We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnissa Lippitt
Modified about 1 year ago
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO EC Competition Law Professor Olav Kolstad Department of Private Law
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO What is competition law? Competition law exists to protect the process of competition in a free market economy –A system where the allocation of resources is determined solely by supply and demand in free markets Competition wanted because of the market result it produces –Efficiency –Low prices –Innovations Competition rules limits the freedom of the market players to protect the process of competition
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Competition policy and competition law Competition policy –Describes the way in which governments take measures to promote competitive market structures and behaviour –Formulation of goals »Competition policy and science Competition law –The legal rules implementing the competition policy –Law and economics Developing competition policy through case law
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Economic efficiency - main objective of competition policy Competition gives the best utilisation of scarce resources –Perfect competition v monopoly Perfect competition –Pareto optimal use of resources »None could be made better of without someone being made worse of »Consumer welfare maximized –Productive efficiency »Constant pressure on costs »Cost reductions is the only means whereby firms can stay in business and increase profits –Dynamic efficiency »New knowledge
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Monopoly –Leads to an inefficient allocation of resources »Quantity supplied less the quantity which would be supplied in a competitive market –Deadweight loss »Loss of consumer surplus which is not turned into profit for the producer –X-efficiency Perfect competition, monopoly and competition in the real world –Workable competition
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Other goals of competition policy? Preservation of liberty Fair competition –Promoting small and medium sized undertakings Socio-political issues –Social policies –Employment –Industrial policy –Environment
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The objectives of EC competition law ECJ: Teleological interpretation Article 2 EC Treaty: –The Community shall have as its task, by establishing a common market and an economic and monetary union and by implementing the common policies or activities referred to in Articles 3 and 3a, to promote throughout the Community a harmonious and balanced development of economic activities, a high level of employment and of social protection, equality between men and women, sustainable and non-inflanatory growth, a high degree of competitiveness and convergence of economic performance, a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of life, and economic and social cohesion and solidarity among Member States.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The common market is not an end in itself but a means of achieving the promotion of matters listed in Article 2 Common market –An area where direct and indirect barriers to trade between Member States are removed (internal aspect) and –a common import and export policy adopted toward the outside world as far as commercial transactions are concerned (external aspect)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Internal market –the internal aspect of the common market –Defined in Article 14: »The internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty. Articles 3 sets out the ”activities” of the Community, including –(g) a system ensuring that competition in the internal market is not distorted
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The role of competition policy as an instrument of single market integration absolutely crucial to understanding EC competition law –Regulates conduct of undertakings threatening the establishment of an internal market –Rules on ”free movement” directed towards Member States EC competition law serve to masters –Competition –Single market integration Thus: efficiency and allocation of resources a central concern, but not the sole goal
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Other objectives? –The objectives in Article 2 –Interface with other policies
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO ECJs concept of competition ECJ has not relied upon any particular competition ”ideology” –But economic arguments/theories/models decisive for the application of the competition rules in individual cases »Article 81 »An economic approach to Aricle 82 Definition in Metro (case 26/76) –The requirements contained in Articles 3 and  of the EEC Treaty that competition shall not be distorted implies the existence on the market of workable competition, that is to say the degree of competition necessary to ensure the observance of the basic requirements and the attainment of the objectives of the Treaty, in particular the creation of a single market achieving conditions similar to those of the domestic market. In accordance with this requirement the nature and the intensiveness of competition may vary to an extent dictated by the products or services in question and the economic structure of the relevant market sectors.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The ECJs concept of ”workable competition” related to what competitin is inteded to achieve in the Community context –Not one of the concepts of ”workable competition” found in economic theory »But influenced by the theory Concept of competition in the Merger Regulation compared: –Prohibits concentrations creating or strengthening a dominant position ”significantly impede effective competition” »Article 2(2) and (3)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO How to pursue the goals? Prevent agreements restrictive of competition –Horisontal agreements (Among competitors) –Vertical agreements (between parties at different levels of the production or distribution chain) Control market power and its abuse Control oligopolistic markets Prevent mergers which lead to a concentration in market power
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The Competition Rules – an overview Article 81 –Article 81(1) prohibits agreements or concerted practices restrictive of competition is –According to Article 81(3) Article 81(1) “may … be declared inapplicable” Article 82 –Forbids dominant undertakings to abuse their market power Merger Regulation –Prohibits concentrations that significantly impedes effective competition
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The sources of EC competition law The Treaty Articles Regulations –Merger regulation –Block exemptions Judgements –European Court of Justice –Court of First Instance Commission notices and guidelines Commission decisions Annual reports from the Commission Other documents
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Some basic concepts Market power Market definition Barriers to entry S-C-P paradigm
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The concept of market power Competition law concerned first and foremost with the problems that occur when a firm or two or more firms possess market power A firm or firms that possess market power can enjoy some of the benefits available to the true monopolist –Market power presents undertakings with the possibility of limiting output and raising price, which are clearly harmful to consumer welfare
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Ways in which market power is manifested –Collusion and cooperation between competitors –Unilateral conduct; Abuse of dominant position –Structural changes; Merger Control –Split up off monopolies The legal test of market power; per se or rule of reason?
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Market definition Decides the factual framework for the analysis of market power –The relevant market –Economic concept: Economic or econometric analysis of the facts An analytical tool, not an end in itself –”a tool for aiding the competitive assessment by identifying those substitute products or services which provide an effective constraint on the competitive behaviour of the products or services being offered in the market by the parties under investigation” But have normative implications –The implications of a broad or limited definition of the relevant market
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The market definition focus on the market as it is today –Identify competitive restraints from actual competitors, does not include potential competitors The European Commission’s Notice on the Definition of the Relevant Market –Extract of the Commissions practice or experience –Without prejudice to the case law of the Court of First Instance and the ECJ –But: In practice an extremely an influential guide
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The “relevant market” the product of three different market dimensions The relevant product market –Interchangeability: to what degree are other products substitutes to the product in question? The relevant geographic market –The area in which the actual product is sold; the relevant geographic market Temporal market
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Barriers to entry Barriers to entry hinders the emergence of potential competition which would otherwise constrain the incumbent undertaking Crucial when determining market power –May have high market shares but no market power if there are no barriers to entry
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Analysing barriers to entry Market definition and entry by production substitutes Market conditions and historical entry Assessment of absolute cost advantages Assessment of strategic (first mover) advantages Vertical foreclosure and exclusion Predatory behaviour Assessment of entry impediments
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO S-C-P paradigm Structure Conduct Performance
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Enforcement – an overview Enforcement by the Commission –The legal basis »Article 85, cfr. Article 83 »Regulation 1/2003 Enforcement by national authorities –Regulation 1/2003
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Enforcement by national courts –Article 81(1) and 82 have direct effect »Case 127/73, BRT v SABAM –After Regulation 1/2003: Also Article 81(3) –Remedies in national courts »The enforceability of agreements »Actions by third parties Damages Does Community law require a national Court to ensure that a remedy is available?
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The scheme of Article 81 The prohibition in Article 81(1) Nullity, Article 81(2) Exemption, Article 81(3)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Article 81(1) – the elements The meaning of “undertaking” Forms of co-operation caught –The meaning of agreement –Decisions by associations of undertakings –Concerted practices “Object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition” Effect on trade between member states De minimis
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The concept of an “undertaking” Article 81 (and 82) applies only to “undertakings” –Undertaking not defined in the EC Treaty ECJs definition of an undertaking: –“the concept of an undertaking encompasses every entity engaged in an economic activity regardless of the legal status of the entity and the way in which it is financed” »Case 41/90, Höfner and Elsner v Macrotron, para 21
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO “Every entity” –The legal form of the entity irrelevant »All kind of companies »Persons Self employed Not employees (Opinion of GA Jacobs, case C-67/96, Albany) »Associations “Associations of undertakings” directly caught But can also be found to act as “undertakings” Example: Co-operatives, P&I clubs Exception: trade unions representing their members –The entity’s engagement in “economic activity” decisive
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO “Economic activity” –Any activity consisting in offering goods and services on a given market »Wide definition –Social activity not economic activity (joined cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet and Pistre, case C-244/94 Fédération française des sociétés d'assurance, case C-67/96 Albany) »fulfilling an exclusively social function »the activity must be based based on the principle of national solidarity »non-profit-making: The ”outcome” not dependent upon the contribution
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The purchase of goods or services an economic activity? –An activity exercised on the market –Court of First instance: T-319/99 Fenin v Commission »”an organisation which purchases goods - even in great quantity - not for the purpose of offering goods and services as part of an economic activity, but in order to use them in the context of a different activity, such as one of a purely social nature, does not act as an undertaking simply because it is a purchaser in a given market ” (para 37)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO State bodies Exercising official authority –ECJ: Article 81 does not apply to agreements concluded by bodies “acting in their capacity as public authorities and undertakings entrusted with the provision of a public service” (case 30/87, Bodson) –Includes tasks which are typical those of a public authority –Such tasks are not of an economic nature –Can to a certain extent be financed through fees of economic contributions Engaging in economic activity –Will be regarded as an “undertaking” –How the public body is organised is not decisive
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Bodies both exercising official authority and engaged in economic activity Undertakings engaged in “services of general economic interest”, article 86(2)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Single economic unit doctrine Two or more separate legal undertakings can be treated as on undertaking –if the undertakings “form an economic unit within which the subsidiary has no real freedom to determine its course of action on the market, and if the agreements or practices are concerned merely with the internal allocation of tasks as between the undertakings” »Case 30/87, Bodson Agreements between two undertakings within a single economic unit not regarded as an agreement “between” undertakings –Escapes the prohibition in article 81(1)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The rationale: –No freedom to take decisions regarding the market conduct »Regarded as unilateral conduct »May be caught by article 82 if the undertaking has a dominant market position –Internal allocation of functions The other side of the coin: –If a subsidiary engages in anti competitive agreements the mother company will also be regarded as part of the agreement
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The test of control –If a parent company owns more than 50% of the shares in a subsidiary interdependency is presumed –Minority share holdings may also give control if combined with specific rights attached to them –One large shareholder and many small –Joint control (50/50) »Jointly controlled companies must belong to a single group of companies to be regarded as part of one economic unit The State regarded as one economic unit?
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The concept of an “agreement” ”Agreement” widely construed –It is sufficient if the undertakings in question should have expressed their joint intention to conduct themselves on the market in a specific way »Alignment of the competition parameters available to them “joint intention” a legally binding agreement not necessary –The form of no importance (oral, signed, unsigned) –“gentlemen’s agreements” –The agreement does not have to be exhaustive »It is enough just to set the broad framework for the undertakings market conduct
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The engagement of the parties in the agreement –It is enough to be partly engaged in the collaboration »Breach of contract regarding parts of the agreement –Passive “members” –An excuse if an undertaking has been “forced” into a cartel? Collaboration through the establishment of a company (joint ventures) The distinction between “agreement” and unilateral conduct –Joined Cases C-2/01 P and C-3/01 P, BAI v Bayer and Commission »Consensus requires and intention from the supplier to impose a contract obligation (an export ban), and an intention from the distributors to adhere to the contract obligation
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The situation when the agreement is terminated –ECJ: It is sufficient if such agreements continue to produce their effects after they have formally ceased to be in force »Case 51/75, EMI Records Limited v CBS United Kingdom Limited –It is the effects of the agreement on the parties conduct that is decisive for the application of art 81(1)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO “Decisions of undertakings” Collusion can take place through the medium of an association: Directly covered by art 81(1) –Makes it possible to hold associations directly liable Association widely defined Decision every statement made with the object or effect of influencing the commercial behaviour of the association’s members –Does not have to be binding (e g recommendations)
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO “Concerted practices” A form of co-ordination where undertakings, without concluding any sort of agreement or establishing a plan of action, knowingly substitute practical co-operation between them for the risks of competition –This criteria avoids that situations where companies collaborate without any kind of agreement but only on the basis of a common understand falls outside article 81(1) It is contrary to the rules on competition for a producer to co-operate with his competitors, in any way whatsoever, in order to determine a co-operated way of action or to ensure its success by prior elimination of all uncertainty as to each others conduct regarding the essential elements of that action –ECJ, case 48/69, ICI v Commission
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Proving concerted practices Direct or indirect contact Meeting of minds or some kind of consensus –Exchange of information –Unilateral disclosure –Public announcements Competition is knowingly substituted with cooperation –Uncertainty eliminated –Subsequent behaviour in the market Casuality
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Can a concerted practice be inferred from circumstantial evidence alone? A question of the use of economic evidence in competition cases Parallel market behaviour alone in itself not a concerted practice BUT: It may however amount to strong evidence of such a practice if it leads to conditions of competition which do not correspond to the normal conditions of the market having regard to the nature of the products, the size and numbers of undertakings, and the volume of the said market power –ECJ, case 48/69, ICI v Commission Oligopoly markets and economic evidence –Joint dominance
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO The distinction between “agreement” and “concerted practices” Overlapping concepts –Complex cartels and/or No precise distinction –And no use for a precise distinction “Concerted practice” important mainly where the Commission or the Courts is forced to rely upon circumstantial evidence alone
EC Competition Law Professor dr. juris Olav Kolstad Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO EC Competition Law Associate professor Olav Kolstad Department of Private Law.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
EU Competition Policy. Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States,
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class I, 6th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
EU Competition Law. Introduction Competition law protects competition in a free market economy, that is, an economic system in which the allocation of.
EU Business Law: Anticompetitive agreements (Art. 101 TFEU) Dr. Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Mergers - introduction ”Merger”, ”acquisition”, ”concentration” The different effects of mergers –Horizontal.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO “object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition” The term “prevention, restriction.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class II, 13th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
SECTION (2) Chapter 5 Competition policy By DAVID YOUNG & STAN METCALFE 1997.
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class IV, 27th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Mergers - introduction ”Merger”, ”acquisition”, ”concentration” The different effects of mergers –Horizontal mergers –Vertical mergers –Conglomerate mergers.
LUMSA – International Commercial Law COMPETITION LAW – GENERAL PRINCIPLES Competition law is law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition.
Chapter Five EUROPEAN COMPETITION POLICY. Role of Competition Policy Promote economic efficiency To control intensity of competition within economy Some.
Investors’ protection in Financial Markets Paola Lucantoni Topics Law and Regulation European Community Securities Regulation Italian Securities Regulation.
“Equal and open access to the market in terms of economic integration and increased competition ” Astana Forum, 24 May 2013 Presented by Hassan Qaqaya,
1 SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL Madrid, february 2007 MICHELE COLUCCI
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
LEB Slide Set 14 Competition Law Matti Rudanko. LEB Slide Set 14 2 A Constitution of Market Economy Well-functioning markets – an unwritten fundamental.
Prohibited agreements: Article 101 (3) Julija Jerneva ( )
European competition policy. Role of competition policy Promote economic efficiency To control intensity of competition within economy Some areas it is.
“object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition” The term “prevention, restriction and distortion” – Used interchangeably Economic.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
Standards of competition law in Member States of the European Union. The conceptual definition of a consumer - The consequence of understanding the terminology.
World-class legal education in the heart of London The Competition Protocol: Undermining EU Competition Law? Wednesday April 28 th 2010,
Dominance – the lost child? Do effects-based rules mean the end of dominance analysis? BICCL Reform of Article February 2006 Thomas Eilmansberger,
From « Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to horizontal cooperation Agreements » The purpose of these guidelines is to provide.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class VI, 17th Nov 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
EU Internal Market HOL 6012 Session 1: Introduction to the economic theory and EU integration Dr. jur. Tatjana Evas Tallinn Law School 2014.
Competition Policy in India: an Overview Pankaj Jain Faculty : Lovely Professional University.
Sam Pieters International Relations Unit DG COMP 12/11/2012 Break out session 1: State owned enterprises and competition neutrality.
European Commission, DG Competition, Policy and Strategy, International Relations 1 New EU Competition Rules for Purchase and Distribution agreements Kris.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class V, 3rd Nov 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
SMP and dominance Pál Belényesi Verona 29 November November 2006.
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
Why competition law? Economic performance Social welfare Well being of consumers.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2012/01/14.
Datum faculteit rechtsgeleerdheidbestuursrecht & bestuurskunde Shared Responsibilities? Shared Competences?
1 The fundamentals of EC competition law Overview, institutions and procedure Karen Williams Hearing Officer for competition proceedings European Commission.
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Competition Policy Gender Module #6 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
How firms compete Easy as PIE: Presenting in English 09/03/2011.
International Contracts Slide Set 1a The Legal Environment of International Markets Matti Rudanko.
Unit 4.2 What Influences The Decisions?. HOW DO THE KEY STAKEHOLDERS INFLUENCE BUSINESS DECISIONS? owners Customers competitors.
COMPETITION POLICY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION AT CUTS-ARC CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP, LUSAKA 7 TH MARCH, 2011 BY SAJEEV NAIR, COMPETITION POLICY.
A monopolistically competitive market is characterized by three attributes: many firms, differentiated products, and free entry. The equilibrium in a monopolistically.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.