONNU- BIUM CONVI -VIUM MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
47
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOT- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES BERNSTEIN ON WAGES RELATIVE TO PROFITS WEBER ON CLOSURE SOMBART ON MOBILITY CONNU- BIUM CONVI -VIUM GOLDTHORPE ON ABSOLUTE RATES MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
48
THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY SINCE MARX INEQUALITY FERGUSON’S UNEQUAL LIVING CONDITIONS MILLAR’S UNEQUAL LAWS UNEM- PLOY- MENT AND HUNGER WAGES BERNSTEIN ON WAGES RELATIVE TO PROFITS WEBER ON CLOSURE SOMBART ON MOBILITY CONNU- BIUM CONVI -VIUM GOLDTHORPE ON ABSOLUTE RATES GOLDTHORPE ON RELATIVE CHANCES MARX ON DE JURE AND DE FACTO INEQUALITY
49
IS NOT ALL THIS QUITE STERILE? NO! NEW SMALL QUESTIONS CAN BE ADDED AND HAVE BEEN ADDED IN SOCIOLOGY’S HISTORY ALSO, NEW EVEN BIGGER QUESTIONS ARE POSSIBLE
50
SOCIOLOGY’S FOUR BIG THEORETICAL TRADITIONS CAN BE WRITTEN AS APPROACHES THAT DEVELOPED INTO INFORMATIVE PROPOSITIONS YIELDING TESTABLE DERIVATIONS HOBBESIAN UTILITARIAN INDIVIDUALISM DURKHEIMIAN STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONALISM MARXIAN HISTORICAL MATERIALISM WEBERIAN INTERPRETATIVE INDIVIDUALISM
51
SINCE BIG QUESTIONS TURN OUT AS NOT TRADITION-SPECIFIC, THE NEED FOR A THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS MY OWN SYNTHESIS FOLLOWS LENSKI, POWER AND PRVILEGE, 1966 AND LENSKI, HUMAN SOCIETIES, 1998 TECHNOLOGICAL-IDEOLOGICAL EVOLUTIONISM COMPRISING A RESOURCES-HYPOTHESIS (INCLUDING SOCIAL RESOURCES) A TECHNOLOGY-HYPOTHESIS AN IDEOLOGY-HYPOTHESIS A NEIGBOURING-COUNTRIES HYPOTHESIS A PAST-PERFORMANCE HYPOTHESIS
52
TESTING HYPOTHESES ANSWERING VARIOUS SMALL QUESTIONS SIMPLE COUNTRY DATA FROM THE WORLD BANK AND OTHER SUPRANATIONAL INSTITUTIONS COMPARATIVE SURVEYS: EUROBAROMETER, EUROPEAN SOCIAL SURVEY AND WORLD VALUES SURVEY STACKING COMPARABLE VARIABLES FROM VARIOUS DATA-SETS IN NATIONAL DIGITAL ARCHIVES INTO ONE SUPER-FILE SIMPLE TIME SERIES FROM STATISTICS NETHERLANDS
53
ADVANCED WAYS OF TESTING HYPOTHESES ANSWERING SMALL QUESTIONS MAYER-BLOSSFELD / MAX PLANCK BERLIN 1982 MULTI-MOMENT DATA SETS FOR INDIVIDUALS ANALYSED BY EVENT HISTORY TECHNIQUES MULTI-MOMENT MULTI-ACTOR AND MULTI-CONTEXT DATA-SETS NIJMEGEN-GROUP 1993, 1998, 2000, 2003 EVENT HISTORY PLUS MULTI-LEVEL TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO
54
DUTCH MULTI-MOMENT INDIVIDUAL DATA-SETS: EDUCATIONAL HISTORY HISTORY OF (NON)EMPLOYMENT FULL- AND PART-TIME JOB HISTORY OCCUPATIONAL TITLES HISTORY HOUSING HISTORY MARRIAGES HISTORY HISTORY OF SMOKING AGE LEAVING CHURCH LEISURE NOW AND AT AGE 18 YEARS
55
DUTCH MULTI-ACTOR DATA-SETS SAMPLE AND INTERVIEW PRIMARY RESPONDENT INTERVIEW SPOUSE SEND A QUESTIONNAIRE TO A PARENT SEND A QUESTIONNAIRE TO A SIBLING SEND A QUESTIONNAIRE TO AN ADULT CHILD
56
DUTCH MULTI-CONTEXT DATA-SETS ASCERTAIN POSTAL CODE OF PRIMARY RESPONDENT RECODE POSTAL CODE INTO LOCAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AND OTHER LOCAL CHARACTERISTICS ASK ADDRESS EMPLOYER AND SEND QUESTIONNAIRE ASK ADDRESS SPORT CLUB AND SEND QUESTIONNAIRE
57
WHY 3M-MAC DATA-SETS? THREE OBJECTIONS AGAINST STANDARD QUANTITATIVE QUESTIONNAIRES ON RANDOM SAMPLES CROSS-SECTIONAL, NO INDIVIDUAL HISTORY ISOLATED INDIVIDUALS, NO CONTEXT ISOLATED INDIVIDUALS, NO RELATIONS
58
HOW TO OVERCOME THESE OBJECTIONS WITHOUT LOOSING ADVANTAGES OF QUANTIFICATION? EVEN LIFE HISTORIES OBTAINED BY QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS CAN BE QUANTIFIED START A SNOWBALL SAMPLE AND APPLY THE SAME QUESTIONNAIRE CONTEXTS CAN BE MEASURED BY BRINGING IN ADMINISTRATIVE DATA THE COLLECTION OF QUANTITATIVE DATA ON VARIOUS TYPES OF ORGANISATIONS IS QUITE POSSIBLE
59
ONE SMALL DUTCH WARM-UP QUESTION WHY WAS SUICIDE SO HIGH IN THE NETHERLANDS IN 1940 AND 1945?
60
BUT ADMINISTRATIVE STATISTICS TELL OTHERWISE: WHY WAS DUTCH SUICIDE SO HIGH IN 1940 AND 1945? DURKHEIMIAN STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONALISM: WHEN NATIONS ARE AT WAR, SUICIDE DROPS EXPLAINED BY INFORMATIVE HYPOTHESIS: MORE (POLITICAL) INTEGRATION, LESS SUICIDE AND AUXILIARY ASSUMPTION: IN TIMES OF WAR, MORE POLITICAL INTEGRATION
61
DURKHEIMS’ SYLLOGISM IN TIMES OF WAR, LESS SUICIDE
62
DURKHEIMS’ SYLLOGISM IN TIMES OF WAR, LESS SUICIDE -----------------------------------------------
63
DURKHEIMS’ SYLLOGISM IN TIMES OF WAR, LESS SUICIDE ----------------------------------------------- MORE (POLITICAL) INTEGRATION, LESS SUICIDE
64
DURKHEIMS’ SYLLOGISM IN TIMES OF WAR, LESS SUICIDE ----------------------------------------------- MORE (POLITICAL) INTEGRATION, LESS SUICIDE IN TIMES OF WAR, MORE INTEGRATION
65
SILLY CRITICISM BY HALBWACHS IN DENMARK DURING WORLD WAR I, IN WHICH DENMARK REMAINED NEUTRAL, LESS SUICIDE WHY NOT TO THE POINT? A CONTRIDICTION OF A DURHEIMIAN EMPIRICAL REGULARITY IS NOT A CONTRADICTION OF A DURKHEIMIAN INFORMATIVE HYPOTHESIS ALTHOUGH DENMARK WAS NEUTRAL IN WORLD WAR I, EXTERNAL THREAT MADE DANISH POLITICAL INTEGRATION RISE
66
BETTER CRITICISM SUICIDE IN THE NETHERLANDS WAS LOW IN 1941, 1942, 1943 AND 1944, BUT HIGH IN 1940 AND 1945; RATES PER 100,000 1939 M11.7V5.4 194015.28.5 1941 8.95.9 1942 10.79.3 194310.87.9 1944 8.26.1 194512.27.4 194611.66.7
67
L. DE JONG, THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE DUTCH KINGDOM DURING WORLD WAR II MENTIONS THAT DUTCH COLLABORATORS WITH THE GERMAN OCCUPATION KILLED THEMSELVES IN 1945, BUT DOES NOT GIVE NUMBERS DE JONG ALSO STATES THAT JEWS COMMITTED SUICIDE IN MAY 1940, ADDING THAT THE NUMBERS ARE UNKNOWN
68
IT SO HAPPENED THAT THE ‘COUNTING CARD’ FOR EVERY SUICIDE IN THE NETHERLANDS BETWEEN 1936 AND 1952 THAT WAS COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF JUSTICE IS STILL AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVES OF STATISTICS NETHERLANDS WE HAD THESE COUNTING CARDS DIGITALISED AND ANALYZED THOSE DATA
69
HISTORIANS HUNTED FOR NAMES OF DUTCH PERSONS WHO COLLABORATED WITH THE GERMAN OCCUPATION AND FOR NAMES OF GERMANS WHO COMMITTED WAR CRIMES IN THE NETHERLANDS HISTORIANS WERE NOT INTERESTED IN NUMBERS
70
SO HOW ABOUT SUICIDE IN THE NETHERLANDS IN 1945? THE NETHERLANDS WAS FULLY LIBERATED IN MAY 1945, WITH THE SOUTH BECOMING FREE IN SEPTEMBER 1944; THERE WAS A HUNT FOR DUTCH COLLABORATORS
71
OF THE 1009 SUICIDES IN 1945, AT LEAST 88 WERE BY POLITICAL DELINQUENTS OF THEM 17 WERE IN MARCH 19 IN APRIL 18 IN MAY 5 POLITICAL SUICIDES IN SEPTEMBER 1944
72
A SIMILAR DURKHEIMIAN EXPLANATION: JEWS WERE PLACED OUTSIDE SOCIETY, CONSEQUENTLY JEWISH SUICIDE ROSE AND WHY HIGHER SUICIDE IN 1940?
73
HOW TO PUT THIS EXPLANATION IN A MORE GENERAL FORM? DURKHEIMIAN HYPOTHESIS: THE HIGHER THE INTEGRATION OF PERSONS IN A COUNTRY’S POLITICS, THE LOWER THEIR CHANCES OF SUICIDE AND COLLABORATORS IN 1945 BECAME OUTCASTS
74
ULTEE’S FIRST SYLLOGISM
75
DUTCH SUICIDE RISES IN 1940
76
ULTEE’S FIRST SYLLOGISM DUTCH SUICIDE RISES IN 1940 ---------------------------------------------------
77
ULTEE’S FIRST SYLLOGISM DUTCH SUICIDE RISES IN 1940 --------------------------------------------------- MORE (POLITICAL) INTEGRATION, LESS SUICIDE; LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE
78
ULTEE’S FIRST SYLLOGISM DUTCH SUICIDE RISES IN 1940 --------------------------------------------------- MORE (POLITICAL) INTEGRATION, LESS SUICIDE; LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE DUTCH JEWS IN 1940 OUTSIDE POLITICS, ECONOMY, SOCIETY
79
ULTEE’S SECOND SYLLOGISM
80
--------------------------------------------------- LESS (POLITICAL) INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE DUTCH JEWS IN 1940 OUTSIDE POLITICS, ECONOMY, SOCIETY
81
ULTEE’S SECOND SYLLOGISM DUTCH JEWISH SUICIDE RISES IN 1940 --------------------------------------------------- LESS (POLITICAL) INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE DUTCH JEWS IN 1940 OUTSIDE POLITICS, ECONOMY, SOCIETY
82
BUT DID JEWISH SUICIDE ONLY RISE IN 1940? JEWS WERE DEPORTED FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 1942 AND 1943 DID JEWISH SUICIDE ALSO RISE IN 1942 AND 1943?
83
JEWSNON-JEWS 1936-39 27 740 1940257 781 1941 38 609 1942246 633 1943165 672 ABSOLUTE NUMBERS OF NON-JEWISH AND JEWISH SUICIDES
84
ULTEE’S THIRD SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE
85
ULTEE’S THIRD SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE JEWS ALSO OUTSIDE SOCIETY IN 1942 AND 1943 BECAUSE OF DEPORTATIONS
86
ULTEE’S THIRD SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE JEWS ALSO OUTSIDE SOCIETY IN 1942 AND 1943 BECAUSE OF DEPORTATIONS ----------------------------------------------------
87
ULTEE’S THIRD SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE JEWS ALSO OUTSIDE SOCIETY IN 1942 AND 1943 BECAUSE OF DEPORTATIONS JEWISH SUICIDE HIGHER IN 1942 AND 1943 -------------------------------------------------------
88
NUMBER OF JEWISH SUICIDES PER 100,000 CONPUTED BY TAKING THE MONTHLY NUMBER OF JEWS PRESENT IN THE NETHERLANDS AS BASIS AND ADDING UP 1936-39 23 1940195 1941 31 1942213 1943224
89
ULTEE’S FOURTH SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE
90
GERMANY OCCUPIED NETHERLANDS IN MAY 1940; JEWISH DEPORTATIONS STARTED JULY 1942 ULTEE’S FOURTH SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE
91
GERMANY OCCUPIED NETHERLANDS IN MAY 1940; JEWISH DEPORTATIONS STARTED JULY 1942 ULTEE’S FOURTH SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE --------------------------------------------------------------------
92
GERMANY OCCUPIED NETHERLANDS IN MAY 1940; JEWISH DEPORTATIONS STARTED JULY 1942 ULTEE’S FOURTH SYLLOGISM LESS INTEGRATION, MORE SUICIDE -------------------------------------------------------------------- IN 1940, JEWISH SUICIDE ROSE IN MAY, IN 1942 JEWISH SUICIDE ROSE IN JULY
93
JAN1940 31942 4 FEB 2 8 MAR 0 2 APR 5 6 MAY 210 4 JUN 6 6 JUL 1443 AUG 531 SEPT 844 OCT 151 NOV 133 DEC 215 ABSOLUTE NUMBER OF JEWISH SUICIDES BY MONTH
94
THEORY-GUIDED RESEARCH AND QUESTION-DRIVEN THEORIZING IS POSSIBLE WITH DIGITALLY AVAILABLE ADMINISTRATIVE STATISTICS
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.