Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byBrennan Beste Modified over 2 years ago

1
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP LID DRIVEN CAVITY FLOW The lid-driven cavity problem has long been used a test or validation case for new codes or new solution methods. The problem geometry is simple and two- dimensional, and the boundary conditions are also simple. The standard case is fluid contained in a square domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions on all sides, with three stationary sides and one moving side (with velocity tangent to the side)

2
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP Lid Driven x Shear Driven Similar simulations have also been done at various aspect ratios, and it can also be done with the lid replaced with a moving fluid. This problem is a somewhat different situation, and is usually referred to as the shear-driven cavity. You may see the two names (lid-driven and shear-driven) used interchangeably in spite of the fact that they are distinct (and different) problems. See link on Numerical Experiments on Cavity Flows.Numerical Experiments on Cavity Flows Re = 400

3
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP Benchmark Solutions This problem has been solved as both a laminar flow and a turbulent flow, and many different numerical techniques have been used to compute these solutions. Since this case has been solved many times, there is a great deal of data to compare with. –Ghia, Ghia, and Shin (1982), "High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method", Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 48, pp. 387-411. – Paramarne & Sharma, 2008, “Consistent Implementation and Comparison of FOU, CD, SOU, and QUICK Convection Schemes on Square, Skew, Trapezoidal, and Triangular Lid-Driven Cavity Flow”, Num Heat Transf. J, Part B Fundamentals,54:1,84 - 102Paramarne & Sharma This problem is a nice one for testing for several reasons: 1.there is a great deal of literature to compare with. 2.the (laminar) solution is steady. 3.the boundary conditions are simple and compatible with most numerical approaches

4
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP Input data for Re = 100 NX = NY = 40 XULAST=YVLAST=1m ULID = 0.0634m/s FLUID: GLYCERIN (65) Re = V.L/enul = 100 Use relax U1=V1=20 Ref Pressure Moving Lid Stationay Lids

5
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP U velocity contours X Y q1

6
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP XY PLOT FOR X/L = 0.5

7
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP Try to assembly a Triangular Cavity Use the same setting of the square cavity. Add two blockages with ‘wedge’ like shape

8
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP Conjugate Heat Transfer Ability to compute conduction of heat through solids, coupled with convective heat transfer in fluid. Example: consider the cooling of a fin when exposed at an air flow. Notice the air stream removes heat from the fin through convection while heat is conducted from the fin base. Convecção Temp. Ambiente ( T ) Condução Fin Base T 0 Convection Environmental ( T ) Conduction

9
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP Conjugate Heat Transfer - Example Consider a micro-chip, mounted on top a circuit board, dissipating 0,1 W on a air flow confined in a 2D channel as represented on the figure. You are asked to assembly this problem using phoenics and explore the Conjugate Heat Transfer features Air (0) Win = 0.5 m/s Tin = 20 o C Chip, P = 0,1 W Board zone– conduction only Air zone: convection only 100 mm h=4 mm h=31 mm h=6 mm

10
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP MODELS Models - Activate Velocity and Energy. Use LVEL model to turbulence Properties - choose air (0) Numeric – 300 sweeps, RELAX U1 = 100, V1 = 100 Output – Monitor IX = 1 e IZ = 3

11
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP LIST OF OBJECTCS OBJ XYZTYPEMATERIALATTRIBUTES EWALL size00.0010.1 plate h = 10 W/m2oC place0.03500 WWALL size00.0010.1 plate h = 10 W/m2oC place000 CHIP size0.0060.0010.01 blocksolid (111)Power = 0.1 W place0.00400.03 BOARD size0.0040.0010.1 blocksolid (101) place000 INLET size0.0350.0010 inlet W = 0,5 &T = 20C place000 OUT size0.0350.0010 outlet P = Patm place000.1

12
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP GRID PROPERTIES REGION X DIRECTIONZ DIRECTION CELLSPWRCELLSPWR 14-1,261 291,221 3152,5121

13
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP RESULTS The air stream does not have enough velocity to remove heat at a higher rate to diminish the chip temperature. Backelite board ( k = 0,23 W/moC) is a poor heat conductor. The fin effect is weak, the chip temperature reaches 210oC.

14
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP RESULTS Replace the board material like cooper (k = 381 W/moC) The board re-distributes the heat dissipated by the chip into the air stream reducing the max chip temperature to 68oC

Similar presentations

OK

Why Laminar Flow in Narrow Channels (Heat Transfer Analysis)

Why Laminar Flow in Narrow Channels (Heat Transfer Analysis)

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on london stock exchange Ppt on indian economy growth Ppt on bluetooth hacking windows Ppt on indian festivals in hindi Ppt on traffic light control using image processing Ppt on ministry of corporate affairs of india Ppt on wireless communication network Ppt on ministry of corporate affairs mumbai Ppt on 60 years of indian parliament latest Ppt on vitamin deficiency